Factors determining exercise capacity evaluated during cardiopulmonary exercise testing in 6-month follow-up after ST elevation myocardial infarction

The effects of rate pressure product at admission on cardiopulmonary function during hospitalization in patients with acute myocardial infarction

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to analyze the correlation between the rate pressure product (RPP) and cardiopulmonary function during hospitalization in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI).

METHODS

A total of 362 patients with AMI were selected for the study, and the median admission RPP was used as the cutoff point to divide the patients into a low-RPP group (n = 181) and a high-RPP group (n = 181). The relationship between the RPP at admission and the cardiopulmonary function during hospitalization was analyzed.

RESULTS

The patients in the high-RPP group had a higher body mass index (BMI) (p = 0.014), a higher prevalence of combined hypertension and diabetes mellitus (p < 0.001), a lower incidence of smoking (p = 0.044), and a higher incidence of oscillatory ventilation (6.1% vs. 1.7%, p = 0.029). The differences in RPP at rest, during warm-up, and within 1 and 4 minutes of recovery were statistically significant between the two groups (p < 0.01 on each occasion), while the differences in anaerobic threshold (AT) and watt max (Max) were not statistically significant (p > 0.05 for both). The patients in the low-RPP group had higher oxygen uptake (VO2 [AT]: 14.9 ± 3.4 vs. 14.2 ± 3.6, p = 0.048) and (VO2peak [Max]:18.2 ± 3.8 vs. 17.3 ± 3.8, p = 0.020). The RPP at admission was negatively correlated with VO2 (AT) and VO2peak (p < 0.05) using the regression Equation VO2peak = 33.682 + (-0.012 * RPP at admission/100) + (-0.105 * Age) + (-0.350 * BMI), while there was no correlation between the RPP at admission and VO2 (AT) (p = 0.149).

CONCLUSION

The RPP at admission was negatively correlated with cardiopulmonary function during hospitalization in patients with AMI. Patients with a high RPP were more likely to have a combination of obesity, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and reduced oxygen uptake during exercise, while a high RPP at admission appeared to affect their cardiovascular response indicators during exercise.

Cardiopulmonary exercise test-based assessment of the effects of sacubitril/valsartan on the blood pressure response to exercise in patients with acute myocardial infarction during hospitalization

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effects of sacubitril/valsartan (S/V) on cardiopulmonary function and blood pressure response to exercise during hospitalization in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) based on the cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET).

METHODS

A total of 265 AMI patients were treated with either perindopril or S/V within 24 hours of admission. CPET was completed for all patients before discharge. There were 182 cases in the perindopril group and 83 cases in the S/V group.

RESULTS

The proportion of exercise oscillatory ventilation (EOV) was higher in the S/V group than in the perindopril group (10.8% vs 1.6%, X² = 11.148, P = .001). The resting heart rate (HR), resting diastolic blood pressure (DBP), and warm-up DBP were lower in the S/V group than in the perindopril group (P < .05). The resting systolic blood pressure (SBP) was 9.0 mmHg lower (115.7 ± 17.5 vs 106.7 ± 15.0, P < .001), the SBP during warm-up was 9.5 mmHg lower (124.8 ± 23.7 vs 115.3 ± 22.5,P = .002), the SBP at the anaerobic threshold (AT) was 10.5 mmHg lower (135.3 ± 24.8 vs 127.1 ± 25.1,P = .021),the SBP at max watts was 11.5 mmHg lower (148.9 ± 26.4 vs 137.4 ± 26.4,P = .001), and the SBP during one-minute recovery was 12.3 mmHg lower (146.5 ± 27.1 vs 134.2 ± 24.4, P = .001)in the S/V group than in the perindopril group. The S/V group had a higher oxygen ventilation equivalent and carbon dioxide ventilation equivalent (VE/VCO₂) at AT and a lower oxygen uptake-work rate relationship during max watts (P < .05). The differences in the oxygen pulse, stroke volume, peak oxygen uptake (VO_{2 peak}), and VE/VCO₂ slope were not statistically significant between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Treatment with S/V was able to reduce the exercise blood pressure in patients with AMI during hospitalization, but did not significantly improve the VO_{2 peak}, VE/VCO₂ slope, or exercise tolerance.