1
|
Khan SM, Sumbal R, Schenk AD. Impact of Anti-HLA De Novo Donor Specific Antibody on Graft Outcomes in Pancreas Transplantation: A Meta-Analysis. Transplant Proc 2021; 53:3022-3029. [PMID: 34772490 DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2021.08.052] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2021] [Accepted: 08/30/2021] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aim of this review is to provide consensus on the impact of antihuman leukocyte antigen (anti-HLA) de novo donor-specific antibodies (dnDSA) on pancreatic allograft loss. METHODS We systematically searched electronic databases through August 2020 using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses methodology. Articles that provided or allowed estimation of the odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for pancreatic allograft loss in patients with and without anti-HLA dnDSA were included. RESULTS Eight studies with a total of 1434 patients were included. Patients with anti-HLA dnDSA had significantly higher odds of graft failure (OR = 4.42, 95% CI [3.15-6.22], I2 = 38%). Pooled data on graft rejection showed that patients with anti-HLA dnDSA have significantly higher odds of rejection than patients without anti-HLA (OR = 3.35, 95% CI [2.28-4.91], I2 = 38%). CONCLUSION The results of our meta-analysis show that anti-HLA dnDSA is strongly associated with pancreas graft failure and rejection. Surveillance for anti-HLA dnDSA is an important component of post-transplant immune monitoring.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sualeh Muslim Khan
- Dow Medical College, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan.
| | - Ramish Sumbal
- Dow Medical College, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan
| | - Austin D Schenk
- Division of Transplantation Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Boggi U, Vistoli F, Andres A, Arbogast HP, Badet L, Baronti W, Bartlett ST, Benedetti E, Branchereau J, Burke GW, Buron F, Caldara R, Cardillo M, Casanova D, Cipriani F, Cooper M, Cupisti A, Davide J, Drachenberg C, de Koning EJP, Ettorre GM, Fernandez Cruz L, Fridell JA, Friend PJ, Furian L, Gaber OA, Gruessner AC, Gruessner RW, Gunton JE, Han D, Iacopi S, Kauffmann EF, Kaufman D, Kenmochi T, Khambalia HA, Lai Q, Langer RM, Maffi P, Marselli L, Menichetti F, Miccoli M, Mittal S, Morelon E, Napoli N, Neri F, Oberholzer J, Odorico JS, Öllinger R, Oniscu G, Orlando G, Ortenzi M, Perosa M, Perrone VG, Pleass H, Redfield RR, Ricci C, Rigotti P, Paul Robertson R, Ross LF, Rossi M, Saudek F, Scalea JR, Schenker P, Secchi A, Socci C, Sousa Silva D, Squifflet JP, Stock PG, Stratta RJ, Terrenzio C, Uva P, Watson CJ, White SA, Marchetti P, Kandaswamy R, Berney T. First World Consensus Conference on pancreas transplantation: Part II - recommendations. Am J Transplant 2021; 21 Suppl 3:17-59. [PMID: 34245223 PMCID: PMC8518376 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.16750] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2021] [Revised: 06/25/2021] [Accepted: 06/26/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
The First World Consensus Conference on Pancreas Transplantation provided 49 jury deliberations regarding the impact of pancreas transplantation on the treatment of diabetic patients, and 110 experts' recommendations for the practice of pancreas transplantation. The main message from this consensus conference is that both simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation (SPK) and pancreas transplantation alone can improve long-term patient survival, and all types of pancreas transplantation dramatically improve the quality of life of recipients. Pancreas transplantation may also improve the course of chronic complications of diabetes, depending on their severity. Therefore, the advantages of pancreas transplantation appear to clearly surpass potential disadvantages. Pancreas after kidney transplantation increases the risk of mortality only in the early period after transplantation, but is associated with improved life expectancy thereafter. Additionally, preemptive SPK, when compared to SPK performed in patients undergoing dialysis, appears to be associated with improved outcomes. Time on dialysis has negative prognostic implications in SPK recipients. Increased long-term survival, improvement in the course of diabetic complications, and amelioration of quality of life justify preferential allocation of kidney grafts to SPK recipients. Audience discussions and live voting are available online at the following URL address: http://mediaeventi.unipi.it/category/1st-world-consensus-conference-of-pancreas-transplantation/246.
