1
|
Gaetani RS, Ladin K, Abelson JS. Journey through the Decades: The Evolution in Treatment and Shared Decision Making for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:2807. [PMID: 39199579 PMCID: PMC11353159 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16162807] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2024] [Revised: 08/03/2024] [Accepted: 08/06/2024] [Indexed: 09/01/2024] Open
Abstract
The management of locally advanced rectal cancer has undergone significant transformations over the decades and optimal treatment approaches continue to evolve. There have been numerous advances in surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation therapy from the first description of the abdominoperineal resection in 1908, timing of chemotherapy and radiation therapy in the late 20th and early 21st century, and most recently, the introduction of organ preservation or nonoperative management in 2004. Alongside these advancements, the concept of shared decision making in medicine has evolved, prompting a focus on patient-centered care. This evolution in practice has been fueled by a growing recognition of the importance of patient autonomy and the alignment of treatment options with patients' values and preferences. With the growing number of possible treatment options, variability in patient counseling exists, highlighting the need for a standardized approach to shared decision making in locally advanced rectal cancer. This narrative review will describe the evolution of treatment options of locally advanced rectal cancer as well as the concept of shared decision making and decision aids, and will introduce a decision aid for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer who have achieved a complete clinical response and are eligible for watch and wait.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Racquel S. Gaetani
- Department of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Lahey Hospital and Medical Center, Burlington, MA 01805, USA;
| | - Keren Ladin
- Department of Community Health, Tufts University, Medford, MA 02155, USA
| | - Jonathan S. Abelson
- Department of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Lahey Hospital and Medical Center, Burlington, MA 01805, USA;
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Wang Y, Yang Y, Liu QQ, Wang SZ. Compare clinical efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant therapy and neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer: Meta-analysis. World J Gastrointest Surg 2024; 16:1845-1856. [PMID: 38983334 PMCID: PMC11230002 DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.v16.i6.1845] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2024] [Revised: 04/01/2024] [Accepted: 04/28/2024] [Indexed: 06/27/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND To compare the efficacy and safety of total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) and neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) in the treatment of middle and low locally advanced rectal cancer. Our study will systematically collect and integrate studies to evaluate the ability of these two treatments to improve tumor shrinkage rates, surgical resection rates, tumor-free survival, and severe adverse events. AIM To provide clinicians and patients with more reliable treatment options to optimize treatment outcomes and quality of life for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer by comparing the advantages and disadvantages of the two treatment options. METHODS A full search of all clinical studies on the effectiveness and safety of TNT and nCRT for treating locally advanced rectal cancer identified in Chinese (CNKI, Wanfang, China Biomedical Literature Database) and English (PubMed, Embase) databases was performed. Two system assessors independently screened the studies according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Quality evaluation and data extraction were performed for the included literature. We used RevMan 5.3 software to perform a meta-analysis of the pathologic complete response (pCR) rate, T stage degradation rate, resection 0 (R0) rate, anal grade 3/4 acute toxicity rate, perioperative complications, overall survival (OS), and disease-free survival (DFS) in the TNT and nCRT groups. RESULTS Finally, 14 studies were included, six of which were randomized controlled studies. A total of 3797 patients were included, including 1865 in the TNT group and 1932 in the nCRT group. The two sets of baseline data were comparable. The results of the meta-analysis showed that the pCR rate [odds ratio (OR) = 1.57, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.30-1.90, P < 0.00001], T stage degradation rate (OR = 2.16, 95%CI: 1.63-2.57, P < 0.00001), and R0 resection rate (OR = 1.42, 95%CI: 1.09-1.85, P = 0.009) were significantly greater in the nCRT group than in the nCRT group. There was no significant difference in the incidence of grade 3/4 acute toxicity or perioperative complications between the two groups. The 5-year OS [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.84, 95%CI: 0.69-1.02, P = 0.08] and DFS (HR = 0.94, 95%CI: 0.03-1.39, P = 0.74) of the TNT group were similar to those of the nCRT group. CONCLUSION TNT has greater clinical efficacy and safety than nCRT in the treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ying Wang
- Department of Anus Intestinal Surgery, Feicheng People’s Hospital, Feicheng 271600, Shandong Province, China
| | - Yan Yang
- Department of Gastroenterology, Qingdao Hospital of University of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences (Qingdao Municipal Hospital), Qingdao 266011, Shandong Province, China
| | - Qi-Qi Liu
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen 518036, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Shao-Zhao Wang
- Department of Anorectal Words, Central Hospital Affiliated Shandong First Medical University, Jinan 250013, Shandong Province, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Anker CJ, Tchelebi LT, Selfridge JE, Jabbour SK, Akselrod D, Cataldo P, Abood G, Berlin J, Hallemeier CL, Jethwa KR, Kim E, Kennedy T, Lee P, Sharma N, Small W, Williams VM, Russo S. Executive Summary of the American Radium Society on Appropriate Use Criteria for Nonoperative Management of Rectal Adenocarcinoma: Systematic Review and Guidelines. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2024:S0360-3016(24)00673-4. [PMID: 38797496 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.05.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2024] [Revised: 04/15/2024] [Accepted: 05/17/2024] [Indexed: 05/29/2024]
Abstract
For patients with rectal cancer, the standard approach of chemotherapy, radiation therapy, and surgery (trimodality therapy) is associated with significant long-term toxicity and/or colostomy for most patients. Patient options focused on quality of life (QOL) have dramatically improved, but there remains limited guidance regarding comparative effectiveness. This systematic review and associated guidelines evaluate how various treatment strategies compare to each other in terms of oncologic outcomes and QOL. Cochrane and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) methodology were used to search for prospective and retrospective trials and meta-analyses of adequate quality within the Ovid Medline database between January 1, 2012, and June 15, 2023. These studies informed the expert panel, which rated the appropriateness of various treatments in 6 clinical scenarios through a well-established consensus methodology (modified Delphi). The search process yielded 197 articles that advised voting. Increasing data have shown that nonoperative management (NOM) and primary surgery result in QOL benefits noted over trimodality therapy without detriment to oncologic outcomes. For patients with rectal cancer for whom total mesorectal excision would result in permanent colostomy or inadequate bowel continence, NOM was strongly recommended as usually appropriate. Restaging with tumor response assessment approximately 8 to 12 weeks after completion of radiation therapy/chemoradiation therapy was deemed a necessary component of NOM. The panel recommended active surveillance in the setting of a near-complete or complete response. In the setting of NOM, 54 to 56 Gy in 27 to 31 fractions concurrent with chemotherapy and followed by consolidation chemotherapy was recommended. The panel strongly recommends primary surgery as usually appropriate for a T3N0 high rectal tumor for which low anterior resection and adequate bowel function is possible, with adjuvant chemotherapy considered if N+. Recent data support NOM and primary surgery as important options that should be offered to eligible patients. Considering the complexity of multidisciplinary management, patients should be discussed in a multidisciplinary setting, and therapy should be tailored to individual patient goals/values.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher J Anker
- Division of Radiation Oncology, University of Vermont Cancer Center, Burlington, Vermont
| | - Leila T Tchelebi
- Northwell, New Hyde Park, New York; Department of Radiation Medicine, Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Hempstead, New York.
| | - J Eva Selfridge
- Division of Solid Tumor Oncology, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Salma K Jabbour
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute, New Brunswick, New Jersey
| | - Dmitriy Akselrod
- Department of Radiology, University of Vermont Larner College of Medicine, Burlington, Vermont
| | - Peter Cataldo
- Department of Surgery, University of Vermont Larner College of Medicine, Burlington, Vermont
| | - Gerard Abood
- Department of Surgery, Loyola University Stritch School of Medicine, Maywood, Illinois
| | - Jordan Berlin
- Division of Hematology Oncology, Department of Medicine Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | | | - Krishan R Jethwa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Ed Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Timothy Kennedy
- Department of Surgery, Rutgers Cancer Institute, New Brunswick, New Jersey
| | - Percy Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, City of Hope National Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
| | - Navesh Sharma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, WellSpan Cancer Center, York, Pennsylvania
| | - William Small
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stritch School of Medicine, Cardinal Bernardin Cancer Center, Loyola University Chicago, Maywood, Illinois
| | - Vonetta M Williams
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering, New York, New York
