Financial and occupational impact of low anterior resection syndrome in rectal cancer survivors

By Any Other Name: Bowel Dysfunction After Proctectomy for Cancer and Its Predictive Factors in Administrative Databases

INTRODUCTION

Diagnosis, outcomes, and costs of care associated with bowel dysfunction after proctectomy for cancer remain underexplored in population-based studies. The lack of administrative coding for bowel dysfunction or low anterior resection syndrome has historically limited secondary data set outcomes analysis. The purpose of this study was to identify a bowel dysfunction phenotype in administrative claims data and characterize its prevalence, predictive factors, and costs.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients were identified with employer-sponsored commercial insurance (MarketScan research databases) undergoing proctectomy for cancer for a retrospective cohort study. Bowel dysfunction was defined as any patient with diagnostic codes for diarrhea, constipation, incontinence, pelvic floor diagnostic testing, or rehabilitative procedures that occurred in the 18 mo to follow surgery. We performed Poisson regression to identify statistically significant covariates of bowel dysfunction occurrence following low anterior resection. A secondary comparative analysis was also performed of total costs of healthcare utilization following gastrointestinal continuity.

RESULTS

6426 proctectomy patients were identified, out of which 2131 had surgery for cancer. 847 patients undergoing proctectomy for cancer (39.7%) experienced bowel dysfunction during 18 mo of follow-up. The most common diagnoses were constipation (53.5%) and diarrhea (40.3%). Diagnostic procedures and rehabilitative procedures were performed in only 29.8% of those with symptoms. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy administration with radiation (incidence rate ratio = 1.23, 95% CI: 1.01-1.51) and without (incidence rate ratio = 1.20, 95% CI: 1.01-1.42) remained associated with postoperative bowel dysfunction when controlling for other factors. Chemoradiation therapy alone was not associated with bowel dysfunction. The median total follow-up costs with bowel dysfunction were $30,769 greater (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

More than one-third of patients have symptomatic bowel dysfunction within 18 mo after restored continuity, with multiagent chemotherapy being the strongest independent predictor. Bowel dysfunction is associated with more than twice healthcare costs postop.

How well do we measure the impact of bowel dysfunction on health-related quality of life after rectal cancer surgery?

BACKGROUND

Rectal cancer surgery risks causing bowel dysfunction, which has an important impact on health-related quality of life. The validity of generic tools used to measure health-related quality of life after bowel dysfunction is unclear. This study aimed to determine the content validity of health-related quality-of-life measurement tools in rectal cancer.

METHODS

This was a qualitative single-center study in which adult patients who underwent rectal cancer surgery with sphincter preservation from July 2017 to October 2020 were recruited. Patients were excluded if they developed local metastasis, required a permanent stoma, or had surgery <1 year since recruitment. Telephone-based semi-structured interviews were conducted. Bowel dysfunction was measured using the Low Anterior Resection Syndrome score. Content analysis was achieved using the International Classification of Functioning framework.

RESULTS

Recurrent bowel dysfunction-related concepts included "Mental functions," "Defecation functions," "Emotional functions," "Recreation and leisure," "Intimate relationships," and "Remunerative employment." A mean of 7.5 recurrent bowel dysfunction-related concepts were identified within the health-related quality of life instruments analyzed. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality-of-Life Questionnaire-C30 (n = 11) and the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (n = 9) covered the greatest number of recurrent bowel dysfunction-related concepts. Concepts such as "Mental functions," "Urination functions," "Sexual functions," "Driving," and "Mobility" were not covered by any instrument.

CONCLUSION

The content of traditional health-related quality-of-life instruments is missing important areas that represent the impact of bowel dysfunction after rectal cancer surgery on health-related quality of life. These findings could help improve patient-centered care in rectal cancer surgery.

Multi-Disciplinary Management in Rectal Cancer Survivorship: A Clinical Practice Review

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer in the USA and worldwide. In the USA, nearly one-third of CRC cases are anatomically classified as rectal cancer. Over the past few decades, continued refinement of multimodality treatment and the introduction of new therapeutic agents have enhanced curative treatment rates and quality of life outcomes. As treatments improve and the incidence of young onset rectal cancer rises, the number of rectal cancer survivors grows each year. This trend highlights the growing importance of rectal cancer survivorship. Multimodality therapy with systemic chemotherapy, chemoradiation, and surgery can result in chronic toxicities in multiple organ systems, requiring a multi-disciplinary care model with services ranging from appropriate cancer surveillance to management of long-term toxicities and optimization of modifiable risk factors. Here, we review the evidence on these long-term toxicities and provide management considerations from consensus guidelines. Specific topics include bowel dysfunction from radiation and surgery, oxaliplatin-induced neuropathy, accelerated bone degeneration, the impact of fluoropyrimidines on long-term cardiovascular health, urinary incontinence, sexual dysfunction, and psychosocial distress. Additionally, we review modifiable risk factors to inform providers and rectal cancer survivors of various lifestyle and behavioral changes that can be made to improve their long-term health outcomes.