Collapse
|
3
|
Buron F, Reffet S, Badet L, Morelon E, Thaunat O. Immunological Monitoring in Beta Cell Replacement: Towards a Pathophysiology-Guided Implementation of Biomarkers. Curr Diab Rep 2021; 21:19. [PMID: 33895937 DOI: 10.1007/s11892-021-01386-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/25/2021] [Indexed: 01/23/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Grafted beta cells are lost because of recurrence of T1D and/or allograft rejection, two conditions diagnosed with pancreas graft biopsy, which is invasive and impossible in case of islet transplantation. This review synthetizes the current pathophysiological knowledge and discusses the interest of available immune biomarkers. RECENT FINDINGS Despite the central role of auto-(recurrence of T1D) and allo-(T-cell mediated rejection) immune cellular responses, the latter are not directly monitored in routine. In striking contrast, there have been undisputable progresses in monitoring of auto and alloantibodies. Except for pancreas recipients in whom anti-donor HLA antibodies can be directly responsible for antibody-mediated rejection, autoantibodies (and alloantibodies in islet recipients) have no direct pathogenic effect. However, their fluctuation offers a surrogate marker for the activation status of T cells (because antibody generation depends on T cells). This illustrates the necessity to understand the pathophysiology when interpreting a biomarker and selecting the appropriate treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fanny Buron
- Department of Transplantation, Nephrology and Clinical Immunology, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, 5 Place d'Arsonval, 69003, Lyon, France
| | - Sophie Reffet
- Department of Endocrinology and Diabetes, Lyon-Sud Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, 69310, Pierre-Bénite, France
| | - Lionel Badet
- Department of Urology and Transplantation surgery, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France
| | - Emmanuel Morelon
- Department of Transplantation, Nephrology and Clinical Immunology, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, 5 Place d'Arsonval, 69003, Lyon, France
- French National Institute of Health and Medical Research (Inserm) Unit 1111, Lyon, France
- Lyon-Est Medical Faculty, Claude Bernard University (Lyon 1), Lyon, France
| | - Olivier Thaunat
- Department of Transplantation, Nephrology and Clinical Immunology, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, 5 Place d'Arsonval, 69003, Lyon, France.
- French National Institute of Health and Medical Research (Inserm) Unit 1111, Lyon, France.
- Lyon-Est Medical Faculty, Claude Bernard University (Lyon 1), Lyon, France.
- Service de Transplantation, Néphrologie et Immunologie Clinique, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, 5 Place d'Arsonval, 69003, Lyon, France.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Despite significant improvement in pancreas allograft survival, rejection continues to be a major clinical problem. This review will focus on emerging literature related to the impact of pretransplant and de-novo DSA (dnDSA) in pancreas transplant recipients, and the diagnosis and treatment of T-cell-medicated rejection (TCMR) and antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) in this complex group of patients. RECENT FINDINGS Recent data suggest that pretransplant DSA and the emergence of dnDSA in pancreas transplant recipients are both associated with increased risk of ABMR. The pancreas allograft biopsy is essential for the specific diagnosis of TCMR and/or ABMR, distinguish rejection from other causes of graft dysfunction, and to guide-targeted therapy. This distinction is important especially in the setting of solitary pancreas transplants but also in simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplants where solid evidence has now emerged demonstrating discordant biopsy findings. Treatment of rejection in a functioning pancreas can prolong allograft survival. SUMMARY The accurate and timely diagnosis of active alloimmune destruction in pancreas transplant recipients is paramount to preserving graft function in the long term. This review will discuss new, rapidly evolving information that is valuable for the physician caring for these patients to achieve optimal immunological outcomes.