| | - Suzanne Russo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MetroHealth, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Lin W, Li C, Clement EA, Brown CJ, Raval MJ, Karimuddin AA, Ghuman A, Phang PT. Surgical Outcomes in Total Neoadjuvant Therapy for Rectal Cancer Versus Standard Long-course Chemoradiation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Ann Surg 2024; 279:620-630. [PMID: 38009646 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000006161] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This systematic review and meta-analysis seeks to evaluate the impact of total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) for rectal cancers on surgical complications and surgical pathology when compared with standard long-course chemoradiotherapy (LCRT). BACKGROUND The oncological benefits of TNT are well published in previous meta-analyses, but there is little synthesized information on how it affects surgical outcomes. A recent study has suggested an increase in local recurrence and higher rates of breached total mesorectal excision (TME) plane in TNT patients. METHODS This study conformed to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. A search was performed in Medline (via PubMed), Cochrane databases, EMBASE and CINAHL to identify relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing outcomes between TNT and LCRT. Meta-analyses of pooled proportions between TNT and LCRT were performed, comparing primary outcomes of surgical mortality, morbidity and all reported complications; surgical-pathology differences, namely mesorectal quality, R0 resection rates, circumferential resection margin positive rates, and sphincter preservation rates. Death and progression of disease during neoadjuvant treatment period was also compared. Risk of bias of RCTs was performed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool by 2 independent reviewers. RESULTS A total of 3185 patients with rectal cancer from 11 RCTs were included in the analysis: 1607 received TNT and 1578 received LCRT, of which 1422 (TNT arm) and 1391 (LCRT arm) underwent surgical resection with curative intent. There was no significant difference in mortality [risk ratio (RR)=0.86, 95% CI: 0.13-5.52, P =0.88, I2 =52%] or major complications (RR=1.04, 95% CI: 0.86-1.26, P =0.70, I2 =0%) between TNT and LCRT. There was a significantly higher risk of breached TME in TNT group on pooled analysis (RR=1.49, 95% CI: 1.03-12.16, P =0.03, I2 =0%), and on subgroup analysis there is higher risk of breached TME in those receiving extended duration of neoadjuvant treatment (>17 weeks from start of treatment to surgery) when compared with LCRT (RR=1.61, 95% CI: 1.06-2.44, P =0.03). No difference in R0 resection rates (RR=0.85, 95% CI: 0.66-1.10, P =0.21, I2 =15%), circumferential resection margin positive rates (RR=0.87, 95% CI: 0.65-1.16, P =0.35, I2 =10%) or sphincter preservation rates (RR=1.02, 95% CI: 0.83-1.25, P =0.88, I2 =57%) were observed. There was a significantly lower risk of progression of disease to an unresectable stage during the neoadjuvant treatment period in TNT patients (RR=0.60, 95% CI: 0.39-0.92, P =0.03, I2 =18%). On subgroup analysis, it appears to favor those receiving extended duration of neoadjuvant treatment (RR=0.44, 95% CI: 0.26-0.80, P =0.002), and those receiving induction-type chemotherapy in TNT (RR=0.25, 95% CI: 0.07-0.88, P =0.03). CONCLUSIONS TNT increases rates of breached TME which can contribute to higher local recurrence rates. TNT, however, improves systemic control by reducing early progression of disease during neoadjuvant treatment period. Further research is warranted to identify patients that will benefit from this strategy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wenjie Lin
- Department of Surgery, Colorectal Surgery Division, St. Paul's Hospital, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore
| | - Christine Li
- Department of Surgery, Colorectal Surgery Division, St. Paul's Hospital, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Elizabeth A Clement
- Department of Surgery, Colorectal Surgery Division, St. Paul's Hospital, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Carl J Brown
- Department of Surgery, Colorectal Surgery Division, St. Paul's Hospital, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Manoj J Raval
- Department of Surgery, Colorectal Surgery Division, St. Paul's Hospital, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Ahmer A Karimuddin
- Department of Surgery, Colorectal Surgery Division, St. Paul's Hospital, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Amandeep Ghuman
- Department of Surgery, Colorectal Surgery Division, St. Paul's Hospital, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Paul T Phang
- Department of Surgery, Colorectal Surgery Division, St. Paul's Hospital, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Lee SF, Yip PL, Wo B, Wong NSM, Vellayappan BA, Mamon HJ, Lee FAS. Neoadjuvant short-course radiotherapy or chemoradiation plus consolidative chemotherapy followed by radical operation for locally advanced rectal cancer. Front Oncol 2024; 13:1284569. [PMID: 38322287 PMCID: PMC10844885 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1284569] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2023] [Accepted: 12/21/2023] [Indexed: 02/08/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction Limited evidence compares short-course radiotherapy (SCRT) and long-course chemoradiotherapy (LCCRT), both of which are followed by consolidative chemotherapy before radical rectal surgery. We conducted a retrospective cohort study to assess treatment response, survival outcomes, and toxicity in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. Materials and methods Patients (cT3-4 and/or N+) treated with SCRT or LCCRT, consolidative chemotherapy, or total mesorectal excision between 2013 and 2021 were identified. the cause-specific cumulative incidence of disease-related treatment failure, locoregional recurrence, distant metastases, and overall survival were evaluated using flexible parametric competing risk analysis and Kaplan-Meier methods, adjusted for treatment regimens and clinicopathological factors. A pathological complete response (pCR), tumor downstaging, and toxicity have been reported. Results Among the 144 patients, 115 (80%) underwent curative rectal surgery. The LCCRT and SCRT groups achieved pCR in 10 (18%) and seven (12%) patients, respectively (odds ratio, 1.68; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.59-4.78). The adjusted cause-specific hazard ratio for disease-related treatment failure with LCCRT versus SCRT was 0.26 (95% CI, 0.08-0.87). Three-year cumulative probability of disease-related treatment failure was 10.0% and 25.6% for LCCRT and SCRT, respectively. No significant differences in T-downstaging, N-downstaging, significant pathologic downstaging (ypT0-2N0), locoregional failure, distant metastasis, or overall survival were found. Late rectal toxicity occurred in 10 (15%) LCCRT and two (3%) SCRT patients, respectively. Conclusion LCCRT with consolidative chemotherapy demonstrated improved disease-related treatment failure compared with SCRT, despite higher late rectal toxicity. Further research is needed to assess the long-term oncologic outcomes and toxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shing Fung Lee
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Tuen Mun Hospital, New Territories West Cluster, Hospital Authority, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National University Cancer Institute, National University Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Pui Lam Yip
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Tuen Mun Hospital, New Territories West Cluster, Hospital Authority, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National University Cancer Institute, National University Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Barry Wo
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Tuen Mun Hospital, New Territories West Cluster, Hospital Authority, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Natalie Sean-Man Wong
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Tuen Mun Hospital, New Territories West Cluster, Hospital Authority, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Balamurugan A. Vellayappan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National University Cancer Institute, National University Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Harvey J. Mamon
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute/Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Francis Ann Shing Lee
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Tuen Mun Hospital, New Territories West Cluster, Hospital Authority, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Janczak J, Ukegjini K, Bischofberger S, Turina M, Müller PC, Steffen T. Quality of Surgical Outcome Reporting in Randomised Clinical Trials of Multimodal Rectal Cancer Treatment: A Systematic Review. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 16:26. [PMID: 38201454 PMCID: PMC10778098 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16010026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2023] [Revised: 12/07/2023] [Accepted: 12/18/2023] [Indexed: 01/12/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) continue to provide the best evidence for treatment options, but the quality of reporting in RCTs and the completeness rate of reporting of surgical outcomes and complication data vary widely. The aim of this study was to measure the quality of reporting of the surgical outcome and complication data in RCTs of rectal cancer treatment and whether this quality has changed over time. METHODS Eligible articles with the keywords ("rectal cancer" OR "rectal carcinoma") AND ("radiation" OR "radiotherapy") that were RCTs and published in the English, German, Polish, or Italian language were identified by reviewing all abstracts published from 1982 through 2022. Two authors independently screened and analysed all studies. The quality of the surgical outcome and complication data was assessed based on fourteen criteria, and the quality of RCTs was evaluated based on a modified Jadad scale. The primary outcome was the quality of reporting in RCTs and the completeness rate of reporting of surgical results and complication data. RESULTS A total of 340 articles reporting multimodal therapy outcomes for 143,576 rectal cancer patients were analysed. A total of 7 articles (2%) met all 14 reporting criteria, 13 met 13 criteria, 27 met from 11 to 12 criteria, 36 met from 9 to 10 criteria, 76 met from 7 to 8 criteria, and most articles met fewer than 7 criteria (mean 5.5 criteria). Commonly underreported criteria included complication severity (15% of articles), macroscopic integrity of mesorectal excision (17% of articles), length of stay (18% of articles), number of lymph nodes (21% of articles), distance between the tumour and circumferential resection margin (CRM) (26% of articles), surgical radicality according to the site of the primary tumour (R0 vs. R1 + R2) (29% of articles), and CRM status (38% of articles). CONCLUSION Inconsistent surgical outcome and complication data reporting in multimodal rectal cancer treatment RCTs is standard. Standardised reporting of clinical and oncological outcomes should be established to facilitate comparing studies and results of related research topics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joanna Janczak
- Clinic for General and Visceral Surgery, Hospital for the Region Fürstenland Toggenburg, CH-9500 Wil, Switzerland;
| | - Kristjan Ukegjini
- Department of Surgery, Hospital of the Canton of St. Gallen, CH-9007 St. Gallen, Switzerland; (K.U.); (S.B.)
| | - Stephan Bischofberger
- Department of Surgery, Hospital of the Canton of St. Gallen, CH-9007 St. Gallen, Switzerland; (K.U.); (S.B.)
| | - Matthias Turina
- Department of Surgery and Transplantation, University Hospital Zurich, CH-8091 Zurich, Switzerland;
| | - Philip C. Müller
- Department of Surgery, Clarunis—University Centre for Gastrointestinal and Hepatopancreatobiliary Diseases, CH-4002 Basel, Switzerland;
| | - Thomas Steffen
- Department of Surgery, Hospital of the Canton of St. Gallen, CH-9007 St. Gallen, Switzerland; (K.U.); (S.B.)
