1
|
Gefen R, Strassmann V, Stefano Hernandez FD, Garoufalia Z, Horesh N, Emile SH, Da Silva G, Wexner S. Risk factors for complications following sacral neuromodulation for faecal incontinence: Long-term follow-up. Colorectal Dis 2024; 26:1597-1607. [PMID: 38997819 DOI: 10.1111/codi.17092] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2024] [Revised: 06/19/2024] [Accepted: 06/22/2024] [Indexed: 07/14/2024]
Abstract
AIM Sacral neuromodulation (SNM) has become a standard surgical treatment for faecal incontinence (FI). Prior studies have reported various adverse events of SNM, including suboptimal therapeutic response, infection, pain, haematoma, and potential need for redo SNM. The aim of this study was to identify the risk factors associated with long-term complications of SNM. METHOD This retrospective cohort reviewed patients who underwent two-stage SNM for FI at our institution between 2011-2021. Preoperative baseline characteristics and follow-up were obtained from the medical record and/or by telephone interview. Management and outcome of each postoperative event were evaluated by univariate and multivariate regression analyses. RESULTS A total of 291 patients (85.2% female) were included in this study. Postoperative complications were recorded in 219 (75.2%) patients and 154 (52.9%) patients required surgical intervention to treat complications. The most common postoperative event was loss of efficacy (46.4%). Other common adverse events were problems at the implant site (pain, infection, etc.) in 16.5% and pain during stimulation in 11.7%. Previous vaginal delivery (OR 2.74, p = 0.003) and anal surgery (OR = 2.46, p = 0.039) were independent predictors for complications. Previous colorectal (OR = 2.04, p = 0.026) and anal (OR = 1.98, p = 0.022) surgery and history of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) (OR = 3.49, p = 0.003) were independent predictors for loss of efficacy. CONCLUSION Postoperative adverse events are frequently recorded after SNM. Loss of efficacy is the most common. Previous colorectal or anal surgery, vaginal delivery, and IBS are independent risk factors for complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel Gefen
- Ellen Leifer Shulman and Steven Shulman Digestive Disease Centre, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, Florida, USA
- Department of General Surgery, Hadassah Medical Organization and Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Victor Strassmann
- Ellen Leifer Shulman and Steven Shulman Digestive Disease Centre, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, Florida, USA
| | - Felice De Stefano Hernandez
- Ellen Leifer Shulman and Steven Shulman Digestive Disease Centre, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, Florida, USA
| | - Zoe Garoufalia
- Ellen Leifer Shulman and Steven Shulman Digestive Disease Centre, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, Florida, USA
| | - Nir Horesh
- Ellen Leifer Shulman and Steven Shulman Digestive Disease Centre, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, Florida, USA
- Department of Surgery and Transplantation, Sheba Medical Centre, Ramat-Gan, Israel
| | - Sameh Hany Emile
- Ellen Leifer Shulman and Steven Shulman Digestive Disease Centre, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, Florida, USA
- Colorectal Surgery Unit, General Surgery Department, Mansoura University Hospitals, Mansoura, Egypt
| | - Giovanna Da Silva
- Ellen Leifer Shulman and Steven Shulman Digestive Disease Centre, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, Florida, USA
| | - Steven Wexner
- Ellen Leifer Shulman and Steven Shulman Digestive Disease Centre, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, Florida, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Bittorf B, Matzel K. [Sacral Neuromodulation for Fecal Incontinence and Constipation: Evidence, Programming and Long-term Management]. Zentralbl Chir 2023; 148:228-236. [PMID: 37267977 DOI: 10.1055/a-2063-3630] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Over the last two decades, sacral neuromodulation (SNM) has established its role in the treatment of functional pelvic organ-/pelvic floor disorders. Even though the mode of action is not fully understood, SNM has become the preferred surgical treatment of fecal incontinence. METHODS AND RESULTS A literature search was carried out on programming sacral neuromodulation and long-term outcomes in treating fecal incontinence and constipation.Sacral neuromodulation was found to be successful in the long term. Over the years, the spectrum of indications has expanded, and now includes patients presenting with anal sphincter lesions. The use of SNM for low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) is currently under clinical