1
|
von Seth J, van der Valk T, Lord E, Sigeman H, Olsen RA, Knapp M, Kardailsky O, Robertson F, Hale M, Houston D, Kennedy E, Dalén L, Norén K, Massaro M, Robertson BC, Dussex N. Genomic trajectories of a near-extinction event in the Chatham Island black robin. BMC Genomics 2022; 23:747. [PMID: 36357860 PMCID: PMC9647977 DOI: 10.1186/s12864-022-08963-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2022] [Accepted: 10/23/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Understanding the micro--evolutionary response of populations to demographic declines is a major goal in evolutionary and conservation biology. In small populations, genetic drift can lead to an accumulation of deleterious mutations, which will increase the risk of extinction. However, demographic recovery can still occur after extreme declines, suggesting that natural selection may purge deleterious mutations, even in extremely small populations. The Chatham Island black robin (Petroica traversi) is arguably the most inbred bird species in the world. It avoided imminent extinction in the early 1980s and after a remarkable recovery from a single pair, a second population was established and the two extant populations have evolved in complete isolation since then. Here, we analysed 52 modern and historical genomes to examine the genomic consequences of this extreme bottleneck and the subsequent translocation. RESULTS We found evidence for two-fold decline in heterozygosity and three- to four-fold increase in inbreeding in modern genomes. Moreover, there was partial support for temporal reduction in total load for detrimental variation. In contrast, compared to historical genomes, modern genomes showed a significantly higher realised load, reflecting the temporal increase in inbreeding. Furthermore, the translocation induced only small changes in the frequency of deleterious alleles, with the majority of detrimental variation being shared between the two populations. CONCLUSION Our results highlight the dynamics of mutational load in a species that recovered from the brink of extinction, and show rather limited temporal changes in mutational load. We hypothesise that ancestral purging may have been facilitated by population fragmentation and isolation on several islands for thousands of generations and may have already reduced much of the highly deleterious load well before human arrival and introduction of pests to the archipelago. The majority of fixed deleterious variation was shared between the modern populations, but translocation of individuals with low mutational load could possibly mitigate further fixation of high-frequency deleterious variation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johanna von Seth
- Centre for Palaeogenetics, Svante Arrhenius Väg 20C, 106 91, Stockholm, Sweden.
- Department of Bioinformatics and Genetics, Swedish Museum of Natural History, Stockholm, Sweden.
- Department of Zoology, Stockholm University, 106 91, Stockholm, Sweden.
| | - Tom van der Valk
- Centre for Palaeogenetics, Svante Arrhenius Väg 20C, 106 91, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Bioinformatics and Genetics, Swedish Museum of Natural History, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Edana Lord
- Centre for Palaeogenetics, Svante Arrhenius Väg 20C, 106 91, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Bioinformatics and Genetics, Swedish Museum of Natural History, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Zoology, Stockholm University, 106 91, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Hanna Sigeman
- Department of Biology, Lund University, Ecology Building, 223 62, Lund, Sweden
- Ecology and Genetics Research Unit, University of Oulu, 90014, Oulu, Finland
| | - Remi-André Olsen
- Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Science for Life Laboratory, Stockholm University, 17121, Solna, Sweden
| | - Michael Knapp
- Department of Anatomy, University of Otago, Dunedin, 9054, New Zealand
- Coastal People Southern Skies Centre of Research Excellence, University of Otago, PO Box 56, Dunedin, 9054, Aotearoa, New Zealand
| | - Olga Kardailsky
- Department of Anatomy, University of Otago, Dunedin, 9054, New Zealand
| | - Fiona Robertson
- Department of Zoology, University of Otago, Dunedin, 9054, New Zealand
| | - Marie Hale
- School of Biological Sciences, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, 8140, New Zealand
| | - Dave Houston
- Department of Conservation, Biodiversity Group, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Euan Kennedy
- Department of Conservation, Science and Capability, Christchurch, New Zealand
| | - Love Dalén
- Centre for Palaeogenetics, Svante Arrhenius Väg 20C, 106 91, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Bioinformatics and Genetics, Swedish Museum of Natural History, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Zoology, Stockholm University, 106 91, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Karin Norén
- Department of Zoology, Stockholm University, 106 91, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Melanie Massaro
- School of Agricultural, Environmental and Veterinary Sciences and Gulbali Institute, Charles Sturt University, PO Box 789, Albury, NSW, Australia
| | - Bruce C Robertson
- Department of Zoology, University of Otago, Dunedin, 9054, New Zealand
| | - Nicolas Dussex
- Centre for Palaeogenetics, Svante Arrhenius Väg 20C, 106 91, Stockholm, Sweden.
- Department of Bioinformatics and Genetics, Swedish Museum of Natural History, Stockholm, Sweden.
- Department of Zoology, Stockholm University, 106 91, Stockholm, Sweden.
| |
Collapse
|