1
|
Yoon SH, Yang IJ, Kim JY, Lee KH. Efficacy of a 1 day Rifaximin and Metronidazole Regimen and Mechanical Bowel Preparation for Preventing Surgical Site Infection in Minimally Invasive Colorectal Cancer Surgery: A Prospective Observational Study. Am Surg 2024; 90:550-559. [PMID: 37707885 DOI: 10.1177/00031348231200667] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/15/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND A combination of oral antibiotics and mechanical bowel preparation is recommended for patients scheduled to undergo elective colorectal surgery on the basis of recent large trials that have reported the superiority of this approach in preventing surgical site infections (SSIs). However, there are no standard recommendations for this approach. Therefore, in this study, we evaluated the efficacy of rifaximin and metronidazole and mechanical bowel preparation for preventing SSIs in cases of minimally invasive surgery for colorectal cancer. METHODS This single-arm prospective observational study included 256 individuals. The primary end point was the rate of SSI. Rifaximin 400 mg and metronidazole 500 mg were administered twice daily (10 am and 10 pm), and mechanical bowel preparation was administered the day before the operation. RESULTS After excluding 15 patients, 241 were enrolled. No adverse event occurred following the administration of oral antibiotics and mechanical bowel preparation; there was 100% compliance. The total SSI rate was 2.9%; the rates of incisional and organ/space SSIs were 1.2% and 1.7%, respectively. All patients were treated conservatively. Univariate analyses revealed preoperative anemia, hypoalbuminemia, and transfusion and postoperative transfusion were significantly associated with SSIs. DISCUSSION A 1 day rifaximin and metronidazole regimen with mechanical bowel preparation for elective minimally invasive surgery for colorectal cancer was associated with a favorable SSI rate of 2.9%, safety, and high compliance. This approach is appropriate for inclusion in the current guidelines for perioperative management of patients scheduled to undergo minimally invasive surgery for colorectal cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seung-Hwan Yoon
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Chungnam National University Hospital, Daejeon, Republic of Korea
| | - In Jun Yang
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Chungnam National University Hospital, Daejeon, Republic of Korea
| | - Ji Yeon Kim
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Chungnam National University Hospital, Daejeon, Republic of Korea
| | - Kyung-Ha Lee
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Chungnam National University Hospital, Daejeon, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Liew AN, Narasimhan V, Peeroo S, Arachchi A, Tay YK, Lim J, Nguyen TC, Saranasuriya C, Suhardja TS, Teoh W, Centauri S, Chouhan H. Mechanical bowel preparation with pre-operative oral antibiotics in elective colorectal resections: an Australian single institution experience. ANZ J Surg 2023; 93:2439-2443. [PMID: 37018489 DOI: 10.1111/ans.18428] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2022] [Revised: 03/08/2023] [Accepted: 03/14/2023] [Indexed: 04/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Anastomotic leaks (AL) and surgical site infections (SSI) are serious complications after colorectal resection. Studies have shown the benefits of pre-operative oral antibiotics (OAB) with mechanical bowel preparation (MBP) in reducing AL and SSI rates. We aim to investigate our experience with the short-term outcomes of AL and SSI following elective colorectal resections in patients receiving OAB with MBP versus MBP only. METHODS A retrospective analysis was performed from our database for patients who underwent elective colorectal resection between January 2019 and November 2021. Prior to August 2020, OAB was not used as part of MBP. After 2020, Neomycin and Metronidazole were used in conjunction with MBP. We evaluated differences in AL and SSI between both groups. RESULTS Five hundred and seventeen patients were included from our database with 247 having MBP while 270 had OAB and MBP. There was a significantly lower rate of AL in patients receiving MBP and OAB as compared to MBP alone (0.4% versus 3.0%, P-value = 0.03). The SSI rate at our institution was 4.4%. It was lower in patients with MBP and OAB as compared to MBP alone, but this was not clinically significant (3.3% versus 5.7%, P-value = 0.19). CONCLUSION The association in the reduction of AL with the addition of OAB to the MBP protocol seen here reinforces the need for future randomized controlled trials in the Australasian context. We recommend colorectal institutions in Australian and New Zealand consider OAB with MBP as part of their elective colorectal resection protocol.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amos Nepacina Liew
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Dandenong Hospital, Monash Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Vignesh Narasimhan
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Dandenong Hospital, Monash Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Saania Peeroo
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Dandenong Hospital, Monash Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Asiri Arachchi
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Dandenong Hospital, Monash Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Yeng Kwang Tay
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Dandenong Hospital, Monash Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - James Lim
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Dandenong Hospital, Monash Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Thang Chieng Nguyen
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Dandenong Hospital, Monash Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Chaminda Saranasuriya
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Dandenong Hospital, Monash Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Thomas Surya Suhardja
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Dandenong Hospital, Monash Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - William Teoh
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Dandenong Hospital, Monash Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Suellyn Centauri
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Dandenong Hospital, Monash Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Hanumant Chouhan
