Computed tomography-based spiculated sign for prediction of malignancy in lung nodules: A meta-analysis

18F-FDG PET/CT based model for predicting malignancy in pulmonary nodules: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Several studies to date have reported on the development of positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT)-based models intended to effectively distinguish between benign and malignant pulmonary nodules (PNs). This meta-analysis was designed with the goal of clarifying the utility of these PET/CT-based conventional parameter models as diagnostic tools in the context of the differential diagnosis of PNs.

METHODS

Relevant studies published through September 2023 were identified by searching the Web of Science, PubMed, and Wanfang databases, after which Stata v 12.0 was used to conduct pooled analyses of the resultant data.

RESULTS

This meta-analysis included a total of 13 retrospective studies that analyzed 1,731 and 693 malignant and benign PNs, respectively. The respective pooled sensitivity, specificity, PLR, and NLR values for the PET/CT-based studies developed in these models were 88% (95%CI: 0.86-0.91), 78% (95%CI: 0.71-0.85), 4.10 (95%CI: 2.98-5.64), and 0.15 (95%CI: 0.12-0.19). Of these endpoints, the pooled analyses of model sensitivity (I2 = 69.25%), specificity (I2 = 78.44%), PLR (I2 = 71.42%), and NLR (I2 = 67.18%) were all subject to significant heterogeneity. The overall area under the curve value (AUC) value for these models was 0.91 (95%CI: 0.88-0.93). When differential diagnosis was instead performed based on PET results only, the corresponding pooled sensitivity, specificity, PLR, and NLR values were 92% (95%CI: 0.85-0.96), 51% (95%CI: 0.37-0.66), 1.89 (95%CI: 1.36-2.62), and 0.16 (95%CI: 0.07-0.35), with all four being subject to significant heterogeneity (I2 = 88.08%, 82.63%, 80.19%, and 86.38%). The AUC for these pooled analyses was 0.82 (95%CI: 0.79-0.85).

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that PET/CT-based models may offer diagnostic performance superior to that of PET results alone when distinguishing between benign and malignant PNs.

A Combination of Radiomic Features, Imaging Characteristics, and Serum Tumor Biomarkers to Predict the Possibility of the High-Grade Subtypes of Lung Adenocarcinoma

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

Lung adenocarcinomas (LADC) containing high-grade subtypes have a poorer prognosis. And some studies have shown that high-grade subtypes have been identified as an independent predictor of local recurrence in patients treated with limited resection. The aim of this study was to construct a combined model based on radiomic features, imaging characteristics and serum tumor biomarkers to predict the possibility of preoperative high-grade subtypes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

156 patients with LADC were retrospectively recruited in this study. These patients were randomly divided into training and validation cohorts. Radiomics features and imaging characteristics were extracted from plain CT images. A nomogram was developed in a training cohort by univariate and multivariate logistic analysis, and its performance was evaluated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, calibration curves, and decision curve analysis (DCA) in the training and validation cohorts.

RESULTS

A total of 1316 radiomic features were extracted from the lesions in plain chest CT images. After applying the mRMR algorithm and the LASSO regression, 4 features were retained. Based on these radiomic features, Radiomic score (Radscore) was calculated for each patient. Spiculation, air bronchogram sign, CYFRA 21-1 and Radscore had been used in the construction of the combined model. The AUC of the combined model was respectively 0.88 (95% CI, 0.82-0.95) and 0.94 (95% CI, 0.86-1.00) in the training and validation cohorts.

CONCLUSION

The combined model based on CT images and serum tumor biomarkers, can predict the high-grade subtypes of LADC in a non-invasive manner, which may influence individual treatment planning, such as the choice of surgical approach and postoperative adjuvant therapy.

A Pulmonary Nodule Spiculation Recognition Algorithm Based on Generative Adversarial Networks

Pulmonary nodules have been found as the main pathological change in the lung. Signs of pulmonary nodule lay the major basis for the recognition of the benign and malignant of pulmonary nodules. The spiculation of pulmonary nodules is one of the main signs. Pulmonary nodules are small in volume, so they are difficult to extract accurately. Moreover, the number of spiculation samples is limited, so it is difficult to build a stable network structure. Thus, a novel pulmonary nodule spiculation recognition algorithm is proposed. MCA (morphological component analysis) model is built to segment pulmonary nodules in accordance with the composition of pulmonary CT images. Subsequently, the maximum density projection mechanism is introduced to characterize the boundary features of pulmonary nodules to the maximum extent. Inspired by time series dynamic programming, this paper proposes DTW (dynamic time warping) distance to measure data similarity. Lastly, a semisupervised generative adversarial network is built to solve the problem of insufficient positive samples, and it is capable of recognizing pulmonary nodule spiculation. As revealed by the experimental result, the proposed algorithm exhibited strong robustness.