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Arndt K, Ore AS, Quinn J, Fabrizio A, Crowell K, Messaris E, Cataldo T. Outcomes Following Recent and Distant Neoadjuvant Radiation in Rectal Cancer: An Institutional Retrospective Review and Analysis of NSQIP. Clin Colorectal Cancer 2023; 22:474-484. [PMID: 37863792 DOI: 10.1016/j.clcc.2023.07.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2023] [Revised: 07/06/2023] [Accepted: 07/08/2023] [Indexed: 10/22/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) is the standard of care in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). However, radiation therapy is thought to increase operative difficulty due to induction of fibrosis. Total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) protocols increase the time between completion of radiation and surgical resection which may lead to increased operative difficulty and complications. METHODS A single institution retrospective review of patients ≥18 years with LARC undergoing nCRT from 2015 to 2022. Patients were dichotomized in 2 cohorts: <90 days from radiation to surgery (recent radiation), and ≥90 days from radiation to surgery (distant radiation). Institutional data was compared to National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) rectal cancer data from 2016 to 2020. Outcomes included intraoperative complications, 30-day morbidity, and oncologic outcomes. RESULTS One hundred forty-six institutional patients included, 120 had recent radiation, 26 had distant radiation. Thirty-day morbidity and intraoperative complications did not differ. There was greater radial margin positivity (7% vs. 24%), fewer lymph nodes harvested (17 ± 5 vs. 15 ± 6), and a lower rate of complete mesorectal dissection (88% vs. 65%,) in distant radiation patients 3059 patients were included in NSQIP analysis, 2029 completed radiation <90 days before surgery and 1030 without radiation 90 days before surgery. Patients without radiation 90 days preoperatively had more radial margin positivity (9.2% vs. 4.6%), organ space infection (8.6% vs. 6.4%), and pneumonia (2.2% vs. 0.9%). CONCLUSION The present study suggests that increased time between radiation and surgery results in more challenging dissection with less complete mesorectal dissection and increased radial margin positivity without increasing technical complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kevin Arndt
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
| | - Ana Sofia Ore
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Jeanne Quinn
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Anne Fabrizio
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Kristen Crowell
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Evangelos Messaris
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Thomas Cataldo
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Donnelly M, Ryan OK, Ryan ÉJ, Creavin B, O'Reilly M, McDermott R, Kennelly R, Hanly A, Martin ST, Winter DC. Total neoadjuvant therapy versus standard neoadjuvant treatment strategies for the management of locally advanced rectal cancer: network meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Br J Surg 2023; 110:1316-1330. [PMID: 37330950 DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znad177] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2023] [Revised: 05/10/2023] [Accepted: 05/20/2023] [Indexed: 06/20/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study compared the advantages and disadvantages of total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) strategies for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer, compared with the more traditional multimodal neoadjuvant management strategies of long-course chemoradiotherapy (LCRT) or short-course radiotherapy (SCRT). METHODS A systematic review and network meta-analysis of exclusively RCTs was undertaken, comparing survival, recurrence, pathological, radiological, and oncological outcomes. The last date of the search was 14 December 2022. RESULTS In total, 15 RCTs involving 4602 patients with locally advanced rectal cancer, conducted between 2004 and 2022, were included. TNT improved overall survival compared with LCRT (HR 0.73, 95 per cent credible interval 0.60 to 0.92) and SCRT (HR 0.67, 0.47 to 0.95). TNT also improved rates of distant metastasis compared with LCRT (HR 0.81, 0.69 to 0.97). Reduced overall recurrence was observed for TNT compared with LCRT (HR 0.87, 0.76 to 0.99). TNT showed an improved pCR compared with both LCRT (risk ratio (RR) 1.60, 1.36 to 1.90) and SCRT (RR 11.32, 5.00 to 30.73). TNT also showed an improvement in cCR compared with LCRT (RR 1.68, 1.08 to 2.64). There was no difference between treatments in disease-free survival, local recurrence, R0 resection, treatment toxicity or treatment compliance. CONCLUSION This study provides further evidence that TNT has improved survival and recurrence benefits compared with current standards of care, and may increase the number of patients suitable for organ preservation, without negatively influencing treatment toxicity or compliance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark Donnelly
- Department of Surgery, St Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
- School of Medicine, University College, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Odhrán K Ryan
- Department of Surgery, St Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
- School of Medicine, University College, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Éanna J Ryan
- Department of Surgery, St Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Ben Creavin
- Department of Surgery, St Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Mary O'Reilly
- Department of Oncology, St Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Ray McDermott
- School of Medicine, University College, Dublin, Ireland
- Department of Oncology, St Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Rory Kennelly
- Department of Surgery, St Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
- Centre for Colorectal Disease, St Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Ann Hanly
- Department of Surgery, St Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
- Centre for Colorectal Disease, St Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Seán T Martin
- Department of Surgery, St Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
- Centre for Colorectal Disease, St Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Des C Winter
- Department of Surgery, St Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
- School of Medicine, University College, Dublin, Ireland
- Centre for Colorectal Disease, St Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Sellés EG, Pieretti DG, Higuero PP, Del Portillo EG, Macías VM, Domínguez MM, Mateos RF, Campos FL, Díaz-Gavela AA, Ferraris G, Couñago F. Total neoadjuvant therapy for locally advanced rectal cancer: a narrative review. Future Oncol 2023; 19:1753-1768. [PMID: 37650764 DOI: 10.2217/fon-2023-0481] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Locally advanced rectal cancer has traditionally been treated with chemoradiotherapy (CRT) followed by surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy. However, a new strategy, total neoadjuvant therapy, involves the administration of CRT and neoadjuvant chemotherapy with the aim of eradicating micrometastases earlier and achieving greater control of the disease. The use of total neoadjuvant therapy has shown higher rates of pathological complete response and resectability compared with CRT, including improved survival. Nevertheless, distant relapse is the main cause of morbidity and mortality in locally advanced rectal cancer. To address this, new biomarkers are being developed to predict disease response.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elías Gomis Sellés
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Virgen del Rocío, Biomedical Institute of Seville (IBIS)/CSIC/University of Seville, Seville, 41013, Spain
| | | | - Paula Peleteiro Higuero
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Santiago de Compostela, 15706, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
| | | | | | | | - Raquel Fuentes Mateos
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, 28034, Spain
| | - Fernando Lopez Campos
- Radiation Oncology Department, University Hospital Ramon y Cajal, Madrid, 28034, Spain
| | - Ana Aurora Díaz-Gavela
- Quironsalud Madrid University Hospital, Radiation Therapy Department, Medicine Department, School of Biomedical Sciences, Universidad Europea, Madrid, 28223, Spain
| | - Gustavo Ferraris
- Radiotherapy Unit, Centro de Radioterapia Dean Funes, Córdoba, X5003 CVY, Argentina
| | - Felipe Couñago
- San Francisco de Asís and La Milagrosa Hospitals, GenesisCare, Madrid, 28002, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Sychev S, Ponomarenko A, Chernyshov S, Alekseev M, Mamedli Z, Kuzmichev D, Polynovskiy A, Rybakov E. Total neoadjuvant therapy in rectal cancer: a network meta-analysis of randomized trials. Ann Coloproctol 2023; 39:289-300. [PMID: 37038270 PMCID: PMC10475801 DOI: 10.3393/ac.2022.00920.0131] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2022] [Revised: 12/22/2022] [Accepted: 01/09/2023] [Indexed: 04/12/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To assess the efficacy of total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) for rectal carcinoma in comparison with conventional chemoradiotherapy (CRT). METHODS A systematic review was performed according to the PRISMA guidelines. A Bayesian network meta-analysis was done using NetMetaXL and WinBUGS. This study was registered in PROSPERO on March 3, 2022 (No. CRD-42022307867). RESULTS Outcomes of 2,719 patients from 10 randomized trials between 2010 and 2022 were selected. Of these 1,191 (44%) had conventional long-course CRT (50-54 Gy) and capecitabine, 506 (18%) had induction chemotherapy followed by CRT (50-54 Gy) and capecitabine (iTNT), 230 (9%) had long-course CRT (50-54 Gy) followed by consolidation chemotherapy (cTNT), and 792 (29%) undergone modified short-course radiotherapy (25 Gy) with subsequent chemotherapy (mTNT). Total pathologic complete response (pCR) was 20% in the iTNT group, 21% in the mTNT group, 22% in the cTNT group, and 12% in the CRT group. Statistically significant difference in pCR rates was detected when comparing iTNT with CRT (odds ratio [OR], 1.76; 95% credible interval [CrI], 1.06-2.8), mTNT with CRT (OR, 1.90; 95% CrI, 1.25-2.74), and cTNT with CRT groups (OR, 2.54; 95% CrI, 1.26-5.08). No differences were found in R0 resection rates. No significant difference was found in long-term outcomes. CONCLUSION The early administration of systemic chemotherapy in the TNT regimen has improved short-term outcomes, though long-term results are underreported. Randomized trials with survival as the endpoint are necessary to evaluate the possible advantages of TNT modes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sergey Sychev
- Ryzhikh National Medical Research Center of Coloproctology, Moscow, Russia
| | | | | | - Mikhail Alekseev
- Ryzhikh National Medical Research Center of Coloproctology, Moscow, Russia
| | - Zaman Mamedli
- N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology, Moscow, Russia
| | - Dmitriy Kuzmichev
- N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology, Moscow, Russia
| | - Andrey Polynovskiy
- N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology, Moscow, Russia
| | - Evgeny Rybakov
- Ryzhikh National Medical Research Center of Coloproctology, Moscow, Russia
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Wu Q, Zhou J, Huang J, Deng X, Li C, Meng W, He Y, Wang Z. Total neoadjuvant therapy versus chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer: Bayesian network meta-analysis. Br J Surg 2023; 110:784-796. [PMID: 37191308 DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znad120] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2022] [Revised: 03/08/2023] [Accepted: 03/23/2023] [Indexed: 05/17/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Total neoadjuvant therapy is a promising treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer, utilizing either short-course radiotherapy or long-course chemoradiotherapy, but their relative efficacy remains unclear. The aim of this Bayesian network meta-analysis was to investigate clinical outcomes amongst patients receiving total neoadjuvant therapy with short-course radiotherapy or long-course chemoradiotherapy, and those receiving long-course chemoradiotherapy alone. METHODS A systematic literature search was performed. All studies that compared at least two of these three treatments for locally advanced rectal cancer were included. The primary endpoint was the pathological complete response rate, and survival outcomes were adopted as secondary outcomes. RESULTS Thirty cohorts were included. Compared with long-course chemoradiotherapy, both total neoadjuvant therapy with long-course chemoradiotherapy (OR 1.78, 95 per cent c.i. 1.43 to 2.26) and total neoadjuvant therapy with short-course radiotherapy (OR 1.75, 95 per cent c.i. 1.23 to 2.50) improved the pathological complete response rate. Similar benefits were observed in the sensitivity and subgroup analyses, except for short-course radiotherapy with one to two cycles of chemotherapy. No significant differences in survival outcomes were found amongst the three treatments. Long-course chemoradiotherapy with consolidation chemotherapy (HR 0.44, 95 per cent c.i. 0.20 to 0.99) exhibited higher disease-free survival than long-course chemoradiotherapy alone. CONCLUSION Compared with long-course chemoradiotherapy, both short-course radiotherapy with greater than or equal to three cycles of chemotherapy and total neoadjuvant therapy with long-course chemoradiotherapy can improve the pathological complete response rate, and long-course chemoradiotherapy with consolidation chemotherapy may lead to a marginal benefit in disease-free survival. The pathological complete response rate and survival outcomes are similar for total neoadjuvant therapy with short-course radiotherapy or long-course chemoradiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qingbin Wu
