1
|
Graft Failure after Uterus Transplantation in 16 Recipients: A Review. J Clin Med 2023; 12:jcm12052032. [PMID: 36902818 PMCID: PMC10003853 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12052032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2023] [Revised: 02/26/2023] [Accepted: 03/02/2023] [Indexed: 03/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Uterus transplantation (UTx) is now an alternative to surrogacy and adoption for women with uterine factor infertility to have children; however, there are still unresolved clinical and technical issues. One of these is that the graft failure rate after transplantation is somewhat higher than that of other life-saving organ transplants, which is a critical concern. Herein, we summarize the details of 16 graft failures after UTx with living or deceased donors using the published literature in order to learn from these negative outcomes. To date, the main causes of graft failure are vascular factors (arterial and/or venous thrombosis, atherosclerosis, and poor perfusion). Many recipients with thrombosis develop graft failure within one month of surgery. Therefore, it is necessary to devise a safe and stable surgical technique with higher success rates for further development in the UTx field.
Collapse
|
2
|
Wall AE, Johannesson L, Reddy V, Warren AM, Gordon EJ, Testa G. Living uterus donors' perceptions of decision-making and informed consent: a qualitative study of the Dallas Uterus Transplant Study participants. Am J Transplant 2023; 23:265-271. [PMID: 36695701 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajt.2022.12.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2022] [Revised: 11/15/2022] [Accepted: 12/02/2022] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
Uterus transplantation is a growing field, but little is known about living uterus donors' perceptions of informed consent or their decision-making processes. This study used semistructured interviews to collect information regarding uterus donors' experiences with uterus donation, perceptions of the informed consent process, and information on how they decided to pursue uterus donation. Interviews were coded for thematic analysis. Three major themes emerged in this study. First, the decision-making process was based on individuals' motivations, rationale, and considerations of alternative contributions to help other women with infertility. Second, participants described how they felt about the process of informed consent, their decision-making processes, and how their experiences compared with their expectations. Third, participants discussed how uterus donation was a valuable experience. This study found that living uterus donors are motivated to give another woman the opportunity to experience pregnancy and childbirth. They were satisfied with the informed consent process, their experiences were in line with their expectations, and the value of uterus donation was associated with the act of donation itself. Our findings suggest that living donor uterus programs should develop robust informed consent processes that provide detailed information about uterus donation and encourage shared decision-making with potential uterus donors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anji E Wall
- Annette C. and Harold C. Simmons Transplant Institute, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA.
| | - Liza Johannesson
- Annette C. and Harold C. Simmons Transplant Institute, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA; Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Vikrant Reddy
- Baylor Scott & White Research Institute, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Ann Marie Warren
- Division of Trauma, Acute Care, and Critical Care Surgery, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA; Department of Surgery, Division of Transplantation, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Elisa J Gordon
- Department of Surgery, Division of Transplantation, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Giuliano Testa
- Annette C. and Harold C. Simmons Transplant Institute, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ayoubi JM, Carbonnel M, Racowsky C, de Ziegler D, Gargiulo A, Kvarnström N, Dahm-Kähler P, Brännström M. Evolving clinical challenges in uterus transplantation. Reprod Biomed Online 2022; 45:947-960. [DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2022.06.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2022] [Revised: 06/17/2022] [Accepted: 06/21/2022] [Indexed: 10/17/2022]
|
4
|
Dorafshar AH, Hamidian Jahromi A, Horen SR, Schechter LS, Johannesson L, Testa G, Hertl M, Dewdney S, Aschkenasy J, Wood-Molo M, Brincat C, Cherullo E, Behel JM, Hebert C, Shulman R, Bassi S, Alecci AT, Konety B. Strategic Planning and Essential Steps for Establishing a Uterine Transplant and Rehabilitation Program: From Idea to Reality. Ann Surg 2022; 276:74-80. [PMID: 34793341 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000005301] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
UTx is performed to address absolute uterine infertility in the presence of uterine agenesis, a nonfunctional uterus, or after a prior hysterectomy. After the initial success of UTx resulting in a livebirth (2014) in Sweden, there are over 70 reported UTx surgeries resulting in more than 40 livebirths worldwide. Currently, UTx has been performed in over 10 countries. As UTx is transitioning from an "experimental procedure" to a clinical option, an increasing number of centers may contemplate a UTx program. This article discusses essential steps for establishment of a successful UTx program. These principles may be implemented in cis- and transgender UTx candidates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amir H Dorafshar
