Small-for-size syndrome in live donor liver transplantation-Pathways of injury and therapeutic strategies

Anesthesia and Critical Care for the Prediction and Prevention for Small-for-size Syndrome: Guidelines from the ILTS-iLDLT-LTSI Consensus Conference

BACKGROUND

During the perioperative period of living donor liver transplantation, anesthesiologists and intensivists may encounter patients in receipt of small grafts that puts them at risk of developing small for size syndrome (SFSS).

METHODS

A scientific committee (106 members from 21 countries) performed an extensive literature review on aspects of SFSS with proposed recommendations. Recommendations underwent a blinded review by an independent expert panel and discussion/voting on the recommendations occurred at a consensus conference organized by the International Liver Transplantation Society, International Living Donor Liver Transplantation Group, and Liver Transplantation Society of India.

RESULTS

It was determined that centers with experience in living donor liver transplantation should utilize potential small for size grafts. Higher risk recipients with sarcopenia, cardiopulmonary, and renal dysfunction should receive small for size grafts with caution. In the intraoperative phase, a restrictive fluid strategy should be considered along with routine use of cardiac output monitoring, as well as use of pharmacologic portal flow modulation when appropriate. Postoperatively, these patients can be considered for enhanced recovery and should receive proactive monitoring for SFSS, nutrition optimization, infection prevention, and consideration for early renal replacement therapy for avoidance of graft congestion.

CONCLUSIONS

Our recommendations provide a framework for the optimal anesthetic and critical care management in the perioperative period for patients with grafts that put them at risk of developing SFSS. There is a significant limitation in the level of evidence for most recommendations. This statement aims to provide guidance for future research in the perioperative management of SFSS.

Donor safety of remnant liver volumes of less than 30% in living donor liver transplantation: A systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

This meta-analysis aimed to investigate the acceptability of donor remnant liver volume (RLV) to total liver volume (TLV) ratio (RLV/TLV) being <30% as safe in living donor liver transplantations (LDLTs).

METHODS

Online databases were searched from January 2000 to June 2022. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) and standardized mean differences (SMDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using fixed- or random-effects model.

RESULTS

One prospective and seven retrospective studies comprising 1935 patients (164 RLV/TLV <30% vs. 1771 RLV/TLV ≥30%) were included. Overall (OR = 1.82; 95% CI [1.24, 2.67]; p = .002) and minor (OR = 1.88; 95% CI [1.23, 2.88]; p = .004) morbidities were significantly lower in the RLV/TLV ≥30% group than in the RLV/TLV <30% group (OR = 1.82; 95% CI [1.24, 2.67]; p = .002). No significant differences were noted in the major morbidity, biliary complications, and hepatic dysfunction. Peak levels of bilirubin (SMD = .50; 95% CI [.07, .93]; p = .02) and international normalized ratio (SMD = .68; 95% CI [.04, 1.32]; p = .04) were significantly lower in the RLV/TLV ≥ 30% group than in the RLV/TLV <30% group. No significant differences were noted in the peak alanine transferase and aspartate transaminase levels and hospital stay.

CONCLUSIONS

Considering the safety of the donor as the top priority, the eligibility of a potential liver donor in LDLT whose RLV/TLV is expected to be <30% should not be accepted.

Meta-analysis and meta-regression of outcomes for adult living donor liver transplantation versus deceased donor liver transplantation

Prior single center or registry studies have shown that living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) decreases waitlist mortality and offers superior patient survival over deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT). The aim of this study was to compare outcomes for adult LDLT and DDLT via systematic review. A meta-analysis was conducted to examine patient survival and graft survival, MELD, waiting time, technical complications, and postoperative infections. Out of 8600 abstracts, 19 international studies comparing adult LDLT and DDLT published between 1/2005 and 12/2017 were included. U.S. outcomes were analyzed using registry data. Overall, 4571 LDLT and 66,826 DDLT patients were examined. LDLT was associated with lower mortality at 1, 3, and 5 years posttransplant (5-year HR 0.87 [95% CI 0.81-0.93], p < .0001), similar graft survival, lower MELD at transplant (p < .04), shorter waiting time (p < .0001), and lower risk of rejection (p = .02), with a higher risk of biliary complications (OR 2.14, p < .0001). No differences were observed in rates of hepatic artery thrombosis. In meta-regression analysis, MELD difference was significantly associated with posttransplant survival (R² 0.56, p = .02). In conclusion, LDLT is associated with improved patient survival, less waiting time, and lower MELD at LT, despite posing a higher risk of biliary complications that did not affect survival posttransplant.