- Department of General Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
- Colorectal Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Jiahao Zhou
- Department of General Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
- Colorectal Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
- West China School of Medicine, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Jun Huang
- Department of General Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
- Colorectal Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
- West China School of Medicine, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Xiangbing Deng
- Department of General Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
- Colorectal Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Changtao Li
- Department of Epidemiology and Medical Statistics, West China School of Public Health and West China Fourth Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Wenjian Meng
- Department of General Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
- Colorectal Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Yazhou He
- Department of Oncology, West China School of Public Health and West China Fourth Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Ziqiang Wang
- Department of General Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
- Colorectal Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Aschele C, Glynne-Jones R. Selecting a TNT Schedule in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: Can We Predict Who Actually Benefits? Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15092567. [PMID: 37174033 PMCID: PMC10177050 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15092567] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2023] [Revised: 04/24/2023] [Accepted: 04/25/2023] [Indexed: 05/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Many consider the standard of care for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) to be preoperative chemoradiotherapy, radical surgery involving a total mesorectal excision, and post-operative adjuvant chemotherapy based on the pathology of the specimen. The poor impact on distant control is a major limitation of this strategy, with metastasis rates remaining in the 25-35% range and recovery after radical surgery leading to reluctance with prescription and inconsistent patient compliance with adjuvant chemotherapy. A second limitation is the low rate of pathologic complete response (pCR) (around 10-15%) despite multiple efforts to potentiate preoperative chemoradiation regimens, which in turn means it is less effective at achieving non-operative management (NOM). Total neoadjuvant treatment (TNT) is a pragmatic approach to solving these problems by introducing systemic chemotherapy at an early timepoint. Enthusiasm for delivering TNT for patients with LARC is increasing in light of the results of published randomized phase III trials, which show a doubling of the pCR rate and a significant reduction in the risk of subsequent metastases. However, there has been no demonstrated improvement in quality of life or overall survival. A plethora of potential chemotherapy schedules are available around the radiotherapy component, which include preoperative induction or consolidation with a range of options (FOLFOXIRI, FOLFOX, or CAPEOX,) and a varying duration of 6-18 weeks, prior to long course chemoradiation (LCCRT) or consolidation NACT following short-course preoperative radiation therapy (SCPRT) using 5 × 5 Gy or LCCRT using 45-60 Gy, respectively. The need to maintain optimal local control is a further important factor, and preliminary data appear to indicate that the RT schedule remains a crucial issue, especially in more advanced tumors, i.e., mesorectal fascia (MRF) invasion. Thus, there is no consensus as to the optimum combination, sequence, or duration of TNT. The selection of patients most likely to benefit is challenging, as clear-cut criteria to individuate patients benefiting from TNT are lacking. In this narrative review, we examine if there are any necessary or sufficient criteria for the use of TNT. We explore potential selection for the individual and their concerns with a generalized use of this strategy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carlo Aschele
- Medical Oncology Unit, Department of Oncology, Ospedale Sant'Andrea, Via Vittorio Veneto 197, 19121 La Spezia, Italy
| | - Robert Glynne-Jones
- Radiotherapy Department, Mount Vernon Centre for Cancer Treatment, Mount Vernon Hospital, Rickmansworth Rd., Northwood, London HA6 2RN, UK
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Borelli B, Germani MM, Carullo M, Mattioni R, Manfredi B, Sainato A, Rossi P, Vagli P, Balestri R, Buccianti P, Morelli L, Antoniotti C, Cremolini C, Masi G, Moretto R. Total neoadjuvant treatment and organ preservation strategies in the management of localized rectal cancer: a narrative review and evidence-based algorithm. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2023; 186:103985. [PMID: 37059274 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2023.103985] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2023] [Revised: 03/26/2023] [Accepted: 04/11/2023] [Indexed: 04/16/2023] Open
Abstract
The multimodal approach with total mesorectal excision preceded by neoadjuvant (chemo)radiotherapy represented the mainstay treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) for a long time. However, the benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy in terms of distant relapse reduction is limited. Recently, chemotherapy regimens administered before surgery and incorporated with (chemo)radiotherapy in total neoadjuvant treatment protocols have been established as new options in the management of LARC. Meanwhile, patients with clinical complete response to neoadjuvant treatment can benefit from organ preservation strategies, aimed at sparing surgery and long-term post-operative morbidities, while preserving an adequate disease control. However, the introduction of a non-operative management in clinical practice is a matter of debate with some concerns regarding the risk of local recurrence and long-term outcomes. In this review, we discuss how these recent advances are reshaping the multimodal management of localized rectal cancer and propose an algorithm to place them in the clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Beatrice Borelli
- Unit of Medical Oncology 2, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Pisana, Pisa, Italy; Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Marco Maria Germani
- Unit of Medical Oncology 2, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Pisana, Pisa, Italy
| | - Martina Carullo
- Unit of Medical Oncology 2, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Pisana, Pisa, Italy; Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Roberto Mattioni
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Pisana, Pisa, Italy
| | - Bruno Manfredi
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Pisana, Pisa, Italy
| | - Aldo Sainato
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Pisana, Pisa, Italy
| | - Piercarlo Rossi
- Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Pisana, Pisa, Italy
| | - Paola Vagli
- Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Pisana, Pisa, Italy
| | - Riccardo Balestri
- General Surgery, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Pisana, Pisa, Italy
| | - Piero Buccianti
- General Surgery, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Pisana, Pisa, Italy
| | - Luca Morelli
- General Surgery, Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Carlotta Antoniotti
- Unit of Medical Oncology 2, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Pisana, Pisa, Italy
| | - Chiara Cremolini
- Unit of Medical Oncology 2, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Pisana, Pisa, Italy; Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Gianluca Masi
- Unit of Medical Oncology 2, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Pisana, Pisa, Italy; Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Roberto Moretto
- Unit of Medical Oncology 2, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Pisana, Pisa, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Xiong K, Bao T, Cao Y, Hu W, Deng J, Chen J, Xiao T. Efficacy and safety of total neoadjuvant therapy in locally advanced rectal cancer: a meta-analysis. Int J Colorectal Dis 2023; 38:89. [PMID: 37004572 DOI: 10.1007/s00384-023-04376-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/17/2023] [Indexed: 04/04/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The standard of care for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) has changed from a single radical surgical treatment to the current multimodality treatment (standard chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT)). The efficacy and safety of both TNT and standard CRT are evaluated in randomized controlled trials (RCTs). METHODS RCTs were comprehensively searched in Chinese and English electronic databases. The experimental and control groups were TNT and the standard CRT, respectively, included in this meta-analysis. The outcomes were assessed through a fixed-effect or random-effect model of pooled odds (OR) or hazard ratios (HR). RESULTS Eleven RCTs, involving 3,101 patients were included in the final analysis. TNT showed increase in the pathological complete response (pCR) (OR = 1.95, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.57-2.41; P < 0.05) and the R0 resection (OR = 1.19, 95% CI: 0.99-1.43; P = 0.062). There was no significant difference in local recurrence-free survival (LRFS) (HR = 0.97, P = 0.803), but TNT had better 3-year disease-free survival (DFS) (HR = 0.82, 95% CI: 0.72-0.93, P < 0.05), overall survival (OS) (HR = 0.87, 95% CI: 0.74-1.02, P = 0.08) and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) (HR = 0.79, 95% CI: 0.67-0.93, P < 0.05) than standard CRT. CONCLUSIONS TNT was safe and feasible as it improved pCR and survival outcomes, and reduced the risk of distant metastasis compared with standard CRT. TNT may be a superior strategy for LARC, but more RCTs are needed to prove it. REGISTRATION AND PROTOCOL PROSPERO CRD42022327697. We added the Chinese database after registration because of the inclusion of fewer RCTs www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/ .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kai Xiong
- College of Clinical Medicine, Guizhou University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Guiyang, China
| | - Tiantian Bao
- Colorectal and Anal Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, No 71 Baoshan North Road, 550001, Guiyang, China
| | - Yibo Cao
- Colorectal and Anal Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, No 71 Baoshan North Road, 550001, Guiyang, China
| | - Wenting Hu
- College of Clinical Medicine, Guizhou University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Guiyang, China
| | - Jia Deng
- College of Clinical Medicine, Guizhou University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Guiyang, China
| | - Jiang Chen
- Colorectal and Anal Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, No 71 Baoshan North Road, 550001, Guiyang, China.
| | - Tianbao Xiao
- Colorectal and Anal Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, No 71 Baoshan North Road, 550001, Guiyang, China.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Zhou C, Wang K, Zhang X, Xiao Y, Yang C, Wang J, Qu F, Wang X, Liu M, Gao C, Xiao L, Wu F. Assessing the predictive value of clinical factors to pathological complete response for locally advanced rectal cancer: An analysis of 124 patients. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1125470. [PMID: 37064150 PMCID: PMC10102576 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1125470] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2023] [Accepted: 03/21/2023] [Indexed: 04/03/2023] Open
Abstract
PurposeTo investigate the clinical factors affecting pathological complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC).MethodsClinical data of 124 LARC patients treated with nCRT and surgery in the fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University from 2014 to 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. In this study, univariate analysis and logistic dichotomous multivariate regression analysis were used to study the clinical factors affecting pCR, and the receiver operator characteristic curve (ROC) analysis was used to further verify the accuracy of partial indexes in predicting pCR.ResultsOf the 124 enrolled patients, 19 patients (15.32%) achieved pCR. Univariate analysis showed that the number of cycles of consolidation chemotherapy, serum carcino-embryonic antigen (CEA) level before treatment, MRI longitudinal length of tumor, and extramural vascular invasion (EMVI) were statistically correlated with pCR. ROC analysis of the longitudinal length of tumor measured by MRI showed that the area under the curve (AUC) value, sensitivity and specificity were 0.735, 89.47% and 48.57% respectively, and the optimal cut-off value was 5.5cm. The ROC analysis showed that the AUC value, sensitivity and specificity of pCR prediction using CEA were 0.741, 63.16% and 90.48%, respectively, and the optimal cut-off value was 3.1ng/ml. Multivariate results showed that the number of cycles of consolidation chemotherapy, serum CEA level before treatment, and EMVI were independent predictors of pCR.ConclusionThe number of cycles of consolidation chemotherapy, serum CEA level before treatment, and EMVI may be important determinants of LARC patients to reach pCR after nCRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chaoxi Zhou