Collapse
|
5
|
Uva PD, Quevedo A, Roses J, Toniolo MF, Pilotti R, Chuluyan E, Casadei DH. Anti-Hla donor-specific antibody monitoring in pancreas transplantation: Role of protocol biopsies. Clin Transplant 2020; 34:e13998. [PMID: 32492226 DOI: 10.1111/ctr.13998] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2020] [Revised: 05/21/2020] [Accepted: 05/22/2020] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
In kidney transplantation, de novo donor-specific antibodies (DSA) correlate with poor graft survival, and Consensus Guidelines recommend a protocol biopsy. In pancreas transplantation, DSA are also associated with poor graft outcomes; however, there are no recommendations on protocol biopsies. We started an antibody screening protocol on pancreas transplant patients at 0, 3, 6, 12 months, and yearly. Patients with DSA or high MFI non-DSA were considered for protocol biopsies of both organs. Results: 143 pancreas recipients were screened. 84 patients had negative antibodies throughout the study, 11 patients were found to have antibodies at graft dysfunction, and 48 patients had positive antibodies at screening without acute organ dysfunction (study group). Among the 30 non-DSA patients, 9 had protocol simultaneous pancreas and kidney biopsies performed with negative results in all of them. In contrast, among the 18 DSA patients, 15 had these biopsies performed, and 47% presented with subclinical rejection of the kidney, the pancreas, or both. In addition, some of the DSA patients without a protocol biopsy presented with rejection during the first 15 months of follow-up. Conclusion: We conclude that protocol biopsies of both grafts may play a role in the follow-up of pancreas transplant patients with de novo DSA appearance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pablo Daniel Uva
- Kidney Pancreas Transplantation, Instituto de Trasplantes y Alta Complejidad (ITAC - Nephrology), Buenos Aires, Argentina.,CEFYBO - CONICET, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Alejandra Quevedo
- Kidney Pancreas Transplantation, Instituto de Trasplantes y Alta Complejidad (ITAC - Nephrology), Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Josefina Roses
- Kidney Pancreas Transplantation, Instituto de Trasplantes y Alta Complejidad (ITAC - Nephrology), Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - María Fernanda Toniolo
- Kidney Pancreas Transplantation, Instituto de Trasplantes y Alta Complejidad (ITAC - Nephrology), Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Roxana Pilotti
- Kidney Pancreas Transplantation, Instituto de Trasplantes y Alta Complejidad (ITAC - Nephrology), Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | | | - Domingo H Casadei
- Kidney Pancreas Transplantation, Instituto de Trasplantes y Alta Complejidad (ITAC - Nephrology), Buenos Aires, Argentina
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Harald C. Ott: Clinician-scientist, Cardiothoracic Surgeon, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School. Transplantation 2019; 103:862-863. [PMID: 29994978 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000002339] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
|
7
|
Fridell JA, Mangus RS, Chen JM, Taber TE, Cabrales AE, Sharfuddin AA, Yaqub MS, Powelson JA. Steroid-free three-drug maintenance regimen for pancreas transplant alone: Comparison of induction with rabbit antithymocyte globulin +/- rituximab. Am J Transplant 2018; 18:3000-3006. [PMID: 29738100 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.14921] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2017] [Revised: 04/13/2018] [Accepted: 04/27/2018] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
Graft survival following pancreas transplant alone (PTA) is inferior to other pancreas transplants. Steroid elimination is appealing, but a two-drug maintenance strategy may be inadequate. Additionally, recipients tend to have diabetic nephropathy and do not tolerate nephrotoxic medications. A three-drug maintenance strategy permits immunosuppression through different mechanisms as well as an opportunity to use lower doses of the individual medications. Induction consisted of five doses of rabbit antithymocyte globulin (1 mg/kg/dose). As of October 2007, a single dose of rituximab (150 mg/m2 ) was added. Maintenance consisted of tacrolimus, sirolimus and mycophenolate mofetil. From 2004 to 2017, 166 PTA were performed. Graft loss at 7 and 90 days were 4% and 5%, and 1-year patient and graft survival were 97% and 91%. Comparing induction without and with rituximab, there was no significant difference in 7- or 90-day graft loss, 1-year patient or graft survival, or in the rate of rejection or infection. Rabbit antithymocyte globulin induction and steroid withdrawal followed by a three-drug immunosuppression regimen is an excellent strategy for PTA recipients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan A Fridell
- Department of Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Richard S Mangus
- Department of Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Jeanne M Chen
- Department of Pharmacy, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Tim E Taber
- Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Arianna E Cabrales
- Department of Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Asif A Sharfuddin
- Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Muhammad S Yaqub
- Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - John A Powelson
- Department of Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Chaigne B, Geneugelijk K, Bédat B, Ahmed MA, Hönger G, De Seigneux S, Demuylder-Mischler S, Berney T, Spierings E, Ferrari-Lacraz S, Villard J. Immunogenicity of Anti-HLA Antibodies in Pancreas and Islet Transplantation. Cell Transplant 2018; 25:2041-2050. [PMID: 27196533 DOI: 10.3727/096368916x691673] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