Current status of left lobe adult to adult living donor liver transplantation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review describes the history and current state of left lobe living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). The transplant community continues to face an organ shortage on a global scale, and the expansion of LDLT is attractive because it allows us to provide life-saving liver transplants to individuals without drawing from, or depending on, the limited deceased donor pool. Donor safety is paramount in LDLT, and for this reason, left lobe LDLT is particularly attractive because the donor is left with a larger remnant.

RECENT FINDINGS

This article reviews the donor and recipient evaluations for left lobe LDLT, discusses small for size syndrome and the importance of portal inflow modification, and reviews recipient outcomes in right lobe versus left lobe LDLT.

SUMMARY

Left lobe LDLT was the first adult-to-adult LDLT ever to be performed in Japan in 1993. Since that time, the use of both right and left lobe LDLT has expanded immensely. Recent work in left lobe LDLT has emphasized the need for inflow modification to reduce portal hyperperfusion and early graft dysfunction following transplant. Accumulating evidence suggests, however, that even though early graft dysfunction following LDLT may prolong hospitalization, it does not predict graft or patient survival.

Study of factors affecting Small for Size Syndrome Post-Adult living donor liver transplantation

AIM

Recently, increasing evidence showed that small-for-size syndrome (SFSS) is a multifactorial disease which is precipitated by various perioperative factors other than graft size. We conducted the current work to evaluate perioperative effectors, which can increase the risk of SFSS following adult living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT).

METHODS

This is a retrospective study on 110 adult cirrhotic cases (mean age of 48.4 ± 6.9 years old) who underwent adult LDLT. Most cases were males (89%). Cases were categorized into two groups based on the occurrence of SFSS. The groups were compared regarding preoperative (gender, age, comorbidities, baseline investigations), intraoperative (mean blood pressure and glucose; mean operation time; number of packed red cells, plasma, platelets, and cryoprecipitate units; time of cold and warm ischemia, and anhepatic phase; preclamping and post-reperfusion portal pressures), and postoperative factors (relevant investigations, hospital stay).

RESULTS

Postoperatively, 23 patients developed SFSS (20.9%). SFSS group had significantly lower preoperative graft recipient weight ratio (GRWR) (0.76 ± 0.1% versus 1.03 ± 0.15, respectively; p < 0.001), and elevated MELD scores (19 ± 2.1 versus 17.9 ± 4; p = 0.024). Preclamping and post-reperfusion portal pressures of ≥22.5 and 17.5 mmHg, exhibited a sensitivity of 95.7% and 91.3% and specificity of 87.4% and 88.9% respectively, for SFSS prediction.

CONCLUSION

SFSS risk is significantly linked to GRWR, MELD score, and intraoperative portal haemodynamics. Intraoperative portal haemodynamics exhibited good diagnostic accuracy for SFSS prediction and represented promising indicators for the prediction of SFSS.

A Novel Method for the Prevention and Treatment of Small-for-Size Syndrome in Liver Transplantation

BACKGROUND

Currently there is no consensus on the optimal management of small-for-size syndrome following liver transplantation. Here we describe a technique to alleviate portal hypertension and improve the hepatocyte reperfusion in small-for-size liver transplantation in a Lewis rat model.

METHODS

The rats underwent trans-portal vein intra-hepatic portosystemic shunt using a self-developed porous conical tube (TPIPSS: Fig. 1) on small-for-size liver transplants (SFS) with right lobe graft. The treatment effect was evaluated by comparing hemodynamic parameters, morphological changes, serum parameters, ET-1 and eNOS expression, hepatocyte proliferation and apoptosis, CYP3A2 levels, postoperative complications, and survival between the two groups with SFS liver transplants.

