The Pulmonary Metastasectomy in Colorectal Cancer cohort study: Analysis of case selection, risk factors and survival in a prospective observational study of 512 patients

The Ugly: Metastatic Colon Cancer-Surgical Options

Over 50% of patients with colorectal cancer develop metastatic disease. Although systemic therapy remains the backbone of palliative treatment, select patients may be candidates for surgical resection with curative intent. Given increasing evidence of the association between metastasectomy and prolonged survival, surgery has acquired an increasingly central role in the management of liver, lung, and peritoneal metastases. This is compounded by accumulating advances in local and systemic treatments that have allowed for expansion of the resectability pool, bringing the potential for curative surgical treatment to increasing numbers of patients with stage IV disease. However, as the boundaries of resectability are pushed, patient selection and consideration of tumor-related and technical factors are imperative to the identification of patients for whom surgery would be of the greatest benefit.

Transcontinental Differences in Management of Pulmonary Metastatic Disease: Europe

Several international registries, including 4 from Europe-Italy, Spain, the Netherlands, and the European Society of Thoracic Surgeons-are dedicated to addressing deficiencies in pulmonary metastasectomy research. The randomized PulMiCC and SABR-COMET trials provide contradictory outcomes and new randomized trials have been initiated. Europe's metastasectomy approach transitioned from open thoracotomy to video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery, with 72% of surgeons favoring minimally invasive methods by 2023. European Society for Medical Oncology guidelines recommend surgery for completely resectable lesions and propose ablative approaches as supplementary or alternative treatments for inoperable cases due to frailty or unfavorable anatomy.

A phase 2 study of adjuvant chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin and oxaliplatin after lung metastasectomy for colorectal cancer (WJOG5810G)

BACKGROUND

The clinical significance of adjuvant chemotherapy after lung metastasectomy for colorectal cancer remains unknown. This phase 2 study evaluated adjuvant chemotherapy with modified 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin and oxaliplatin (mFOLFOX6) after lung metastasectomy.

METHODS

Eligibility criteria included colorectal adenocarcinoma, first curative resection of ≤4 lung metastases, and no prior chemotherapy. Treatment consisted of 12 cycles of mFOLFOX6. The primary endpoint was the 5-year overall survival (OS) rate, with the expectation of 50% (threshold, 35%) and a planned sample size of 100 (90% power; alpha error, 5%).

RESULTS

Fifty-two patients were enrolled between July 2011 and July 2014; patient enrollment was closed prematurely because of slow accrual. Excluding four ineligible patients, the characteristics of the 48 patients in the efficacy analysis set were a median age of 62 years (range, 43-75 years), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 in 45 patients, prior resection of extrathoracic metastasis in four patients, and postoperative carcinoembryonic antigen within normal range in 43 patients; the status of lung metastasis was single in 34 patients, unilateral in 40 patients, and metachronous in 41 patients; and a disease-free interval between primary tumor resection and diagnosis of lung metastasis of <2 years in 33 patients. The 5-year OS rate was 85.2% (95% confidence interval [CI], 71.4%-92.6%), and the 5-year disease-free survival rate was 60.2% (95% CI, 44.9%-72.4%). Forty-one of the 52 patients (78.8%) in the safety analysis set completed 12 cycles of mFOLFOX6. Grade ≥3 adverse events were neutropenia (50.0%), fatigue (7.7%), peripheral sensory neuropathy (7.7%), and other (<5%).

CONCLUSIONS

Adjuvant chemotherapy with mFOLFOX6 is feasible, and may be effective after lung metastasectomy for colorectal cancer.

Effects of location of primary tumor on survival after pulmonary metastasectomy for colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

The benefit of pulmonary metastasectomy (PM) in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) with isolated lung metastases remains unclear, and failure to separate colon from rectal cancer may contribute. Using a large national database, we investigate whether PM is associated with survival benefits in patients presenting with CRC with synchronous lung metastases based on primary tumor location.