Low Anterior Resection Syndrome in a Reference North American Sample: Prevalence and Associated Factors

BACKGROUND

Low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) is a well-described consequence of rectal cancer treatment. Studying the degree to which bowel dysfunction exists in the general population may help to better interpret to what extent LARS is related to disease and/or cancer treatment. Currently, North American LARS normative data are lacking. The aim of this study was to describe the prevalence of bowel dysfunction, as measured by the LARS score, and quality of life (QoL) in a reference North American sample. Quality of life was measured and associations between participant characteristics and LARS were identified.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a single-institution cross-sectional study of asymptomatic adults who underwent screening and surveillance colonoscopies from 2018 to 2021 with no/benign endoscopic findings. Survey was conducted on select comorbidities, sociodemographic factors, LARS, and QoL. Outcomes were LARS and QoL. Multivariable linear regression accounting for a priori clinical factors associated with bowel dysfunction was performed.

RESULTS

Of 1,004 subjects approached, 502 (50.0%) participated, and 135 (26.9%) participants had major/minor LARS. On multiple linear regression, female sex (β = 2.15, 95% CI 0.30 to 4.00), younger age (β = -0.10, 95% CI -0.18 to -0.03), White ethnicity (β = 2.45, 95% CI 0.15 to 4.74), and the presence of at least one of the following factors: diabetes, depression, neurologic disorder, or cholecystectomy (β = 3.54, 95% CI 1.57 to 5.51) were independently associated with a higher LARS score. Individuals with LARS had lower global QoL, functional subscales, and various symptom subscale scores.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study identified the baseline prevalence of LARS in asymptomatic adults who have not undergone a low anterior resection. These normative data will allow for more accurate interpretation of ongoing studies on LARS in North American rectal cancer patients.

The impact of restorative proctectomy versus permanent colostomy on health-related quality of life after rectal cancer surgery using the patient-generated index

BACKGROUND

The impact of bowel dysfunction versus colostomy on quality of life after rectal cancer surgery is poorly understood.

BACKGROUND

To evaluate the quality of life after rectal cancer surgery in patients with colostomy versus restorative proctectomy.

METHODS

A mixed-methods study measuring quality of life using the Patient-Generated Index, patients were asked to list up to 5 areas of their life affected by their surgery. Areas were then weighted according to patients' preferences for improvement to generate a score from 0-100. The areas reported by patients were linked to the International Classification of Functioning for content analysis. Bowel dysfunction was measured using the low anterior resection syndrome score, and patients were then grouped according to (1) colostomy, (2) no/minor, or (3) major low anterior resection syndrome. Quality of life was compared between groups.

RESULTS

Overall, 121 patients were included (colostomy n = 39, restorative proctectomy n = 82). There were no differences in demographics, neoadjuvant radiotherapy, or time to follow-up between groups. In the restorative proctectomy group, 53% had no/minor, and 47% had major low anterior resection syndrome. Overall, patients with colostomy had significantly lower quality-of-life scores than those with restorative proctectomy. However, patients with major low anterior resection syndrome scored similarly to those with colostomy. On content analysis, patients with colostomies reported more problems with sexual function, body image, and sports. Patients with restorative proctectomy reported more problems with sleep, using transportation, and taking care of themselves.

CONCLUSION

Colostomy has a more detrimental impact on quality of life than restorative proctectomy. However, bowel dysfunction severity is important to consider. The patient experience between treatments differs.

Incidence and Factors Associated With Mental Health Disorders in Patients With Rectal Cancer Post-Restorative Proctectomy

BACKGROUND

Most patients with rectal cancer experience bowel symptoms post-restorative proctectomy. The incidence of mental health disorders post-restorative proctectomy and its association with bowel symptoms are unknown.

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed 1) to describe the incidence of mental health disorders in patients who underwent restorative proctectomy for rectal cancer and 2) to study the association between incident mental health disorders and bowel dysfunction after surgery.

DESIGN

This retrospective cohort study used the Clinical Practice Research Datalink and Hospital Episode Statistics databases.

SETTINGS

The databases were based in the United Kingdom.

PATIENTS

All adult patients who underwent restorative proctectomy for a rectal neoplasm between 1998 and 2018 were included.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome was an incident mental health disorder. The associations between bowel, sexual, and urinary dysfunctions and incident mental health disorders were studied using Cox proportional hazard regression models.

