Post-operative complications requiring hospitalization more than one yr after living donor liver transplantation

Open Abdominal Management for Damage Control in Liver Transplantation: A Single-center Experience

Background

Patients undergoing liver transplantation are in a state of coagulopathy before surgery because of liver failure. Intraoperative hemorrhage, massive transfusions, and post-reperfusion syndrome further contribute to coagulopathy, acidosis, and hypothermia. In such situations, temporary cessation of surgery with open abdominal management and resuscitation in the intensive care unit (ICU), which is commonly used as a damage control strategy in trauma care, may be effective. We assessed the outcomes of open abdominal management in liver transplantation and the corresponding complication rates.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed the outcomes of patients undergoing open abdominal management among 250 consecutive liver transplantation cases performed at our institution from 2009 to 2022.

Results

Open abdominal management was indicated in 16 patients. The open abdomen management group had higher Model for End-stage Liver Disease scores (24 versus 16, P < 0.01), a higher incidence of previous upper abdominal surgery (50% versus 18%, P < 0.01), more pretransplant ICU treatment (31% versus 10%, P = 0.03), and more renal replacement therapy (38% versus 12%, P = 0.01). At the time of the damage control decision, coagulopathy (81%), acidosis (38%), hypothermia (31%), and a high-dose noradrenaline requirement (75%) were observed. The abdominal wall was closed in the second operation in 75% of patients, in the third operation in 19%, and in the fourth operation in 6%. Postoperatively, the frequency of early allograft dysfunction was predominantly higher in the open abdominal management group (69%), whereas the frequency of vascular complications and intra-abdominal infection was the same as in other patients.

Conclusions

Open abdominal management can be a crucial option in cases of complex liver transplant complicated by conditions such as hypothermia, acidosis, coagulopathy, and hemodynamic instability. Damage control management minimizes deterioration of the patient's condition during surgery, allowing completion of the planned procedure after stabilizing the patient's overall condition in the ICU.

Pretransplant serum procalcitonin level for prediction of early post-transplant sepsis in living donor liver transplantation

AIM

Infection is a frequent cause of in-hospital mortality after liver transplantation (LT). Elimination of possible risks in the pretransplant period, early diagnosis of post-transplant sepsis, and prompt treatment with antimicrobial agents are important. The objectives of this study were to analyze the impact of early post-transplant sepsis on outcomes and to clarify the value of predictive factors for early post-transplant sepsis.

METHODS

The study included 136 patients who underwent initial living donor LT (LDLT) at our institute between April 2009 and December 2016. Sepsis was defined using the third international consensus criteria. The results of biochemical tests at the introduction of anesthesia before LDLT were collected for pretransplant evaluation.

RESULTS

Post-transplant sepsis was found in 37 patients (27.2%). More patients had a pre-transplant serum procalcitonin (PCT) level >0.5 ng/mL in the sepsis group than in the non-sepsis group (11 [29.7%] vs 10 [10.1%]; P = 0.007). The 1-year survival rate in the sepsis group was significantly lower than in the non-sepsis group (53.8% vs 87.2%; P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis identified pretransplant serum PCT >0.5 ng/mL (odds ratio, 3.8; 95% confidence interval, 1.3-10.9; P = 0.01) as the only independent risk factor for post-transplant sepsis.

CONCLUSIONS

Survival of patients with early post-transplant sepsis was poor and the incidence of sepsis was associated with the pretransplant serum PCT level. Re-evaluation of the general condition and rescheduling of LT should be considered in a patient with pretransplant serum PCT >0.5 ng/mL.

Analysis of early relaparotomy following living donor liver transplantation

We retrospectively analyzed the causes, risk factors, and impact of early relaparotomy after adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) on the posttransplant outcome. Adult recipients who underwent initial LDLT at our institution between August 1997 and August 2015 (n = 196) were included. Any patients who required early retransplantation were excluded. Early relaparotomy was defined as surgical treatment within 30 days after LDLT. Relaparotomy was performed 66 times in 52 recipients (a maximum of 4 times in 1 patient). The reasons for relaparotomy comprised postoperative bleeding (39.4%), vascular complications (27.3%), suspicion of abdominal sepsis or bile leakage (25.8%), and others (7.6%). A multivariate analysis revealed that previous upper abdominal surgery and prolonged operative time were independent risk factors for early relaparotomy. The overall survival rate in the relaparotomy group was worse than that in the nonrelaparotomy group (6 months, 67.3% versus 90.1%, P < 0.001; 1 year, 67.3% versus 88.6%, P < 0.001; and 5 years, 62.6% versus 70.6%, P = 0.06). The outcome of patients who underwent 2 or more relaparotomies was worse compared with patients who underwent only 1 relaparotomy. In a subgroup analysis according to the cause of initial relaparotomy, the survival rate of the postoperative bleeding group was comparable with the nonrelaparotomy group (P = 0.96). On the other hand, the survival rate of the vascular complication group was significantly worse than that of the nonrelaparotomy group (P = 0.001). Previous upper abdominal surgery is a risk factor for early relaparotomy after LDLT. A favorable longterm outcome is expected in patients who undergo early relaparotomy due to postoperative bleeding. Liver Transplantation 22 1519-1525 2016 AASLD.