Perineal healing following salvage surgery for anal cancer

Risk factors and outcome following salvage surgery for squamous cell carcinoma of the anus

BACKGROUND

Chemoradiotherapy is the primary treatment for anal cancer. 15-33% of patients will have persistent or recurrent disease after treatment requiring salvage surgery. Relapse after surgery, postoperative complications, and mortality as well as possible risk factors are not fully understood due to the rareness of the disease. The aim of the study was to report outcomes after salvage surgery as well as evaluate risk factors for postoperative complications, cancer relapse and survival.

METHODS

Data were retrospectively collected from electronical patients charts and pathology reports from all patients undergoing salvage surgery from July 1st, 2011 to July 1st, 2021 at the Department of Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark.

RESULTS

A total of 98 patients were included in the study. The 5-year overall survival was 61.8%. Relapse after surgery occurred in 36.7% of patients and was significantly associated with R1-resection (HR = 4.4) and preoperative nodal metastases (HR = 4.5). Negative prognostic factors for survival were found to be R1-resection (HR = 3.2), preoperative nodal metastases (HR = 2.9), and male gender (HR = 0.5). There was no association found between complications and survival (HR 1.2). None of the possible risk factors were associated with major postoperative complications.

CONCLUSIONS

An acceptable overall survival after surgery was found. Survival and relapse-free survival was negatively associated with R1 resections and positive preoperative lymph nodes. Complications did not influence long-term survival.

A V–Y fasciocutaneous flap for perineal reconstruction following abdominoperineal resection: quicker and better than a myocutaneous gluteal flap?

Background

Abdominoperineal resection in patients with anorectal malignancies may require flap reconstruction for large perineal defects as an adjunct to the oncologic surgery. Perineal reconstruction should be timely, safe, and yield good long-term functional results. There is no agreement on the ideal approach.

Methods

We performed a retrospective observational cohort study to compare clinical outcomes and post-operative complications between a musculocutaneous gluteal flap and a fasciocutaneous V–Y flap for perineal reconstruction. We included all patients who underwent abdominoperineal resection at Karolinska University Hospital between 2016 and 2019. Patient demographics and comorbidities, as well as treatment data, post-operative complications, and follow-up data, were collected from medical records.

Results

A total of 44 patients were included with a mean age of 65 years where 73% were men. Reconstruction was made with a musculocutaneous gluteal flap in 19 patients (43%) and with a fasciocutaneous V–Y flap in 25 patients (57%). Flap-related post-operative complications occurred in 39% of the patients and the incidence did not differ between the groups (p = 0.831). Neither operative time, time to ambulant mobility, time to drain removal, nor time to epidural removal differed between the groups (p > 0.05). Four patients in the gluteal flap group and one patient in the V–Y flap group presented with long-term complications.

Conclusions

Post-operative complications are common after perineal reconstruction following abdominoperineal resection regardless of reconstructive approach. Our study confirms that both a fasciocutaneous and a musculocutaneous flap are acceptable options for perineal reconstruction.

Level of evidence: Level III, risk/prognostic study.