1
|
Milana F, Polidoro MA, Famularo S, Lleo A, Boldorini R, Donadon M, Torzilli G. Surgical Strategies for Recurrent Hepatocellular Carcinoma after Resection: A Review of Current Evidence. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15020508. [PMID: 36672457 PMCID: PMC9856445 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15020508] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2022] [Revised: 01/07/2023] [Accepted: 01/10/2023] [Indexed: 01/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common primary liver cancer, and both liver resection and liver transplantation are considered potentially curative options. However, high recurrence rates affect the prognosis depending both on the primary HCC pathology characteristics or on the type and time of the relapse. While great attention has been usually posted on treatment algorithms for the first HCC, treatment algorithms for recurrent HCC (rHCC) are lacking. In these cases, surgery still represents a curative option with both redo hepatectomy and/or salvage liver transplantation, which are considered valid treatments in selected patients. In the current era of personalised medicine with promises of new systemic-targeted immuno-chemotherapies, we wished to perform a narrative review of the literature on the role of surgical strategies for rHCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Flavio Milana
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, 20072 Pieve Emanuele, MI, Italy
- Department of Hepatobiliary and General Surgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, 20089 Rozzano, MI, Italy
| | - Michela Anna Polidoro
- Hepatobiliary Immunopathology Laboratory, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, 20089 Rozzano, MI, Italy
| | - Simone Famularo
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, 20072 Pieve Emanuele, MI, Italy
- Department of Hepatobiliary and General Surgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, 20089 Rozzano, MI, Italy
| | - Ana Lleo
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, 20072 Pieve Emanuele, MI, Italy
- Department of Internal Medicine, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, 20089 Rozzano, MI, Italy
| | - Renzo Boldorini
- Department of Health Sciences, Università del Piemonte Orientale, 28100 Novara, NO, Italy
- Department of Pathology, University Maggiore Hospital, 28100 Novara, NO, Italy
| | - Matteo Donadon
- Hepatobiliary Immunopathology Laboratory, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, 20089 Rozzano, MI, Italy
- Department of Health Sciences, Università del Piemonte Orientale, 28100 Novara, NO, Italy
- Department of General Surgery, University Maggiore Hospital, 28100 Novara, NO, Italy
- Correspondence:
| | - Guido Torzilli
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, 20072 Pieve Emanuele, MI, Italy
- Department of Hepatobiliary and General Surgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, 20089 Rozzano, MI, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Sposito C, Citterio D, Virdis M, Battiston C, Droz Dit Busset M, Flores M, Mazzaferro V. Therapeutic strategies for post-transplant recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Gastroenterol 2022; 28:4929-4942. [PMID: 36160651 PMCID: PMC9494935 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v28.i34.4929] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2022] [Revised: 03/05/2022] [Accepted: 07/26/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Despite stringent selection criteria, hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence after liver transplantation (LT) still occurs in up to 20% of cases, mostly within the first 2–3 years. No adjuvant treatments to prevent such an occurrence have been developed so far. However, a balanced use of immunosuppression with minimal dose of calcineurin inhibitors and possible addition of mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors is strongly advisable. Moreover, several pre- and post-transplant predictors of recurrence have been identified and may help determine the frequency and duration of post-transplant follow-up. When recurrence occurs, the outcomes are poor with a median survival of 12 mo according to most retrospective studies. The factor that most impacts survival after recurrence is timing (within 1–2 years from LT according to different authors). Several therapeutic options may be chosen in case of recurrence, according to timing and disease presentation. Surgical treatment seems to provide a survival benefit, especially in case of late recurrence, while the benefit of locoregional treatments has been suggested only in small retrospective studies. When systemic treatment is indicated, sorafenib has been proved safe and effective, while only few data are available for lenvatinib and regorafenib in second line. The use of immune checkpoint inhibitors is controversial in this setting, given the safety warnings for the risk of acute rejection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carlo Sposito
- HPB Surgery, Hepatology and Liver Transplantation, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori di Milano, Milan 20133, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan 20100, Italy
| | - Davide Citterio
- HPB Surgery, Hepatology and Liver Transplantation, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori di Milano, Milan 20133, Italy
| | - Matteo Virdis
- HPB Surgery, Hepatology and Liver Transplantation, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori di Milano, Milan 20133, Italy
| | - Carlo Battiston
- HPB Surgery, Hepatology and Liver Transplantation, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori di Milano, Milan 20133, Italy
| | - Michele Droz Dit Busset
