Double-blind randomized controlled trial of collagen mesh for the prevention of abdominal incisional hernia in patients having a vertical rectus abdominis myocutaneus flap during surgery for advanced pelvic malignancy

Absorbable Barbed Continuous versus Nonabsorbable Nonbarbed Interrupted Suturing Methods for Donor-site Closure of the Rectus Abdominis Myocutaneous Flap

Abdominal incisional hernia is a complication of the rectus abdominis myocutaneous (RAMC) flap harvest. This study aimed to compare the incidence of abdominal incisional hernia and donor-site closure time between absorbable barbed continuous (ABC) and non-absorbable non-barbed interrupted (nAnBI) methods.

Methods

This study included 145 patients who underwent free RAMC flap reconstruction after head and neck cancer surgery at Kobe University Hospital between January 2012 and March 2020. The nAnBI method was selected between January 2012 and August 2016, and the ABC method was selected between September 2016 and March 2020. The incidence of abdominal incisional hernia and the average time required for donor-site closure were compared between the two groups.

Results

Of the 145 patients surveyed, 116 (57 and 59 in the nAnBI and ABC groups, respectively) were followed-up for at least 90 days after the surgery. The incidence rates of abdominal incisional hernia were 0% and 5.1% (n = 3) in the nAnBI and ABC groups, respectively, with no significant differences (p = 0.244). The average donor-site closure times were 127.6 and 111.3 minutes in the nAnBI and ABC groups, respectively, with no significant differences (p = 0.122).

Conclusions

No significant differences in the incidence of abdominal incisional hernia and donor-site closure time were observed between the nAnBI and ABC groups. However, there was a tendency for increased hernia occurrence and shorter wound closure time in the ABC group. A randomized prospective multicenter study is warranted to validate our findings of the ABC method.

Radiological incidence of donor-site incisional hernia and parastomal hernia after vertical rectus abdominus myocutaneous flap-based reconstruction following colorectal surgery

AIM

A vertical rectus abdominis myocutaneous (VRAM) flap is commonly used to reconstruct perineal defects for low rectal and anal cancer. The incidence of midline incisional hernias after VRAM reconstruction varies from 3.6% when detected clinically to 50% when detected radiologically. The aim of this study is to accurately determine the radiological incidence of donor-site incisional and parastomal hernia following VRAM reconstruction.

METHOD

This was a retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing colorectal surgery requiring VRAM reconstruction over 10 years. Data were collected on patient demographics, indication for surgery and surgical procedure, including details of any hernia repair. Images from surveillance CTs were reviewed for the presence and size of midline incisional and/or parastomal hernias. Parastomal hernias were classified based on the European Hernia Society (EHS) classification.

RESULTS

One hundred and seventy three patients were included in the analysis. The median age was 67 years (range 29-88 years) and the median length of follow-up was 49 months (interquartile range 24.3-71.0 months). The cumulative incidence of donor-site incisional hernia after VRAM at 1, 2 and 5 years was 15.1%, 25.4% and 29.1%, respectively. The cumulative incidence for PSH at 1, 2 and 5 years was 33.1%, 46.6% and 53.3%, respectively (95% CI 45.4%-60.5%).

CONCLUSION

Most patients who develop donor-site incisional hernia and parastomal herniation following VRAM tend to do so within the first 2 years. Although the use of CT imaging improves the diagnosis of donor-site incisional and parastomal hernias, the clinical significance of this is unknown.

Flap Reconstruction of Perineal Defects after Pelvic Exenteration: A Systematic Description of Four Choices of Surgical Reconstruction Methods

BACKGROUND

The treatment of locally advanced or recurrent anorectal cancer requires radical surgery such as extralevator abdominoperineal resection and pelvic exenteration. Larger defects require flap reconstruction. The authors evaluated outcomes of different perineal reconstruction techniques.

METHODS

A systematic search was performed in the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases. Studies reporting outcomes on perineal flap reconstruction in patients with anal or colorectal cancer were included. Data on patient characteristics, surgical details, perineal and donor-site complications, revision surgery, mortality, and quality of life were extracted. Articles were assessed using the Group Reading Assessment and Diagnostic Evaluation approach.

RESULTS

The authors included 58 mainly observational studies comprising 1988 patients. Seventy-three percent of patients had rectal cancer. The majority of 910 abdominoperineal resection patients underwent reconstruction with rectus abdominis flaps (91 percent). Dehiscence (15 to 32 percent) and wound infection (8 to 16 percent) were the most common complications. Partial flap necrosis occurred in 2 to 4 percent and flap loss occurred in 0 to 2 percent. Perineal herniation was seen in 6 percent after gluteal flap reconstruction and in 0 to 1 percent after other types of reconstruction. Donor-site complications were substantial but were reported inconsistently.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinical outcome data on perineal reconstruction after exenterative surgery are mostly of very low quality. Perineal reconstruction after pelvic exenteration is complex and requires a patient-tailored approach. Primary defect size, reconstruction aims, donor-site availability, and long-term morbidity should be taken into account. This review describes the clinical outcomes of four flap reconstruction techniques. Shared clinical decision-making on perineal reconstruction should be based on these present comprehensive data.