METHODS

The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database from 2010 to 2015 was queried to identify patients with stage IV CRC with isolated synchronous lung metastases at initial diagnosis. These patients were restricted to include only those in which the location of the primary tumor being either colon or rectum could be conclusively identified, and the primary site was resected. SEER-Medicare linked claims were also queried to identify cases of PM that were not adequately recorded in SEER alone. Patients were then analyzed using Kaplan-Meier (K-M) methods and multivariate analysis was performed to identify variables associated with overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

From the SEER database 185,871 patients with metastatic CRC were identified. Only 588 had isolated synchronous lung metastases, with 441 with colon cancer and 147 with rectal cancer. PM was performed in 15.3% (n = 90) with two-thirds being colon cancer. Univariate K-M demonstrated worse OS for rectal cancer than colon cancer, which remained significant on multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSION

OS is associated with the site of primary CRC in patients undergoing PM. Distinct mutational and molecular characteristics differences between colon and rectal cancer may explain these findings and are an area for future research.

Comments on Ambrogi et al. Lung Metastasectomy: Where Do We Stand? Results from an Italian Multicentric Prospective Database. J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13, 3106

We were interested to read the results from the Italian database [...].

A Retrospective Analysis of Real-Life Management of Colorectal Cancer Lung-Limited Metastases Treated with Surgery: Outcomes and Prognostic Factors

Background: Unlike liver metastases, the role of surgery in colorectal cancer lung-limited metastases (CCLLM) is not yet established, and data are still poor. We performed a retrospective analysis to evaluate the impact of surgery on the management of CCLLM. Material and Method: We retrospectively analyzed patients who received surgery for CCLLM at our Institution from January 2010 to June 2019. The aim of the study was to evaluate the impact of clinical and pathological features on the survival (OS and DFS) of patients treated with surgery for CCLLM. Results: One hundred and fifty patients were included in the analysis. Seventy-six patients received preoperative chemotherapy (pCT) and 56 an adjuvant treatment (aCT), while 18 underwent up-front surgery without CT. In the whole population, median OS (mOS) and median DFS (mDFS) were 54.1 months (95%CI 44.0-82.1) and 24.0 months (95%CI 20.0-31.2), respectively. In multivariate analysis, number of metastases was the only factor correlated to DFS (p = 0.0006) and OS (p = 0.0018). Conclusion: Our study, although retrospective and of small size, shows that tumor burden (number of metastases) is the main prognostic factor in patients undergoing lung surgery for CCLLM. Moreover, our results suggest that surgery for lung metastases might prolong survival. These data strengthen the role of multidisciplinary management to allow patients with CCLLM to pursue local treatment whenever possible, even regardless of previous liver surgery or RAS mutated status.

Treatment of Colorectal Lung Metastases: Two Centers Retrospective Study

INTRODUCTION

Clear guidelines for colorectal lung metastasis (LM) treatment are not available. This study aimed to provide insight into the treatment strategies and efficacy of local and systemic therapy in patients with LM eligible for (potentially) curative treatment.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study of patients with ≤5 LM discussed in two tertiary referral centers. Patient and tumor characteristics were compared between treatment groups. Treatment strategies were compared between centers and survival data between treatment groups, local treatment modalities, and treating centers.

RESULTS

Ninety-two patients (median 2 LMs) were included. Seventy-one (77%) patients underwent local treatment (17 surgery, 13 ablation, 38 radiotherapy, 3 combination of local treatments) and 21 (23%) with systemic therapy alone. The latter group more frequently had extrapulmonary metastases (81.0% vs. 26.8%, p < 0.001) and synchronous presentation of LM (23.8% vs. 7.0%, p = 0.045). Choice of local versus systemic therapy and time to start treatment after diagnosis (median 109 days, IQR 44-240 vs. 88 days, IQR 53-168) were comparable between centers. Three-year survival rates did not differ between treatment groups, local treatment modalities, or treating centers.

CONCLUSION

Treatment strategies and oncological outcomes were rather similar between centers. Survival outcomes were not different between locally and systemically treated patients.

