Positive pleural cytology is an indicator for visceral pleural invasion in metastatic pleural effusions

Construction of a multi-classified decision tree model for identifying malignant pleural effusion and tuberculous pleural effusion

OBJECTIVE

Pleural effusion (PE) is a common clinical complication associated with various disorders. We aimed to utilize laboratory variables and their corresponding ratios in serum and PE for the differential diagnosis of multiple types of PE based on a decision tree (DT) algorithm.

METHODS

A total of 1435 untreated patients with PE admitted to The First Affiliated Hospital of Ningbo University were enrolled. The demographic and laboratory variables were collected and compared. The receiver operating characteristic curve was used to select important variables for diagnosing malignant pleural effusion (MPE) or tuberculous pleural effusion (TPE) and included in the DT model. The data were divided into the training set and the test set at a ratio of 7:3. The training data was used to develop the DT model, and the test data was for evaluating the model. Independent data was collected as external validation.

RESULTS

Three PE indicators (carcinoembryonic antigen, adenosine deaminase [ADA], and total protein), two serum indicators (neuron-specific enolase and cytokeratin 19 fragments), and two ratios [high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP)/ PE lymphocyte and hsCRP/PE ADA] were used to construct the DT model. The area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity for diagnosing MPE were 0.963, 84.0%, 91.6% in the training set, 0.976, 84.1%, 88.6% in the test set, and 0.955,83.3%, 86.7% in the external validation set. The AUC, sensitivity, and specificity of diagnosing TPE were 0.898, 86.8%, 92.3% in the training set, 0.888, 88.8%, 92.7% in the test set, and 0.778, 84.8%, 94.3% in the external validation set.

CONCLUSION

The DT model showed good diagnostic efficacy and could be applied for the differential diagnosis of MPE and TPE in clinical settings.

Diagnosis and Treatment of Pleural Effusion. Recommendations of the Spanish Society of Pulmonology and Thoracic Surgery. Update 2022

Pleural effusion (PE) is a common yet complex disease that requires specialized, multidisciplinary management. Recent advances, novel diagnostic techniques, and innovative patient-centered therapeutic proposals have prompted an update of the current guidelines. This document provides recommendations and protocols based on a critical review of the literature on the epidemiology, etiology, diagnosis, prognosis, and new therapeutic options in PE, and addresses some cost-effectiveness issues related to the main types of PE.

Sensitivity and complications of thoracentesis and thoracoscopy: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Thoracentesis and thoracoscopy are used to diagnose malignant pleural effusions (MPE). Data on how sensitivity varies with tumour type is limited.

METHODS

Systematic review using PubMed was performed through August 2020 to determine the sensitivity of thoracentesis and thoracoscopy for MPE secondary to malignancy, by cancer type, and complication rates. Tests to identify sources of heterogeneity were performed. Study quality was assessed using Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS)-2 and National Institutes of Health quality assessment tools. Publication bias was tested using funnel plots.

RESULTS

Meta-analyses for sensitivity of thoracentesis for MPE secondary to malignancy, mesothelioma and lung and breast cancer included 29, eight, 12 and nine studies, respectively. Pooled sensitivities were 0.643 (95% CI 0.592-0.692), 0.451 (95% CI 0.249-0.661), 0.738 (95% CI 0.659-0.836) and 0.820 (95% CI 0.700-0.917), respectively. For sensitivity of thoracoscopy for MPE secondary to malignancy and mesothelioma, 41 and 15 studies were included, respectively. Pooled sensitivities were 0.929 (95% CI 0.905-0.95) and 0.915 (95% CI 0.871-0.952), respectively. Pooled complication rates of thoracentesis and thoracoscopy were 0.041 (95% CI 0.025-0.051) and 0.040 (95% CI 0.029-0.052), respectively. Heterogeneity was significant for all meta-analyses. Funnel plots were asymmetric.

INTERPRETATION

Sensitivity of thoracentesis varied significantly per cancer type. Pooled complication rates were low. Awareness of how sensitivity of thoracentesis changes across cancers can improve decision-making when MPE is suspected.