[Prophylaxis of parastomal, perineal and incisional hernias in colorectal surgery]

This article gives an overview of the relevant evidence from the literature on the topic of prophylactic use of meshes to prevent incisional and parastomal hernias in colorectal surgery. In addition, based on a structured literature search the incidence of hernias in colorectal surgery over the past 5 years was analyzed. A slight majority (54%) of articles recommended the use of prophylactic mesh implantation in colorectal surgery. The prophylactic use of meshes appears to reduce the risk of hernias in colorectal surgery but is associated with a slightly increased perioperative wound infection rate. Parastomal hernias are associated with higher incidence rates compared with incisional hernias and also appear to benefit more from prophylactic mesh implantation. The evidence in the literature is still unclear regarding the use of synthetic or biological implants due to the lack of randomized controlled trials. Perineal hernias were excluded from the analysis due to the incomparability of the mainly casuistic literature. An overview is given in the discussion. The analysis of the literature and also in reflection of our own experience comes to the conclusion that the disrupted integrity of the abdominal wall due to the operation should be prophylactically reinforced with a mesh after colorectal surgery. An evidence-based recommendation is not possible based on the current state of research on implantation techniques, e.g. onlay, sublay intraperitoneal onlay mesh (IPOM) and selection of the implant.

Vertical rectus abdominis flap (VRAM) for perineal reconstruction following pelvic surgery: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

The vertical rectus abdominis myocutaneous (VRAM) flap is an established technique employed to reconstruct pelvic and perineal defects not amenable to primary closure. The aim of this study was to systematically review the morbidity of VRAM flap reconstruction following exenterative pelvic surgery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A systematic literature search was conducted by using Medline, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases. Abstracts of all studies published from inception to November 2019 were identified. Search terms used included 'vertical rectus abdominis myocutaneous', 'vertical rectus abdominis musculocutaneous' and 'VRAM'. Only studies that described outcomes when a VRAM flap was used during exenterative pelvic surgery were included; case reports were excluded. The primary outcome measure was VRAM flap morbidity. Secondary outcome measures included donor site morbidity and hospital length of stay.

RESULTS

Sixty-five studies with a total of 1827 patients were identified and included. Perineal reconstruction was most commonly performed following abdominal perineal excision of the rectum (APER) (n = 636 and 34.8%). Median patient age at surgery ranged from 38 to 78 years. Mean perineal flap morbidity was 27%, with a complete flap loss rate of 1.8% and a perineal hernia rate of 0.2%. Mean donor site morbidity was 15%, with an abdominal dehiscence rate of 5.5% and an incisional hernia rate of 3.3%.

CONCLUSIONS

While overall morbidity after VRAM flap reconstruction in pelvic visceral surgery is high; the risk of major complications remains low. These data are important when counselling patients for surgery.

Morbidity associated with the immediate vertical rectus abdominus myocutaneous flap reconstruction after radical pelvic surgery

AIM

Patients who undergo radical pelvic surgery often have problems with perineal wound healing and pelvic collections. While there is recognition of the perineal morbidity, there also remains uncertainty around the benefit of vertical rectus abdominus myocutaneous (VRAM) flaps due to the balance between primary healing and the complications associated with this form of reconstruction. This study aimed to evaluate factors associated with significant flap and donor site related complications following VRAM flap reconstruction for radical pelvic surgery.

METHOD

A retrospective analysis of VRAM flap related complications was undertaken from prospectively maintained databases for all patients undergoing radical pelvic surgery (2001- 2017) in two cancer centres.

RESULTS

In all, 154 patients were identified [median age 62 years (range 26-89 years), 80 (52%) men]. Thirty-three (21%) patients experienced significant donor or flap related complications. Major complications (Clavien-Dindo ≥ 3) related to the abdominal donor site occurred in nine (6%) patients, while those related to the flap or perineal site occurred in 28 (18%) patients. Only smoking (P = 0.003) and neoadjuvant radiotherapy (P = 0.047) were associated with the development of significant flap related complications on univariate analysis. Flap related complications resulted in a significantly longer hospital stay (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Careful patient selection is required to balance the risks vs the benefits of VRAM flap reconstruction. Immediate VRAM reconstruction in patients undergoing radical pelvic surgery can achieve early healing and stable perineal closure; it has a low but significant morbidity. Major flap related complications are significantly associated with smoking status and neoadjuvant radiotherapy and result in a prolonged length of hospital stay.