- HPB Surgery, Hepatology and Liver Transplantation, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori di Milano, Milan 20133, Italy
| | - Maria Flores
- HPB Surgery, Hepatology and Liver Transplantation, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori di Milano, Milan 20133, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Mazzaferro
- HPB Surgery, Hepatology and Liver Transplantation, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori di Milano, Milan 20133, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan 20100, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Wang MX, Chen D, Zhao YY, Yang B, Jiang JP, Zeng FJ, Wei L, Chen ZS. Role of selected criteria and preventive chemotherapy in tumor recurrence after liver transplantation. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int 2020; 19:378-383. [PMID: 32622825 DOI: 10.1016/j.hbpd.2020.06.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2019] [Accepted: 06/16/2020] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Long-term survival after liver transplantation (LT) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients remains poor because of tumor recurrence. To improve the prognosis of HCC patients after LT, we aimed to identify different transplantation criteria and risk factors related to tumor recurrence and evaluate the effect of preventive chemotherapy in a single center. METHODS In total, data on 20 variables and the survival of 199 patients with primary HCC who underwent LT between 2005 and 2015 were included for analysis. The patients were divided into the following three groups: Group 1, within the Milan and Hangzhou criteria (n = 51); Group 2, beyond the Milan but within the Hangzhou criteria (n = 36); and Group 3, beyond the Milan and Hangzhou criteria (n = 112). Survival probabilities for the three groups were calculated using multivariate Cox regression analysis. The association between preventive therapy and HCC-recurrence after LT was analyzed by multiple logistic regression analysis. RESULTS Child-Pugh stage C and hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection were independent risk factors for patients with tumor recurrence who did not meet the Milan criteria. The overall survival rates of the 199 patients showed statistically significant differences among the three groups (P < 0.001). Moreover, no significant difference was noted in the survival rate between Group 1 and Group 2 (P > 0.05). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that postoperative prophylactic chemotherapy reduced the risk of tumor recurrence in patients who did not meet the Hangzhou and Milan criteria (OR = 0.478; 95% CI: 0.308-0.741; P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Child-Pugh classification and HBV infection were the independent risk factors of tumor recurrence in HCC patients with LT. The Hangzhou criteria were effective and analogous compared with the Milan criteria. Preventive chemotherapy significantly reduced the risk of recurrence and prolonged the survival time for HCC patients beyond the Milan and Hangzhou criteria after LT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mei-Xi Wang
- Institute of Organ Transplantation, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430030, China; Key Laboratory of Organ Transplantation, Ministry of Education, Wuhan 430030, China; NHC Key Laboratory of Organ Transplantation, Wuhan 430030, China; Key Laboratory of Organ Transplantation, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Wuhan 430030, China
| | - Dong Chen
- Institute of Organ Transplantation, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430030, China; Key Laboratory of Organ Transplantation, Ministry of Education, Wuhan 430030, China; NHC Key Laboratory of Organ Transplantation, Wuhan 430030, China; Key Laboratory of Organ Transplantation, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Wuhan 430030, China
| | - Yuan-Yuan Zhao
- Institute of Organ Transplantation, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430030, China; Key Laboratory of Organ Transplantation, Ministry of Education, Wuhan 430030, China; NHC Key Laboratory of Organ Transplantation, Wuhan 430030, China; Key Laboratory of Organ Transplantation, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Wuhan 430030, China
| | - Bo Yang
- Institute of Organ Transplantation, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430030, China; Key Laboratory of Organ Transplantation, Ministry of Education, Wuhan 430030, China; NHC Key Laboratory of Organ Transplantation, Wuhan 430030, China; Key Laboratory of Organ Transplantation, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Wuhan 430030, China
| | - Ji-Pin Jiang
- Institute of Organ Transplantation, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430030, China; Key Laboratory of Organ Transplantation, Ministry of Education, Wuhan 430030, China; NHC Key Laboratory of Organ Transplantation, Wuhan 430030, China; Key Laboratory of Organ Transplantation, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Wuhan 430030, China
| | - Fan-Jun Zeng
- Institute of Organ Transplantation, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430030, China; Key Laboratory of Organ Transplantation, Ministry of Education, Wuhan 430030, China; NHC Key Laboratory of Organ Transplantation, Wuhan 430030, China; Key Laboratory of Organ Transplantation, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Wuhan 430030, China
| | - Lai Wei
- Institute of Organ Transplantation, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430030, China; Key Laboratory of Organ Transplantation, Ministry of Education, Wuhan 430030, China; NHC Key Laboratory of Organ Transplantation, Wuhan 430030, China; Key Laboratory of Organ Transplantation, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Wuhan 430030, China.