The aim of the current study was to characterize the anti-HLA antibodies before and after pancreatic islet or pancreas transplantation. We assessed the risk of anti-donor-specific antibody (DSA) sensitization in a single-center, retrospective clinical study at Geneva University Hospital. Data regarding clinical characteristics, graft outcome, HLA mismatch, donor HLA immunogenicity, and anti-HLA antibody characteristics were collected. Between January 2008 and July 2014, 18 patients received islet transplants, and 26 patients received a pancreas transplant. Eleven out of 18 patients (61.1%) in the islet group and 12 out of 26 patients (46.2%) in the pancreas group had anti-HLA antibodies. Six patients (33.3%) developed DSAs against HLA of the islets, and 10 patients (38.4%) developed DSAs against HLA of the pancreas. Most of the DSAs were at a low level. Several parameters such as gender, number of times cells were transplanted, HLA mismatch, eplet mismatch and PIRCHE-II numbers, rejection, and infection were analyzed. Only the number of PIRCHE-II was associated with the development of anti-HLA class II de novo DSAs. Overall, the development of de novo DSAs did not influence graft survival as estimated by insulin independence. Our results indicated that pretransplant DSAs at low levels do not restrict islet or pancreas transplantation [especially islet transplantation (27.8% vs. 15.4.%)]. De novo DSAs do occur at a similar rate in both pancreas and islet transplant recipients (mainly of class II), and the immunogenicity of donor HLA is a parameter that should be taken into consideration. When combined with an immunosuppressive regimen and close follow-up, development of low levels of DSAs was not found to result in reduced graft survival or graft function in the current study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benjamin Chaigne
- Transplantation Immunology Unit, Service of Immunology and Allergy and Service of Laboratory Medicine, Geneva University Hospital and Medical School, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Kirsten Geneugelijk
- Laboratory for Translational Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Benoît Bédat
- Service of Transplantation and Visceral Surgery, Geneva University Hospital and Medical School, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Mohamed Alibashe Ahmed
- Service of Transplantation and Visceral Surgery, Geneva University Hospital and Medical School, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Gideon Hönger
- Transplantation Immunology and Nephrology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Sophie De Seigneux
- Service of Nephrology, Geneva University Hospital and Medical School, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Sandrine Demuylder-Mischler
- Service of Transplantation and Visceral Surgery, Geneva University Hospital and Medical School, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Thierry Berney
- Service of Transplantation and Visceral Surgery, Geneva University Hospital and Medical School, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Eric Spierings
- Laboratory for Translational Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Sylvie Ferrari-Lacraz
- Transplantation Immunology Unit, Service of Immunology and Allergy and Service of Laboratory Medicine, Geneva University Hospital and Medical School, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Jean Villard
- Transplantation Immunology Unit, Service of Immunology and Allergy and Service of Laboratory Medicine, Geneva University Hospital and Medical School, Geneva, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Park MH, Kim S, Hwang H, Park H, Kwak J, Kwon EK, Sung HY, Han B. Positive Rates of Preliminary Crossmatches Among Transplantation Candidates Waitlisted for Different Organs in the Korean Network for Organ Sharing. Transplant Proc 2017; 48:2464-2466. [PMID: 27742323 DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2016.02.086] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2015] [Accepted: 02/02/2016] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE For deceased-donor organ transplantations, negative T cell crossmatches (XMs) are mandatory for kidney and pancreas allocation in the Korean Network for Organ Sharing (KONOS) organ allocation system. Submission and periodic renewal of serum to the KONOS is required for all transplantation candidates of kidney or pancreas and these sera are distributed to 23 laboratories for preliminary XMs. We have investigated how sensitization status varies among transplantation candidates waitlisted for different organs. METHODS Positive rates of T cell XMs performed during recent 1-year period (from March 2014 to February 2015) in the Korea Organ Donation Agency laboratory have been analyzed according to different organs. For 163 cases of deceased donors, 3605 recipients (22.1 recipients per one donor) were crossmatched using both of National Institutes of Health and antihuman globulin complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC) methods and flow cytometry method. RESULTS T cell XM positive rates varied among transplantation candidates for different organs. The positive rate was high for kidney (485/3,145, 15.4%), and low for pancreas or kidney/pancreas (7/200, 3.5%), lung (0/41, 0%), and heart (11/221, 5.0%). Among XM-positive individuals, nearly two-thirds of the kidney transplantation candidates showed strong sensitization status with CDC+/flow+ results (64.5%), whereas pancreas or kidney/pancreas transplantation candidates more commonly showed weaker sensitization status with CDC-/flow+ results (85.7%). CONCLUSION Kidney transplantation candidates show a much higher positive rate and stronger sensitization status than candidates for other organs. The results of this study would be useful for determining the number of candidates to be crossmatched for different organs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M H Park
- Korea Organ Donation Agency Laboratory, Seoul, Korea.
