Diagnostic accuracy of C-reactive protein, procalcitonin and neutrophils for the early detection of anastomotic leakage after colorectal resection: a multicentric, prospective study

Bile acid in drainage fluid for early diagnosis of anastomotic leakage and safe discharge after minimally invasive rectal cancer resection: A prospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

This study was designed to evaluate the diagnostic value of bile acid levels in drainage fluid for early prediction and exclusion of anastomotic leakage, and assess the performance in allowing a safe discharge.

METHODS

This prospective single-center study was conducted in patients diagnosed with rectal cancer who had received minimally invasive anterior resection consecutively from December 2021 to March 2024. Bile acid in drainage fluid, C-reactive protein, and procalcitonin in serum were measured on the third and fifth day after surgery. Four criteria were considered in discharging patients: a C-reactive protein level below 100 mg/L, flatus with or without defecation, a restore of liquid diet, a bile acid level less than 2 μmol/L.

RESULTS

A total of 419 patients were included and divided into an anastomotic leakage group (n = 37; 8.8%) and a nonanastomotic leakage group (n = 382; 91.2%). Of those patients, 384 accorded with the discharge criteria and 380 of them (99%) discharged safely. The rate of anastomotic leakage after discharge and readmission was 0.5% and 0.3%. Bile acid levels in drainage fluid in the anastomotic leakage group were significantly greater than that in the nonanastomotic leakage group on both postoperative days 3 and 5 (postoperative day 3: 3.00 [2.00-5.17] μmol/L vs 0.80 [0.40-1.30] μmol/L, P < .001; and postoperative day 5: 5.17 [3.00-9.20] μmol/L vs 2.00 [1.40-3.50] μmol/L, P < .001). The negative predictive value in ruling out an anastomotic leakage were 0.96 on postoperative day 3 and 0.97 on postoperative day 5 for bile acid alone.

CONCLUSION

Drainage bile acid has a high negative predictive value in the early diagnosis of anastomotic leakage and showed potential to allow for safe discharge.

Early warning model to detect anastomotic leakage following colon surgery: a clinical observational study

PURPOSE

We aimed to develop a predictive tool for anastomotic leakage (AL) following colon cancer surgery by combining a clinical early warning score (EWS) with the C-reactive protein (CRP) level.

METHODS

The records of 1,855 patients who underwent colon cancer surgery at the Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust between January 2013 and December 2018, with or without AL, were retrospectively reviewed. EWS and CRP levels were assessed daily from the first postoperative day until discharge. AL was defined as an anastomotic defect observed at reoperation, the presence of feculent fluid in a pelvic drain, or evidence of AL on computed tomography. The tool incorporated postoperative EWS and CRP levels for the accurate early detection of AL.

RESULTS

From postoperative days 3 to 7, the mean CRP level exceeded 200 mg/L in patients with AL and was under 200 mg/L in those without AL (P<0.05). From postoperative days 1 to 5, the mean EWS among patients with leakage exceeded 2, while scores were below 2 among those without leakage (P<0.05). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis identified postoperative day 3 as the most predictive of early leakage, with cutoff values of 2.4 for EWS and 180 mg/L for CRP; this yielded an area under the curve of 0.87 (sensitivity, 90%; specificity, 70%).

CONCLUSION

We propose using an EWS of 2.4 and a CRP level of 180 mg/L on postoperative day 3 following colon surgery with anastomosis as threshold values to prompt investigation and treatment of AL.

Diagnostic Modalities for Early Detection of Anastomotic Leak After Colorectal Surgery

INTRODUCTION

Anastomotic leak (AL) remains a severe complication following colorectal surgery, leading to increased morbidity and mortality, particularly in cases of delayed diagnosis. Existing diagnostic methods, including computed tomography (CT) scans, contrast enemas, endoscopic examinations, and reoperations can confirm AL but lack strong predictive value. Early detection is crucial for improving patient outcomes, yet a definitive and reliable predictive test, or "gold standard," is still lacking.

