The science behind programming algorithms for sacral neuromodulation

Gastric and sacral electrical stimulation for motility disorders-A clinical perspective

BACKGROUND

Electrical stimulation of the gut has been investigated in recent decades with a view to treating various gastro-intestinal motility disorders including, among others, gastric electrical stimulation to relieve nausea and vomiting associated with gastroparesis and sacral neuromodulation to treat fecal incontinence and/or constipation. Although their symptomatic efficacy has been ascertained by randomized controlled trials, their mechanisms of action are not fully understood.

PURPOSE

This review summarizes the past year's literature on the mechanisms of action of gut electrical stimulation therapies, including their impact on the gut-brain axis.

Micro/nanomotors for neuromodulation

Micro-nanomotors (MNMs) are micro/nanoscale intelligent devices with vast potential in the fields of drug delivery, precision medicine, biosensing, and environmental remediation. Their primary advantage lies in their ability to convert various forms of external energy (such as magnetic, ultrasonic, and light energy) into their own propulsive force. Additionally, MNMs offer high controllability and modifiability, enabling them to navigate in the microscopic world. Importantly, recent research has harnessed the unique advantages of MNMs to synergize their capabilities in neuromodulation. This mini-review presents the significant progress and pioneering achievements in the use of MNMs for neuromodulation, with the aim of inspiring readers to explore the broader biomedical applications of these MNMs. Through continuous innovation and diligent exploration, MNMs show promise to have a profound impact on the field of biomedicine.

Preliminary analysis of stimulation parameters for sacral neuromodulation in different indications: a multicenter retrospective cohort study from China

BACKGROUND

Sacral neuromodulation (SNM) is an effective approach for treating lower urinary tract dysfunction (LUTD), and stimulation programming is essential for successful treatment. However, research on SNM programming for various indications is limited. Thus, the authors aimed to determine whether there were differences in the stimulation parameters for different SNM indications and the appropriate programming recommendations.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Clinical data were retrospectively collected from patients with LUTD who underwent SNM and completed internal pulse generator implantation. The parameters with the highest patient satisfaction or the most symptom improvement during the test period were considered optimal and used to set the programming after internal pulse generator implantation.

RESULTS

After screening, 282 patients were enrolled and categorized into four groups based on the following indications: refractory overactive bladder (OAB) ( n =61), neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction (nLUTD) ( n =162), interstitial cystitis/painful bladder syndrome (IC/BPS) ( n =24), and idiopathic nonobstructive urinary retention (NOUR) ( n =35). When analyzing the optimal stimulus parameters, disparities in the stimulation amplitude and pulse frequency were noted among the four groups. The stimulation amplitude in the nLUTD group was higher than that in the idiopathic NOUR group ( P =0.013). Differences in pulse frequency were observed between the refractory OAB and nLUTD groups ( P <0.001) and between the refractory OAB and idiopathic NOUR groups ( P =0.001). No differences in the electrode configuration or pulse width settings existed among the four groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The stimulation parameters for SNM varied among the different indications. For the initial programming of stage I, most patients are recommended to start with stimulation amplitudes below 2 V, although patients with nLUTD may benefit from higher amplitudes. A standard pulse width of 210 μs is recommended for all patients. However, for individuals experiencing nLUTD or idiopathic NOUR, the pulse frequency can begin above the standard 14 Hz but not exceed 50 Hz.

Sensing in Sacral Neuromodulation: A Feasibility Study in Subjects With Urinary Incontinence and Retention

OBJECTIVES

Sacral neuromodulation (SNM) therapy standard of care relies on visual-motor responses and patient-reported sensory responses in deciding optimized lead placement and programming. Automatic detection of stimulation responses could offer a simple, consistent indicator for optimizing SNM. The purpose of this study was to measure and characterize sacral evoked responses (SERs) resulting from sacral nerve stimulation using a commercial, tined SNM lead.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A custom external research system with stimulation and sensing hardware was connected to the percutaneous extension of an implanted lead during a staged (tined lead) evaluation for SNM. The system collected SER recordings across a range of prespecified stimulation settings (electrode configuration combinations for bipolar stimulation and bipolar sensing) during intraoperative and postoperative sessions in 21 subjects with overactive bladder (OAB) and nonobstructive urinary retention (NOUR). Motor and sensory thresholds were collected during the same sessions.

RESULTS

SERs were detected in all 21 subjects. SER morphology (number of peaks, magnitude, and timing) varied across electrode configurations within and across subjects. Among subjects and electrode configurations tested, recordings contained SERs at motor threshold and/or sensory threshold in 75% to 80% of subjects.