| | - S Kim
- Korea Organ Donation Agency Laboratory, Seoul, Korea
| | - H Hwang
- Korea Organ Donation Agency Laboratory, Seoul, Korea
| | - H Park
- Korea Organ Donation Agency Laboratory, Seoul, Korea
| | - J Kwak
- Korea Organ Donation Agency Laboratory, Seoul, Korea
| | - E K Kwon
- Korea Organ Donation Agency Laboratory, Seoul, Korea
| | - H Y Sung
- Korea Organ Donation Agency Laboratory, Seoul, Korea
| | - B Han
- Korea Organ Donation Agency Laboratory, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Vrakas G, Arantes RM, Gerlach U, Reddy S, Friend P, Vaidya A. Solitary pancreas transplantation: a review of the UK experience over a period of 10 yr. Clin Transplant 2015; 29:1195-202. [DOI: 10.1111/ctr.12650] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/04/2015] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Peter Friend
- Oxford Transplant Centre; Churchill Hospital; Oxford UK
| | - Anil Vaidya
- Oxford Transplant Centre; Churchill Hospital; Oxford UK
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Mujtaba MA, Fridell J, Book B, Faiz S, Sharfuddin A, Wiebke E, Rigby M, Taber T. Re-exposure to beta cell autoantigens in pancreatic allograft recipients with preexisting beta cell autoantibodies. Clin Transplant 2015; 29:991-6. [PMID: 26289931 DOI: 10.1111/ctr.12619] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/14/2015] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Re-exposure to beta cell autoantigens and its relevance in the presence of donor-specific antibodies (DSA) in pancreatic allograft recipients is not well known. Thirty-three patients requiring a pancreas transplant were enrolled in an IRB approved study. They underwent prospective monitoring for DSA and beta cell autoantibody (BCAA) levels to GAD65, insulinoma-associated antigen 2 (IA-2), insulin (micro-IAA [mIAA]), and islet-specific zinc transporter isoform-8 (ZnT8). Twenty-five (75.7%) had pre-transplant BCAA. Twenty had a single antibody (mIAA n = 15, GAD65 n = 5); five had two or more BCAA (GAD65 + mIAA n = 2, GAD65 + mIAA+IA-2 n = 2, GA65 + mIAA+IA-2 + ZnT8 = 1). No changes in GAD65 (p > 0.29), IA-2 (>0.16), and ZnT8 (p > 0.07) were observed between pre-transplant and post-transplant at 6 or 12 months. A decrease in mIAA from pre- to post-6 months (p < 0.0001), 12 months (p < 0.0001), and from post-6 to post-12 months (p = 0.0002) was seen. No new BCAA was observed at one yr. Seven (21.0%) developed de novo DSA. The incidence of DSA was 24% in patients with BCAA vs. 25% in patients without BCAA (p = 0.69). Pancreatic allograft function of patients with vs. without BCAA, and with and without BCAA + DSA was comparable until last follow-up (three yr). Re-exposure to beta cell autoantigens by pancreas transplant may not lead to increased levels or development of new BCAA or pancreatic allograft dysfunction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Muhammad Ahmad Mujtaba
- Division of Nephrology/Transplant, Department of Medicine, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA
| | - Jonathan Fridell
- Division of Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Benita Book
- Transplant Immunology Lab, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Sara Faiz
- Department of Pathology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA
| | - Asif Sharfuddin
- Division of Nephrology/Transplant, Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Eric Wiebke
- Pediatrics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Mark Rigby
- Transplant Immunology Lab, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Tim Taber
- Division of Nephrology/Transplant, Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Pelletier RP, Rajab AA, Diez A, DiPaola NR, Bumgardner GL, Elkhammas EA, Henry ML. Early immunosuppression treatment correlates with laterde novodonor-specific antibody development after kidney and pancreas transplantation. Clin Transplant 2015; 29:1119-27. [DOI: 10.1111/ctr.12636] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/11/2015] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Ronald P. Pelletier
- Division of Transplantation; Department of Surgery; The Ohio State University; Columbus OH USA
| | - Amer A. Rajab
- Division of Transplantation; Department of Surgery; The Ohio State University; Columbus OH USA
| | - Alejandro Diez
- Division of Nephrology; Department of Internal Medicine; The Ohio State University; Columbus OH USA
| | | | - Ginny L. Bumgardner
- Division of Transplantation; Department of Surgery; The Ohio State University; Columbus OH USA
| | - Elmahdi A. Elkhammas
- Division of Transplantation; Department of Surgery; The Ohio State University; Columbus OH USA
| | - Mitchell L. Henry