| | - Zhi-Shui Chen
- Institute of Organ Transplantation, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430030, China; Key Laboratory of Organ Transplantation, Ministry of Education, Wuhan 430030, China; NHC Key Laboratory of Organ Transplantation, Wuhan 430030, China; Key Laboratory of Organ Transplantation, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Wuhan 430030, China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Han DH, Joo DJ, Kim MS, Choi GH, Choi JS, Park YN, Seong J, Han KH, Kim SI. Living Donor Liver Transplantation for Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Portal Vein Tumor Thrombosis after Concurrent Chemoradiation Therapy. Yonsei Med J 2016; 57:1276-81. [PMID: 27401662 PMCID: PMC4960397 DOI: 10.3349/ymj.2016.57.5.1276] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2015] [Revised: 01/02/2016] [Accepted: 01/04/2016] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Locally advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with portal vein thrombosis carries a 1-year survival rate <10%. Localized concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT), followed by hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC), was recently introduced in this setting. Here, we report our early experience with living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) in such patients after successful down-staging of HCC through CCRT and HAIC. Between December 2011 and September 2012, eight patients with locally advanced HCC at initial diagnosis were given CCRT, followed by HAIC, and underwent LDLT at the Severance Hospital, Seoul, Korea. CCRT [45 Gy over 5 weeks with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) as HAIC] was followed by HAIC (5-FU/cisplatin combination every 4 weeks for 3-12 months), adjusted for tumor response. Down-staging succeeded in all eight patients, leaving no viable tumor thrombi in major vessels, although three patients first underwent hepatic resections. Due to deteriorating liver function, transplantation was the sole therapeutic option and offered a chance for cure. The 1-year disease-free survival rate was 87.5%. There were three instances of post-transplantation tumor recurrence during follow-up monitoring (median, 17 months; range, 10-22 months), but no deaths occurred. Median survival time from initial diagnosis was 33 months. Four postoperative complications recorded in three patients (anastomotic strictures: portal vein, 2; bile duct, 2) were resolved through radiologic interventions. Using an intensive tumor down-staging protocol of CCRT followed by HAIC, LDLT may be a therapeutic option for selected patients with locally advanced HCC and portal vein tumor thrombosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dai Hoon Han
- Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
- Liver Cancer Special Clinic, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Dong Jin Joo
- Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
- Liver Cancer Special Clinic, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
- Research Institute for Transplantation, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Myoung Soo Kim
- Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
- Research Institute for Transplantation, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Gi Hong Choi
- Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
- Liver Cancer Special Clinic, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
- Research Institute for Transplantation, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jin Sub Choi
- Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
- Liver Cancer Special Clinic, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
- Research Institute for Transplantation, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Young Nyun Park
- Liver Cancer Special Clinic, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
- Department of Pathology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jinsil Seong
- Liver Cancer Special Clinic, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
- Department of Radiological Oncology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Kwang Hyub Han
- Liver Cancer Special Clinic, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
- Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
| | - Soon Il Kim
- Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