CONCLUSIONS

This study confirmed that implanted SNM leads can be used to directly record SERs elicited by stimulation in subjects with OAB and NOUR. SERs were readily detectable at typical SNM stimulation settings and procedural time points. Using these SERs as possible objective measures of SNM response has the capability to automate patient-specific SNM therapy, potentially providing consistent lead placement, programming, and/or closed-loop therapy.

Pathways and parameters of sacral neuromodulation in rats

The stimulation paradigm for sacral neuromodulation has remained largely unchanged since its inception. We sought to determine, in rats, whether stimulation-induced increases in bladder capacity correlated with the proportion of sensory pudendal (PudS) neurons at each stimulated location (L6, S1). If supported, this finding could guide the choice of stimulation side (left/right) and level (S2, S3, S4) in humans. Unexpectedly, we observed that acute stimulation at clinically relevant (low) amplitudes [1-1.5 × motor threshold (Tm)], did not increase bladder capacity, regardless of stimulus location (L6 or S1). More importantly for the ability to test our hypothesis, there was little anatomic variation, and S1 infrequently contributed nerve fibers to the PudS nerve. During mapping studies we noticed that large increases in PudS nerve activation occurred at amplitudes exceeding 2Tm. Thus, additional cystometric studies were conducted, this time with stimulation of the L6-S1 trunk, to examine further the relationship between stimulation amplitude and cystometric parameters. Stimulation at 1Tm to 6Tm evoked increases in bladder capacity and decreases in voiding efficiency that mirrored those produced by PudS nerve stimulation. Many animal studies involving electrical stimulation of nerves of the lower urinary tract use stimulation amplitudes that exceed those used clinically (∼1Tm). Our results confirm that high amplitudes generate immediate changes in cystometric parameters; however, the relationship to low-amplitude chronic stimulation in humans remains unclear. Additional studies are needed to understand changes that occur with chronic stimulation, how these changes relate to therapeutic outcomes, and the contribution of specific nerve fibers to these changes.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Acute low-amplitude electrical stimulation of sacral nerve (sacral neuromodulation) did not increase bladder capacity in anesthetized CD, obese-prone, or obese-resistant rats. Increasing stimulation amplitude correlated with increases in bladder capacity and pudendal sensory nerve recruitment. It is unclear how the high-amplitude acute stimulation that is commonly used in animal experiments to generate immediate effects compares mechanistically to the chronic low-amplitude stimulation used clinically.

Retrospective study of sacral neuromodulator implantations in a French hospital center: Lifespan and hospital costs assessment

PURPOSE

Sacral nerve neuromodulation (SNM) is a safe and effective therapy for the management of fecal and/or urinary incontinence. The generators InterStim™ and InterStim™ II (Medtronic™) are non-rechargeable active implantable medical devices with a limited lifespan. The aims of this study were to assess the generators' median lifespan for all indications and the long-term hospital costs of the therapy.

METHODS

This was a retrospective monocentric study that included 215 patients aged over 18 years who were treated by SNM for fecal incontinence and/or urinary incontinence. Lifespan was considered as the amount of time between definitive implantation and observed battery depletion by the surgeon and was assessed by the Kaplan-Meier method. Costs were assessed according to the activity-based pricing of the French public health care system.

RESULTS

The median observed lifetime of stimulators implanted in our center was 7.29 years and 5.9 years for InterStim™ and InterStim™ II, respectively. The difference observed between the two generations was statistically significant. The modelling of primary implantation and renewal costs allowed us to observe that the decrease in the lifetime of Interstim™ II is associated with an increase in hospital costs over time. The retrospective study design is one limitation and we did not take into consideration stimulation's settings.

CONCLUSIONS

The InterStim™ II lifespan is shorter than the first-generation device. This is associated with an increase of the long-term hospital costs. Additional information about the new neuromodulator will be required to choose the most appropriate IPG for the patient while optimizing the costs.

Transcutaneous Electrical Stimulation of the Abdomen, Ear, and Tibial Nerve Modulates Bladder Contraction in a Rat Detrusor Overactivity Model: A Pilot Study

PURPOSE

The global prevalence of overactive bladder (OAB) is estimated at 11.8%. Despite existing treatment options such as sacral neuromodulation, a substantial number of patients remain untreated. One potential alternative is noninvasive transcutaneous electrical stimulation. This form of stimulation does not necessitate the implantation of an electrode, thereby eliminating the need for highly skilled surgeons, expensive implantable devices, or regular hospital visits. We hypothesized that alternative neural pathways can impact bladder contraction.

