Predictive model and risk factors associated with a revised definition of early allograft dysfunction in liver transplant recipients

Overcoming the hurdles of steatotic grafts in liver transplantation: Insights into survival and prognostic factors

With increasing metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease, the use of steatotic grafts in liver transplantation (LT) and their impact on postoperative graft survival (GS) needs further exploration. Analyzing adult LT recipient data (2002-2022) from the United Network for Organ Sharing database, outcomes of LT using steatotic (≥30% macrosteatosis) and nonsteatotic donor livers, donors after circulatory death, and standard-risk older donors (age 45-50) were compared. GS predictors were evaluated using Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses. Of the 35,345 LT donors, 8.9% (3,155) were fatty livers. The initial 30-day postoperative period revealed significant challenges with fatty livers, demonstrating inferior GS. However, the GS discrepancy between fatty and nonfatty livers subsided over time ( p = 0.10 at 5 y). Long-term GS outcomes showed comparable or even superior results in fatty livers relative to nonsteatotic livers, conditional on surviving the initial 90 postoperative days ( p = 0.90 at 1 y) or 1 year ( p = 0.03 at 5 y). In the multivariable Cox regression analysis, the high body surface area (BSA) ratio (≥1.1) (HR 1.42, p = 0.02), calculated as donor BSA divided by recipient BSA, long cold ischemic time (≥6.5 h) (HR 1.72, p < 0.01), and recipient medical condition (intensive care unit hospitalization) (HR 2.53, p < 0.01) emerged as significant adverse prognostic factors. Young (<40 y) fatty donors showed a high BSA ratio, diabetes, and intensive care unit hospitalization as significant indicators of a worse prognosis ( p < 0.01). Our study emphasizes the initial postoperative 30-day survival challenge in LT using fatty livers. However, with careful donor-recipient matching, for example, avoiding the use of steatotic donors with long cold ischemic time and high BSA ratios for recipients in the intensive care unit, it is possible to enhance immediate GS, and in a longer time, outcomes comparable to those using nonfatty livers, donors after circulatory death livers, or standard-risk older donors can be anticipated. These novel insights into decision-making criteria for steatotic liver use provide invaluable guidance for clinicians.

Characteristics, Risk Factors, and Outcome of New-onset Systolic Heart Failure After Liver Transplantation: A Single-center Cohort

New-onset systolic heart failure (HF) after liver transplantation (LT) is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality; however, its characteristics are still insufficiently delineated. HF may involve the left ventricle (LV), right ventricle (RV), or both ventricles. We explored the incidence, characteristics, etiologies, risks, involved cardiac chambers, and outcomes of HF after LT.

Methods

This study included 528 adult patients with preoperative LV ejection fraction ≥ 55% who underwent LT between 2016 and 2020. The primary outcome was new-onset systolic HF, defined by the presence of clinical signs, symptoms, and echocardiographic evidence of reduced LVejection fraction <50% and RV dysfunction within the first year after LT.

Results

Thirty-one patients (6%) developed systolic HF within a median of 9 d (1-364). Of those, 23% of patients had ischemic HF, whereas 77% had nonischemic HF. Nonischemic HF was caused by stress (11), sepsis (8), or other factors (5). Nonischemic HF was secondary to isolated LV failure in 58% of patients or RV ± LV failure in 42% of patients. Recursive partitioning identified subgroups with varying risks and uncovered interaction between variables. HF risk increased from 4.2% to 13% when epinephrine and/or norepinephrine drips were used intraoperatively (P < 0.01). When no epinephrine and/or norepinephrine were used, HF risk increased from 3.1% to 38.5% if baseline hemoglobin was <7.2 g/dL (P < 0.01). When baseline hemoglobin was ≥7.2 g/dL, HF risk increased from 0% to 5.2% when ≥3500 mL crystalloid was used intraoperatively (P < 0.01). Posttransplant first-year survival and reversibility of HF depended on the etiology (stress, sepsis, ischemia, etc) and cardiac chamber involvement (isolated LV or RV ± LV). RV dysfunction was associated with inferior recovery of cardiac function and poorer survival than nonischemic isolated LV dysfunction (50% versus 70%, respectively).

Conclusions

Posttransplant new-onset HF is mostly nonischemic in nature and is associated with increased morbidity and mortality.

Graft-to-recipient weight ratio exerts nonlinear effects on prognosis by interacting with donor liver macrosteatosis

Aim

To investigate the interactions between the graft-to-recipient weight ratio (GWRWR) and other risk factors responsible for inferior allograft outcomes.

Methods

A total of 362 patients who received liver transplantation (LT) were enrolled. Indicators such as graft/recipient weight and other prognostic factors were collected. Comparisons of indicators and survival analysis were performed in groups categorized by the GWRWR. Interactions of large-for-size grafts (LFSGs) with graft macrosteatosis (MaS) were evaluated in terms of relative excess risk caused by interaction (RERI) and attributable proportion (AP). Cytoscape visualized the role of LFSGs in the risk profile for poor prognosis.