- Research Institute for Transplantation, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Gudkov SV, Shilyagina NY, Vodeneev VA, Zvyagin AV. Targeted Radionuclide Therapy of Human Tumors. Int J Mol Sci 2015; 17:E33. [PMID: 26729091 PMCID: PMC4730279 DOI: 10.3390/ijms17010033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 107] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2015] [Revised: 12/07/2015] [Accepted: 12/22/2015] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Targeted radionuclide therapy is one of the most intensively developing directions of nuclear medicine. Unlike conventional external beam therapy, the targeted radionuclide therapy causes less collateral damage to normal tissues and allows targeted drug delivery to a clinically diagnosed neoplastic malformations, as well as metastasized cells and cellular clusters, thus providing systemic therapy of cancer. The methods of targeted radionuclide therapy are based on the use of molecular carriers of radionuclides with high affinity to antigens on the surface of tumor cells. The potential of targeted radionuclide therapy has markedly grown nowadays due to the expanded knowledge base in cancer biology, bioengineering, and radiochemistry. In this review, progress in the radionuclide therapy of hematological malignancies and approaches for treatment of solid tumors is addressed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sergey V Gudkov
- Laboratory of Optical Theranostics, Lobachevsky Nizhny Novgorod State University, Gagarin Ave. 23, Nizhny Novgorod 603950, Russia.
- Institute of Theoretical and Experimental Biophysics, Russian Academy of Sciences, Institutskaya St, 3, Pushchino, Moscow 142290, Russia.
- Prokhorov Institute of General Physics, Russian Academy of Sciences, Vavilova St, 38, Moscow 119991, Russia.
| | - Natalya Yu Shilyagina
- Laboratory of Optical Theranostics, Lobachevsky Nizhny Novgorod State University, Gagarin Ave. 23, Nizhny Novgorod 603950, Russia.
| | - Vladimir A Vodeneev
- Laboratory of Optical Theranostics, Lobachevsky Nizhny Novgorod State University, Gagarin Ave. 23, Nizhny Novgorod 603950, Russia.
| | - Andrei V Zvyagin
- Laboratory of Optical Theranostics, Lobachevsky Nizhny Novgorod State University, Gagarin Ave. 23, Nizhny Novgorod 603950, Russia.
- ARC Centre of Excellence for Nanoscale BioPhotonics (CNBP), Macquarie University, Sydney 2109, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Camacho JC, Coursey-Moreno C, Telleria JC, Aguirre DA, Torres WE, Mittal PK. Nonvascular post-liver transplantation complications: from US screening to cross-sectional and interventional imaging. Radiographics 2015; 35:87-104. [PMID: 25590390 DOI: 10.1148/rg.351130023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Orthotopic liver transplantation is becoming an increasingly routine procedure for a variety of benign and malignant diseases of the liver and biliary system. Continued improvements in surgical techniques and post-transplantation immunosuppression regimens have resulted in better graft and patient survival. A number of potentially treatable nonvascular complications of liver transplantation are visible at imaging, and accurate diagnosis of these complications allows patients to benefit from potential treatment options. Biliary complications include stricture (anastomotic and nonanastomotic), leak, biloma formation, and development of intraductal stones. Pathologic conditions, including hepatitis C infection, hepatocellular carcinoma, hepatic steatosis, and primary sclerosing cholangitis, may recur after liver transplantation. Transplant patients are at increased risk for developing de novo malignancy, including post-transplantation lymphoproliferative disorder, which results from immunosuppression. Patients are also at increased risk for systemic infection from immunosuppression, and patients with hepatic artery and biliary complications are at increased risk for liver abscess. Transplant recipients are typically followed with serial liver function testing; abnormal serum liver function test results may be the first indication that there is a problem with the transplanted liver. Ultrasonography is typically the first imaging test performed to try to identify the cause of abnormal liver function test results. Computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, angiography, and/or cholangiography may be necessary for further evaluation. Accurately diagnosing nonvascular complications of liver transplantation that are visible at imaging is critically important for patients to benefit from appropriate treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juan C Camacho
- From the Abdominal Imaging Division, Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, 1364 Clifton Rd NE, Atlanta, GA 30322 (J.C.C., C.C.M., J.C.T., W.E.T., P.K.M.); and Abdominal Imaging Division, Department of Imaging, Fundación Santa Fe de Bogotá University Hospital, Bogotá, Colombia (D.A.A.)