METHODS

In this pilot study, we conducted transcutaneous electrical stimulation of the abdominal wall (T6-L1), the ear (vagus nerve), and the ankle (tibial nerve) of 3 anesthetized female Sprague-Dawley rats. Stimulation was administered within a range of 20 Hz to 20 kHz, and its impact on intravesical pressure was measured. We focused on 3 primary outcomes related to intravesical pressure: (1) the pressure change from the onset of a contraction to its peak, (2) the average duration of contraction, and (3) the number of contractions within a specified timeframe. These measurements were taken while the bladder was filled with either saline or acetic acid (serving as a model for OAB).

RESULTS

Transcutaneous stimulation of the abdominal wall, ear, and ankle at a frequency of 20 Hz decreased the number of bladder contractions during infusion with acetic acid. As revealed by a comparison of various stimulation frequencies of the tibial nerve during bladder infusion with acetic acid, the duration of contraction was significantly shorter during stimulation at 1 kHz and 3 kHz relative to stimulation at 20 Hz (P = 0.025 and P = 0.044, respectively).

CONCLUSION

The application of transcutaneous electrical stimulation to the abdominal wall, ear, and tibial nerve could provide less invasive and more cost-effective treatment options for OAB relative to percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation and sacral neuromodulation. A follow-up study involving a larger sample size is recommended.

[Sacral Neuromodulation for Fecal Incontinence and Constipation: Evidence, Programming and Long-term Management]

BACKGROUND

Over the last two decades, sacral neuromodulation (SNM) has established its role in the treatment of functional pelvic organ-/pelvic floor disorders. Even though the mode of action is not fully understood, SNM has become the preferred surgical treatment of fecal incontinence.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A literature search was carried out on programming sacral neuromodulation and long-term outcomes in treating fecal incontinence and constipation.Sacral neuromodulation was found to be successful in the long term. Over the years, the spectrum of indications has expanded, and now includes patients presenting with anal sphincter lesions. The use of SNM for low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) is currently under clinical investigation. Findings of SNM for constipation are less convincing. In several randomised crossover studies, no success was demonstrated, even though it is possible that subgroups may benefit from the treatment. Currently the application cannot be recommended in general.The pulse generator programming sets the electrode configuration, amplitude, pulse frequency and pulse width. Usually pulse frequency and pulse width follow a default setting (14 Hz, 210 s), while electrode configuration and stimulation amplitude are adjusted individually to the patient need and perception of stimulation.Despite low infection rates and few electrode-/pulse generator dysfunctions, up to 65% of patients require surgical reintervention during long term follow-up - in 50% of cases because of battery depletion, which is an expected event. At least one reprogramming is necessary in about 75% of the patients during the course of the treatment, mostly because of changes in effectiveness, but rarely because of pain. Regular follow-up visits appear to be advisable.

CONCLUSION

Sacral neuromodulation can be considered to be a safe and effective long-term therapy of fecal incontinence. To optimise the therapeutic effect, a structured follow-up regime is advisable.

Efficacy of Posterior Tibial Nerve Stimulation in the Treatment of Fecal Incontinence: A Systematic Review

Fecal incontinence is a condition that carries high social stigmatization and a determining factor in the quality of life of the person who suffers from it. Its etiology is multifactorial and treatment includes surgical and conservative measures, including stimulation of the posterior tibial nerve. The aim of this review is to determine whether posterior tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS) is more effective than other treatments in reducing episodes of fecal incontinence in adults. A systematic review of randomized clinical trials that analyzed different approaches and comparisons with other treatments in adults without neurological or metabolic diseases was carried out, analyzing, fundamentally, the reduction of episodes of fecal incontinence. In general, a reduction in fecal incontinence episodes is observed in the experimental groups compared with the control groups, although these differences are not significant in most studies. The results regarding the effectiveness of PTNS in reducing episodes of fecal incontinence compared to other treatments are not entirely conclusive, although benefits are observed regarding the stimulation of sacral roots. More well-designed studies with a long-term follow-up of the results are needed so that the recommendation of this treatment can be generalized.

Is sacral nerve modulation reprogramming effective after permanent implantation for faecal incontinence?

AIM

Sacral nerve modulation (SNM) is recommended as a first-line surgical therapy for patients with faecal incontinence (FI). During patient follow-up, it is recommended that stimulation settings be reprogrammed to optimize patient outcomes. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy of stimulator reprogramming in patients with an implanted SNM device to treat FI.