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Dandenong Hospital, Monash Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Hansen RB, Balachandran R, Valsamidis TN, Iversen LH. The role of preoperative mechanical bowel preparation and oral antibiotics in prevention of anastomotic leakage following restorative resection for primary rectal cancer - a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Colorectal Dis 2023; 38:129. [PMID: 37184767 DOI: 10.1007/s00384-023-04416-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/25/2023] [Indexed: 05/16/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Anastomotic leakage after colorectal cancer resection is a feared postoperative complication seen among up till 10-20% of patients, with a higher risk following rectal resection than colon resection. Recent studies suggest that the combined use of preoperative mechanical bowel preparation and oral antibiotics may have a preventive effect on anastomotic leakage. This systematic review aims to explore the association between preoperative mechanical bowel preparation combined with oral antibiotics and the risk of anastomotic leakage following restorative resection for primary rectal cancer. METHODS Three databases were systematically searched in February 2022. Studies reporting anastomotic leakage rate in patients, who received mechanical bowel preparation and oral antibiotics before elective restorative resection for primary rectal cancer, were included. A meta-analysis was conducted based on the risk ratios of anastomotic leakage. RESULTS Among 839 studies, 5 studies met the eligibility criteria. The median number of patients were 6111 (80-29,739). The combination of preoperative mechanical bowel preparation and oral antibiotics was associated with a decreased risk of anastomotic leakage (risk ratio = 0.52 (95% confidence interval 0.39-0.69), p-value < 0.001). Limitations included a low number of studies, small sample sizes and the studies being rather heterogenous. CONCLUSION This systematic review and meta-analysis found that the use of mechanical bowel preparation and oral antibiotics is associated with a decreased risk of anastomotic leakage among patients undergoing restorative resection for primary rectal cancer. The limitations of the review should be taken into consideration when interpreting the results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Rogini Balachandran
- Department of Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | | | - Lene Hjerrild Iversen
- Department of Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Paine H, Jones F, Kinross J. Preparing the Bowel (Microbiome) for Surgery: Surgical Bioresilience. Clin Colon Rectal Surg 2023; 36:138-145. [PMID: 36844712 PMCID: PMC9946716 DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1760675] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/25/2023]
Abstract
The preparation of the bowel for radical surgery is a corner stone of elective colorectal practice. The evidence for this intervention is of variable quality and it is often contradictory, yet there is now a global move toward the adoption of oral antibiotic therapy for the reduction of perioperative infective complications, such as surgical site infections. The gut microbiome is a critical mediator of the systemic inflammatory response to surgical injury, wound healing, and perioperative gut function. The loss of critical microbial symbiotic functions caused by bowel preparation and surgery has an adverse impact on surgical outcomes, yet the mechanisms through which this occurs are poorly defined. In this review, the evidence for bowel preparation strategies is critically appraised in the context of the gut microbiome. The impact of antibiotic therapy on the surgical gut microbiome and the importance of the intestinal "resistome" to surgical recovery is described. Data to support the augmentation of the microbiome through diet, probiotic and symbiotic approaches, as well as fecal transplantation are also appraised. Finally, we propose a novel strategy of bowel preparation defined as " surgical bioresilience " and define areas or prioritization in this emerging field. This describes the optimization of surgical intestinal homeostasis and core surgical exposome-microbiome interactions that regulate the wound immune microenvironment, the systemic inflammatory response to surgical injury, and gut function across the perioperative time course.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heidi Paine
- Division of General Surgery, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Faye Jones
- Division of General Surgery, King Edward VII Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - James Kinross
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kinross J. Probiotics and synbiotics reduce infective complications from colorectal surgery. Tech Coloproctol 2022; 26:687-689. [PMID: 35764831 DOI: 10.1007/s10151-022-02653-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/17/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- J Kinross
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College, St. Mary's Hospital, 10th Floor QEQMW, Praed Street, London, W2 1NY, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Slim K, Veziant J, Joris J. Bowel preparation for colorectal surgery: Questions to answer. Surgery 2022; 171:1700-1701. [PMID: 35216821 DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2022.01.032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2022] [Accepted: 01/23/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Karem Slim
- Francophone Group for Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (GRACE), Beaumont, France.
| | - Julie Veziant
- Department of Digestive and Oncologic Surgery, University Hospital Lille, France
| | - Jean Joris
- Department of Anesthesia, University Hospital Liege, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Reeves N, Williams G. Towards the reduction of surgical site infection rates in colorectal surgery. Colorectal Dis 2022; 24:238-239. [PMID: 34714586 DOI: 10.1111/codi.15970] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2021] [Accepted: 09/09/2021] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Nicola Reeves
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Royal Gwent Hospital, Newport, UK
| | - Gethin Williams
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Royal Gwent Hospital, Newport, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Molina Meneses SP, Palacios Fuenmayor LJ, Castaño LLano RDJ, Mejia Gallego JI, Sánchez Patiño LA. Determinación de los factores predictivos para complicaciones en cirugía electiva de pacientes con cáncer colorrectal. Experiencia del Instituto de Cancerología Las Américas Auna (Colombia, 2016-2019). REVISTA COLOMBIANA DE CIRUGÍA 2021. [DOI: 10.30944/20117582.863] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Introducción. El pilar fundamental del tratamiento del cáncer colorrectal es la cirugía, situación que expone a los pacientes a la posible presentación de complicaciones, morbimortalidad, pobre calidad de vida, recurrencia tumoral o la muerte. El objetivo de este estudio fue determinar las variables clínicas y quirúrgicas que inciden en el riesgo de la aparición de complicaciones en los pacientes con cáncer colorrectal llevados a cirugía electiva entre los años 2016 y 2019.