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Fahrner R, Dondorf F, Ardelt M, Dittmar Y, Settmacher U, Rauchfuß F. Liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma - factors influencing outcome and disease-free survival. World J Gastroenterol 2015; 21:12071-12082. [PMID: 26576092 PMCID: PMC4641125 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i42.12071] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2015] [Revised: 08/04/2015] [Accepted: 09/14/2015] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma is one of the leading causes of cancer-related death worldwide. Liver transplantation can be a curative treatment in selected patients. However, there are several factors that influence disease-free survival after transplantation. This review addresses the pre-, intra- and postoperative factors that influence the risk of tumor recurrence after liver transplantation.
Collapse
|
8
|
Faltermeier C, Busuttil RW, Zarrinpar A. A Surgical Perspective on Targeted Therapy of Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Diseases 2015; 3:221-252. [PMID: 28943622 PMCID: PMC5548262 DOI: 10.3390/diseases3040221] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2015] [Revised: 09/15/2015] [Accepted: 09/21/2015] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), the second leading cause of cancer deaths worldwide, is difficult to treat and highly lethal. Since HCC is predominantly diagnosed in patients with cirrhosis, treatment planning must consider both the severity of liver disease and tumor burden. To minimize the impact to the patient while treating the tumor, techniques have been developed to target HCC. Anatomical targeting by surgical resection or locoregional therapies is generally reserved for patients with preserved liver function and minimal to moderate tumor burden. Patients with decompensated cirrhosis and small tumors are optimal candidates for liver transplantation, which offers the best chance of long-term survival. Yet, only 20%-30% of patients have disease amenable to anatomical targeting. For the majority of patients with advanced HCC, chemotherapy is used to target the tumor biology. Despite these treatment options, the five-year survival of patients in the United States with HCC is only 16%. In this review we provide a comprehensive overview of current approaches to target HCC. We also discuss emerging diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers, novel therapeutic targets identified by recent genomic profiling studies, and potential applications of immunotherapy in the treatment of HCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claire Faltermeier
- Dumont-UCLA Transplant Center, Division of Liver and Pancreas Transplantation, Department of Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.
| | - Ronald W Busuttil
- Dumont-UCLA Transplant Center, Division of Liver and Pancreas Transplantation, Department of Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.