Application of the international system for reporting serous fluid cytopathology on reporting various body fluids; experience of a tertiary care hospital

Objectives:

Cytological examination of effusion sample is a preliminary and minimally invasive method for the diagnosis of body fluids. Recently, the International System For Reporting Serous Fluid Cytopathology (ISRSFC) and the Indian Academy of Cytologist (IAC) have published guidelines for reporting effusion cytology and calculating the risks of malignancy (ROMs) for each defined category. We report our 2 years of experience in reclassifying and assessing the feasibility of applying ISRFSC and IAC categories to effusion fluid and to provide an estimate of the risk of malignancy for each diagnostic category.

Material and Methods:

Cytological reports of patients from January 2019 to December 2020 were retrieved and reclassified into a five-tiered classification scheme as per ISRSFC guidelines. Cellblock and immunohistochemistry were performed in selected cases. Clinico radiological and histopathological information were obtained and correlated with the cytological findings wherever available.

Results:

In the study, 652 cases were included during the 2 years. Out of these, 328 (50.3%) were women and 314 (47.3%) were men. Patient’s ages ranged between 2 92 years with a mean age of 47.4 years. There were 366 (56.1%) cases of ascitic fluid followed by 262 (40.1%) cases of pleural fluid and 24 (3.8%) cases of pericardial fluid in the analysis. Of all the cases, 13 (2%) were non-diagnostic (ND), 464 (71.6%) were negative for malignant (NFM) cells, 16 (2.4%) were atypia of uncertain significance, 31 (4.7%) were suspicious of malignancy, and 125 (19.3%) were malignant. Cellblock was prepared in 65 cases. Lung cancer followed by breast cancer was the most common malignancies involving the pleural effusion and ovarian cancer was the most common cause of peritoneal effusion. ROM for each diagnostic category was 23% for ND, 25% for NFM, 56% for the atypical category, 80.6% in suspicious, and 90% were for positive for malignancy category.

Conclusion:

The use of a five-tiered system as per the ISRFC and IAC guidelines are feasible for the standardized reporting of effusion samples, thus avoiding subjective variation of reporting.

Management of Malignant Pleural Effusion: Where Are We Now?

Pleural malignancies are among the most common causes of pleural disease and form the basis of our daily pleural practice. There has been significant research and increase in both diagnostic and therapeutic management of malignant pleural diseases in the last decade. Good-quality data have led to a paradigm shift in the management options of pleural malignancies, and indwelling pleural catheter is now recommended and widely used as first-line intervention. Several trials compared different treatment modalities for pleural malignancies and continue to emphasize the need to reduce hospital length of stay and unnecessary pleural intervention, and the importance of patient choice in clinical decision making. This practical review aims to summarize the current knowledge for the management of pleural malignancies, and the understanding of the steps that we still have to climb to optimize management and reduce morbidity.

Categorisation of serous effusions using the International System for Reporting Serous Fluid Cytopathology and assessment of risk of malignancy with diagnostic accuracy

CONTEXT

The International System for Reporting Serous Fluid Cytopathology (ISRSFC) standardises the reporting of serous effusion cytology under five categories: Non-Diagnostic (ND), Negative for Malignancy (NFM), Atypia of Undetermined Significance (AUS), Suspicious for Malignancy (SFM), and Malignant (M). Very few studies have been conducted so far to confirm the risk of malignancy of the different categories.

AIMS

The main objectives of our study were to classify serous effusions according to the ISRSFC categories and assess their risk of malignancy (ROM) and performance parameters.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All serous effusion samples received from January 2019 to December 2020 were reclassified according to the ISRSFC. Using histopathological diagnosis as the gold standard, ROM and performance parameters were calculated.

RESULTS

A total of 831 pleural effusion samples were reclassified as follows: ND, 3 (0.4%); NFM, 635 (76.4%); AUS, 65 (7.8%); SFM, 60 (7.2%); and M, 68 (8.2%). For 457 peritoneal effusion samples, the reclassifications were ND, 5 (1.1%); NFM, 368 (80.5%); AUS, 19 (4.2%); SFM, 17 (3.7%); and M, 48 (10.5%). All 12 (100%) pericardial effusions belonged to the NFM category. The ROM for the ND, NFM, AUS, SRM, and M categories was 0%, 2.1%, 33.3%, 94.1%, 100%, respectively, in pleural effusions, and 50%, 4.8%, 22.2%, 83.3%, 100%, respectively, in peritoneal effusions. The ROM was 0% for NFM in pericardial effusions.