Pulmonary Metastasectomy for Adrenocortical Carcinoma-Not If, but When

BACKGROUND

Adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) commonly metastasizes to the lungs, and pulmonary metastasectomy (PM) is utilized due to limited systemic options.

METHODS

All ACC patients with initially only lung metastases (LM) from a single institution constituted this observational case series. Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazard analyses evaluated the association with potential prognostic factors and outcomes. Overall survival (OS) was calculated from the date of the PM or, in those patients who did not undergo surgery, from the development of LM.

RESULTS

A total of 75 ACC patients over a 45-year period met the criteria; 52 underwent PM, and 23 did not. The patients undergoing PM had a median OS of 3.1 years (95% CI: 2.4, 4.7 years) with the 5- and 10-year OS being 35.5% and 32.8%, respectively. The total resected LM did not impact the OS nor the DFS. The patients who developed LM after 11 months from the initial ACC resection had an improved OS (4.2 years; 95% CI: 3.2, NR; p = 0.0096) compared to those developing metastases earlier (2.4 years; 95% CI: 1.6, 2.8). Patients who underwent PM within 11 months of adrenalectomy demonstrated a reduced OS (2.2 years; 95% CI: 1.0, 2.7) compared to those after 11 months (3.6 years, 95% CI: 2.6, NR; p = 0.0045). PM may provide benefit to those patients with LM at presentation (HR: 0.5; p = 0.2827), with the time to first PM as a time-varying covariate.

CONCLUSIONS

PM appears to have a role in ACC patients. The number of nodules should not be an exclusion factor. Patients developing LM within a year of primary tumor resection may benefit from waiting before further surgeries, which may provide additional insight into who may benefit from PM.

Long-term outcomes and early recurrence after resection for metachronous pulmonary metastases from colorectal cancer

PURPOSE

Properly selecting patients for aggressive curative resection for pulmonary metastases (PMs) from colorectal cancer (CRC) is desirable. We purposed to clarify prognostic factors and risk factors for early recurrence after metachronous PM resection.

METHODS

Clinical data of 151 patients who underwent R0 resection for metachronous PMs from CRC at two institutions between 2008 and 2021 were reviewed.

RESULTS

Seventy-six patients (50.3%) were male, and the median age was 71 (42-91) years. The numbers of colon/rectal cancers were 76/75, with pStage I/II/III/IV/unknown in 15/34/86/13/3. The duration from primary surgery to PM was 19.7 (1.0-106.4) months. The follow-up period was 41.9 (0.3-156.2) months. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) rates were 75.1%, 53.7%, and 51.1%, and the 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival (OS) rates were 97.7%, 87.5%, and 68.2%. On multivariate analysis, lymph node metastasis of the primary lesion (HR 1.683, 95%CI 1.003-2.824, p = 0.049) was an independent predictor of poor RFS, and history of resection for extrapulmonary metastasis (e-PM) (HR 2.328, 95%CI 1.139-4.761, p = 0.021) was an independent predictor of poor OS. Patients who experienced early recurrence (< 6 months) after PM resection showed poorer OS than others (3-year OS 50.8% vs. 90.2%, p = 0.002). On multivariate analysis, e-PM was an independent predictor of early recurrence after PM resection (OR 3.989, 95%CI 1.002-15.885, p = 0.049).

CONCLUSION

Since a history of e-PM was a predictor of early recurrence and poor OS after R0 resection for PM, surgical treatment of patients with a history of e-PM should be considered carefully.

Contemporary Outcomes for the Curative Treatment of Colorectal Cancer Pulmonary Metastases

PURPOSE

Treatment of pulmonary metastases (PM) from colorectal cancer (CRC) is the standard of care by several guidelines from Europe and the USA, but the validity of this strategy has been recently questioned, and the available evidence supporting this strategy is weak. We report the outcomes of a curative intent strategy in a very recent and homogenous series of patients.