| | - Ali Zarrinpar
- Dumont-UCLA Transplant Center, Division of Liver and Pancreas Transplantation, Department of Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Lin HS, Wan RH, Gao LH, Li JF, Shan RF, Shi J. Adjuvant chemotherapy after liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and a meta-analysis. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int 2015; 14:236-45. [PMID: 26063023 DOI: 10.1016/s1499-3872(15)60373-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most common tumors worldwide and liver transplantation (LT) is considered as the best therapeutic option for patients with HCC combined with cirrhosis. However, tumor recurrence after LT for HCC remains the major obstacle for long-term survival. The present study was to evaluate the efficacy and necessity of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with HCC who had undergone LT. DATA SOURCES Several databases were searched to identify comparative studies fulfilling the predefined selection criteria before October 2014. Suitable studies were chosen and data extracted for meta-analysis. Three authors independently evaluated the bias of each study according to the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Review of Intervention. Stata 12 was used for statistical analysis. Hazard ratio (HR) was considered as a summary statistic for overall survival, disease-free survival and recurrence rate. RESULTS Three prospective studies and 5 retrospective studies including 360 patients (166 in the adjuvant chemotherapy group, and 194 in the control group) were included. Compared with the control group, post-LT adjuvant chemotherapy conferred significant benefit for overall survival (HR: 0.34; 95% CI: 0.22-0.52; P=0.000). Meanwhile, the results showed an improvement for disease-free survival on favoring adjuvant chemotherapy (HR: 0.87; 95% CI: 0.78-0.95; P=0.004). However, no significant difference in HCC recurrence rate was observed between the two groups (HR: 1.26; 95% CI: 0.40-4.00; P=0.696). Descriptions of adverse events were of anecdotal nature and did not allow meta-analytic calculations. CONCLUSIONS Adjuvant chemotherapy after LT for HCC can significantly prolong patient's survival and delay the recurrence of HCC. For advanced HCC with poor differentiation, patients may perhaps benefit from the early implantation of adjuvant chemotherapy after LT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hua-Shan Lin
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Nanchang University, Nanchang 330000, China. sj88692702@ sina.com
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Kornberg A. Liver Transplantation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma beyond Milan Criteria: Multidisciplinary Approach to Improve Outcome. ISRN HEPATOLOGY 2014; 2014:706945. [PMID: 27335840 PMCID: PMC4890913 DOI: 10.1155/2014/706945] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2013] [Accepted: 01/03/2014] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
The implementation of the Milan criteria (MC) in 1996 has dramatically improved prognosis after liver transplantation (LT) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Liver transplantation has, thereby, become the standard therapy for patients with "early-stage" HCC on liver cirrhosis. The MC were consequently adopted by United Network of Organ Sharing (UNOS) and Eurotransplant for prioritization of patients with HCC. Recent advancements in the knowledge about tumor biology, radiographic imaging techniques, locoregional interventional treatments, and immunosuppressive medications have raised a critical discussion, if the MC might be too restrictive and unjustified keeping away many patients from potentially curative LT. Numerous transplant groups have, therefore, increasingly focussed on a stepwise expansion of selection criteria, mainly based on tumor macromorphology, such as size and number of HCC nodules. Against the background of a dramatic shortage of donor organs, however, simple expansion of tumor macromorphology may not be appropriate to create a safe extended criteria system. In contrast, rather the implementation of reliable prognostic parameters of tumor biology into selection process prior to LT is mandatory. Furthermore, a multidisciplinary approach of pre-, peri-, and posttransplant modulating of the tumor and/or the patient has to be established for improving prognosis in this special subset of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A. Kornberg
- Department of Surgery, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich, Ismaningerstraße 22, D-81675 Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Mancuso A. Management of hepatocellular carcinoma: Enlightening the gray zones. World J Hepatol 2013; 5:302-310. [PMID: 23805354 PMCID: PMC3692971 DOI: 10.4254/wjh.v5.i6.302] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2013] [Accepted: 05/20/2013] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Management of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has been continuously evolving during recent years. HCC is a worldwide clinical and social issue and typically a complicates cirrhosis. The incidence of HCC is increasing, not only in the general population of patients with cirrhosis, but particularly in some subgroups of patients, like those with human immunodeficiency virus infection or thalassemia. Since a 3% annual HCC incidence has been estimated in cirrhosis, a bi-annual screening is generally suggested. The diagnostic criteria of HCC has recently had a dramatic evolution during recent years. HCC diagnosis is now made only on radiological criteria in the majority of the cases. In the context of cirrhosis, the universally accepted criteria for HCC diagnosis is contrast enhancement in arterial phase and washout in venous/late phase at imaging, the so called “typical pattern”. However, recently updated guidelines slightly differ in diagnostic criteria. Apart from liver transplantation, the only cure of both HCC and underlying liver cirrhosis, all the other treatments have to match with higher rate of HCC recurrence. The latter can be classified into curative (resection and percutaneous ablation) and palliative treatments. The aim of this paper was to review the current knowledge on management of HCC and to enlighten the areas of uncertainty.
Collapse
|