METHODS

A comprehensive PubMed review was focused on CT imaging, serum levels of C-reactive protein (CRP), and procalcitonin (PCT) to assess their predictive utility in detecting AL after colorectal resection. Three independent reviewers evaluated eligibility, extracted data, and assessed the methodological quality of the studies.

RESULTS

Summarized in detailed tables, our analysis revealed the effectiveness of both CRP and PCT in the early detection of AL during the postoperative period. CT imaging, capable of identifying fluid collection, pneumoperitoneum, extraluminal contrast extravasation, abscess formation, and other early signs of leak, also proved valuable.

CONCLUSIONS

Considering the variability in findings and statistics across these modalities, our study suggests a personalized, multimodal approach to predicting AL. Integrating CRP and PCT assessments with the diagnostic capabilities of CT imaging provides a nuanced, patient-specific strategy that significantly enhances early detection and management. By tailoring interventions based on individual clinical characteristics, surgeons can optimize patient outcomes, reduce morbidity, and mitigate the consequences associated with AL after colorectal surgery. This approach emphasizes the importance of personalized medicine in surgical care, paving the way for improved patient health outcomes.

Early Predictors of Fistula Formation Following Head and Neck Reconstruction

BACKGROUND

 Salivary fistula formation is a common and serious complication following head and neck reconstruction. Because it can cause delayed wound healing and infection and carotid artery rupture in severe cases, hence, early detection and treatment are crucial. This study was designed to identify early predictors of postoperative fistula formation.

METHODS

 We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients who underwent head and neck reconstruction between 2015 and 2022. Body temperature, serum white blood cell (WBC) count, and serum C-reactive protein (CRP) levels were assessed until postoperative day (POD) 14 and compared between patients with and without fistula.

RESULTS

 In this study, 200 patients were included. No significant differences in body temperature and WBC count were observed between the two groups during the entire study period. CRP levels after POD2 were higher in the fistula group than in the without fistula group. From the receiver operating characteristic curves comparing the two groups, the best cutoff level for CRP was 6.27 mg/dL from POD7 to POD8, with 77.1% sensitivity, 69.8% specificity, and 90.1% negative predictive value.

CONCLUSION

 CRP is a valuable predictor of fistula formation following head and neck reconstruction. The course of CRP levels in patients with fistulas remains consistently elevated compared to patients without fistulas, and it is particularly useful for the exclusion diagnosis of fistula.

Considerations in case of suspected anastomotic leakage in the lower GI tract

Colorectal anastomotic leakage (CAL) remains a feared complication after colorectal surgery and requires prompt detection and proper treatment. With the upswing of fast-track recovery programs in recent years this challenge has increased, as clinical features may only arise after discharge. Therefore, identification of the best diagnostic tools is of utmost importance, also since early treatment is associated with high success rates. Diagnostic tools range from general screening tools to invasive procedures to assess the severity of the leak. Laboratory tests, in particular the inflammation biomarkers C-reactive protein and procalcitonin, have a significant role in the detection of CAL after colorectal surgery. As these biomarkers are unspecific for CAL, additional imaging should be performed when blood levels are elevated. The golden standard for the detection of AL after colonic resections is a computed tomography (CT-scan). If tolerated, a contrast medium should be administered rectally to enhance diagnostic accuracy. When suspicion of CAL remains high despite negative previous tests, further endoscopy examination should be conducted. However, endoscopic examinations become more suitable for the early diagnostic work-up after rectal resections. This review aims to provide an overview of current diagnostics for the screening and assessment of the severity of CAL after colorectal surgery.

C-reactive Protein and Procalcitonin Levels to Predict Anastomotic Leak After Colorectal Surgery: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Anastomotic leak (AL) is a feared complication after colorectal surgery. Prompt diagnosis and treatment are crucial. C-reactive protein (CRP) and procalcitonin (PCT) have been proposed as early AL indicators. The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the CRP and CPT predictive values for early AL diagnosis after colorectal surgery.