METHODS

We did a retrospective review of all curative intent surgical or ablative treatment of PM from CRC performed consecutively in 3 French institutions from January 2015 to December 2019. Demographics, clinicopathological, and molecular characteristics were evaluated. Cox regression models were used to identify prognostic factors related to local recurrence and disease-free survival.

RESULTS

Records from 152 patients were reviewed. One-hundred thirty-five patients (88%) had surgical metastasectomy. Median age was 67 years. Most of the patients had a single lesion (66%), and 16% had synchronous PM. Eighty-one patients (53%) experienced recurrence, and the thorax was the most common site of recurrence. Median disease-free survival and overall survival were 35 months and 78 months after PM treatment. At the end of the study, only 17% of the patients died. Pulmonary tumor burden was correlated with disease-free survival in univariate analysis, but multivariate analysis did not find any prognostic factor independently associated with local recurrence or survival.

CONCLUSION

Our finds corroborate existing recommendation for the invasive treatment of PM from CRC in selected patients.

Colorectal Pulmonary Metastases: Pulmonary Metastasectomy or Stereotactic Radiotherapy?

BACKGROUND

Pulmonary metastasectomy and stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) are both guideline-recommended treatments for selected patients with oligometastatic colorectal pulmonary metastases. However, there is limited evidence comparing these local treatment modalities in similar patient groups.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed records of consecutive patients treated for colorectal pulmonary metastases with surgical metastasectomy or SABR from 2012 to 2019 at two Dutch referral hospitals that had different approaches toward the local treatment of colorectal pulmonary metastases, one preferring surgery, the other preferring SABR. Two comparable patient groups were identified based on tumor and treatment characteristics.

RESULTS

The metastasectomy group comprised 40 patients treated for 69 metastases, and the SABR group had 60 patients who were treated for 90 metastases. Median follow-up was 38 months (IQR: 26-67) in the surgery group and 46 months (IQR: 30-79) in the SABR group. Median OS was 58 months (CI: 20-94) in the metastasectomy group and 70 months (CI: 29-111) in the SABR group (p = 0.23). Five-year local recurrence-free survival (LRFS) was 44% after metastasectomy and 30% after SABR (p = 0.16). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 15 months (CI: 3-26) in the metastasectomy group and 10 months (CI: 6-13) in the SABR group (p = 0.049). Local recurrence rate was 12.5/7.2% of patients/metastases respectively after metastasectomy and 38.3/31.1% after SABR (p < 0.001). Lower BED Gy10 was correlated with an increased likelihood of recurrence (p = 0.025). Clavien Dindo grade III-V complication rates were 2.5% after metastasectomy and 0% after SABR (p = 0.22).

CONCLUSION

In this retrospective cohort study, pulmonary metastasectomy and SABR had comparable overall survival, local recurrence-free survival, and complication rates, despite patients in the SABR group having a significantly lower progression-free survival and local control rate. These data would support a randomized controlled trial comparing surgery and SABR in operable patients with radically resectable colorectal pulmonary metastases.

Results of intention-to-treat pulmonary metastasectomies in northern Finland revealing significant number of new lung primary carcinomas: time to move on from wedge resections?

Background

A considerable proportion of intended pulmonary metastasectomies is known to turn out as new incidental primary lung cancers in final pathology. We aimed to analyse the trends and results of pulmonary metastasectomies using the intention-to-treat approach with an emphasis on final histopathological findings.

Methods

All intention-to-treat pulmonary metastasectomies performed in Oulu University Hospital between 2000 and 2020 were included in the study. Long term survival was analysed with the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank tests. A binary logistic regression analysis was performed to calculate odds ratios for incidental primary lung cancer in final histology.