- Department of General Surgery, Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China
| | - Kanghua Wang
- Department of Medical Oncology, Affiliated Hospital Of Hebei University, Baoding, China
- Department of Radiotherapy, Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China
| | - Xiaoxiao Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hebei Cancer Hospital Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Langfang, China
| | - Yuting Xiao
- Department of Radiotherapy, Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China
| | - Congrong Yang
- Department of Radiotherapy, Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China
| | - Jun Wang
- Department of Radiotherapy, Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China
| | - Fuyin Qu
- Department of Radiotherapy, Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China
| | - Xuan Wang
- Department of Radiotherapy, Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China
| | - Ming Liu
- Department of Radiotherapy, Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China
| | - Chao Gao
- Department of Radiotherapy, Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China
| | - Linlin Xiao
- Department of Radiotherapy, Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China
| | - Fengpeng Wu
- Department of Radiotherapy, Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China
- *Correspondence: Fengpeng Wu,
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Prabhakaran S, Kong JC. Individualized chemotherapy and immunotherapy for rectal cancer: the next step forward. ANZ J Surg 2023; 93:8-9. [PMID: 36797850 DOI: 10.1111/ans.18235] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2022] [Accepted: 12/19/2022] [Indexed: 02/18/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Swetha Prabhakaran
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Joseph Ch Kong
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Central Clinical School, Monash University, Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Division of Cancer Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Xiao W, Luo H, Yao Y, Wang Y, Liu S, Sun R, Chen G. Total neoadjuvant treatment and PD-1/PD-L1 checkpoint inhibitor in locally advanced rectal cancer. Front Immunol 2023; 14:1149122. [PMID: 37033988 PMCID: PMC10079866 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1149122] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2023] [Accepted: 03/15/2023] [Indexed: 04/11/2023] Open
Abstract
For local advanced rectal cancer (LARC), total neoadjuvant treatment (TNT) has shown more complete response (CR), reduced risk of distant metastasis (DM) and increase of the sphincter preservation rate. Now it is the one and only recommendation for high-risk group of LARC according to National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) rectal cancer guideline, while it is also preferentially recommended for low-risk group of LARC. TNT is also beneficial for distant rectal cancer patients who have need for organ preservation. Even though the prognostic value of programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) in the neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NACRT) of LARC patients is undetermined yet, the combination of NACRT and programmed cell death-1 (PD-1)/PD-L1 antibodies seem bring new hope for mismatch repair proficient (pMMR)/microsatellite stable (MSS) LARC patients. Accumulating small sample sized studies have shown that combining NACRT with PD-1/PD-L1 antibody yield better short-term outcomes for pMMR/MSS LARC patients than historic data. However, ideal total dose and fractionation of radiotherapy remains one of unresolved issues in this combination setting. Thorough understanding the impact of radiotherapy on the tumor microenvironment and their interaction is needed for in-depth understanding and exquisite design of treatments combination model.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Weiwei Xiao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
- *Correspondence: Gong Chen, ; Weiwei Xiao,
| | - Huilong Luo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Ye Yao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yaqin Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Shuang Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Rui Sun
- Department of Radiation Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Gong Chen
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
- *Correspondence: Gong Chen, ; Weiwei Xiao,
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Bedrikovetski S, Traeger L, Fitzsimmons T, Perry J, Vather R, Moore JW, Sammour T. Personalized total neoadjuvant therapy versus chemotherapy during the ‘wait period’ versus standard chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer. ANZ J Surg 2022; 93:1267-1273. [DOI: 10.1111/ans.18229] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2022] [Accepted: 12/16/2022] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Sergei Bedrikovetski
- Department of Surgical Specialties, Adelaide Medical School, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences University of Adelaide Adelaide South Australia Australia
- Colorectal Unit, Department of Surgery Royal Adelaide Hospital Adelaide South Australia Australia
| | - Luke Traeger
- Department of Surgical Specialties, Adelaide Medical School, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences University of Adelaide Adelaide South Australia Australia
- Colorectal Unit, Department of Surgery Royal Adelaide Hospital Adelaide South Australia Australia
| | - Tracy Fitzsimmons
- Department of Surgical Specialties, Adelaide Medical School, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences University of Adelaide Adelaide South Australia Australia
- Colorectal Unit, Department of Surgery Royal Adelaide Hospital Adelaide South Australia Australia
| | - Joanne Perry
- Colorectal Unit, Department of Surgery Royal Adelaide Hospital Adelaide South Australia Australia
| | - Ryash Vather
- Colorectal Unit, Department of Surgery Royal Adelaide Hospital Adelaide South Australia Australia
| | - James W. Moore
- Department of Surgical Specialties, Adelaide Medical School, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences University of Adelaide Adelaide South Australia Australia
- Colorectal Unit, Department of Surgery Royal Adelaide Hospital Adelaide South Australia Australia
| | - Tarik Sammour
- Department of Surgical Specialties, Adelaide Medical School, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences University of Adelaide Adelaide South Australia Australia
- Colorectal Unit, Department of Surgery Royal Adelaide Hospital Adelaide South Australia Australia
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Gabbani M, Giorgi C, Napoli G, Tebano U, Perrone MS, Missiroli S, Berretta M, Mandarà M, Zaninelli M, Luca N, Grigolato D, Muraro M, Rinaldi G, Pinton P, Fiorica F. Outcomes of Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer Patients Treated with Total Neoadjuvant Treatment: A Meta-Anaysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Clin Colorectal Cancer 2022; 21:297-308. [PMID: 36210320 DOI: 10.1016/j.clcc.2022.07.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2022] [Revised: 07/21/2022] [Accepted: 07/22/2022] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Determining outcomes using the total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) in patients with local advanced rectal cancer is important for stratifying patients according to expected outcomes in future studies in the era of treatment combination. The present meta-analysis estimated the pathological complete response, disease-free survival, and overall survival probabilities of rectal cancer patients and identified predictors of outcomes. METHODS Studies reporting pathological complete response rate and time-dependent outcomes (progression or death) after total neoadjuvant treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) were identified in MEDLINE through January 2022. Three independent observers extracted data on patient populations and outcomes and combined the data using a distribution-free summary survival curve. The primary outcomes were actuarial probabilities of recurrence and survival. RESULTS Fourteen RCTs, including 18 TNT arms, met the inclusion criteria. The pooled estimate of pathological complete response (pCR) probability was 23.6%, with moderate heterogeneity between studies. The pooled estimates of actuarial disease-free survival rate were 70.6% at 3 years and 65.4% at 5 years. The pooled estimates of actuarial survival rates were 93% at 3 years and 81.6% at 5 years. In both these outcomes, heterogeneity between studies was highly significant. CONCLUSION This meta-analysis showed that Total Neoadjuvant Therapy is an optimal approach for LARC patients. The results provide a useful benchmark for future comparisons of the benefits of combinations of other drug families as target therapies or immunotherapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Milena Gabbani
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, Verona, Italy
| | - Carlotta Giorgi
- Dept. of Morphology, Surgery and Experimental Medicine, Section of Pathology, Oncology and Experimental Biology, Laboratory for Technologies of Advanced Therapies (LTTA), University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Napoli
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, Verona, Italy
| | - Umberto Tebano
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, Verona, Italy
| | - Maria Sole Perrone
- Dept. of Morphology, Surgery and Experimental Medicine, Section of Pathology, Oncology and Experimental Biology, Laboratory for Technologies of Advanced Therapies (LTTA), University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy
| | - Sonia Missiroli
- Dept. of Morphology, Surgery and Experimental Medicine, Section of Pathology, Oncology and Experimental Biology, Laboratory for Technologies of Advanced Therapies (LTTA), University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy
| | - Massimiliano Berretta
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Policlinico "G. Martino" University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| | | | | | - Nicoletta Luca
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, Verona, Italy
| | - Daniela Grigolato
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, Verona, Italy
| | - Marco Muraro
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, Verona, Italy
| | - Giulia Rinaldi
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, Verona, Italy
| | - Paolo Pinton
- Dept. of Morphology, Surgery and Experimental Medicine, Section of Pathology, Oncology and Experimental Biology, Laboratory for Technologies of Advanced Therapies (LTTA), University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy
| | - Francesco Fiorica
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, Verona, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Zhang X, Ma S, Guo Y, Luo Y, Li L. Total neoadjuvant therapy versus standard therapy in locally advanced rectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis of 15 trials. PLoS One 2022; 17:e0276599. [PMID: 36331947 PMCID: PMC9635708 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0276599] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2022] [Accepted: 10/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) before total mesorectal excision (TME) and followed systemic chemotherapy is widely accepted as the standard therapy for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). This meta-analysis was to evaluate the current evidence regarding nCRT in combination with induction or consolidation chemotherapy for rectal cancer in terms of oncological outcomes. Methods A systematic search of medical databases (PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Library) was conducted up to the end of July 1, 2021. This meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the efficacy of TNT in terms of pathological complete remission (pCR), nCRT or surgical complications, R0 resection, local recurrence, distant metastasis, disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) in LARC. Results Eight nRCTs and 7 RCTs, including 3579 patients were included in the meta-analysis. The rate of pCR was significantly higher in the TNT group than in the nCRT group, (OR 1.85, 95% CI 1.39–2.46, p < 0.0001), DFS (HR 0.80, 95% CI 0.69–0.92, p = 0.001), OS (HR 0.75, 95% CI 0.62–0.89, p = 0.002), nCRT complications (OR 1.05, 95% CI 0.77–1.44, p = 0.75), surgical complications (OR 1.02, 95% CI 0.83–1.26, p = 0.83), local recurrence (OR 1.82, 95% CI 0.95–3.49, p = 0.07), distant metastasis (OR 0.77, 95% CI 0.58–1.03, p = 0.08) did not differ significantly between the TNT and nCRT groups. Conclusion TNT appears to have advantages over standard therapy for LARC in terms of pCR, R0 resection, DFS, and OS, with comparable nCRT and postoperative complications, and no increase in local recurrence and distant metastasis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiping Zhang
- Department of General Surgery, Qinan Hospital, Tianshui, China
| | - Shujie Ma
- Department of General Surgery, People’s Hospital of Gannan, Hezuo, China
| | - Yinyin Guo
- Department of Pharmacy, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Lanzhou, China
| | - Yang Luo
- Department of Neurology, The First Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
| | - Laiyuan Li