RESULTS

Porous conical prosthesis prolonged the filling time of small-for-size grafts. Moreover, grafts with TPIPSS showed a lower portal vein pressure, improved microcirculatory flow, alleviated histological changes, decreased ET-1 and increased eNOS expressions, and significantly less damage to liver function comparing to grafts without TPIPSS. Mean survival and overall 30-day survival were significantly higher in the TPIPSS group.

CONCLUSIONS

These results demonstrate that porous conical tube as trans-portal vein intra-hepatic portosystemic shunt device is an effective way to alleviate portal vein hypertension and improve hepatocyte reperfusion after small-for-size liver transplantation.

A Single-Center Experience in Portal Flow Augmentation in Liver Transplantation With Prior Large Spontaneous Splenorenal Shunt

Large portosystemic shunts may cause portal steal syndrome in liver transplantation (LT). Because of the possible devastating consequences of the syndrome, the authors recommend perioperative management of these large shunts. Fourteen adult recipients who underwent portal flow augmentation, including left renal vein ligation (LRVL), renoportal anastomosis (RPA), shunt ligation (SL), and splenic vein ligation (SVL) for large spontaneous splenorenal shunt (SSRS), are included in this study, and the results were analyzed. A total of 13 patients had a large SSRS, and in 1 patient, the large shunt was placed between the superior mesenteric vein and the right renal vein. LDLT was performed in 13 patients. LRVL (n = 5), SVL (n = 6), RPA (n = 2), SL (n = 1) were performed to the patients as graft inflow augmentation. The graft-recipient weight ratios (GRWR) were less than 0.8% in 5 patients (35.7%): 2 had LRVL, and 3 had SVL. Small-for-size syndrome (SFSS) occurred only in these 2 patients with LRVL (GRWR ≤0.8%) and, splenic artery ligation was performed for graft inflow modulation. No mortality or serious complications were reported during follow-up. We consider that in patients with large SSRS and small-for-size grafts, SVL can be performed safely and with satisfactory outcomes.

Relationship Between Change Rate of Tacrolimus Clearance During Continuous Intravenous Infusion and Recipient Recovery at an Early Stage After Living Donor Liver Transplantation

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Tacrolimus clearance (CL) is significantly altered according to recovery of liver function at an early stage after living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). In this study, we aimed to examine the impact of the change rate from postoperative day (POD) 1 in CL (ΔCL) of tacrolimus during continuous intravenous infusion (CIVI) on recipient recovery.

METHODS

A tacrolimus population pharmacokinetic model on POD1 after LDLT was developed using Phoenix NLME 1.3. The CL_POD1 was calculated using the final model. The CL_POD4-7 was calculated by dividing total daily tacrolimus dose by the area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to 24 h.

RESULTS

Data were obtained from 57 LDLT recipients, along with 540 points (177 points on POD1, 363 points on POD4-7) of tacrolimus whole blood concentrations at CIVI. The median tacrolimus CL decreased from POD1 to POD4 (from 2.73 to 1.40 L/h) and was then stable until POD7. Stepwise Cox proportional hazards regression analyses showed that the graft volume (GV)/standard liver volume (SLV) ratio (GV/SLV) and the tacrolimus ΔCL_POD6 were independent factors predicting early discharge (within 64 days median value) of recipients after LDLT [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.041, P = 0.001 and HR = 1.023, P = 0.004].

CONCLUSIONS

The tacrolimus ΔCL during CIVI immediately after LDLT in each recipient was a useful indicator for evaluation of recovery at an early stage after LDLT.

Clinical translation of liver regeneration therapies: A conceptual road map

The increasing incidence of severe liver diseases worldwide has resulted in a high demand for curative liver transplantation. Unfortunately, the need for transplants by far eclipses the availability of suitable grafts leaving many waitlisted patients to face liver failure and often death. Routine use of smaller grafts (for example left lobes, split livers) from living or deceased donors could increase the number of life-saving transplants but is often limited by the graft versus recipient weight ratio defining the safety margins that minimize the risk of small for size syndrome (SFSS). SFSS is a severe complication characterized by failure of a small liver graft to regenerate and occurs when a donor graft is insufficient to meet the metabolic demand of the recipient, leading to liver failure as a result of insufficient liver mass. SFSS is not limited to transplantation but can also occur in the setting of hepatic surgical resections, where life-saving large resections of tumors may be limited by concerns of post-surgical liver failure. There are, as yet no available pro-regenerative therapies to enable liver regrowth and thus prevent SFSS. However, there is optimism around targeting factors and pathways that have been identified as regulators of liver regeneration to induce regrowth in vivo and ex vivo for clinical use. In this commentary, we propose a roadmap for developing such pro-regenerative therapy and for bringing it into the clinic. We summarize the clinical indications, preclinical models, pro-regenerative pathways and safety considerations necessary for developing such a drug.