Results

A total of 154 intended pulmonary metastasectomies were performed to 127 individual patients. There was an increasing trend in pulmonary metastasectomies during the study period. Despite the increasing trend in comorbidities of the operated patients, the length of hospital stays decreased, and the postoperative complication rates remained stable. In final pathology reports, 9.7% were new primary lung cancers and 13.0% were benign nodules. A long disease-free interval (≥24 months) and smoking history were associated with incidental primary lung cancer in final histology. The short-term 30- and 90-day mortalities after pulmonary metastasectomy were 0.7%. The 5-year survival after pulmonary metastasectomy from all histologies was 52.8%, and from colorectal cancer metastasectomies (n=34) it was 73.5%.

Conclusions

The significant amount of new primary lung cancer lesions in pulmonary metastasectomy specimens highlight the diagnostic importance of pulmonary metastasectomy. A segmentectomy could be considered as a primary procedure in pulmonary metastasectomy in patients with a long disease-free interval and a heavy smoking history.

Study Protocol for a Randomised Controlled Trial on Pulmonary Metastasectomy vs. Standard of Care in Colorectal Cancer Patients With ≥ 3 Lung Metastases (PUCC-Trial)

This is a multicentre prospective randomised controlled trial for patients with 3 or more resectable pulmonary metastases from colorectal carcinoma. The study investigates the effects of pulmonary metastasectomy in addition to standard medical treatment in comparison to standard medical treatment plus possible local ablative measures such as SBRT. This trial is intended to demonstrate an overall survival difference in the group undergoing pulmonary metastasectomy. Further secondary and exploratory endpoints include quality of life (EORTC QLQ-C30, QLQ-CR29 and QLQ-LC29 questionnaires), progression-free survival and impact of mutational status. Due to the heterogeneity and complexity of the disease and treatment trajectories in metastasised colorectal cancer, well powered trials have been very challenging to design and execute. The goal of this study is to create a setting which allows treatment as close to the real life conditions as possible but under well standardised conditions. Based on previous trials, in which patient recruitment in the given setting hindered successful study completion, we decided to (1) restrict inclusion to patients with 3 or more metastases (since in case of lesser, surgery will probably be the preferred option) and (2) allow for real world standard of care (SOC) treatment options before and after randomisation including watchful waiting (as opposed to a predefined treatment protocol) and (3) possibility that patient can receive SOC externally (to reduce patient burden). Moreover, we chose to stipulate 12 weeks of systemic treatment prior to possible resection to further standardize treatment response and disease course over a certain period of time. Hence, included patients will be in the disease state of oligopersistence rather than primary oligometastatic. The trial was registered in the German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS-No.: DRKS00024727).

Pulmonary Metastasectomy in Colorectal Cancer (PulMiCC) randomised controlled trial: a systematic review of published responses

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this review was to assess the nature and tone of the published responses to the Pulmonary Metastasectomy in Colorectal Cancer (PulMiCC) randomized controlled trial.

METHODS

Published articles that cited the PulMiCC trial were identified from Clarivate Web of Science (©. Duplicates and self-citations were excluded and relevant text extracted. Four independent researchers rated the extracts independently using agreed scales for the representativeness of trial data and the textual tone. The ratings were aggregated and summarized. Two PulMiCC authors carried out a thematic analysis of the extracts.

RESULTS

Sixty-four citations were identified and relevant text was extracted and examined. The consensus rating for data inclusion was a median of 0.25 out of 6 (range 0 to 5.25, IQR 0-1.5) and for textual tone the median rating was 1.87 out of 6 (range 0 to 5.75, IQR 1-3.5). The majority of citations did not provide adequate representation of the PulMiCC data and the overall the textual tone was dismissive. Although some were supportive, many discounted the findings because the trial closed early and was underpowered to show non-inferiority. Two misinterpreted the authors' conclusions but there was acceptance that five-year survival was much higher than widely assumed.

CONCLUSIONS

Published comments reveal a widespread reluctance to consider seriously the results of a carefully conducted randomized trial. This may be because the results challenge accepted practice because of 'motivated reasoning'. But there is a widespread misunderstanding of the fact that though PulMiCC with 93 patients was underpowered to test non-inferiority, it still provides reliable evidence to undermine the widespread belief in a major survival benefit from metastasectomy.