METHOD

The data from patients who received a permanent SNM implant in a single centre from January 2008 to December 2019 were retrospectively analysed. Symptoms that occurred after implantation, the stimulator settings of the SNM device and changes made at each follow-up visit were noted. The efficacy of reprogramming was determined by assessing patient satisfaction.

RESULTS

Of the 117 patients (male/female 4/113; mean age 59.5 ± 11.8 years) with a SNM implant for FI, 84 (72%) had at least one symptom requiring reprogramming of the stimulator, most often during the first year after implantation (p = 0.05). The most frequently reported symptoms were loss of efficacy (68.5%; p = 1 × 10^-3 ) and pain (20.5%; p = 1 × 10^-3 ). Reprogramming was effective 53% of the time when treating loss of efficacy and 76% of the time when treating pain. When the stimulation parameters were reprogrammed at least four consecutive times to correct a symptom, the reprogramming was less effective in treating the symptom (p = 0.02).

CONCLUSION

Regular follow-up of patients with SNM device implants associated with reprogramming of stimulation parameters to improve the treatment of reported symptoms would optimize the efficacy of SNM.

The Influence of Electrode Configuration Changes on the Sensory and Motor Response During (Re)Programming in Sacral Neuromodulation

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to assess the neurophysiological basis behind troubleshooting in sacral neuromodulation (SNM). Close follow-up of SNM patients with program parameter optimization has proven to be paramount by restoring clinical efficacy and avoiding surgical revision.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 34 successful SNM patients (28 overactive bladder wet, six nonobstructive urinary retention) with an implantable pulse generator were included. All possible bipolar and monopolar electrode settings were tested at sensory threshold (ST) to evaluate sensory (mapped on a perineal grid with 1 cm² coordinates) and motor (peak-to-peak amplitude and latency of muscle action potential) responses of the pelvic floor. Pelvic floor muscle electromyography was recorded using a multiple array probe, placed intravaginally. Parametric tests were used for paired data: repeated-measures ANOVA or t-test. A nonparametric test was used for paired data: Friedman ANOVA or Wilcoxon signed rank (WSR) test; p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. If significant, ANOVA was followed by Dunn-Bonferroni post hoc analysis.

RESULTS

Monopolar configurations showed significantly lower STs-1.38 ± 0.73 V vs 1.76 ± 0.89 V (paired t-test: p < 0.0001)-and presented with significantly higher peak-to-peak amplitudes-115.67 ± 79.03 μV vs 90.77 ± 80.55 μV (WSR: p = 0.005)-than bipolar configurations. When polarity was swapped, configurations with the cathode distal to the anode showed significantly lower STs, 1.73 ± 0.91 V vs 1.85 ± 0.87 V (paired t-test: p = 0.003), and mean peak-to-peak amplitudes, 81.32 ± 72.82 μV vs 100.21 ± 90.22 μV (WSR: p = 0.0001). Cathodal changes resulted in more changes in sensory responses than anodal changes (χ² test: p = 0.044). In cathodal changes only, peak-to-peak amplitudes were significantly higher when the distance between electrodes was maximally spread (WSR: p = 0.046).

CONCLUSIONS

From a neurophysiological point of view, monopolar configurations stimulated more motor nerve fibers at lower STs, therefore providing more therapeutic efficiency. Swapping polarity or changing the position of the cathode led to different sensory and motor responses, serving as potential reprogramming options.

Reprogramming Sacral Neuromodulation for Sub-Optimal Outcomes: Evidence and Recommendations for Clinical Practice

Objectives

In some patients treated for urinary or fecal incontinence with sacral neuromodulation (SNM) persistence of symptoms, a reduction in efficacy or adverse effects of stimulation can occur. In such situations, further programming of the SNM device can help resolve problems. Infrequently hardware failure is detected. This article aims to provide practical guidance to solve sub‐optimal outcomes (troubleshooting) occurring in the course of SNM therapy.

Materials and Methods

A systematic literature review was performed. Collective clinical experience from an expert multidisciplinary group was used to form opinion where evidence was lacking.

Results

Circumstances in which reprogramming is required are described. Actions to undertake include changes of electrode configuration, stimulation amplitude, pulse frequency, and pulse width. Guidance in case of loss of efficacy and adverse effects of stimulation, developed by a group of European experts, is presented. In addition, various hardware failure scenarios and their management are described.

Conclusions

Reprogramming aims to further improve patient symptoms or ensure a comfortable delivery of the therapy. Initial changes of electrode configuration and adjustment of stimulation parameters can be performed at home to avoid unnecessary hospital visits. A logical and stepwise approach to reprogramming can improve the outcome of therapy and restore patient satisfaction.