Predictive utility of the C-reactive protein to albumin ratio in early allograft dysfunction in living donor liver transplantation: A retrospective observational cohort study

BACKGROUND

This study was performed to determine the association between the ratio of C-reactive protein to albumin (CRP/ALB) and the risk of early allograft dysfunction (EAD) in patients undergoing living donor liver transplantation (LDLT).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 588 adult patients undergoing LDLT were retrospectively investigated, after 22 were excluded because of signs of overt infection or history of ALB infusion. The study population was classified into high and low CRP/ALB ratio groups according to EAD. All laboratory variables, including CRP and ALB, had been collected on the day before surgery. A percentage value for the CRP/ALB ratio (%) was calculated as CRP/ALB × 100.

RESULTS

After LDLT, 83 patients (14.1%) suffered EAD occurrence. A higher CRP/ALB ratio was independently associated with risk of EAD, Model for End-stage Liver Disease score, fresh frozen plasma transfusion, and donor age. Based on a cutoff CRP/ALB ratio (i.e., > 20%), the probability of EAD was significantly (2-fold) higher in the high versus low CRP/ALB group. The predictive utility of CRP/ALB ratio for EAD was greater than those of other inflammatory markers. In addition, patients with a high CRP/ALB ratio had poorer survival than those with a low CRP/ALB ratio during the follow-up period.

CONCLUSIONS

The easily calculated CRP/ALB ratio may allow estimation of the risk of EAD after LDLT and can provide additional information that may facilitate the estimation of a patient's overall condition.

Portal flow modulation in living donor liver transplantation: review with a focus on splenectomy

Small-for-size graft (SFSG) syndrome after living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) is the dysfunction of a small graft, characterized by coagulopathy, cholestasis, ascites, and encephalopathy. It is a serious complication of LDLT and usually triggered by excessive portal flow transmitted to the allograft in the postperfusion setting, resulting in sinusoidal congestion and hemorrhage. Portal overflow injures the liver directly through nutrient excess, endothelial activation, and sinusoidal shear stress, and indirectly through arterial vasoconstriction. These conditions may be attenuated with portal flow modulation. Attempts have been made to control excessive portal flow to the SFSG, including simultaneous splenectomy, splenic artery ligation, hemi-portocaval shunt, and pharmacological manipulation, with positive outcomes. Currently, a donor liver is considered a SFSG when the graft-to-recipient weight ratio is less than 0.8 or the ratio of the graft volume to the standard liver volume is less than 40%. A strategy for transplanting SFSG safely into recipients and avoiding extensive surgery in the living donor could effectively address the donor shortage. We review the literature and assess our current knowledge of and strategies for portal flow modulation in LDLT.

A novel and simple formula to predict liver mass in porcine experimental models

A primary limitation in hepatic surgery is leaving a remnant liver of adequate size and function. Experimental models have been designed to study processes of liver injury and regeneration in this context, yet a formula to accurately calculate liver mass in an animal model is lacking. This study aims to create a novel and simple formula to estimate the mass of the native liver in a species of pigs commonly used in experimental liver surgery protocols. Using data from 200 male weanling Landrace-Large White hybrid pigs, multiple linear regression analysis is used to generate the formula. Clinical features used as variables for the predictive model are body mass and length. The final formula for pig liver mass is as follows: Liver mass (g) = 26.34232 * Body mass (kg) - 1.270629 * Length (cm) + 163.0076; R² = 0.7307. This formula for porcine liver mass is simple to use and may be helpful in studies using animals of similar characteristics to evaluate restoration of liver mass following major hepatectomy.

Mesenchymal stem cells prolong survival and prevent lethal complications in a porcine model of fulminant liver failure

BACKGROUND

Fulminant liver failure (FLF) is a life-threatening disease.