Survival and prognostic factors in patients undergoing pulmonary metastasectomy for lung metastases from retroperitoneal sarcoma

BACKGROUND

Soft-tissue sarcomas are rare malignancies that consist of many different histologic subtypes and arise in various locations in the body. In patients with lung metastases from retroperitoneal sarcomas, the long-term outcomes and prognostic factors are unknown. This study is a retrospective review of patients undergoing pulmonary metastasectomy for retroperitoneal sarcoma metastases at one institution, with the purpose of determining prognostic factors and clinical outcomes.

METHODS

This is a single-center, retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing pulmonary metastasectomy for lung metastases from various sarcomas at Okayama University Hospital from January 2006 to December 2018. The Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test were used for the analyses, and cut-off values of continuous variables were determined by a receiver operating characteristic curve analysis.

RESULTS

Twenty-four patients underwent the first pulmonary metastasectomy for lung metastases from retroperitoneal sarcoma in our hospital. Leiomyosarcoma was the most common histologic subtype of retroperitoneal sarcoma (79.2%, n = 19). Median overall survival was 49.9 months, and the 3-year and 5-year survival rates after the first pulmonary metastasectomy were 62.5% and 26.4% respectively. In univariate analysis, age ≥56 years, disease-free interval < 15 months, and size of metastasis (≥ 27 mm) were associated with poor survival.

CONCLUSION

Pulmonary metastasectomy can be considered as an effective management strategy in retroperitoneal sarcoma patients with lung metastases in appropriately selected cases, just as it is for other sarcomas.

ERS International Congress 2021: highlights from Assembly 8 Thoracic Surgery and Lung Transplantation

The thoracic surgery and lung transplantation assembly of the European Respiratory Society (ERS) is delighted to present the highlights from the 2021 International ERS Congress. We have selected four sessions that discussed recent advances across a wide range of topics: including digital health surveillance in thoracic surgery, emerging concepts in pulmonary metastasectomy, advances in mesothelioma care, and novel developments in lung graft allocation and monitoring. The sessions are summarised by early career members in close collaboration with the assembly faculty. We aim to give the reader an update on the highlights of the conference in the fields of thoracic surgery and lung transplantation.

The full cohort of 512 patients and the nested controlled trial in 93 patients in the Pulmonary Metastasectomy in Colorectal Cancer (PulMiCC) study raise doubts about the effective size at present claimed

A comparison of the relative merits of video-assisted pulmonary metastasectomy versus thoracotomy is predicated on the assumption that removal of asymptomatic lung metastases favourably influences survival and that it does so by a large degree. Recently published but long-awaited evidence from a prospective cohort study and a randomised trial of Pulmonary Metastasectomy in Colorectal Cancer (PulMiCC) challenges that assumption.

Characteristics and Growth Rate of Lung Metastases in Patients With Primary Gastrointestinal Malignancies and Lung-dominant Metastatic Disease: A Retrospective Cohort Analysis

INTRODUCTION

There are no formal guidelines for the management of patients with primary gastrointestinal (GI) cancers who have lung-exclusive or lung-predominant metastases. We performed a retrospective analysis to evaluate host and tumor characteristics of this patient population, model patterns and rates of growth, and describe treatment approaches.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Eligible patients had a GI cancer with either synchronous or metachronous lung metastases but no other visceral or peritoneal sites of involvement. In addition to collecting detailed patient-specific and tumor-specific information, all imaging studies (computed tomography±positron emission tomography scans) were reviewed by an independent radiologist. Up to 5 lung metastases were tracked through each patient's clinical course. Growth rate was estimated using a linear mixed model analysis.