- Department of Anorectal Surgery, Gansu Provincial Hospital, Lanzhou, China
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
MRI-based radiomics to predict neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy outcomes in locally advanced rectal cancer: A multicenter study. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2022; 38:175-182. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2022.11.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2022] [Revised: 11/12/2022] [Accepted: 11/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
|
22
|
Zhao X, Han P, Zhang L, Ma J, Dong F, Zang L, He Z, Zheng M. Prolonged neoadjuvant chemotherapy without radiation versus total neoadjuvant therapy for locally advanced rectal cancer: A propensity score matched study. Front Oncol 2022; 12:953790. [PMID: 36185248 PMCID: PMC9523158 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.953790] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2022] [Accepted: 08/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Although neoadjvuant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) improves the local control rate of locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC), it fails to significantly improve disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). We explored the efficacy of prolonged neoadjuvant chemotherapy (pNCT) without radiation and compared this schema with total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT). Material and methods Patients diagnosed with LARC and received TNT (4 cycles of induction CapeOX/FOLFOX followed with CRT) or pNCT (6~8 cycles of CapeOX/FOLFOX) between June 2016 and October 2021 were retrospective analyzed. All patients underwent total mesorectal excision (TME). A 1:1 propensity score match was performed to adjust baseline potential confounders. The tumor response, toxicity, recurrence-free survival (RFS) and OS were observed. Results A total of 184 patients with 92 patients in each group were finally enrolled. The median follow-up time was 35 months. TNT showed better pathological complete response (pCR) rate (25.0% vs 16.3%) and objective regression rate (73.9% vs 59.8%) than pNCT. TNT and pNCT produce similar 3-year RFS and OS rates in patients with mid-to-upper rectal cancer. TNT was associated with improved tumor responsiveness in all patients and improved 3-year RFS rates in those with low rectal cancer. Conclusion pNCT is an option for patients with mid-to-upper rectal cancer, but radiation is still necessary for low rectal cancer. To determine optimal schema for neoadjuvant therapy and patient selection, additional randomized controlled studies are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xuan Zhao
- Department of General Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
- Shanghai Minimally Invasive Surgery Center, Shanghai, China
| | - Peiyi Han
- Department of General Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
- Shanghai Minimally Invasive Surgery Center, Shanghai, China
| | - Luyang Zhang
- Department of General Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
- Shanghai Minimally Invasive Surgery Center, Shanghai, China
| | - Junjun Ma
- Department of General Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
- Shanghai Minimally Invasive Surgery Center, Shanghai, China
| | - Feng Dong
- Department of General Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
- Shanghai Minimally Invasive Surgery Center, Shanghai, China
| | - Lu Zang
- Department of General Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
- Shanghai Minimally Invasive Surgery Center, Shanghai, China
| | - Zirui He
- Department of General Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
- Shanghai Minimally Invasive Surgery Center, Shanghai, China
- *Correspondence: Minhua Zheng, ; Zirui He,
| | - Minhua Zheng
- Department of General Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
- Shanghai Minimally Invasive Surgery Center, Shanghai, China
- *Correspondence: Minhua Zheng, ; Zirui He,
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Ma Z, Tan L, Liu ZL, Xiao JW. Total neoadjuvant therapy or standard chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Surg 2022; 9:911538. [PMID: 36090336 PMCID: PMC9458916 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.911538] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2022] [Accepted: 08/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and Aim The effectiveness of total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) on patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) is controversy. This study aims to compare the prognostic value of TNT with standard neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for LARC. Methods We searched databases (Embase [Ovid], Medline [Ovid], PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science) for articles published between January 1, 2000, and March 10, 2022. Studies on evaluating the effects of TNT and standard CRT on the prognosis of LARC were included. The primary outcomes were overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). Results 19 primary studies, involving 10 randomized controlled trials, 3 prospective studies and 6 retrospective studies, with data on 5,074 patients treated for LARC were included in the meta-analysis. Statistical analyses revealed that, compared with standard CRT, TNT significantly improved OS (hazard ratio [HR]=0.77, 95% confidence interval [CI]=0.65–0.90, I2 = 30%, P = 0.17), DFS (HR = 0.85, 95% CI = 0.74–0.97, I² = 11%, P = 0.35), distant metastases-free survival (DMFS, HR = 0.76, 95% CI = 0.65–0.90, I² = 0%, P = 0.50), pathological complete response rate (pCR, OR = 1.89, 95% CI = 1.61–2.22, I² = 0%, P = 0.47), and R0 resection rate (OR = 1.33, 95% CI = 1.07–1.67, I² = 16%, P = 0.28), but local recurrence-free survival (LRFS, HR = 1.12, 95% CI = 0.90–1.39, I² = 4%, P = 0.37). Conclusions Comprehensive literature research shows that TNT showed excellent short-term efficacy in terms of pCR and R0 resection rate while also improved the long-term outcomes of OS, DFS and DMFS, might become a new standard of treatment in patients with LARC. Even so, more studies and longer follow-up were still warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhou Ma
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Clinical Medical College and The First Affiliated Hospital of Chengdu Medical College, Chengdu, China
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, BaZhong Central Hospital, Bazhong, China
| | - Ling Tan
- Department of Urology, People's Hospital Affiliated to Chongqing Three Gorges Medical College, Chongqing, China
| | - Zi-lin Liu
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Clinical Medical College and The First Affiliated Hospital of Chengdu Medical College, Chengdu, China
| | - Jiang-wei Xiao
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Clinical Medical College and The First Affiliated Hospital of Chengdu Medical College, Chengdu, China
- Correspondence: Jiang-wei Xiao
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Guida AM, Sensi B, Formica V, D'Angelillo RM, Roselli M, Del Vecchio Blanco G, Rossi P, Capolupo GT, Caricato M, Sica GS. Total neoadjuvant therapy for the treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer: a systematic minireview. Biol Direct 2022; 17:16. [PMID: 35698084 PMCID: PMC9195214 DOI: 10.1186/s13062-022-00329-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2022] [Accepted: 05/30/2022] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Colorectal carcinoma is the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths, and indeed, rectal cancer accounting for approximately one third of newly diagnosed patients. Gold standard in the treatment of rectal cancer is a multimodality approach, aiming at a good control of the local disease. Distant recurrences are the major cause of mortality. Currently, Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer (LARC) patients undergo a combined treatment of chemotherapy and radiotherapy, followed by surgery. Eventually, more chemotherapy, namely adjuvant chemotherapy (aCT), may be necessary. Total Neoadjuvant Therapy (TNT) is an emerging approach aimed to reduce distant metastases and improve local control. Several ongoing studies are analyzing whether this new approach could improve oncological outcomes. Published results were encouraging, but the heterogeneity of protocols in use, makes the comparison and interpretation of data rather complex. One of the major concerns regarding TNT administration is related to its effect on larger and more advanced cancers that might not undergo similar down-staging as smaller, early-stage tumors. This minireview, based on a systematic literature search of randomized clinical trials and meta-analysis, summarizes current knowledge on TNT. The aim was to confirm or refute whether or not current practice of TNT is based on relevant evidence, to establish the quality of that evidence, and to address any uncertainty or variation in practice that may be occurring. A tentative grouping of general study characteristics, clinical features and treatments characteristics has been undertaken to evaluate if the reported studies are sufficiently homogeneous in terms of subjects involved, interventions, and outcomes to provide a meaningful idea of which patients are more likely to gain from this treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea M Guida
- Department of Surgery, Minimally Invasive Unit, University of Rome Tor Vergata, 00133, Rome, Italy
| | - Bruno Sensi
- Department of Surgery, Minimally Invasive Unit, University of Rome Tor Vergata, 00133, Rome, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Formica
- Department of Systems Medicine, Medical Oncology Unit, Policlinico Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
| | - Rolando M D'Angelillo
- Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, Radiation Oncology, University of Rome Tor Vergata, 00133, Rome, Italy
| | - Mario Roselli
- Department of Systems Medicine, Medical Oncology Unit, Policlinico Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Piero Rossi
- Department of Surgery, Minimally Invasive Unit, University of Rome Tor Vergata, 00133, Rome, Italy
| | - Gabriella T Capolupo
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Colorectal Surgery Unit, Campus Bio-Medico University, 00128, Rome, Italy
| | - Marco Caricato
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Colorectal Surgery Unit, Campus Bio-Medico University, 00128, Rome, Italy
| | - Giuseppe S Sica
- Department of Surgery, Minimally Invasive Unit, University of Rome Tor Vergata, 00133, Rome, Italy. .,Department of Surgery, Policlinico Tor Vergata, University of Rome, Tor Vergata, Viale Oxford 81, 00133, Rome, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Abstract
The management of localized rectal cancer requires a multidisciplinary approach to optimize outcomes, reduce morbidity and prevent under or overtreatments. While early stages may obtain benefit of local resections without any additional therapies, locally advanced rectal cancer becomes a challenge defining the better sequential strategy of surgery, radiotherapy and chemotherapy. The latest results of international phase III studies have positioned the total neoadjuvant therapy as a potential new standard of care in high risk rectal cancers, however, the best schedule is still not well defined.
Collapse
|
26
|
The Evolving Neoadjuvant Treatment Paradigm for Patients with Locoregional mismatch Repair Proficient Rectal Cancer. Curr Treat Options Oncol 2022; 23:453-473. [PMID: 35312962 DOI: 10.1007/s11864-022-00961-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/31/2022] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
OPINION STATEMENT The standard of care for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) has included preoperative chemoradiation, total mesorectal excision surgery and post operative adjuvant chemotherapy based on histopathology. The current therapeutic landscape in LARC has many different options with different directions of travel - depending on the goal of treatment. Enthusiasm for delivering total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) is increasing in the light of recently published randomised phase III trials - RAPIDO and PRODIGE-23. There is a wide diversity of different potential schedules and a multitude of approaches, which include induction neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) with a range of chemotherapy options (CAPEOX, FOLFOX, FOLFOXIRI) and a varying duration of 6-18 weeks, or consolidation NACT. These schedules either precede or follow short-course preoperative radiation therapy (SCPRT) using 5 × 5Gy or long-course chemoradiation (LCCRT) using 45-60Gy respectively. The different strategies of induction and consolidation neoadjuvant chemotherapy have been compared and have similar long-term outcomes, but consolidation chemotherapy may facilitate organ-sparing. The results are driving novel paradigms with both intensification and de-intensification treatment strategies. The ideal combination, sequence or duration of such a TNT approach remains undefined. As yet, there are no robust clinical, genetic, molecular, immune or imaging features (alone or integrated), which either direct or aid these choices. Currently, the selection of neoadjuvant treatment is driven by the impact on avoidance or feasibility of surgery or reducing the risk of metastases rather than prevention of local recurrence. Most believe that TNT will improve overall survival, despite the present lack of evidence. Both the inherent heterogeneity in LARC and the observed range of different responses underline the need for response biomarkers to individually tailor therapy rather than 'a one size fits all' approach.