METHODS

Lethal FLF was induced by ischemia-reperfusion (I-R) injury in mini-pigs, and MSCs were infused via splenic vein after reperfusion.

RESULTS

Accumulated survival within 28 days was significantly improved by MSCs (P = 0.0348). Notably, MSCs maintained blood-gas homeostasis in the first 24 hours and prevented FLF-induced elevation of prothrombin time, international normalized ratio, and creatinine and ammonia levels in the first 3 days. With MSCs, serum levels of liver enzymes gradually decreased after 3 days, and platelet count was back to normal at 1 week of FLF. MSCs promoted liver regeneration within 2 weeks and differentiated into functional hepatocytes at 2-4 weeks after transplantation, evidenced by increase in Ki67-positive cells, detectable human hepatocyte growth factor, human vascular endothelial growth factor, human hepatocyte-specific antigen, and human albumin-expressing cells in the liver at different time points. Reactive oxidative species (ROS) were accumulated after FLF and eliminated at 4 weeks after MSC transplantation.

CONCLUSIONS

Together, MSCs prolong the survival and prevent lethal sequelae of I-R injury-induced FLF by maintenance of liver-function homeostasis and rescue of ROS in the acute stage and by homing and differentiation into hepatocytes in the subacute stage.

Quantitative study of liver hemodynamic changes in rats with small-for-size syndrome by the 4D-CT perfusion technique

OBJECTIVE

The microcirculatory hemodynamic changes of small-for-size syndrome (SFSS) are still unclear. In this study, they were investigated by four-dimensional CT perfusion (4D-CTP) technique.

METHODS

The sham group, 50, 60, 70 and 80 % partial hepatectomy (PH) rat groups were established. At 1 hour (1 h), 1 day (1 d), 3 days (3 d) and 7 days (7 d) post-operation, serological examination, 4D-CTP scan and histopathological examination were performed. One-way analysis of variance and the Kruskal-Wallis test were used for the comparison.

RESULTS

Based on the diagnostic criteria of SFSS, the 80 % group was considered to be a successful model. In all the PH groups, portal vein perfusion and total liver perfusion peaked at 1 h and declined at 1d and 3d. Both portal vein perfusion and total liver perfusion were significantly higher in the 80 % group than the sham group, 50 and 60% groups at 1 h (p < 0.05), and 80 % group at 3d and 7d (p < 0.05). In the 50 and 60 % groups, hepatic artery perfusion decreased at 1 h and maintained at a lower level until at 7 d; whereas, in the 70 and 80% groups, it increased at 1 h, then decreased and reached the lowest level at 7 d. No significant difference appeared in hepatic artery perfusion between any two groups at any time points. At all time points, hepatic perfusion index was lower in all the PH groups than the sham group. Significant differences in hepatic perfusion index appeared between the 80% group and the sham group at 1 h and 1 d (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The CTP parameters quantitatively revealed the microcirculatory hemodynamic changes in SFSS, which were further confirmed to be associated with histopathological injury. It is suggested that the hemodynamic changes in SFSS remnant liver can provide useful information for further revealing the mechanism of SFSS and may help for guiding the treatments.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

By using the 4D-CTP technique, the hepatic microcirculatory hemodynamic changes could be quantitatively measured in vivo for small animal research.

Outcome of the use of paediatric donor livers in adult recipients: A single Chinese centre experience

BACKGROUND

Paediatric liver allografts sometimes are allocated to adult recipients when there are no suitable paediatric recipients on the waiting list. However, debate exits regarding the reported outcomes of liver transplants using such small grafts.

METHODS

Records from adult patients undergoing liver transplantation between February 2010 and January 2016 who received whole grafts from paediatric (≤ 13 years) donors or ideal deceased adult (18-35 years) donors were reviewed. Patient and graft survival, post-transplant liver function, and complications between the two groups were compared.

RESULTS

The baseline characteristics were comparable, except that the paediatric donor allografts had smaller size. The 3-month, 1-year, and 3-year rates of patient survival were 91.3%, 85.2%, and 85.2% in the paediatric donor group and 93.4%, 88.9%, and 85.0% in the adult donor group (P = 0.947), respectively. One patient receiving a paediatric allograft developed small-for-size liver syndrome post-transplantation. There was no difference in primary non-function, early allograft dysfunction, biliary complications, vascular complications, or infection between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Our study indicates that using paediatric donor livers in well-selected adult recipients is a safe procedure, considering there was no suitable paediatric recipient. However, the risk of portal hyperperfusion should be considered in clinical cases such as size-mismatched transplants.