CONCLUSION

The ISRSFC is an excellent system for accurately classifying serous effusions with greater reproducibility of reports and better communication between pathologist and clinician.

Objective Thoracoscopic Criteria in Differentiation between Benign and Malignant Pleural Effusions

BACKGROUND

Thoracoscopy is the "gold standard" diagnostic modality for investigation of suspected pleural malignancy. It is postulated that meticulous assessment of the pleural cavity may be adequate to indicate malignancy through the macroscopic findings of nodules, pleural thickening, and lymphangitis. We attempted to critically assess this practice, by precisely defining objective macroscopic criteria which might differentiate benign from malignant pleural diseases according to intrapleural pattern and anatomical location, and thereby to explore the predilection of abnormalities to specific sites on pleural surfaces.

METHODS

A structured review of recorded video footage from medical thoracoscopy procedures in 96 patients was conducted by 2 independent assessors. Abnormalities were scored on agreed, objective criteria for the presence of nodules, lymphangitis and inflammation on each of the costoparietal, visceral and diaphragmatic surfaces. The costoparietal pleura was divided into 6 levels (apical, middle, and inferior surfaces of the lateral and posterior parietal pleura). The anterior surface of the costoparietal pleura was excluded from analysis after interim review as this surface was rarely seen.

RESULTS

In the benign group, inflammation was the predominant finding in 65% (n = 33; costoparietal), 44% (n = 21; visceral), and 42% (n = 15; diaphragmatic). Nodules were detected in 24% (n = 12; costoparietal), 8% (n = 4; visceral), and 8% (n = 3; diaphragmatic). The most affected surfaces with inflammation were the middle lateral (60%) and the inferior lateral (57.8%) parts of the costoparietal pleura. In the malignant group, nodules were the predominant finding according to surface in 73% (n = 33; costoparietal), 32% (n = 13; visceral) and 48% (n = 17; diaphragmatic). Inflammation was detected in 44% (n = 20; costoparietal), 25% (n = 10; visceral), and 29% (n = 10; diaphragmatic). The most affected surfaces with nodules were the middle lateral (67.4%) and inferior lateral (66.7%) costoparietal pleural surfaces.

CONCLUSION

This is the first detailed, anatomical description of abnormalities in the pleural space during thoracoscopy. While nodules were the predominant pattern in malignant pleural effusion, they were detected in 24% of benign diagnoses. Detection of nodules in >1 area of the costoparietal pleura was in favor of a malignant diagnosis. Inflammation was the predominant pattern in benign pleural effusion. Our results suggest that macroscopic nodules in malignant diagnoses have a predilection for the middle and inferior surfaces of the lateral costoparietal pleura.

Application of Indian Academy of Cytologists Guidelines for Reporting Serous Effusions: An Institutional Experience

Background:

Recently, the Indian Academy of Cytologists (IAC) has published the guidelines for interpretation and reporting of serous effusions. Till date, there are no studies on its applicability.

Aims:

The present study was carried out to assess the feasibility of applying the IAC reporting categories to effusions, determine the frequency, and provide an estimate of the risk of malignancy (ROM) for individual diagnostic categories.

Materials and Methods:

All cases of serous effusion fluids reported in the year 2019 were retrieved from the archives and reassigned as per the IAC diagnostic categories. The clinical and histopathological follow-up information was obtained wherever possible.

Results:

A total of 1340 effusion samples were received from 1085 patients. There were 561 (51.7%) males and 524 (48.3%) females. Majority were pleural (1066, 79.5%), followed by peritoneal (187, 14%) and pericardial (87, 6.5%) effusions. The age ranged from 7 months to 92 years. There were 35 (2.6%) samples in category 1 (non-diagnostic), 954 (71.2%) in category 2 (benign), 17 (1.3%) in category 3 (atypical), 59 (4.4%) in category 4 (suspicious for malignancy) and 275 (20.5%) in category 5 (malignant). The estimated ROM in serous effusion samples was 20% for category 1, 16.7% for category 2, 50% for category 3, 94.4% for category 4 and 100% for category 5.