investigation. Findings of SNM for constipation are less convincing. In several randomised crossover studies, no success was demonstrated, even though it is possible that subgroups may benefit from the treatment. Currently the application cannot be recommended in general.The pulse generator programming sets the electrode configuration, amplitude, pulse frequency and pulse width. Usually pulse frequency and pulse width follow a default setting (14 Hz, 210 s), while electrode configuration and stimulation amplitude are adjusted individually to the patient need and perception of stimulation.Despite low infection rates and few electrode-/pulse generator dysfunctions, up to 65% of patients require surgical reintervention during long term follow-up - in 50% of cases because of battery depletion, which is an expected event. At least one reprogramming is necessary in about 75% of the patients during the course of the treatment, mostly because of changes in effectiveness, but rarely because of pain. Regular follow-up visits appear to be advisable. CONCLUSION Sacral neuromodulation can be considered to be a safe and effective long-term therapy of fecal incontinence. To optimise the therapeutic effect, a structured follow-up regime is advisable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Birgit Bittorf
- Chirurgische Klinik, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Deutschland
| | - Klaus Matzel
- Chirurgische Klinik, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Dudding TC, Lehur PA, Sørensen M, Engelberg S, Bertapelle MP, Chartier-Kastler E, Everaert K, Van Kerrebroeck P, Knowles CH, Lundby L, Matzel KE, Muñoz-Duyos A, Rydningen MB, de Wachter S. Reprogramming Sacral Neuromodulation for Sub-Optimal Outcomes: Evidence and Recommendations for Clinical Practice. Neuromodulation 2021; 24:1247-1257. [PMID: 34264542 PMCID: PMC9291141 DOI: 10.1111/ner.13494] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2021] [Revised: 05/12/2021] [Accepted: 06/07/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Objectives In some patients treated for urinary or fecal incontinence with sacral neuromodulation (SNM) persistence of symptoms, a reduction in efficacy or adverse effects of stimulation can occur. In such situations, further programming of the SNM device can help resolve problems. Infrequently hardware failure is detected. This article aims to provide practical guidance to solve sub‐optimal outcomes (troubleshooting) occurring in the course of SNM therapy. Materials and Methods A systematic literature review was performed. Collective clinical experience from an expert multidisciplinary group was used to form opinion where evidence was lacking. Results Circumstances in which reprogramming is required are described. Actions to undertake include changes of electrode configuration, stimulation amplitude, pulse frequency, and pulse width. Guidance in case of loss of efficacy and adverse effects of stimulation, developed by a group of European experts, is presented. In addition, various hardware failure scenarios and their management are described. Conclusions Reprogramming aims to further improve patient symptoms or ensure a comfortable delivery of the therapy. Initial changes of electrode configuration and adjustment of stimulation parameters can be performed at home to avoid unnecessary hospital visits. A logical and stepwise approach to reprogramming can improve the outcome of therapy and restore patient satisfaction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas C Dudding
- Pelvic Floor Unit, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - Paul A Lehur
- Coloproctology Unit, Ospedale Regionale di Lugano, Lugano, Switzerland
| | - Michael Sørensen
- Department of Surgical and Medical Gastroenterology, Hvidovre University Hospital, Hvidovre, Denmark
| | | | - Maria Paola Bertapelle
- Neurourology Maria Adelaide Hospital, Azienda Ospedaliera Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy
| | | | - Karel Everaert
- Department of Urology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Philip Van Kerrebroeck
- Pelvic Care Centre Maastricht, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Charles H Knowles
- Centre for Neuroscience, Surgery & Trauma, Blizard Institute, Queen Mary University of London & Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Lilli Lundby
- Pelvic Floor Unit, Department of Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Klaus E Matzel
- Chirurgische Klinik, Sektion Koloproktologie, Universität Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Arantxa Muñoz-Duyos
- Coloproctology Unit, Hospital Universitari Mutua Terrassa, University of Barcelona, Terrassa, Spain
| | - Mona B Rydningen