Collapse
|
27
|
Prabhakaran S, Yang TWW, Johnson N, Bell S, Chin M, Simpson P, Carne P, Farmer C, Skinner S, Warrier SK, Kong JCH. Latest evidence on the management of early‐stage and locally advanced rectal cancer: a narrative review. ANZ J Surg 2022; 92:365-372. [DOI: 10.1111/ans.17429] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2021] [Revised: 11/21/2021] [Accepted: 12/10/2021] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Swetha Prabhakaran
- Department of Colorectal Surgery Alfred Health Melbourne Victoria Australia
| | | | - Nicholas Johnson
- Department of Colorectal Surgery Alfred Health Melbourne Victoria Australia
| | - Stephen Bell
- Department of Colorectal Surgery Alfred Health Melbourne Victoria Australia
- Central Clinical School Monash University Melbourne Victoria Australia
| | - Martin Chin
- Department of Colorectal Surgery Alfred Health Melbourne Victoria Australia
- Central Clinical School Monash University Melbourne Victoria Australia
| | - Paul Simpson
- Department of Colorectal Surgery Alfred Health Melbourne Victoria Australia
- Central Clinical School Monash University Melbourne Victoria Australia
| | - Peter Carne
- Department of Colorectal Surgery Alfred Health Melbourne Victoria Australia
- Central Clinical School Monash University Melbourne Victoria Australia
| | - Chip Farmer
- Department of Colorectal Surgery Alfred Health Melbourne Victoria Australia
- Central Clinical School Monash University Melbourne Victoria Australia
| | - Stewart Skinner
- Department of Colorectal Surgery Alfred Health Melbourne Victoria Australia
- Central Clinical School Monash University Melbourne Victoria Australia
| | - Satish K Warrier
- Department of Colorectal Surgery Alfred Health Melbourne Victoria Australia
- Central Clinical School Monash University Melbourne Victoria Australia
- Division of Cancer Surgery Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre Melbourne Victoria Australia
- The Sir Peter MacCallum Centre Department of Oncology The University of Melbourne Parkville Victoria Australia
| | - Joseph CH Kong
- Department of Colorectal Surgery Alfred Health Melbourne Victoria Australia
- Central Clinical School Monash University Melbourne Victoria Australia
- Division of Cancer Surgery Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre Melbourne Victoria Australia
- The Sir Peter MacCallum Centre Department of Oncology The University of Melbourne Parkville Victoria Australia
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Johnson D, Li L, Lee KC, Lam KO, Wong KH, Ho WM, Ma B. Total Neoadjuvant Therapy for High Risk Rectal Cancer in Western and Asian Populations – Current Evidence and Clinical Applications. Clin Colorectal Cancer 2021; 21:45-54. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clcc.2021.12.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2021] [Revised: 12/14/2021] [Accepted: 12/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
29
|
Liu S, Jiang T, Xiao L, Yang S, Liu Q, Gao Y, Chen G, Xiao W. Total Neoadjuvant Therapy (TNT) versus Standard Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Oncologist 2021; 26:e1555-e1566. [PMID: 33987952 PMCID: PMC8417863 DOI: 10.1002/onco.13824] [Citation(s) in RCA: 79] [Impact Index Per Article: 26.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2020] [Accepted: 04/08/2021] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) is a novel approach for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC), which attempts to deliver both systemic chemotherapy and neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy prior to surgery. However, its efficacy and safety remain controversial in randomized controlled trials (RCTs). We conducted this meta-analysis to assess such concerns. MATERIALS AND METHODS Head-to-head phase II/III RCTs were searched in Embase, PubMed, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library, as well as other sources. The primary endpoint was pathologic complete response (pCR). Secondary endpoints were disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), local recurrence-free survival, distant metastasis-free survival, and the R0 resection rate. RESULTS Eight phase II/III RCTs involving 2,196 patients with LARC were assessed. The primary analysis demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in the pCR rate for TNT treatment (odds ratio, 1.77; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.28-2.45; p = .0005). TNT treatment also showed improvements in DFS and OS outcomes compared with standard chemoradiotherapy (hazard ratio [HR], 0.83; 95% CI, 0.72-0.96; p = .03 and HR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.74-1.05; p = .15). In addition, TNT treatment showed significant efficacy in reducing the risk of distant metastasis (HR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.68-0.95; p = .012). CONCLUSION The overall pCR rate may be improved with TNT compared with standard treatment. The TNT strategy may also improve DFS and OS and reduce the risk of distant metastasis. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE Locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) is a relatively common disease, with a poor prognosis because of its high metastatic potential. The role of total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) has always been controversial. This meta-analysis found that TNT in LARC is associated with a significant improvement in overall pathologic complete response rate, disease-free survival, overall survival, and distant metastasis-free survival compared with standard treatment. TNT is a promising strategy for LARC, especially for patients who have little desire for surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shuang Liu
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat‐sen University Cancer CenterGuangzhouPeople's Republic of China
- Sun Yat‐sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer MedicineGuangzhouPeople's Republic of China
| | - Ting Jiang
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat‐sen University Cancer CenterGuangzhouPeople's Republic of China
- Sun Yat‐sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer MedicineGuangzhouPeople's Republic of China
| | - Lin Xiao
- Department of Oncology, Section II, Jiangmen Central Hospital, Affiliated Jiangmen Hospital of Sun Yat‐sen UniversityJiangmenPeople's Republic of China
| | - Shanfei Yang
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat‐sen University Cancer CenterGuangzhouPeople's Republic of China
- Sun Yat‐sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer MedicineGuangzhouPeople's Republic of China
| | - Qing Liu
- Sun Yat‐sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer MedicineGuangzhouPeople's Republic of China
- Department of Medical Statistics and Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Sun Yat‐sen UniversityGuangzhouPeople's Republic of China
| | - Yuanhong Gao
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat‐sen University Cancer CenterGuangzhouPeople's Republic of China
- Sun Yat‐sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer MedicineGuangzhouPeople's Republic of China
| | - Gong Chen
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Sun Yat‐sen University Cancer CenterGuangzhouPeople's Republic of China
- Sun Yat‐sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer MedicineGuangzhouPeople's Republic of China
| | - Weiwei Xiao
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat‐sen University Cancer CenterGuangzhouPeople's Republic of China
- Sun Yat‐sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer MedicineGuangzhouPeople's Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Kong JC, Soucisse M, Michael M, Tie J, Ngan SY, Leong T, McCormick J, Warrier SK, Heriot AG. Total Neoadjuvant Therapy in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Metaanalysis of Oncological and Operative Outcomes. Ann Surg Oncol 2021; 28:7476-7486. [PMID: 33891203 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-021-09837-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2021] [Accepted: 02/24/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Total neoadjuvant therapy in rectal cancer refers to the administration of chemoradiotherapy plus chemotherapy before surgery. Recent studies have shown improved pathological complete response and disease-free survival with this approach. However, survival benefits remain unproven. Our objective is to present a metaanalysis of oncological outcomes of total neoadjuvant therapy in locally advanced rectal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS A comprehensive search was performed on PubMed, Medline, and Google Scholars. Studies comparing total neoadjuvant therapy with standard neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy were included. Data extracted from the individual studies were pooled and a metaanalysis performed. The outcomes of interest are the rate of complete pathological response, nodal response, resection margin, anal preservation, anastomotic leak, local recurrence, distant recurrence, disease-free survival, and overall survival. RESULTS There were 15 comparative studies with 2437 patients in the neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy group and 2284 in the total neoadjuvant therapy group. The pooled complete pathological response was 22.3% in the total neoadjuvant therapy group, compared with 14.2% in the standard neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy group (p < 0.001). Even though there was no difference in local recurrence rate, there was a significantly lower rate of distant recurrence (OR 0.81, p = 0.02), and better 3-year disease-free survival (70.6% vs. 65.3%, respectively, p < 0.001) and overall survival (84.9% vs. 82.3%, respectively, p = 0.006), favoring the total neoadjuvant therapy group. Due to significant heterogeneity in the study protocols, there remains uncertainty on the ideal chemotherapy/radiotherapy sequence. CONCLUSIONS This study provides supporting evidence on the favorable immediate and intermediate oncological outcomes with the use of total neoadjuvant therapy for locally advanced rectal cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph C Kong
- Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia. .,Division of Cancer Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia. .,Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
| | - Mikael Soucisse
- Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Michael Michael
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia.,Division of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Jeanne Tie
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia.,Division of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Samuel Y Ngan
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia.,Division of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Trevor Leong
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia.,Division of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Jacob McCormick
- Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Satish K Warrier
- Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.,Division of Cancer Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.,Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Alexander G Heriot
- Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.,Division of Cancer Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.,Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Total neoadjuvant therapy for rectal cancer: Making sense of the results from the RAPIDO and PRODIGE 23 trials. Cancer Treat Rev 2021; 96:102177. [PMID: 33798955 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2021.102177] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2021] [Revised: 02/27/2021] [Accepted: 03/01/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
A few months ago, results from two randomised phase III trials of total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) in locally advanced rectal cancer were presented (RAPIDO and PRODIGE 23), consistently showing better short- and long-term outcomes with TNT as compared with standard neoadjuvant long-course chemoradiotherapy (CRT) or short-course radiotherapy (SCRT). These results represent corroborating evidence in support of a practice that many centres had already implemented based on promising preliminary data. Also, they provide new, high-level evidence to endorse TNT as a new management option in the treatment algorithm of stage II-III rectal cancer in those centres where CRT and SCRT have long remained the only accepted standard neoadjuvant treatments. Having two consistently positive trials is certainly reassuring regarding the potential of TNT as a general treatment approach. Nevertheless, substantial differences between these trials pose important challenges in relation to the generalisability and applicability of their results, and translation of the same into practical clinical recommendations. In this article, we address a number of key questions that the RAPIDO and PRODIGE 23 trials have raised among the broad community of gastrointestinal oncologists, proposing an interpretation of the data that may help the decision making, and highlighting grey areas that warrant further investigation.
Collapse
|
32
|
Riesco-Martinez MC, Fernandez-Martos C, Gravalos-Castro C, Espinosa-Olarte P, La Salvia A, Robles-Diaz L, Modrego-Sanchez A, Garcia-Carbonero R. Impact of Total Neoadjuvant Therapy vs. Standard Chemoradiotherapy in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials. Cancers (Basel) 2020; 12:E3655. [PMID: 33291454 PMCID: PMC7762140 DOI: 10.3390/cancers12123655] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2020] [Revised: 11/30/2020] [Accepted: 12/02/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Multimodality treatment is a standard of care for LARC, but the optimal sequencing of the treatment modalities remains unclear. Several randomized clinical trials (RCTs) compared total neoadjuvant treatment (TNT) vs. standard neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) with inconsistent results. A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the efficacy of TNT in terms of complete pathological response (pCR) rate, disease-free and overall survival vs. standard CRT in LARC. A systematic search was performed through MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and meeting abstracts up to May 2020. RCTs comparing CRT vs. TNT followed by surgery in LARC were eligible for the study. Study selection and data extraction were done following PRISMA guidelines by two independent reviewers. The Mantel-Haenzel method was used to obtain a fixed-effects model of pooled odds or hazard ratios for the main outcomes. Eight RCTs, including 2301 patients, met the eligibility criteria. TNT significantly improved pCR rate (OR = 1.99, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.59-2.49; p < 0.001), 3-year disease-free-survival (DFS) (HR = 0.82, 95%CI 0.71-0.95; p = 0.01) and 3-year overall survival (OS) (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.81, p = 0.04). Grade 3-4 adverse events were not significantly different in both strategies (OR = 1.58; p = 0.14). An improved pCR rate was documented regardless of the type of radiotherapy administered (long vs. short fractionation schedules). No significant heterogeneity was found. The results of this meta-analysis show that TNT improves pCR and survival rates vs. standard preoperative CRT in patients with LARC. TNT may become a new standard of care in LARC, although longer follow-up is needed to properly assess its long-term impact on survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria C. Riesco-Martinez
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, UCM, 28041 Madrid, Spain; (C.G.-C.); (P.E.-O.); (A.L.S.); (L.R.-D.); (A.M.-S.); (R.G.-C.)