Conclusions:

The categorization of serous effusion cytology samples as per the IAC diagnostic categories and as per the reporting format developed by the IAC is feasible and the management recommendations are mostly appropriate.

Cytohistological correlation in serous effusions using the newly proposed International System for Reporting Serous Fluid Cytopathology: Experience of an oncological center

BACKGROUND

Cytological analysis is part of the initial etiological evaluation of serous effusions. The newly proposed International System for Reporting Serous Fluid Cytopathology (ISRSFC) aims to standardize reporting.

METHODS

All pleural and peritoneal effusion samples admitted for cytological analysis at our institution between 2012 and 2016, and pericardial effusion samples admitted between 2008 and 2018, were reviewed and reclassified according to the ISRSFC. Risk of malignancy (ROM) and performance parameters were calculated.

RESULTS

1496 pleural effusion samples were reclassified: 12(0.8%) non-diagnostic (ND), 944(63.1%) negative for malignancy (NFM), 9(0.6%) atypia of undetermined significance (AUS), 54(3.6%) suspicious of malignancy (SFM) and 477(31.9%) malignant (M). 64 pericardial effusion samples were reclassified: 23(35.9%) NFM, 1(1.6%) AUS, 4(6.3%) SFM and 36(56.2%) M. 763 peritoneal effusion samples were reclassified: 5(0.7%) ND, 457(59.9%) NFM, 12(1.6%) AUS, 37(4.8%) SFM and 252(33%) M. The ROM was, respectively, for each of the aforementioned categories, 57.1%, 23.9%, 50%, 76.2%, 100% in pleural effusions, 100%, 26.3%, 62.5%, 91.7%, 100% in peritoneal effusions and 0% for NFM, 0% for AUS and 100% for M in pericardial effusions. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and diagnostic accuracy were, respectively, 61.6%, 100%, 100%, 73.3%, 81.3% for pleural, 100%, 100%, 100%, 100%, 100% for pericardial and 61.2%, 100%, 100%, 70%, 79.7% for peritoneal effusion samples.

CONCLUSION

Serous effusion cytology has a high specificity and positive predictive value and a modest sensitivity and negative predictive value, supporting its role in confirming the diagnosis of malignancy. The ISRSFC will increase standardization and reproducibility in reporting, leading to improved clinical decision-making.

A 2-year retrospective study on pleural effusions: A cancer centre experience

BACKGROUND

Cytopathological examination of pleural effusions is a fast and minimally invasive method for verification of the presence of neoplastic cells. We report our 2-year experience using a categorised diagnostic system and reporting risks of malignancy (ROMs) for each defined category.

METHODS

Cytological reports of patients between November 2016 and October 2018 were collected, with results primarily classified into a five-tiered classification scheme. Immunohistochemistry markers used in cytology and their results were also recorded. Final agreement to histology and overall test performance was calculated for cases with available concomitant (up to 3 months) pleural biopsies.

RESULTS

A total of 519 samples from 385 patients were collected, being 29 (5.6%) classified as non-diagnostic, 291 (56%) as negative, 28 (5.4%) as atypical, 30 (5.8%) as suspicious and 141 (27.2%) as positive. Most requested markers were calretinin, TTF1, Ber-EP4 and Gata-3, being conclusive in 45 (76.3%) cases. Total cyto-histological agreement was achieved in 49 (80.3%) specimens, with an overall sensitivity and specificity of 69.4% and 93.3%, respectively. Positive predictive value was 96.2% and negative predictive value was of 56%. ROM for each diagnostic category was 50% for non-diagnostic, 44% for negative, 50% for atypical, 83.3% for suspicious and 96.2% for positive.

CONCLUSIONS

Our 2-year retrospective study has shown a high specificity and positive predictive value for pleural cytology. The use of a five-tiered system has also shown to be highly effective, with a concordantly progressive higher ROM for the assigned diagnostic categories.