Predictive model for the probability of malignancy in solitary pulmonary nodules: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

To date, multiple predictive models have been developed with the goal of reliably differentiating between solitary pulmonary nodules (SPNs) that are malignant and those that are benign. The present meta-analysis was conducted to assess the diagnostic utility of these predictive models in the context of SPN differential diagnosis.

METHODS

The PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, CNKI, Wanfang, and VIP databases were searched for relevant studies published through August 31, 2021. Pooled data analyses were conducted using Stata v12.0.

RESULTS

In total, 20 retrospective studies that included 5171 SPNs (malignant/benign: 3662/1509) were incorporated into this meta-analysis. Respective pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), and diagnostic score values were 88% (95CI%: 0.84-0.91), 78% (95CI%: 0.74-0.80), 3.91 (95CI%: 3.42-4.46), 0.16 (95CI%: 0.12-0.21), and 3.21 (95CI%: 2.87-3.55), with an area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curve value of 86% (95CI%: 0.83-0.89). Significant heterogeneity among studies was detected with respect to sensitivity (I² = 89.07%), NLR (I² = 87.29%), and diagnostic score (I² = 72.28%). In a meta-regression analysis, sensitivity was found to be impacted by the standard reference in a given study (surgery and biopsy vs. surgery only, P = 0.02), while specificity was impacted by whether studies were blinded (yes vs. unclear, P = 0.01). Sensitivity values were higher when surgery and biopsy samples were used as a standard reference, while unclear blinding status was associated with increased specificity. No significant evidence of publication bias was detected for the present meta-analysis (P = 0.539).

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this meta-analysis demonstrate that predictive models can offer significant diagnostic utility when establishing whether SPNs are malignant or benign.

Clinical and CT Radiomics Nomogram for Preoperative Differentiation of Pulmonary Adenocarcinoma From Tuberculoma in Solitary Solid Nodule

Aim

To investigate clinical and computed tomography (CT) radiomics nomogram for preoperative differentiation of lung adenocarcinoma (LAC) from lung tuberculoma (LTB) in patients with pulmonary solitary solid nodule (PSSN).

Materials and Methods

A total of 313 patients were recruited in this retrospective study, including 96 pathologically confirmed LAC and 217 clinically confirmed LTB. Patients were assigned at random to training set (n = 220) and validation set (n = 93) according to 7:3 ratio. A total of 2,589 radiomics features were extracted from each three-dimensional (3D) lung nodule on thin-slice CT images and radiomics signatures were built using the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) logistic regression. The predictive nomogram was established based on radiomics and clinical features. Decision curve analysis was performed with training and validation sets to assess the clinical usefulness of the prediction model.

Results

A total of six clinical features were selected as independent predictors, including spiculated sign, vacuole, minimum diameter of nodule, mediastinal lymphadenectasis, sex, and age. The radiomics nomogram of lung nodules, consisting of 15 selected radiomics parameters and six clinical features showed good prediction in the training set [area under the curve (AUC), 1.00; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.99-1.00] and validation set (AUC, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.98-1.00). The nomogram model that combined radiomics and clinical features was better than both single models (p < 0.05). Decision curve analysis showed that radiomics features were beneficial to clinical settings.

Conclusion

The radiomics nomogram, derived from unenhanced thin-slice chest CT images, showed favorable prediction efficacy for differentiating LAC from LTB in patients with PSSN.

Calcification sign for prediction of benignity in pulmonary nodules: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The calcification sign assessed by computed tomography appears to be a potential marker for benignities among patients diagnosed with pulmonary nodules (PNs). The following meta-analysis has been purposefully designed to figure-out the diagnostic value of the calcification signature as a way of identifying benignities from PNs.

METHODS

Cochrane Library, Embase and PubMed were considered as a reference to obtain the required data from January 2000 until October 2020. Stata v12.0 was used as a standard tool for statistical assessment.

RESULTS

Eleven retrospective studies were assessed via this meta-analysis, which included 6136 PNs (1827 benign and 4309 malignant). The pooled diagnostic odd ratios, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), sensitivity and specificity were 6.79, 6.06, 0.89, 13% and 98%, respectively. The value obtained for the area under the curve was 0.65, showing moderate overall diagnostic accuracy. A significant heterogeneity was found while calculating the pooled sensitivity (I²  = 85.5%), specificity (I²  = 75.0%), PLR (I²  = 59.0%), NLR (I²  = 79.5%) and DOR (I²  = 100.0%) in the current analysis. Sub-group analyses presented better PLR and specificity values for the study with a sample size ≥ 400. Deeks' funnel plot asymmetry test detected no potential evidence of significant publication bias (p = 0.091).

CONCLUSIONS

Calcification signs have been identified as moderate regulators corresponding to overall diagnostic performance (via marking a distinct differentiation between malignant and benign) for PNs. However, the manifestation of the calcification sign had a good directive property for benign PNs.