RESULTS

In total, 2197 patients who underwent restorative proctectomy were identified. Of 1858 patients without preoperative bowel, sexual, or urinary dysfunction, 1455 had no preoperative mental health disorders. In this cohort, 466 patients (32.0%) developed incident mental health disorders following restorative proctectomy during 6333 person-years of follow-up. On multivariate Cox regression, female sex (adjusted HR 1.30; 95% CI, 1.06-1.56), metastatic disease (adjusted HR 1.57; 95% CI, 1.14-2.15), incident bowel dysfunction (adjusted HR 1.41, 95% CI, 1.13-1.77), and urinary dysfunction (adjusted HR 1.57; 95% CI, 1.16-2.14) were found to be associated with developing incident mental health disorders post-restorative proctectomy.

LIMITATIONS

This study was limited by its observational study design and residual confounding.

CONCLUSIONS

Incident mental health disorders after restorative proctectomy for rectal cancer are common. The presence of bowel and urinary functional impairment significantly increases the risk of poor psychological outcomes among rectal cancer survivors.

CON LOS TRASTORNOS DE SALUD MENTAL EN PACIENTES CON CNCER DE RECTO POSTERIOR A PROCTECTOMA RESTAURADORA

ANTECEDENTES: La mayoría de los pacientes con cáncer de recto experimentan síntomas intestinales después de la proctectomía restauradora. Se desconoce la incidencia de trastornos de salud mental posteriores a la proctectomía restauradora y su asociación con síntomas intestinales.OBJETIVOS: Los objetivos de nuestro estudio son: a) describir la incidencia de trastornos de salud mental en pacientes sometidos a proctectomía restauradora por cáncer de recto; b) estudiar la asociación entre los trastornos de salud mental incidentes y la disfunción intestinal después de la cirugía.DISEÑO: Este fue un estudio de cohorte retrospectivo que utilizó las bases de datos Clinical Practice Research Datalink y Hospital Episode Statistics.ENTORNO CLÍNICO: Las bases de datos se basaron en el Reino Unido.PACIENTES: Se incluyeron todos los pacientes adultos que se sometieron a una proctectomía restauradora por una neoplasia rectal entre 1998 y 2018.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE VALORACIÓN: El resultado primario fue un trastorno de salud mental incidente. Las asociaciones entre la disfunción intestinal, sexual y urinaria y los trastornos de salud mental incidentes se estudiaron utilizando modelos de regresión de riesgos proporcionales de Cox.RESULTADOS: En total, se identificaron 2.197 pacientes que se sometieron a proctectomía restauradora. De 1.858 pacientes sin disfunción intestinal, sexual o urinaria preoperatoria, 1.455 personas tampoco tenían trastornos de salud mental preoperatorios. En esta cohorte, 466 (32,0 %) pacientes desarrollaron trastornos de salud mental incidentes después de la PR durante 6333 años-persona de seguimiento. En la regresión multivariada de Cox, sexo femenino (HRa 1,30, IC 95% 1,06-1,56), enfermedad metastásica (HRa 1,57, IC 95% 1,14-2,15) e incidencia intestinal (HRa 1,41, IC del 95 %: 1,13 a 1,77) y la disfunción urinaria (aHR 1,57, IC del 95 %: 1,16 a 2,14) se asociaron con el desarrollo de trastornos de salud mental incidentes después de la proctectomía restauradora.LIMITACIONES: Este estudio estuvo limitado por el diseño del estudio observacional y la confusión residual.CONCLUSIÓN: Los trastornos de salud mental incidentes después de la proctectomía restauradora para el cáncer de recto son comunes. La presencia de deterioro funcional intestinal y urinario aumenta significativamente el riesgo de malos resultados psicológicos entre los sobrevivientes de cáncer de recto. (Traducción- Dr. Ingrid Melo ).

A novel nomogram to predict low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) after ileostomy reversal for rectal cancer patients

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) in patients undergoing low or ultra-low anterior resection (LAR) is a common problem and significantly impacts the quality of life. Patients with an ileostomy after LAR are more likely to develop LARS. However, there hasn't been a model predicting LARS occurrence in these patients. This study aims to construct a nomogram to predict the probability of LARS occurrence in patients with temporary ileostomy and guide preventive strategies before reversal.

METHODS

168 patients undergoing LAR with ileostomy from one center were enrolled as the training cohort, and 134 patients of the same inclusion criteria from another center were enrolled as the validation cohort. The training cohort was screened for risk factors for major LARS using univariate and multivariate logistic regression. The nomogram was constructed using the filtered variables, the ROC curve was used to describe the model's discrimination, and the calibration was used to describe the accuracy.

