High recurrence rate after posterior component separation and keyhole mesh reconstruction for complex parastomal hernia: A case series study

Early outcomes of robotic modified retromuscular Sugarbaker technique for end colostomy parastomal hernia repair

AIM

The modified retromuscular Sugarbaker or Pauli technique is a technique for parastomal hernia repair, which requires the dissection of the retromuscular space and a transversus abdominis release for stoma lateralization and placement of a retromuscular mesh. Given the limited evidence regarding the robotic approach to this technique, this study aims to evaluate the outcomes of this newly introduced procedure, focusing on the rate of 30-day complications and recurrence rates.

METHODS

Retrospective case series report. Patients included underwent an elective robotic modified retromuscular Sugarbaker technique for the repair of a parastomal hernia associated with an end colostomy. All surgeries were performed at a tertiary referral center from September 2020 to December 2023.

RESULTS

A total of 21 patients underwent a robotic modified retromuscular Sugarbaker in our study. The parastomal hernias operated on were classified according to the European Hernia Society as 9.5% (2/21) type I, 52.4% (11/21) type II, 23.8% (5/21) type III, 14.3% (3/21) type IV. Early complications observed included 14.3% (3/21) seroma, 9.5% (2/21) surgical site infection, 19% (4/21) postoperative ileus, and one case of large bowel obstruction due to colitis (4.8%), which was managed conservatively. No Clavien-Dindo grade III complications were reported. The overall recurrence rate was 9.5% (2/21) with a median follow-up of 12.5 months (IQR: 3.9-21.3). Both recurrences occurred during the early phases of the learning curve and were possibly attributed to insufficient lateralization of the stoma.

CONCLUSION

Robotic modified retromuscular Sugarbaker for parastomal hernia repair is a challenging procedure with promising early outcomes.

Parastomal hernia repair according to Modified Stapled Mesh Stoma Reinforcement Technique (mSMART): which are the results ?

INTRODUCTION

Parastomal hernia repair is a real surgical challenge because of the high rate of recurrence. The Stapled Mesh Stoma Reinforcement Technique (SMART) is a keyhole-like technique in which the mesh is stapled to the fascia using a circular mechanical stapler.

METHODS

A prospective study from January 2021 to February 2023 was conducted including all patients operated with the SMART technique. Primary endpoint was the recurrence rate during the follow-up. Secondary endpoints were reoperation, Surgical site Occurrence (SSO) and deep (mesh) surgical site infection (SSI) within 30 days postoperatively.

RESULTS

Sixteen patients operated on SMART procedures were included. The mean follow-up was 11.3 ± 9.2 months. The SSO rate was 18.7% (n = 3). A seroma was drained radiologically (IIIa), one haematoma was evacuated surgically (IIIb) and one patient presented a postoperative lesion of a ureter after a parastomal Bricker's hernia repair. In addition, there was one death due to multiple organ failure (V). There was no SSI. The recurrence rate was 57.1% during the follow-up.

CONCLUSION

This study shows disappointing results for this SMART technique, with a high recurrence rate.

Open retromuscular keyhole compared with Sugarbaker mesh for parastomal hernia repair: Early results of a randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Open parastomal hernia repair can be performed using retromuscular synthetic mesh in a keyhole or Sugarbaker configuration. Relative morbidity and durability are unknown. Here, we present perioperative outcomes of a randomized controlled trial comparing these techniques, including 30-day patient-reported outcomes, reoperations, and wound complications in ≤90 days.

METHODS

This single-center randomized clinical trial compared open parastomal hernia repair with retromuscular medium-weight polypropylene mesh in the keyhole and Sugarbaker configuration for permanent stomas between April 2019 and April 2022. Adult patients with parastomal hernias requiring open repair with sufficient bowel length for either technique were included. Patient-reported outcomes were collected at 30 days; 90-day outcomes included initial hospital length of stay, readmission, wound morbidity, reoperation, and mesh- or stoma-related complications.