Results

Based on the GWRWR, LT cases can be categorized into three subgroups, standard (1%-2.5%), optimal (2.5%-3.0%), and inferior prognosis (>3.0%). Survival analysis confirmed clear separations in cases categorized by the above-defined limits on the GWRWR (P < 0.05). LFSGs caused inferior prognosis by initiating positive interactions with MaS severity.

Conclusion

The GWRWR exerted nonlinear effects on prognosis in deceased donor LT cases. LFSGs (GWRWR > 3.0%) caused inferior outcomes, while grafts sized within (2.5%-3.0%) had optimal post-transplant prognosis. MaS increased the risk of poor prognosis by exerting positive synergistic effects on LFSGs.

Evaluating Outcomes Related to Donor and Recipient Metabolic Environment: Macrosteatotic Allografts and Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis

The increasing prevalence of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) affects both recipient and donor populations in liver transplantation. Presently, it is unclear whether transplantation of macrosteatotic allografts is affected by the metabolic milieu of liver transplant recipients. This study investigates fatty liver disease at the intersection of donor and recipient. A retrospective review of the Organ Procurement and Transplantation database identified 5167 NASH and 26,289 non-NASH transplant recipients who received transplants from January 1, 2004, to June 12, 2020. A total of 12,569 donors had allografts with no macrosteatosis (<5%), 16,140 had mild macrosteatosis (5%-29%), and 2747 had moderate to severe macrosteatosis (≥30%). Comparing recipients with NASH to propensity score-matched (PSM) recipients without NASH demonstrated noninferior graft and patient survival up to 10 years in patients with NASH. Similar trends were observed in subgroup analyses of transplants within each strata of allograft macrosteatosis. Assessing allograft macrosteatosis specifically in the NASH population demonstrated that allografts with ≥30% macrosteatosis were associated with reduced early graft survival (30 days, 93.32% versus 96.54% [P = 0.02]; 1 year, 84.53% versus 88.99% [P = 0.05]) compared with PSM grafts with <30% macrosteatosis. Long-term graft survival at 5 and 10 years, however, was similar. The use of carefully selected macrosteatotic allografts can be successful in both recipients with NASH and recipients without NASH. The metabolic environment of patients with NASH does not appear to adversely affect outcomes with regard to the allograft when controlled for numerous confounders. It is, however, important to remain cognizant of the potential for high-risk macrosteatotic allografts to negatively affect outcomes.

Clear mortality gap caused by graft macrosteatosis in Chinese patients after cadaveric liver transplantation

BACKGROUND

Liver transplantation (LT) is one of the most effective surgical treatment for patients with end-stage liver disease. Steatosis is a contributor for inferior graft quality. But its impact and safety on transplantation was less assessed in Chinese patients.

METHODS

Graft steatosis and related information involved in recipients, donors and surgical procedures were retrospectively collected from 239 patients.

RESULTS

Donor macrosteatosis (MaS) caused about 2.14 and 2.80 folds of increment on patient and graft mortality. Dose-response analysis revealed prominent risk of grafts on overall patient/organ mortality when MaS content exceeded 10% (P<0.05). Noteworthy, deaths were only observed in MaS group when concurrent with extremely higher post-transplant alanine aminotransferase (ALT, 64%). However, microsteatosis (MiS) grafts didn't affect outcomes after LT. In a cohort of Chinese patients, MaS had comprehensive effects on post-transplant outcomes with relatively lower safety threshold at 10%. Mortality gap caused by MaS grafts was observed in patients with severer ischemia reperfusion injury.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study revealled the graft MaS affected the post-transplant outcomes in lower risk cutoff in Chinese patients. Further study is worthy to validate these results and investigate inner mechanism under the phenomenon.

Model for early allograft function is predictive of early graft loss in donation after circulatory death liver transplantation

Donation after circulatory death (DCD) liver transplantation is associated with higher rates of graft loss. In this paper, we explored whether the Model for Early Allograft Function (MEAF) predicted outcome in DCD liver transplantation. We performed a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from all adult DCD (Maastricht 3) livers transplanted in Cambridge and Edinburgh between 1 January 2011 and 30 June 2017, excluding those undergoing any form of machine perfusion. 187 DCD liver transplants were performed during the study period. DCD liver transplants with a lower MEAF score had a significantly better survival compared to those with a high MEAF score (Mantel-Cox P < .0001); this was largely due to early graft loss. Beyond 28 days post-transplant, there were no significant long-term graft or patient survival differences irrespective of the grade of MEAF (Mantel-Cox P = .64 and P = .43, respectively). The MEAF score correlated with the length of ICU (P = .0011) and hospital stay (P = .0007), but did not predict the requirement for retransplantation for ischemic cholangiopathy (P = .37) or readmission (P = .74). In this study, a high MEAF score predicted early graft loss, but not the subsequent need for re-transplantation or late graft failure as a result of intrahepatic ischemic bile duct pathology.