METHODS

Systematic literature search to identify studies evaluating the diagnostic accuracy of postoperative CRP and CPT for AL. A Bayesian meta-analysis was carried out using a random-effects model and pooled predictive parameters to determine postoperative CRP and PCT cut-off values at different postoperative days (POD).

RESULTS

Twenty-five studies (11,144 patients) were included. The pooled prevalence of AL was 8% (95 CI 7-9%), and the median time to diagnosis was 6.9 days (range 3-10). The derived POD3, POD4 and POD5 CRP cut-off were 15.9 mg/dl, 11.4 mg/dl and 10.9 mg/dl respectively. The diagnostic accuracy was comparable with a pooled area under the curve (AUC) of 0.80 (95% CIs 0.23-0.85), 0.84 (95% CIs 0.18-0.86) and 0.84 (95% CIs 0.18-0.89) respectively. Negative likelihood ratios (LR-) showed moderate evidence to rule out AL on POD 3 (LR- 0.29), POD4 (LR- 0.24) and POD5 (LR- 0.26). The derived POD3 and POD5 CPT cut-off were 0.75 ng/ml (AUC = 0.84) and 0.9 ng/ml (AUC = 0.92) respectively. The pooled POD5 negative LR (-0.18) showed moderate evidence to rule out AL.

CONCLUSIONS

In the setting of colorectal surgery, CRP and CPT serum concentrations lower than the derived cut-offs on POD3-POD5, may be useful to rule out AL thus possibly identifying patients at low risk for AL development.

An umbrella review of meta-analyses on diagnostic accuracy of C-reactive protein

BACKGROUND

Multiple studies and meta-analyses have reported the diagnostic value of C-reactive protein (CRP) in several diseases. However, the precision, and influence of potential bias regarding the diagnostic values of existing evidence may have implications for clinical practice.

METHODS

We performed an umbrella review of diagnostic test accuracy studies of CRP for diseases by searching PubMed, Embase, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and WanFang databases up to March 7, 2021. Five independent reviewers evaluated eligibility, extracted data, and assessed methodological quality. We descriptively analyzed the diagnostic accuracy of CRP for multiple diseases, heterogeneity between studies, and publication bias.

RESULTS

Seventy-four meta-analyses were included, with 13 diseases classified according to the International Classification of Diseases-11 (ICD-11). The methodological quality of the included meta-analyses was mostly low, with only 16 meta-analyses rated as moderate or high, including seven diseases classified by ICD-11. CRP had a relatively greater diagnostic accuracy for two of these diseases. For postoperative infectious complications after bariatric surgery, sensitivity and specificity were 0.81 (0.34-1) and 0.91 (0.73-1), respectively. For anastomotic leakage after colorectal surgery, sensitivity and specificity were 0.95 (0.75-0.99) and 0.95 (0.75-0.99), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The diagnostic accuracy of CRP for multiple diseases has been extensively studied; however, most studies have low methodological quality. Evidence indicates that CRP has a relatively greater diagnostic accuracy for inflammation and infection diseases, especially for postoperative infectious complications after bariatric surgery and anastomotic leakage after colorectal surgery.

Risk Factors and Preventive Measures for Anastomotic Leak in Colorectal Cancer

Anastomotic leak (AL) represents one of the most detrimental complications after colorectal surgery. The patient-related factors and surgery-related factors leading to AL have been identified in previous studies. Through early identification and timely adjustment of risk factors, preventive measures can be taken to reduce potential AL. However, there are still many problems associated with AL. The debate about preventive measures such as preoperative mechanical bowel preparation (MBP), intraoperative drainage, and surgical scope also continues. Recently, the gut microbiota has received more attention due to its important role in various diseases. Although the underlying mechanisms of gut microbiota on AL have not been validated completely, new strategies that manipulate intrinsic mechanisms are expected to prevent and treat AL. Moreover, laboratory examinations for AL prediction and methods for blood perfusion assessment are likely to be promoted in clinical practice. This review outlines possible risk factors for AL and suggests some preventive measures in terms of patient, surgery, and gut microbiota.