RESULTS

Forty patients met eligibility criteria (18 pancreatic, 15 colorectal, 6 hepatobiliary, 1 gastroesophageal; synchronous vs. metachronous, 13 and 27, respectively). Median time from original cancer diagnosis to onset of metachronous lung lesions was 16 months. Interval from first appearance of lung metastases to treatment initiation was 6.2 months. Average growth rate of the largest lesion was 0.21 mm/mo (95% confidence interval, 0.12-0.30), with substantial intrapatient and interpatient variability. Sixty percent of patients underwent locoregional interventions in addition to or in lieu of systemic therapy for their lung metastases. Median survival of the entire study cohort from first appearance of lung metastases was 54 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Lung metastases from primary GI cancers have a variable but overall indolent natural history and are generally associated with prolonged survival outcomes. Further efforts to define patterns of growth of lung metastases, informed by size, number, and clinical/molecular features, are needed to guide appropriate timing and selection of therapy as well as surveillance strategies.

The Pulmonary Metastasectomy in Colorectal Cancer (PulMiCC) burden of care study: Analysis of local treatments for lung metastases and systemic chemotherapy in 220 patients in the PulMiCC cohort

AIM

The aim of this work was to examine the burden of further treatments in patients with colorectal cancer following a decision about lung metastasectomy.

METHOD

Five teams participating in the Pulmonary Metastasectomy in Colorectal Cancer (PulMiCC) study provided details on subsequent local treatments for lung metastases, including the use of chemotherapy. For patients in three groups (no metastasectomy, one metastasectomy or multiple local interventions), baseline factors and selection criteria for additional treatments were examined.

RESULTS

The five teams recruited 220 patients between October 2010 and January 2017. No lung metastasectomy was performed in 51 patients, 114 patients had one metastasectomy and 55 patients had multiple local interventions. Selection for initial metastasectomy was associated with nonelevated carcinoembryonic antigen, fewer metastases and no prior liver metastasectomy. These patients also had better Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group scores and lung function at baseline. Four sites provided information on chemotherapy in 139 patients: 79 (57%) had one to five courses of chemotherapy, to a total of 179 courses. The patterns of survival after one or multiple metastasectomy interventions showed evidence of guarantee-time bias contributing to an impression of benefit over no metastasectomy. After repeated metastasectomy, a significantly higher risk of death was observed, with no apparent reduction in chemotherapy usage.

CONCLUSION

Repeated metastasectomy is associated with a higher risk of death without reducing the use of chemotherapy. Continued monitoring without surgery might reassure patients with indolent disease or allow response assessment during systemic treatment. Overall, the carefully collected information from the PulMICC study provides no indication of an important survival benefit from metastasectomy.

Pulmonary metastasectomy with lymphadenectomy for colorectal pulmonary metastases: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Routine lymphadenectomy during metastasectomy for pulmonary metastases of colorectal cancer has been recommended by several recent expert consensus meetings. However, evidence supporting lymphadenectomy is limited. The aim of this study was to perform a systematic review of the literature on the impact of simultaneous lymph node metastases on patient survival during metastasectomy for colorectal pulmonary metastases (CRPM).

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines of studies on lymphadenectomy during pulmonary metastasectomy for CRPM. Articles published between 2000 and 2020 were identified from Medline, Embase and the Cochrane Library without language restriction. Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) framework was used to assess the risk of bias and applicability of included studies. Survival rates were assessed and compared for the presence and level of nodal involvement.

RESULTS

Following review of 8054 studies by paper and abstract, 27 studies comprising 3619 patients were included in the analysis. All patients included in these studies underwent lymphadenectomy during pulmonary metastasectomy for CRPM. A total of 690 patients (19.1%) had simultaneous lymph node metastases. Five-year overall survival for patients with and without lymph node metastases was 18.2% and 51.3%, respectively (p < .001). Median survival for patients with lymph node metastases was 27.9 months compared to 58.9 months in patients without lymph node metastases (p < .001). Five-year overall survival for patients with N1 and N2 lymph node metastases was 40.7% and 10.9%, respectively (p = .064).

CONCLUSION

Simultaneous lymph node metastases of CRPM have a detrimental impact on survival and this is most apparent for mediastinal lymph node metastases. Therefore, lymphadenectomy during pulmonary metastasectomy for CRPM can be advised to obtain important prognostic value.