- Norwegian National Advisory Unit on Incontinence and Pelvic Floor Health, University Hospital of North Norway, Tromso, Norway
| | - Stefan de Wachter
- Department of Urology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University Hospital Antwerpen, University Antwerpen, Edegem, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Nurse- and Pelvic Floor Physical Therapist-Led Bowel Training in Patients With Fecal Incontinence in a Tertiary Care Center. Gastroenterol Nurs 2021; 44:39-46. [PMID: 33538522 DOI: 10.1097/sga.0000000000000498] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2019] [Accepted: 10/07/2019] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Little is known about nurse- and pelvic floor physical therapist-led bowel training in fecal incontinence after previous conservative management has been deemed unsatisfactory. The objective of this study was to evaluate combined nurse- and physical therapist-led bowel training sessions in a tertiary care center. This was a prospective, cross-sectional study. All patients with fecal incontinence between 2015 and 2016 with and without previous conservative management were included. Combined conservative treatment was defined as the use of stool-bulking agents (psyllium fibers) with or without antidiarrheal medication (loperamide) in combination with biofeedback or pelvic floor muscle training. Questionnaires regarding fecal incontinence (Vaizey incontinence score) and quality of life (Short Form Health Survey-36) were used. A decrease in the Vaizey incontinence score of 5 or more points was deemed to be clinically significant. Vaizey incontinence scores in all 50 patients decreased from 14.7 (SD = 4.5) to 9.9 (SD = 4.8) at follow-up (p < .001). Forty percent of patients reported an improvement in their Vaizey incontinence score (change of 5 or more points). Improvement was noted in those with and without previous treatment. Quality of life improved significantly. The limitation of the study includes lack of a standardized treatment protocol. Fecal incontinence reduced after nurse- and physical therapist-led bowel training sessions in patients with and without previous treatment, increasing their quality of life.
Collapse
|
5
|
Barbosa M, Glavind-Kristensen M, Moller Soerensen M, Christensen P. Secondary sphincter repair for anal incontinence following obstetric sphincter injury: functional outcome and quality of life at 18 years of follow-up. Colorectal Dis 2020; 22:71-79. [PMID: 31347749 DOI: 10.1111/codi.14792] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2019] [Accepted: 07/07/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
AIM Secondary sphincter repair has been the conventional management of anal incontinence (AI) when a structural defect in the sphincter is recognized. However, disappointing long-term results have contributed to a tendency towards an increasing use of alternative treatment methods. This study aimed to assess the long-term functional outcomes following a secondary sphincter repair in women with AI after obstetric sphincter injury. METHOD This is a questionnaire study of women who underwent a secondary sphincter repair in Denmark between January 1990 and December 2005. Patients were identified through the Danish National Patient Registry. Functional outcomes were assessed by a self-administered questionnaire in 2010 and 2018. Primary outcomes were Wexner and St. Mark's scores. Impact on quality of life was assessed using the Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life Scale. RESULTS Functional outcome was assessed in 370 women in 2010 and 255 women in 2018. At 18.3 [interquartile range (IQR 15.0-22.0)] years of follow-up, the mean ± SD Wexner score was 8.8 ± 4.8 and the mean St. Mark's score was 11.7 ± 5.0. Flatus incontinence was the most frequent symptom, reported by 97%. Incontinence for liquid and solid stools was reported by 75% and 54%, respectively. There were no significant changes in incontinence frequencies over time. Women with a Wexner score of ≥ 9 had a significantly lower quality of life score in all domains than did women with a Wexner score of < 9 (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION At long-term follow-up, few patients are fully continent following a secondary sphincter repair. However, it appears that the functional results remain stable at very long-term follow-up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Barbosa
- Pelvic Floor Unit, Department of Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus N, Denmark
| | - M Glavind-Kristensen
- Pelvic Floor Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus N, Denmark
| | - M Moller Soerensen
- Pelvic Floor Unit, Department of Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus N, Denmark
| | - P Christensen