Métodos. Estudio observacional, descriptivo, transversal y retrospectivo. Se incluyeron pacientes mayores de 18 años con cáncer colorrectal sometidos a cirugía electiva. Se realizó un análisis multivariado para determinar los factores que se relacionan con las complicaciones postquirúrgicas.
Resultados. Se incluyeron 298 pacientes, 68 % mayores de 60 años, 52,3 % mujeres, 74,2 % presentaban comorbilidades y 48,3 % fueron diagnosticados en estadio III. El 48,3 % presentó complicaciones postoperatorias. De ellos, el 68,1 % no tenía tamización nutricional y el 61,8 % no tenía preparación del colon; un 55 % fueron cirugías del recto, 69,1 % de las cirugías fueron por vía laparoscópica y 71,8 % presentaron sangrado inferior a 500 ml. La mayoría de las complicaciones fueron clasificadas como Clavien-Dindo I-III.
Discusión. Las características de los pacientes fueron similares a los presentados en otros estudios, aunque hubo mayor incidencia de íleo postoperatorio. El análisis multivariado mostró una mayor probabilidad de presentar una complicación en pacientes con diabetes mellitus, hipertensión arterial, falta de tamización nutricional o preparación de colon, cirugía de recto y el sangrado mayor a 500 ml.
Collapse
|
9
|
Koliarakis I, Athanasakis E, Sgantzos M, Mariolis-Sapsakos T, Xynos E, Chrysos E, Souglakos J, Tsiaoussis J. Intestinal Microbiota in Colorectal Cancer Surgery. Cancers (Basel) 2020; 12:cancers12103011. [PMID: 33081401 PMCID: PMC7602998 DOI: 10.3390/cancers12103011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2020] [Revised: 10/04/2020] [Accepted: 10/13/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary The microbial communities of the intestine exist in a delicate balance with the human. Colorectal cancer is one of the most common gastrointestinal malignancies, and the microbiota seems to be related to it. The intestinal microbiota of patients after colorectal surgery is changed due to surgical stress and other perioperative factors. The occurrence of complications after colorectal cancer (CRC) surgery may depend on these bacterial shifts, which could also be associated with prognosis and survival in postoperative CRC patients. Abstract The intestinal microbiota consists of numerous microbial species that collectively interact with the host, playing a crucial role in health and disease. Colorectal cancer is well-known to be related to dysbiotic alterations in intestinal microbiota. It is evident that the microbiota is significantly affected by colorectal surgery in combination with the various perioperative interventions, mainly mechanical bowel preparation and antibiotic prophylaxis. The altered postoperative composition of intestinal microbiota could lead to an enhanced virulence, proliferation of pathogens, and diminishment of beneficial microorganisms resulting in severe complications including anastomotic leakage and surgical site infections. Moreover, the intestinal microbiota could be utilized as a possible biomarker in predicting long-term outcomes after surgical CRC treatment. Understanding the underlying mechanisms of these interactions will further support the establishment of genomic mapping of intestinal microbiota in the management of patients undergoing CRC surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ioannis Koliarakis
- Laboratory of Anatomy, School of Medicine, University of Crete, 70013 Heraklion, Greece;
| | - Elias Athanasakis
- Department of General Surgery, University Hospital of Heraklion, 71110 Heraklion, Greece; (E.A.); (E.C.)
| | - Markos Sgantzos
- Laboratory of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine, School of Health Sciences, University of Thessaly, 41334 Larissa, Greece;
| | - Theodoros Mariolis-Sapsakos
- Surgical Department, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Agioi Anargyroi General and Oncologic Hospital of Kifisia, 14564 Athens, Greece;
| | - Evangelos Xynos
- Department of Surgery, Creta Interclinic Hospital of Heraklion, 71305 Heraklion, Greece;
| | - Emmanuel Chrysos
- Department of General Surgery, University Hospital of Heraklion, 71110 Heraklion, Greece; (E.A.); (E.C.)
| | - John Souglakos
- Laboratory of Translational Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Crete, 71003 Heraklion, Greece;
| | - John Tsiaoussis
- Laboratory of Anatomy, School of Medicine, University of Crete, 70013 Heraklion, Greece;
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +30-2810-394716
| |
Collapse
|