RESULTS

The optimal cut-off value for stoma closure time was 128 days. Three risk factors were identified using logistic regression analysis: preoperative radiotherapy (OR = 3.038, [95%CI 1.75-5.015], P = 0.005), stoma closure time (OR = 2.298, [95%CI 1.088-4.858], P = 0.029) and pN stage (OR = 1.739, [95%CI 1.235-3.980], P = 0.001). A nomogram was constructed based on these three variables and showed good performance predicting major LARS after stoma reversal. The area under the curve (AUC) was 0.827 in the training group and 0.821 in the validation group; The calibration curve suggested good precision in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

This novel nomogram can accurately predict the probability of major LARS occurrence after ileostomy reversal for rectal cancer patients. This model can help screen ileostomy patients with high risks and guide individualized preventive strategies before stoma reversal.

Labor Market Attachment 2 Years After Colorectal Cancer Surgery: A Population-based Study

Objectives

To investigate the association between clinical/sociodemographic factors and labor market attachment, and to estimate employment probability 2 years after colorectal cancer (CRC) surgery.

Background

A rising prevalence of younger CRC survivors commands a stronger focus on labor market attachment. The association between clinical factors like type of surgery and CRC survivors' labor market attachment remains poorly investigated.

Methods

National registries provided information on employment status and clinical/sociodemographic variables for all 20- to 60-year-old CRC patients without previous cancer diagnosed in Denmark from 2001 to 2014, undergoing surgery and being attached to the labor market. Associations between clinical/sociodemographic factors and labor market attachment were investigated in multiple logistic regression analyses.

Results

A total of 5755 CRC patients were included. Two years after surgery, 59.7% were working. Factors significantly associated with a higher probability of working were being in the 46 to 50 years age group, male gender, higher educational level, no comorbidity, working at the time of diagnosis, lower Union for International Cancer Control stage, and undergoing surgery in the most recent of four time-periods. Two years after undergoing surgery, the probability of working was significantly higher for left-sided than for right-sided colon resections, higher for low anterior resection (LAR)/high tumor than for LAR/low tumor, and higher for abdominoperineal resection than for Hartmann's procedure. Of the 4798 (86.8%) patients alive 2 years after surgery, 68.8% were working, 7.8% had retired, whereas 23.4% were on temporary benefits, sick leave, or disability pension.

Conclusions

Clinical/sociodemographic factors were associated with the probability of working 2 years after surgery. This knowledge can be used to inform patients and target interventions towards patients with low post-CRC probability of working.

Pelvic floor peritoneum reconstruction is a protective factor for defecation dysfunction after laparoscopic anterior resection in patients with middle and low rectal cancer

PURPOSE

The pelvic cavity is a monolithic structure whose integrity plays an important role in the pelvic organ function. Currently, pelvic floor peritoneum reconstruction (PFPR) is rarely performed during laparoscopic surgery for middle and low rectal cancer patients. This study evaluated the effect of PFPR using barbed wire during laparoscopic surgery on the postoperative defecation function in middle and low rectal cancer patients.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study involving a total of 252 middle and low rectal cancer patients who had been subjected to laparoscopic-assisted anterior resection of rectal cancer at Shanghai Changhai Hospital from March 2018 to April 2020. The Wexner and low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) scores were used to evaluate the postoperative defecation function among patients. A Wexner score ≥ 8 and LARS score ≥ 30 were considered to indicate major defecation dysfunction.

RESULTS

A total of 229 patients (52 patients subjected to PFPR) were followed up, and the Wexner and LARS scores were recorded. The follow-up rate was 90.87%, the mean follow-up time was 22.88 ± 6.93 months, the stoma rate was 64.29%, the ileostomy reduction surgical rate was 90.74%, and the stoma duration was 7.64 ± 2.94 months. Regarding the assessment of postoperative defecation dysfunction using the Wexner score, a multivariate analysis revealed that a long operation time (odds ratio [OR], 0.991; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.984-0.999, p = 0.026) and radiotherapy (OR, 0.352; 95% CI, 0.156-0.797, p = 0.012) were independent risk factors for major defecation dysfunction, while a high tumor location (OR, 1.318; 95% CI, 1.151-1.657, p = 0.001) and PFPR (OR, 4.770; 95% CI, 1.435-15.857, p = 0.011) were independent protective factors for major defecation dysfunction. Regarding the assessment of the postoperative defecation function using the LARS score, a multivariate analysis revealed that a high tumor location (OR, 1.293; 95% CI, 1.125-1.486, p < 0.001) and PFPR (OR, 3.010; 95% CI, 1.345-6.738, p = 0.007) were independent protective factors for major defecation dysfunction. A subgroup analysis showed that the postoperative Wexner score (3.13 ± 2.79 vs. 4.71 ± 3.45 p = 0.003) and LARS score (21.77 ± 8.62 vs. 25.14 ± 8.78 p = 0.015) were lower for patients with PFPR than for patients without PFPR. Regarding patients with low rectal cancer, those with PFPR had a lower LARS score than those without it (23.62 ± 8.94 vs. 28.40 ± 7.90, p = 0.022), but there was no significant difference in the Wexner score between the groups. A total of 9.76% of patients with PFPR and 48.89% of those without PFPR showed an intestinal accumulation in the sacral front (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