- Division of Transplantation; Department of Surgery; The Ohio State University; Columbus OH USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Stratta RJ, Farney AC, Rogers J, Orlando G. Immunosuppression for pancreas transplantation with an emphasis on antibody induction strategies: review and perspective. Expert Rev Clin Immunol 2014; 10:117-32. [PMID: 24236648 DOI: 10.1586/1744666x.2014.853616] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
A review of recent literature was performed to identify trends and evaluate outcomes with respect to immunosuppression in pancreas transplantation (PTX). In the past decade, the majority of PTXs were performed with depleting antibody induction, particularly in the setting of either calcineurin inhibitor minimization, corticosteroid withdrawal or both. Maintenance immunosuppression consisted of predominantly tacrolimus (TAC)/mycophenolatemofetil, TAC/mycophenolic acid or TAC/sirolimus with or without corticosteroids. Depending on PTX category, donor and recipient risk factors, case mix and immunosuppressive regimen, the 1-year incidence of acute rejection has decreased to 5-20%. Current 1-year rates of immunological pancreas graft loss range between 1.8 and 6%. Depleting antibody induction and either TAC/mycophenolatemofetil or TAC/sirolimus maintenance therapy with early steroid withdrawal have become the mainstay of immunosuppression in PTX. However, the development of non-nephrotoxic, nondiabetogenic, and nongastrointestinal toxic regimens is highly desirable to improve quality of life in all solid organ transplant recipients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert J Stratta
- Department of General Surgery, Section of Transplantation, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Medical Center Blvd., Winston-Salem, NC27157, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Mittal S, Page SL, Friend PJ, Sharples EJ, Fuggle SV. De novo donor-specific HLA antibodies: biomarkers of pancreas transplant failure. Am J Transplant 2014; 14:1664-71. [PMID: 24866735 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.12750] [Citation(s) in RCA: 64] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2013] [Revised: 03/18/2014] [Accepted: 03/19/2014] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
This study assesses the role of posttransplant HLA antibody monitoring in the surveillance of pancreas transplant recipients. Four hundred thirty-three pancreas transplants were performed at the Oxford Transplant Centre 2006-2011 (317 simultaneous pancreas kidney [SPK] and 116 isolated pancreas [IP]). HLA antibody monitoring was performed at 0, 6 and 12 months and annually and during clinical events. There was no association between pancreas graft failure and recipient or donor characteristics. Posttransplant antibody status, available for 354 (81.8%) of recipients, demonstrated that 141 (39.8%) developed de novo HLA antibodies, of which 52 (36.9%) were de novo donor-specific HLA antibodies (DSA) (34 SPK, 18 IP). The development of antibodies to donor HLA, but not to nondonor HLA, was significantly associated with poorer graft outcomes, with 1- and 3-year graft survival inferior in SPK recipients (85.2% vs. 93.5%; 71.8% vs. 90.3%, respectively; log-rank p = 0.002), and particularly in IP recipients (50.0% vs. 82.9%; 16.7 vs. 79.4%, respectively; log-rank p = 0.001). In a multivariate analysis, development of de novo DSA emerged as a strong independent predictor of pancreas graft failure (hazard ratio 4.66, p < 0.001). This is the largest study to examine de novo HLA antibodies following pancreas transplantation and clearly defines a high-risk group in need of specific intervention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Mittal
- Oxford Transplant Centre, Oxford, UK; Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford, UK
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) is acknowledged and defined in kidney transplantation, but where do we stand as far as pancreas transplantation is concerned? Here we appraise the most recent findings in pancreatic AMR and give suggestions for future research in the field by addressing currently unresolved issues. RECENT FINDINGS Five main topics are discussed: chronological assessment of all literature on biopsy-proven pancreatic AMR; role of C4d and recent development in other markers; the use of sentinel organs, such as kidney biopsies and duodenal patch biopsies for diagnosis of pancreatic AMR; studies addressing islet pathology and its relevance in AMR; and protocol and follow-up pancreas biopsy practice in relation to pancreas transplant management and survival. SUMMARY Antibody-mediated processes play a role in pancreas transplantation. However, sensitive markers, pathophysiological understanding, and adequate interventions have not yet been established. Much data are still lacking and we believe that studying protocol and follow-up biopsies along with serial donor-specific antibody data may improve pancreas transplant patient management and outcomes.
Collapse
|