1
|
Lloyd AJ, Hardy NP, Jordan P, Ryan EJ, Whelan M, Clancy C, O'Riordan J, Kavanagh DO, Neary P, Sahebally SM. Efferent limb stimulation prior to loop ileostomy closure: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Tech Coloproctol 2023; 28:15. [PMID: 38095756 DOI: 10.1007/s10151-023-02875-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2023] [Accepted: 11/01/2023] [Indexed: 12/18/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Postoperative ileus (POI) remains a common phenomenon following loop ileostomy closure. Our aim was to determine whether preoperative physiological stimulation (PPS) of the efferent limb reduced POI incidence. METHODS A PRISMA-compliant meta-analysis searching PubMed, EMBASE and CENTRAL databases was performed. The last search was carried out on 30 January 2023. All randomized studies comparing PPS versus no stimulation were included. The primary endpoint was POI incidence. Secondary endpoints included the time to first passage of flatus/stool, time to resume oral diet, need for nasogastric tube (NGT) placement postoperatively, length of stay (LOS) and other complications. Random effects models were used to calculate pooled effect size estimates. Trial sequential analyses (TSA) were also performed. RESULTS Three randomized studies capturing 235 patients (116 PPS, 119 no stimulation) were included. On random effects analysis, PPS was associated with a quicker time to resume oral diet (MD - 1.47 days, 95% CI - 2.75 to - 0.19, p = 0.02), shorter LOS (MD - 1.47 days, 95% CI - 2.47 to - 0.46, p = 0.004) (MD - 1.41 days, 95% CI - 2.32 to - 0.50, p = 0.002, I2 = 56%) and fewer other complications (OR 0.42, 95% CI 0.18 to 1.01, p = 0.05). However, there was no difference in POI incidence (OR 0.35, 95% CI 0.10 to 1.21, p = 0.10), the requirement for NGT placement (OR 0.50, 95% CI 0.21 to 1.20, p = 0.12) or time to first passage of flatus/stool (MD - 0.60 days, 95% CI - 1.95 to 0.76, p = 0.39). TSA revealed imprecise estimates for all outcomes (except LOS) and further studies are warranted to meet the required information threshold. CONCLUSIONS PPS prior to stoma closure may reduce LOS and postoperative complications albeit without a demonstrable beneficial effect on POI. Further high-powered studies are required to confirm or refute these findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A J Lloyd
- Department of Surgery, Tallaght University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Tallaght University Hospital, Dublin , Ireland.
| | - N P Hardy
- Department of Surgery, Tallaght University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - P Jordan
- Department of Surgery, Tallaght University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - E J Ryan
- Department of Surgery, Tallaght University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - M Whelan
- Department of Surgery, Tallaght University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - C Clancy
- Department of Surgery, Tallaght University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - J O'Riordan
- Department of Surgery, Tallaght University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - D O Kavanagh
- Department of Surgery, Tallaght University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
- Department of Surgical Affairs, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland
| | - P Neary
- Department of Surgery, Tallaght University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - S M Sahebally
- Department of Surgery, Tallaght University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Garfinkle R, Demian M, Sabboobeh S, Moon J, Hulme-Moir M, Liberman AS, Feinberg S, Hayden DM, Chadi SA, Demyttenaere S, Samuel L, Hotakorzian N, Quintin L, Morin N, Faria J, Ghitulescu G, Vasilevsky CA, Boutros M. Bowel stimulation before loop ileostomy closure to reduce postoperative ileus: a multicenter, single-blinded, randomized controlled trial. Surg Endosc 2022; 37:3934-3943. [PMID: 35984521 PMCID: PMC9390101 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-022-09510-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2022] [Accepted: 07/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
Introduction The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of preoperative bowel stimulation on the development of postoperative ileus (POI) after loop ileostomy closure. Methods This was a multicenter, randomized controlled trial (NCT025596350) including adult (≥ 18 years old) patients who underwent elective loop ileostomy closure at 7 participating hospitals. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) using a centralized computer-generated sequence with block randomization to either preoperative bowel stimulation or no stimulation (control group). Bowel stimulation consisted of 10 outpatient sessions within the 3 weeks prior to ileostomy closure and was performed by trained Enterostomal Therapy nurses. The primary outcome was POI, defined as an intolerance to oral food in the absence of clinical or radiological signs of obstruction, on or after postoperative day 3, that either (a) required nasogastric tube insertion; or (b) was associated with two of the following: nausea/vomiting, abdominal distension, or the absence of flatus. Results Between January 2017 and November 2020, 101 patients were randomized, and 5 patients never underwent ileostomy closure; thus, 96 patients (47 stimulated vs. 49 control) were analyzed according to a modified intention-to-treat protocol. Baseline characteristics were well balanced in both groups. The incidence of POI was lower among patients randomized to stimulation (6.4% vs. 24.5%, p = 0.034; unadjusted RR: 0.26, 95% CI 0.078–0.87). Stimulated patients also had earlier median time to first flatus (2.0 days (1.0–2.0) vs. 2.0 days (2.0–3.0), p = 0.025), were more likely to pass flatus on postoperative day 1 (46.8% vs. 22.4%, p = 0.022), and had a shorter median postoperative hospital stay (3.0 days (2.0–3.5) vs. 4.0 days (2.0–6.0), p = 0.003). Conclusions Preoperative bowel stimulation via the efferent limb of the ileostomy reduced POI after elective loop ileostomy closure. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00464-022-09510-5.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard Garfinkle
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Marie Demian
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Sarah Sabboobeh
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Jeongyoon Moon
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | | | - A Sender Liberman
- Department of Surgery, McGill University Health Center, Montreal, Canada
| | - Stan Feinberg
- Department of Surgery, North York General Hospital, Toronto, Canada
| | - Dana M Hayden
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, USA
| | - Sami A Chadi
- Department of Surgery, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
| | | | - Louise Samuel
- Department of Nursing, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Canada
| | | | - Laurence Quintin
- Department of Nursing, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Canada
| | - Nancy Morin
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Julio Faria
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Gabriela Ghitulescu
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Carol-Ann Vasilevsky
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Marylise Boutros
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada. .,Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, 3755 Cote Ste Catherine, G-317, Montreal, QC, H3T 1E2, Canada.
| | | |
Collapse
|