- Laboratorio de Oncologia Clinico-Traslacional, Instituto de Investigacion Sanitaria Hospital 12 de Octubre (imas12), CNIO, CIBERONC, 28041 Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Cristina Gravalos-Castro
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, UCM, 28041 Madrid, Spain; (C.G.-C.); (P.E.-O.); (A.L.S.); (L.R.-D.); (A.M.-S.); (R.G.-C.)
| | - Paula Espinosa-Olarte
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, UCM, 28041 Madrid, Spain; (C.G.-C.); (P.E.-O.); (A.L.S.); (L.R.-D.); (A.M.-S.); (R.G.-C.)
- Laboratorio de Oncologia Clinico-Traslacional, Instituto de Investigacion Sanitaria Hospital 12 de Octubre (imas12), CNIO, CIBERONC, 28041 Madrid, Spain
| | - Anna La Salvia
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, UCM, 28041 Madrid, Spain; (C.G.-C.); (P.E.-O.); (A.L.S.); (L.R.-D.); (A.M.-S.); (R.G.-C.)
- Laboratorio de Oncologia Clinico-Traslacional, Instituto de Investigacion Sanitaria Hospital 12 de Octubre (imas12), CNIO, CIBERONC, 28041 Madrid, Spain
| | - Luis Robles-Diaz
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, UCM, 28041 Madrid, Spain; (C.G.-C.); (P.E.-O.); (A.L.S.); (L.R.-D.); (A.M.-S.); (R.G.-C.)
| | - Andrea Modrego-Sanchez
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, UCM, 28041 Madrid, Spain; (C.G.-C.); (P.E.-O.); (A.L.S.); (L.R.-D.); (A.M.-S.); (R.G.-C.)
| | - Rocio Garcia-Carbonero
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, UCM, 28041 Madrid, Spain; (C.G.-C.); (P.E.-O.); (A.L.S.); (L.R.-D.); (A.M.-S.); (R.G.-C.)
- Laboratorio de Oncologia Clinico-Traslacional, Instituto de Investigacion Sanitaria Hospital 12 de Octubre (imas12), CNIO, CIBERONC, 28041 Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Affiliation(s)
- Diana D Shi
- Harvard Radiation Oncology Program, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Brigham and Women's Cancer Center, Boston, MA
| | - Harvey J Mamon
- Brigham and Women's Hospital and Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Hoendervangers S, Burbach JPM, Lacle MM, Koopman M, van Grevenstein WMU, Intven MPW, Verkooijen HM. Pathological Complete Response Following Different Neoadjuvant Treatment Strategies for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol 2020; 27:4319-4336. [PMID: 32524461 PMCID: PMC7497700 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-020-08615-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2019] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Background Pathological complete response (pCR) following neoadjuvant treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) is associated with better survival, less local recurrence, and less distant failure. Furthermore, pCR indicates that the rectum may have been preserved. This meta-analysis gives an overview of available neoadjuvant treatment strategies for LARC and analyzes how these perform in achieving pCR as compared with the standard of care. Methods Pubmed, Embase, and Cochrane Central bibliographic databases were searched. Randomized controlled trials in which patients received neoadjuvant treatment for MRI-staged nonmetastatic resectable LARC were included. The primary outcome was pCR, defined as ypT0N0. A meta-analysis of studies comparing an intervention with standard fluoropyrimidine-based chemoradiation (CRT) was performed. Results Of the 17 articles included in the systematic review, 11 were used for the meta-analysis. Addition of oxaliplatin to fluoropyrimidine-based CRT resulted in significantly more pCR compared with fluoropyrimidine-based CRT only (OR 1.46), but at the expense of more ≥ grade 3 toxicity. Other treatment strategies, including consolidation/induction chemotherapy and short-course radiotherapy (SCRT), did not improve pCR rates. None of the included trials reported a benefit in local control or OS. Five-year DFS was significantly worse after SCRT-delay compared with CRT (59% vs. 75.1%, HR 1.93). Conclusions All included trials fail to deliver high-level evidence to show an improvement in pCR compared with standard fluoropyrimidine-based CRT. The addition of oxaliplatin might result in more pCR but at the expense of more toxicity. Furthermore, this benefit does not translate into less local recurrence or improved survival. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1245/s10434-020-08615-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Hoendervangers
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands. .,Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | - J P M Burbach
- Department of Surgery, MC Leeuwarden, Leeuwarden, The Netherlands
| | - M M Lacle
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - M Koopman
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | - M P W Intven
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - H M Verkooijen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Total Neoadjuvant Therapy in Rectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Treatment Outcomes. Ann Surg 2020; 271:440-448. [PMID: 31318794 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000003471] [Citation(s) in RCA: 200] [Impact Index Per Article: 50.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The addition of induction chemotherapy to concomitant neoadjuvant chemoradiation in locally advanced rectal cancer could increase pathological downstaging and act on occult micrometastatic disease, leading ultimately to a better outcome. A systematic review was carried out of the existing literature on the treatment outcomes of total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) on locally advanced rectal cancer. TNT was defined as chemotherapy using cycles of induction and/or consolidation in conjunction with standard chemoradiotherapy prior to surgery. METHODS A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library was performed according to the PRISMA statement up until January 2019. The primary endpoints were complete pathologic response (pCR), disease-free survival, and overall survival rates. RESULTS A total of 28 studies (3 retrospective and 25 prospective for a total of 3579 patients) were included in the final analysis (n = 2688 treated with TNT and n = 891 with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy therapy). The pooled pCR rate was 22.4% (95% CI 19.4%-25.7%) in all patients treated with TNT (n = 27 studies with data available). In n = 10 comparative studies with data available, TNT was found to increase the odds of pCR by 39% (1.40, 95% CI 1.08-1.81, P = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS The addition of induction or consolidation chemotherapy to standard neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy results in a higher pCR rate. Given that the comparative analysis was derived from few randomized publications, large confirmatory trials should be carried out before a strong recommendation is made in favor of TNT.
Collapse
|
36
|
Adjuvant chemotherapy for rectal cancer: Current evidence and recommendations for clinical practice. Cancer Treat Rev 2019; 83:101948. [PMID: 31955069 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2019.101948] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2019] [Revised: 12/03/2019] [Accepted: 12/04/2019] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
While adjuvant chemotherapy is an established treatment for pathological stage II and especially stage III colon cancer, its role in the multimodal management of rectal cancer remains controversial. As a result, there is substantial variation in the use of this treatment in clinical practice. Even among centres and physicians who consider adjuvant chemotherapy as a standard treatment, notable heterogeneity exists with regard to patient selection criteria and chemotherapy regimens. The controversy around this topic is confirmed by the lack of full consensus among national and international clinical guidelines. While most of the clinical trials do not support the contention that adjuvant chemotherapy may improve survival outcomes if pre-operative (chemo)radiotherapy is also given, these suffer from many limitations that preclude drawing definitive conclusions. Nevertheless, in the era of evidence-based medicine, physicians should be guided by the available data and refrain from extrapolating results of adjuvant colon cancer trials to inform treatment decisions for rectal cancer. Patients should be informed of the evidence gap, be given the opportunity to carefully discuss pros and cons of all the possible management options and be empowered in the decision making. In this article we review the available evidence on adjuvant chemotherapy for rectal cancer and propose a risk-adapted decisional algorithm that largely relies on informed patient preferences.
Collapse
|
37
|
Nasrolahi H, Mirzaei S, Mohammadianpanah M, Bananzadeh AM, Mokhtari M, Sasani MR, Mosalaei A, Omidvari S, Ansari M, Ahmadloo N, Hamedi SH, Khanjani N. Efficacy and Feasibility of Adding Induction Chemotherapy to Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: A Phase II Clinical Trial. Ann Coloproctol 2019; 35:242-248. [PMID: 31725999 PMCID: PMC6863011 DOI: 10.3393/ac.2018.09.06] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2018] [Accepted: 09/06/2018] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Currently, neoadjuvant chemoradiation (CRT) followed by total mesorectal resection is considered the standard of care for treating locally advanced rectal cancer. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy and feasibility of adding induction chemotherapy to neoadjuvant CRT in locally advanced rectal cancer. Methods This phase-II clinical trial included 54 patients with newly diagnosed, locally advanced (clinical T3–4 and/or N1–2, M0) rectal cancer. All patients were treated with 3 cycles of preoperative chemotherapy using the XELOX (capecitabine + oxaliplatin) regimen before and after a concurrent standard long course of CRT (45–50.4 Gy) followed by standard radical surgery. Pathologic complete response (PCR) rate and toxicity were the primary and secondary endpoints, respectively. Results The study participants included 37 males and 17 females, with a median age of 59 years (range, 20–80 years). Twenty-nine patients (54%) had clinical stage-II disease, and 25 patients (46%) had clinical stage-III disease. Larger tumor size (P = 0.006) and distal rectal location (P = 0.009) showed lower PCR compared to smaller tumor size and upper rectal location. Pathologic examinations showed significant tumor regression (6.1 ± 2.7 cm vs. 1.9 ± 1.8 cm, P < 0.001) with 10 PCRs (18.5%) compared to before the intervention. The surgical margin was free of cancer in 52 patients (96.3%). Treatment-related toxicities were easily tolerated, and all patients completed their planned treatment without interruption. Grade III and IV toxicities were infrequent. Conclusion The addition of induction chemotherapy to neoadjuvant CRT is an effective and well-tolerated treatment approach in patients with rectal cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Sepideh Mirzaei
- Namazi Hospital, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
| | - Mohammad Mohammadianpanah
- Colorectal Research Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, Namazi Hospital, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
| | - Ali Mohammad Bananzadeh
- Colorectal Research Center, Department of Colorectal Surgery, Shahid Faghihi Hospital, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
| | - Maral Mokhtari
- Colorectal Research Center, Department of Pathology, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
| | - Mohammad Reza Sasani
- Medical Imaging Research Center, Department of Radiology, Namazi Hospital, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
| | - Ahmad Mosalaei
- Shiraz Institute for Cancer Research, Medical School, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
| | - Shapour Omidvari
- Breast Diseases Research Center, Namazi Hospital, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|