PFPR and a high tumor location are protective factors for postoperative defecation dysfunction in middle and low rectal cancer patients. PFPR can be routinely performed during laparoscopic surgery.

Physical activity levels after low anterior resection for rectal cancer: one-year follow-up

Background

Overall survival rates after rectal cancer have increased. Therefore, functional outcomes rightly deserve more interest. The aims of this study were to assess progression in total, sports, occupational and household physical activity levels of rectal cancer survivors, from preoperatively to 12 months after surgery/stoma closure and to explore predictive factors.

Methods

Multi-center prospective study with 125 patients who underwent low anterior resection for rectal cancer. The Flemish Physical Activity Computerized Questionnaire was completed concerning all physical activity levels at baseline (past preoperative year) and at 1, 4, 6 and 12 months after surgery/stoma closure. At these timepoints, questionnaires (LARS−/ COREFO-questionnaire) regarding bowel symptoms were also filled out. Results were analyzed using linear mixed models for repeated measures.

Results

Total physical activity levels up to 12 months remained significantly lower than preoperative. Occupational and sports physical activity levels remained significantly lower until 6 and 4 months postoperative, respectively. Predictive factors for decreased physical activity levels at a specific timepoint were: younger age and no stoma (total physical activity, 1 month), low/mid rectal tumor, no stoma, non-employed status (total, 4 months), higher COREFO-scores (occupational, 4 months) and non-employed status (total, 12 months). At all timepoints, lower COREFO-scores were associated with higher total physical activity levels; male gender and lower educational levels with higher occupational levels; younger age, normal BMI, employed status and adjuvant therapy with higher sports levels; and female gender, lower educational level and unemployed status with higher household levels.

Conclusions

One year after rectal cancer treatment, total physical activity levels were still not recovered. Rectal cancer patients, especially those at risk for decreased physical activity levels and with major bowel complaints, should be identified and guided to increase their activities.

Trial registration

This trial has been registered at Netherlands Trial Register (NTR6383, 23/01/2017).

Patient-led follow-up reduces outpatient doctor visits and improves patient satisfaction. One-year analysis of secondary outcomes in the randomised trial Follow-Up after Rectal CAncer (FURCA)

BACKGROUND

FURCA (Follow-Up after Rectal Cancer) is a multi-centre randomised trial comparing patient-led follow-up with standard outpatient follow-up. This paper reports one-year follow-up data from the FURCA trial on selected secondary outcomes including type and number of contacts, patient-reported involvement and satisfaction with health care services during follow-up.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Patients with rectal cancer (stage < IV) from four Danish surgical centres were randomised (1:1) into intervention (education and self-referral to project nurse) or standard follow-up (routine clinical doctor visits). The present analysis involved data on hospital contacts during the first year after surgery, patient involvement and satisfaction measured at one year, and baseline patient-reported and clinical variables.

RESULTS

Of 512 eligible patients, 168 were allocated to patient-led follow-up (intervention) and 168 to standard follow-up (control). The total number of hospital contacts in the intervention arm did not differ significantly from the number of contacts in the control arm (p = 0.44). More patients had ≥15 contacts in the intervention arm than in the control arm (p = 0.004). The total number of outpatient doctor visits was significantly lower in the intervention arm (p < 0.001). Patients in both arms rated involvement and satisfaction high; yet patients in the intervention arm scored significantly higher on two of six items regarding involvement and all five items regarding satisfaction. Of the 168 patients in the intervention arm, 43% made direct contact (self-referral) to the project nurse, and 14 of these patients (8%) had ≥4 contacts. The primary reason for self-referral was bowel dysfunction.

DISCUSSION

The findings indicate the value of a patient-led follow-up program in terms of direct access and more individually tailored intervention based on patients' needs, with most tasks being managed by nurses. Patient-led follow-up came with improved patient-perceived involvement and satisfaction; thus, it was both acceptable and favourable for the patients.