Combination of liver graft sonographic grading and point shear wave elastography to reduce early allograft dysfunction after liver transplantation

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the performance of a liver graft sonographic grading system and point shear wave elastography (PSWE) in predicting early allograft dysfunction (EAD) after liver transplantation (LT).

METHODS

Successive brain-dead donors and liver recipients in our hospital from March 2017 to May 2018 were retrospectively recruited. All donors underwent PSWE examination, abdominal ultrasonography, and sonographic grading (grade 0 to grade 5). Donors with ≥ 10 valid PSWE examinations and a failure rate of < 60% were included. For all recipients, abdominal ultrasonography and blood tests for biologic parameters were performed preoperatively and daily postoperatively to screen for EAD. The recipients and their grafts were classified into EAD and non-EAD groups. Statistical analyses were performed to analyze the correlations among liver stiffness (LS), liver graft sonographic grading, and EAD.

RESULTS

Thirty-two donors and 32 corresponding liver recipients were enrolled (15 cases in the EAD group; 17 in the non-EAD group). There were no grade 0, 1, or 2 cases in the two groups. For prediction of EAD in recipients after LT, the AUC for PSWE was 0.929 and the AUC for combination of PSWE and sonographic grading system was 0.935.

CONCLUSIONS

Combination of PSWE and sonographic grading system can predict postoperative EAD in LT recipients with high sensitivity. Abnormal results may suggest a need for liver biopsy preoperatively, thus avoiding unnecessary surgical preparation for liver procurement.

KEY POINTS

• Combination of PSWE with new sonographic grading system is useful for preoperative evaluation of liver grafts from brain-dead donors. • EAD is as a criterion for evaluating the diagnostic value of PSWE and sonographic grading system. • Combination of PSWE and sonographic grading system can predict postoperative EAD in LT recipients with high sensitivity.

The postoperative hepatic artery resistance index after living donor liver transplantation can predict early allograft dysfunction

To investigate whether postoperative hepatic hemodynamics have an impact on graft function.Using a retrospective cohort with 262 adult living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) recipients, we discussed the relationship between postoperative hepatic hemodynamics and patient outcomes.According to the definition of early allograft dysfunction (EAD), the patients were classified into the EAD group (43 patients) and the non-EAD group (219 patients). In terms of postoperative hemodynamic parameters, there was no significant differences between these 2 groups regarding hepatic artery flow (HAF), hepatic artery velocity (HAV), portal vein flow (PVF), and portal vein velocity (PVV), except for the hepatic artery resistance index (HARI) which was somewhat higher in the EAD group on postoperative day 3 (POD3) (0.70 vs 0.61, P < .05). According to these results, we used a ROC curve and found that a HARI of 0.68 was the cutoff point (with 73.8% sensitivity and 58.3% specificity) for predicting EAD after LDLT. In addition, multivariate analysis showed that fulminant hepatic failure, pretransplant hepatorenal syndrome, and HARI ≥ 0.68 on POD3 were independent risk factors for postoperative EAD.Our results showed that postoperative hemodynamics might influence graft function by altering hepatic artery flow.

Predictive utility of the C-reactive protein to albumin ratio in early allograft dysfunction in living donor liver transplantation: A retrospective observational cohort study

BACKGROUND

This study was performed to determine the association between the ratio of C-reactive protein to albumin (CRP/ALB) and the risk of early allograft dysfunction (EAD) in patients undergoing living donor liver transplantation (LDLT).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 588 adult patients undergoing LDLT were retrospectively investigated, after 22 were excluded because of signs of overt infection or history of ALB infusion. The study population was classified into high and low CRP/ALB ratio groups according to EAD. All laboratory variables, including CRP and ALB, had been collected on the day before surgery. A percentage value for the CRP/ALB ratio (%) was calculated as CRP/ALB × 100.

RESULTS

After LDLT, 83 patients (14.1%) suffered EAD occurrence. A higher CRP/ALB ratio was independently associated with risk of EAD, Model for End-stage Liver Disease score, fresh frozen plasma transfusion, and donor age. Based on a cutoff CRP/ALB ratio (i.e., > 20%), the probability of EAD was significantly (2-fold) higher in the high versus low CRP/ALB group. The predictive utility of CRP/ALB ratio for EAD was greater than those of other inflammatory markers. In addition, patients with a high CRP/ALB ratio had poorer survival than those with a low CRP/ALB ratio during the follow-up period.

CONCLUSIONS

The easily calculated CRP/ALB ratio may allow estimation of the risk of EAD after LDLT and can provide additional information that may facilitate the estimation of a patient's overall condition.