RESULTS

A total of 150 patients were randomized (75 keyhole and 75 Sugarbaker). There were no differences in length of stay, readmission, reoperation, recurrence, or wound complications. Twenty-four patients (16%) required procedural intervention for wound morbidity. Ten patients (6.7%) required abdominal reoperation in ≤90 days, 7 (4.7%) for wound morbidity, including 3 partial mesh excisions (1 keyhole compared with 2 Sugarbaker; P = 1). Four mesh-related stoma complications requiring reoperations occurred, including stoma necrosis (n = 1), bowel obstruction (n = 1), parastomal recurrence (n = 1), and mucocutaneous separation (n = 1), all in the Sugarbaker arm (P = .12). Patient-reported outcomes were similar between groups at 30 days.

CONCLUSION

Open parastomal hernia repair with retromuscular mesh in the keyhole and Sugarbaker configurations had similar perioperative outcomes. Patients will be followed to determine long-term relative durability, which is critical to understanding each approach's risk-benefit ratio.

Parastomal hernia repair: a five-year experience from a single centre in the UK

Parastomal hernias can affect significantly quality of life in patients who often had underwent major operations. The incidence and recurrence is still high although many techniques have been introduced to improve outcomes. Hence, there is still no agreement on what procedure has better results when it comes to repairing a parostomal hernia. Our aim is to compare outcomes of laparoscopic and open parastomal hernia repair in terms of recurrence, reoperations, post-operative complications and length of stay. Sixty-three parastomal hernia repairs were performed in a single Colorectal Centre over a period of 4 years. Eighteen procedures were performed laparoscopically and 45 open. All the 7 emergency procedures were approached open. Both the techniques showed to be safe with post-operative major complication rate (Clavien-Dindo III or above) of 9.52%. The laparoscopic group was found to have a shorter length of stay (p = 0.04) and earlier start of stoma function (p = 0.01), more uneventful recoveries (0.02) and less minor post-operative complications (Clavien-Dindo I or II-p = 0.01,) but similar recurrence rate (p = 0.41). In the open group, the placement of a mesh showed to reduce the rate of recurrence (p = 0.0001). However, this was not found in the laparoscopic approach. In conclusion, the laparoscopic approach showed do give less post-operative complications and a shorter length of stay, with no benefit in the recurrence rate. Considering the open technique, the use of a mesh seemed to reduce the rate of recurrence.

Biologic vs Synthetic Mesh for Parastomal Hernia Repair: Post Hoc Analysis of a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

Parastomal hernias are often repaired with mesh to reduce recurrences, but the presence of an ostomy increases the wound class from clean to clean-contaminated/contaminated and makes the choice of mesh more controversial than in a strictly clean case. We aimed to compare the outcomes of biologic and synthetic mesh for parastomal hernia repair.

STUDY DESIGN

This is a post hoc analysis of parastomal hernia repairs in a randomized trial comparing biologic and synthetic mesh in contaminated ventral hernia repairs. Outcomes included rates of surgical site occurrences requiring procedural intervention (SSOPI), reoperations, stoma/mesh-related adverse events, parastomal hernia recurrence rates (clinical, patient-reported, and radiographic) at 2 years, quality of life (EQ-5D, EQ-5D Visual Analog Scale, and Hernia-Related Quality of Life Survey), and hospital costs up to 30 days.

RESULTS

A total of 108 patients underwent parastomal hernia repair (57 biologic (53%) and 51 synthetic (47%)). Demographic and hernia characteristics were similar between the two groups. No significant differences in SSOPI rates or reoperations were observed between mesh types. Four mesh erosions into an ostomy requiring reoperations (2 biologic vs 2 synthetic) occurred. At 2 years, parastomal hernia recurrence rates were similar for biologic and synthetic mesh (17 (29.8%) vs 13 (25.5%), respectively; P=.77). Overall and hernia-related quality of life improved from baseline and were similar between the two groups at 2 years. Median total hospital cost and median mesh cost were higher for biologic compared to synthetic mesh.

CONCLUSION

Biologic and synthetic mesh have similar wound morbidity, reoperations, 2-year hernia recurrence rates, and quality of life in parastomal hernia repairs. Cost should be considered in mesh choice for parastomal hernia repairs.