- Pelvic Floor Unit, Department of Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus N, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Sphincter repair or Sacral Nerve Modulation: Still debatable? SEMINARS IN COLON AND RECTAL SURGERY 2019. [DOI: 10.1016/j.scrs.2019.100708] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
|
7
|
Brochard C, Mege D, Bridoux V, Meurette G, Damon H, Lambrescak E, Faucheron JL, Trilling B, Lehur PA, Wyart V, Sielezneff I, Mion F, Etienney I, Leroi AM, Siproudhis L. Is Sacral Nerve Modulation a Good Option for Fecal Incontinence in Men? Neuromodulation 2019; 22:745-750. [PMID: 31318471 DOI: 10.1111/ner.13017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2019] [Revised: 05/09/2019] [Accepted: 05/15/2019] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The objective was to assess the efficacy and the safety of sacral nerve modulation (SNM) in men with fecal incontinence (FI) compared with those of SNM in women. METHOD Prospectively collected data from patients from seven tertiary colorectal units who underwent an implant procedure between January 2010 and December 2015 were reviewed retrospectively. Outcomes and surgical revision and definitive explantation rates were compared between men and women. RESULTS A total of 469 patients (60 men [12.8%]; mean age = 61.4 ± 12.0 years) were included in the study, 352 (78.1%) (31 men [8.8%]) of whom received a permanent implant. The ratio of implanted/tested men was significantly lower than the ratio of implanted/tested women (p = 0.0004). After a mean follow-up of 3.4 ± 1.9 years, the cumulative successful treatment rates tended to be less favorable in men than in women (p = 0.0514): 88.6% (75.6-95.1), 75.9% (60.9-86.4), 63.9% (48.0-77.3), and 43.9% (26.7-62.7) at one, two, three, and five years, respectively, in men; 92.0% (89.1-94.2), 84.2% (80.3-87.4), 76.8% (72.3-80.7), and 63.6% (57.5-69.3) at one, two, three, and five years, respectively, in women. The revision rate for infection and the definitive explantation rate for infection were higher in men than in women (p = 0.0001 and p = 0.0024, respectively). CONCLUSION Both short- and long-term success rates of SNM for FI were lower in men than in women. The revision and definitive explantation for long-term infection rates were significantly higher in men.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charlène Brochard
- Department of Digestive Physiology and Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital of Rennes Pontchaillou, CIC1414, INPHY, INSERM U1241, University of Rennes 1, Rennes, France
| | - Diane Mege
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Marseille, Timone University Hospital, Marseille, France
| | - Valérie Bridoux
- Normandie Univ, UNIROUEN, Inserm U1073, Rouen University Hospital, Department of Digestive Surgery, Rouen, France
| | - Guillaume Meurette
- Clinique de Chirurgie Digestive et Endocrinienne, Institut des Maladies de l'Appareil Digestif, University Hospital of Nantes, Nantes, France
| | - Henri Damon
- Université de Lyon, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Digestive Physiology, Hospital E Herriot, Lyon, France
| | - Elsa Lambrescak
- Department of Coloproctology, Groupe Hospitalier Diaconesses Croix Saint-Simon, Paris, France
| | - Jean-Luc Faucheron
- Department of Surgery, Colorectal Unit, Michallon University Hospital, Grenoble, France.,University Grenoble Alps UMR 5525, CNRS, TIMC-IMAG, Grenoble, France
| | - Bertrand Trilling
- Department of Surgery, Colorectal Unit, Michallon University Hospital, Grenoble, France.,University Grenoble Alps UMR 5525, CNRS, TIMC-IMAG, Grenoble, France
| | - Paul-Antoine Lehur
- Clinique de Chirurgie Digestive et Endocrinienne, Institut des Maladies de l'Appareil Digestif, University Hospital of Nantes, Nantes, France.,Department of General Surgery, Ospedale Civico di Lugano, Lugano, Switzerland
| | - Vincent Wyart
- Clinique de Chirurgie Digestive et Endocrinienne, Institut des Maladies de l'Appareil Digestif, University Hospital of Nantes, Nantes, France
| | - Igor Sielezneff
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Marseille, Timone University Hospital, Marseille, France
| | - François Mion
- Université de Lyon, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Digestive Physiology, Hospital E Herriot, Lyon, France
| | - Isabelle Etienney
- Department of Coloproctology, Groupe Hospitalier Diaconesses Croix Saint-Simon, Paris, France
| | - Anne-Marie Leroi
- Normandie Univ, UNIROUEN, Inserm U1073, Rouen University Hospital, Department of Digestive Surgery, Rouen, France
| | - Laurent Siproudhis
- Department of Digestive Physiology and Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital of Rennes Pontchaillou, CIC1414, INPHY, INSERM U1241, University of Rennes 1, Rennes, France
| |
Collapse
|