ERS/EACTS statement on the management of malignant pleural effusions

Malignant pleural effusions (MPE) are a common pathology, treated by respiratory physicians and thoracic surgeons alike. In recent years, several well-designed randomized clinical trials have been published that have changed the landscape of MPE management. The European Respiratory Society (ERS) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS) established a multidisciplinary collaboration of clinicians with expertise in the management of MPE with the aim of producing a comprehensive review of the scientific literature. Six areas of interest were identified, including the optimum management of symptomatic MPE, management of trapped lung in MPE, management of loculated MPE, prognostic factors in MPE, whether there is a role for oncological therapies prior to intervention for MPE and whether a histological diagnosis is always required in MPE. The literature revealed that talc pleurodesis and indwelling pleural catheters effectively manage the symptoms of MPE. There was limited evidence regarding the management of trapped lung or loculated MPE. The LENT score was identified as a validated tool for predicting survival in MPE, with Brims' prognostic score demonstrating utility in mesothelioma prognostication. There was no evidence to support the use of oncological therapies as an alternative to MPE drainage, and the literature supported the use of tissue biopsy as the gold standard for diagnosis and treatment planning.Management options for malignant pleural effusions have advanced over the past decade, with high-quality randomized trial evidence informing practice in many areas. However, uncertainties remain and further research is required http://ow.ly/rNt730jOxOS.

Comparison of cytology, chest computed and positron emission tomography findings in malignant pleural effusion from lung cancer

Background

Malignant pleural effusion (MPE) is a common medical problem in lung cancer (LC). Pleural fluid cytology (PFC), chest computed tomography (CCT) and positron emission tomography (PET) findings are helpful as first line approach. The objectives of this study were to evaluate whether there is a correlation between PFC, CCT and PET in patients with MPE due to LC.

Methods

We selected patients from our electronic files. Data of PFC, pleural biopsy (PB), CCT and PET have been recorded and analyzed.

Results

A total of 101 consecutive patients (66 males, 65.3%) with a mean age of 66.2±31 years were selected. Types of LC were adenocarcinoma in 71 patients (70.2%), squamous in 13 (12.8%), small-cell in 12 (11.8%) and large cell in 5 (4.9%). CCT showed nodules in 6 (5.9%), pleural thickening in 8 (7.9%) and both in 17 (16.8%) patients. PFC was positive in 55/91 thoracentesis (60.4%) and 32/52 thoracoscopy (61.5%), while PB in 38/40 performed (95%). PET fixation was found in 32/47 (68%) patients who had MPE at diagnosis. When we associate PFC to CCT and PET findings, the yield in our study becomes 90%. No correlation was observed between CCT findings and PFC (P=0.62) between PFC and PET fixation (P=0.63) or between CCT and PET (P=0.06).

Conclusions

In our cohort of LC patients with MPE, we observed a high sensitivity for PFC, while in most of the cases no findings were observed in CCT. PET had a relative low sensitivity. However, when all 3 methods were combined the yield was 90%.

ERS/EACTS statement on the management of malignant pleural effusions

Malignant pleural effusions (MPE) are a common pathology, treated by respiratory physicians and thoracic surgeons alike. In recent years, several well-designed randomised clinical trials have been published that have changed the landscape of MPE management. The European Respiratory Society (ERS) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS) established a multidisciplinary collaboration of clinicians with expertise in the management of MPE with the aim of producing a comprehensive review of the scientific literature.

Six areas of interest were identified, including the optimum management of symptomatic MPE, management of trapped lung in MPE, management of loculated MPE, prognostic factors in MPE, whether there is a role for oncological therapies prior to intervention for MPE and whether a histological diagnosis is always required in MPE.

The literature revealed that talc pleurodesis and indwelling pleural catheters effectively manage the symptoms of MPE. There was limited evidence regarding the management of trapped lung or loculated MPE. The LENT score was identified as a validated tool for predicting survival in MPE, with Brims' prognostic score demonstrating utility in mesothelioma prognostication. There was no evidence to support the use of oncological therapies as an alternative to MPE drainage, and the literature supported the use of tissue biopsy as the gold standard for diagnosis and treatment planning.