Exogenous melatonin protects small-for-size liver grafts by promoting monocyte infiltration and releases interleukin-6

Defective regeneration of small-for-size (SFS) liver remnants and partial grafts remains a key limiting factor in the application of liver surgery and transplantation. Exogenous melatonin (MLT) has protective effects on hepatic ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI), but its influence on graft regeneration is unknown. The aim of the study is to investigate the role of MLT in IRI and graft regeneration in settings of partial liver transplantation. We established three mouse models to study hepatic IRI and regeneration associated with partial liver transplantation: (I) IR+PH group: 60 minutes liver ischemia (IR) plus 2/3 hepatectomy (PH); (II) IR+exPH group: 60 minutes liver IR plus extended hepatectomy (exPH) associated with the SFS syndrome; (III) SFS-LT group: Arterialized 30% SFS liver transplant. Each group was divided into MLT or vehicle-treated subgroups. Hepatic injury, inflammatory signatures, liver regeneration, and animal survival rates were assessed. MLT reduced liver injury, enhanced liver regeneration, and promoted interleukin (IL) 6, IL10, and tumor necrosis factor-α release by infiltrating, inflammatory Ly6C+ F4/80+ monocytes in the IR+PH group. MLT-induced IL6 significantly improved hepatic microcirculation and survival in the IR+exPH model. In the SFS-LT group, MLT promoted graft regeneration and increased recipient survival along with increased IL6/GP130-STAT3 signaling. In IL6^-/- mice, MLT failed to promote liver recovery, which could be restored through recombinant IL6. In the IR+exPH and SFS-LT groups, inhibition of the IL6 co-receptor GP130 through SC144 abolished the beneficial effects of MLT. MLT ameliorates SFS liver graft IRI and restores regeneration through monocyte-released IL6 and downstream IL6/GP130-STAT3 signaling.

Feasibility of using marginal liver grafts in living donor liver transplantation

Liver transplantation (LT) is one of the most effective treatments for end-stage liver disease caused by related risk factors when liver resection is contraindicated. Additionally, despite the decrease in the prevalence of hepatitis B virus (HBV) over the past two decades, the absolute number of HBsAg-positive people has increased, leading to an increase in HBV-related liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. Consequently, a large demand exists for LT. While the wait time for patients on the donor list is, to some degree, shorter due to the development of living donor liver transplantation (LDLT), there is still a shortage of liver grafts. Furthermore, recipients often suffer from emergent conditions, such as liver dysfunction or even hepatic encephalopathy, which can lead to a limited choice in grafts. To expand the pool of available liver grafts, one option is the use of organs that were previously considered “unusable” by many, which are often labeled “marginal” organs. Many previous studies have reported on the possibilities of using marginal grafts in orthotopic LT; however, there is still a lack of discussion on this topic, especially regarding the feasibility of using marginal grafts in LDLT. Therefore, the present review aimed to summarize the feasibility of using marginal liver grafts for LDLT and discuss the possibility of expanding the application of these grafts.

Liver paired exchange: Can the liver emulate the kidney?

Kidney paired exchange (KPE) constitutes 12% of all living donor kidney transplantations (LDKTs) in the United States. The success of KPE programs has prompted many in the liver transplant community to consider the possibility of liver paired exchange (LPE). Though the idea seems promising, the application has been limited to a handful of centers in Asia. In this article, we consider the indications, logistical issues, and ethics for establishing a LPE program in the United States with reference to the principles and advances developed from experience with KPE. Liver Transplantation 24 677-686 2018 AASLD.

Evaluation the efficacy and safety of simultaneous splenectomy in liver transplantation patients: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Simultaneous splenectomy during liver transplantation (LT) is debated. The present meta-analysis assessed the efficacy and safety of splenectomy on the outcome of LT patients.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Embase, and Wanfang databases for relevant studies published until the date of July 15, 2017. Quality assessment of the included studies was performed using a modified Newcastle-Ottawa Scale judgment. The data were analyzed using RevMan5.3 software.

RESULTS

A total of 16 studies consisting of 2198 patients (892 patients received splenectomy during LT [SPLT group] and 1306 patients received LT only [LT group]) were included in the present meta-analysis. Efficacy analysis revealed that pooled hazard ratio for overall survival (OS) between 2 groups was not significantly different (hazard ratio = 1.03; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.71-1.50). SPLT group had less postoperative rejection (odds ratio [OR] = 0.63, 95% CI: 0.50-0.79) and small for size syndrome (OR = 0.23, 95% CI: 0.07-0.79). SPLT group had significantly lower preoperative platelet (mean difference [MD] = -17.23, 95% CI: -19.54, -14.91), but significantly higher postoperative platelet (MD = 170.45, 95% CI: 108.33-232.56). Conversely, SPLT group had significant higher preoperative portal pressure (MD = 1.54, 95% CI: 0.75-2.33) and significant lower postoperative portal pressure (MD = -1.17, 95% CI: -2.24, -0.11). Safety analysis revealed that SPLT group had significantly longer operation time (MD = 56.66, 95% CI: 35.96-77.35), more intraoperative blood loss (MD = 1.08, 95% CI: 0.25-1.91), and more intraoperative red blood cell (RBC) transfusion (MD = 3.77, 95% CI: 3.22-4.33). Furthermore, SPLT group had significantly higher incidence of postoperative hemorrhage (OR = 3.07, 95% CI: 1.92-4.91), postoperative thrombosis (OR = 3.63, 95% CI: 1.06-12.45), and perioperative infection (OR = 2.62, 95% CI: 1.76-3.90). In addition, perioperative mortality was significantly higher in the SPLT group (OR = 3.14, 95% CI: 1.31-7.52). Postoperative hospital stay did not differ significantly between 2 groups (OR = -1.75, 95% CI: -3.66-0.16).

CONCLUSIONS

Splenectomy benefits LT patients in increasing platelet count. However, splenectomy is a morbid procedure as splenectomy increases operation time, intraoperative blood loss, intraoperative RBC transfusion, and postoperative complications. Splenectomy does not improve OS but increase perioperative mortality. Therefore, splenectomy should be performed only in selective patients.

Fibrosis in small syngeneic rat liver grafts because of damaged bone marrow stem cells from chronic alcohol consumption

A patient with liver failure due to chronic and acute alcohol abuse under consideration for an urgent liver transplant shortly after stopping alcohol may have residual abnormalities that threaten transplant success, particularly for a small graft. To address this, we studied a model in which reduced-size (50%) Lewis rat livers are transplanted into green fluorescence protein transgenic Lewis recipients after they are fed alcohol or a control diet for 5 weeks. Here we show that normal small Lewis grafts transplanted to alcohol-fed Lewis hosts developed fibrosis, whereas no fibrosis was observed in control-fed recipients. Host-derived CD133 + 8-hydroxy-2'-deoxyguanosine (8-OHdG) cells were significantly increased in livers recovered from both alcohol-fed and control recipients, but only alcohol-fed recipients demonstrated co-staining (a marker of oxidative DNA damage). α smooth muscle actin (α-SMA) staining, a marker for myofibroblasts, also co-localized with CD133 + cells only in the livers of alcohol-fed recipients. Immunostaining and polymerase chain reaction analysis confirmed that chronic alcohol consumption decreased the proportion of bone marrow stem cells (BMSCs) expressing CD133, c-Kit, and chemokine (C-X-C motif) receptor 4 markers and caused oxidative mitochondria DNA (mtDNA) damage. Culture of CD133 + cells from normal rats with medium containing 3% ethanol for 48 hours resulted in elevated mitochondrial 8-OHdG and mtDNA deletion, and ethanol exposure diminished CD133 expression but dramatically increased α-SMA expression. In conclusion, oxidative mtDNA damage and deletions occur in BMSCs of chronic alcohol-fed recipients, and these damaged cells mobilize to the small liver grafts and become myofibroblasts where they play a key role in the subsequent development of fibrosis. Liver Transplantation 23 1564-1576 2017 AASLD.