- Division of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL
| | | | - Sydney R Horen
- Division of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL
| | - Loren S Schechter
- Division of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL
- The Center for Gender Confirmation Surgery, Weiss Memorial Hospital, Chicago, IL
| | - Liza Johannesson
- Annette C. and Harold C. Simmons Transplant Institute, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, TX
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Giuliano Testa
- Annette C. and Harold C. Simmons Transplant Institute, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Martin Hertl
- Division of Transplant Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL
| | - Summer Dewdney
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL
| | | | - Mary Wood-Molo
- Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL
| | - Cynthia Brincat
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL
| | - Edward Cherullo
- Department of Urology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL
| | - Jay M Behel
- Department of Psychiatry, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL
- Rush Center for Gender, Sexuality & Reproductive Health, Chicago, IL
| | - Charles Hebert
- Department of Psychiatry, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL
- Department of Internal Medicine, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL
| | - Robert Shulman
- Department of Psychiatry, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL
| | - Shruti Bassi
- Department of Anesthesiology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL
| | | | - Badrinath Konety
- Department of Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
McKenna GJ, Johannesson L, Testa G. Technological Advancements in Uterus Transplantation. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2022; 65:44-51. [PMID: 35045024 DOI: 10.1097/grf.0000000000000676] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
Uterus transplantation is barely a decade old and in a young, evolving field it is hard to identify "technological advances" since it is, in of itself, a technological advance. Nonetheless, one can still identify advances in diagnostic imaging that have improved donor screening to avoid graft losses, highlight the adoption of robotic surgery to make the living donor uterus procurement more minimally invasive, and look to a future of biotechnology like perfusion pumps and bioengineering such as synthetic uterus to increase donor supply. Additional technologies are on the horizon and promise to shape the field further.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Greg J McKenna
- Annette C. and Harold C. Simmons Transplant Institute, Baylor University Medical Center
- Texas A&M University School of Medicine, Dallas, Texas
| | - Liza Johannesson
- Annette C. and Harold C. Simmons Transplant Institute, Baylor University Medical Center
| | - Giuliano Testa
- Annette C. and Harold C. Simmons Transplant Institute, Baylor University Medical Center
- Texas A&M University School of Medicine, Dallas, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
da Graca B, Johannesson L, Testa G, Wall AE. The Ethical Evolution of Uterus Transplantation From Concept to Clinical Procedure. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2022; 65:24-36. [PMID: 35045022 DOI: 10.1097/grf.0000000000000687] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Uterus transplantation (UTx) offers women with absolute uterine factor infertility a path to motherhood that enables them to carry their own pregnancy. Debates about the ethics of UTx have evolved in tandem with its clinical evolution: clinical trials have provided evidence regarding risks and benefits to donors and recipients that were initially uncertain; technical advances have altered the balance between risks and benefits; and the experiences of donors and recipients has revealed questions that were not anticipated. As UTx transitions to a clinical procedure, questions remain about long-term risks and benefits, applications beyond carrying a pregnancy, and cost and access.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Liza Johannesson
- Annette C. and Harold C. Simmons Transplant Institute, Baylor University Medical Center
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Giuliano Testa
- Annette C. and Harold C. Simmons Transplant Institute, Baylor University Medical Center
| | - Anji E Wall
- Annette C. and Harold C. Simmons Transplant Institute, Baylor University Medical Center
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Wall AE, Johannesson L, Sok M, Warren AM, Gordon EJ, Testa G. The journey from infertility to uterus transplantation: A qualitative study of the perspectives of participants in the Dallas Uterus Transplant Study. BJOG 2021; 129:1095-1102. [PMID: 34889028 DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.17052] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2021] [Revised: 11/08/2021] [Accepted: 11/22/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess how absolute uterine factor infertility affects women who undergo uterus transplantation, how uterus transplantation impacts women with absolute uterine factor infertility and how uterus transplant recipients view uterus transplantation in terms of their reproductive autonomy. DESIGN Qualitative semi-structured interview study. SETTING Uterus transplant programme in a large academic medical centre in the USA. POPULATION/SAMPLE Twenty one uterus transplant recipients. METHODS A medical chart review was conducted to collect patient demographic information and clinical outcomes. Semi-structured interviews collected information regarding participants' experience. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S) The outcomes of interest were participants' experience of infertility, experience with uterus transplantation and general perceptions of uterus transplantation. RESULTS Six participants were pregnant (one with a second child), six had experienced early graft failure and removal, five had delivered a healthy baby, and four had a viable graft and were awaiting embryo transfer. The primary themes identified were: the negative impact of absolute uterine factor infertility diagnosis on psychological wellbeing, relationships and female identity; the positive impact of uterus transplantation on healing the emotional scars of absolute uterine factor infertility, female identity and value of research trial participation and the perception of uterus transplantation as an expansion of reproductive autonomy. All participants reported that uterus transplantation was worthwhile, regardless of individual outcome. CONCLUSION Absolute uterine factor infertility has a negative impact on women from a young age, affects multiple relationships and challenges female identity. Uterus transplantation helps to reverse this impact, transforming women's life narrative of infertility and enhancing female identity. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT Absolute uterine factor infertility (AUFI) adversely affects women. Uterus transplantation helps mitigate the negative impact of AUFI, by transforming women's life narratives of infertility and enhancing female identity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anji E Wall
- Annette C. and Harold C. Simmons Transplant Institute, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Liza Johannesson
- Annette C. and Harold C. Simmons Transplant Institute, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Monica Sok
- Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Ann Marie Warren
- Division of Trauma, Acute Care, and Critical Care Surgery, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Elisa J Gordon
- Department of Surgery, Division of Transplantation, and Center for Health Services and Outcomes Research, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Giuliano Testa
- Annette C. and Harold C. Simmons Transplant Institute, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Uterus transplantation (UTx) is transitioning from an experimental procedure to a clinical treatment for absolute uterine factor infertility (AUFI). Standardized protocols for the evaluation and selection of donors and recipients that maximize chances of success - a healthy live birth - are needed. RECENT FINDINGS To date, recipient eligibility has been limited to otherwise healthy women with AUFI who are of childbearing age and are good candidates for in-vitro fertilization (IVF). For donors (living or deceased), selection criteria vary, apart from basic requirements of blood-type compatibility and freedom from critical infectious diseases, but generally require a term birth and a uterus free from uterine pathologies. The stepwise evaluation process for candidate recipients and living donors moves through health screening (medical and psychosocial); initial selection committee review; IVF (recipients only); and final selection committee review. This eliminates candidates with poor chances of success before exposure to unnecessary risks. SUMMARY The currently stringent selection criteria for prospective recipients and donors will likely broaden, as UTx becomes more widely available. Continued research is needed to define the donor, recipient and uterine graft factors associated with successful outcomes, and to support the development of standardized selection criteria.
Collapse
|
9
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Donor hysterectomy for live donor uterus transplantation was from the start performed by laparotomy, but minimal invasive surgery has entered the scene. In particular robotic-assisted laparoscopy is used since robotics is advantageous in the complex donor hysterectomy surgery in narrow space. This review covers the development and benefits of robotics and the published robotic donor hysterectomy experiences. RECENT FINDINGS Robotic donor hysterectomy publications are scarce with eight cases in Sweden, five in USA, and one each in China and Spain. Robotics have been performed for either the entire donor hysterectomy or with conversion to laparotomy for the last steps of the surgical procedure. The total operative times are in line with open surgery, although a decrease is expected in the future. The estimated blood loss and hospital stays are less than at open surgery. The complication panorama includes hydronephrosis, ureteric fistula and pressure alopecia. Live births with healthy babies have been reported. SUMMARY In uterus transplantation, robotic live donor hysterectomy has proven to be feasible, safe and associated with successful live births. The robotic donor hysterectomy is a low-volume procedure and an international registry to gather collective information is crucial for further evaluation and development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Niclas Kvarnström
- Department of Transplantation, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg
| | - Mats Brännström
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology
- Stockholm IVF-EUGIN, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Warren AM, McMinn K, Testa G, Wall A, Saracino G, Johannesson L. Motivations and Psychological Characteristics of Nondirected Uterus Donors From The Dallas UtErus Transplant Study. Prog Transplant 2021; 31:385-391. [PMID: 34713738 DOI: 10.1177/15269248211046027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Uterus transplantation has demonstrated success in clinical trials. Questions regarding how it should transition to a clinical procedure must be addressed. A critical element is an evidence regarding the psychological experiences of living uterus donors, especially donors who are nondirected (altruistic). PROJECT AIMS To describe the motivations for donation, psychological characteristics, and mental health history of nondirected living uterus donors in the Dallas UtErus Transplant Study (NCT02656550). DESIGN An observational design was used to evaluate 44 self-referred nondirected uterus donors for the uterus transplant program. The donors participated in a clinical interview with a licensed psychologist and completed assessment instruments for depression, anxiety, posttraumatic stress, health-related quality of life, and resilience at the time of evaluation. RESULTS Among the 11 donors, the median age was 36 years, 10 were married, 10 were of non-Hispanic/Latino ethnicity, and all had given birth (median of 2 children). The most frequent motivations for the donation were to provide another woman with the opportunity to carry her own child and to contribute to science. No participants met clinical criteria for depression, anxiety or posttraumatic stress but 4 reported current mental health conditions and 7 reported past or present treatment. Quality of life and resilience scores were above population norms. CONCLUSION Women selected as nondirected uterus donors were motivated to help other women experience carrying their own child and to contribute to science. A minority of women reported mental health conditions and/or treatment, and this was determined not to exclude participation with uterus donation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ann M Warren
- Baylor Scott & White Research Institute, Dallas, TX, USA.,Division of Trauma, Acute Care, and Critical Care Surgery, 22683Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Kenleigh McMinn
- Division of Trauma, Acute Care, and Critical Care Surgery, 22683Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Giuliano Testa
- Annette C. and Harold Simmons Transplant Institute, 22683Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Anji Wall
- Annette C. and Harold Simmons Transplant Institute, 22683Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Giovanna Saracino
- Annette C. and Harold Simmons Transplant Institute, 22683Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Liza Johannesson
- Annette C. and Harold Simmons Transplant Institute, 22683Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Escandón JM, Bustos VP, Santamaría E, Langstein HN, Ciudad P, Hernandez-Alejandro R, Moore RG, Leckenby JI, Manrique OJ. Evolution and Transformation of Uterine Transplantation: A Systematic Review of Surgical Techniques and Outcomes. J Reconstr Microsurg 2021; 38:429-440. [PMID: 34535036 DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1735261] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Uterine transplantation (UTx) is acknowledged to be on the second (2A) of five steps of development in accordance with the staging system for the evaluation of surgical innovations. Accordingly, we aimed to systematically review the available evidence of the surgical techniques and outcomes of UTx in terms of graft survival. METHODS A comprehensive search was conducted across PubMed Medline, Cochrane-EBMR, Scopus, Web of Science, and CENTRAL through November 2020. RESULTS Forty studies, reporting 64 recipients and 64 donors, satisfied inclusion criteria. The surgical time and the estimated blood loss were 515 minutes and 679 mL for graft procurement via laparotomy, 210 minutes and 100 mL for laparoscopic-assisted graft harvest, and 660 minutes and 173 mL for robotic-assisted procedures, respectively. Urinary tract infections (n = 8) and injury to the urinary system (n = 6) were the most common donor complications. Using the donor's internal iliac system, two arterial anastomoses were performed in all cases. Venous outflow was accomplished through the uterine veins (UVs) in 13 cases, a combination of the UVs and the ovarian/uteroovarian veins (OVs/UOVs) in 36 cases, and solely through the OVs/UOVs in 13 cases. Ischemia time was 161 and 258 minutes when using living donors (LD) and deceased donors (DD), respectively. Forty-eight uteri were successfully transplanted or fulfilled the purpose of transplantation, 41 from LDs and 7 from DDs. Twenty-five and four live childbirths from LDs and DDs have been reported, respectively. CONCLUSION UTx is still experimental. Further series are required to recommend specific surgical techniques that best yield a successful transplant and reduce complications for donors and recipients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph M Escandón
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Strong Memorial Hospital, University of Rochester Medical Center, New York
| | - Valeria P Bustos
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Eric Santamaría
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Hospital General Dr. Manuel Gea Gonzalez, National Cancer Institute, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Howard N Langstein
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Strong Memorial Hospital, University of Rochester Medical Center, New York
| | - Pedro Ciudad
- Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Burn Surgery, Arzobispo Loayza National Hospital, Lima, Peru
| | - Roberto Hernandez-Alejandro
- Department of Surgery and Division of Abdominal Transplantation and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Strong Memorial Hospital, University of Rochester Medical Center, New York
| | - Richard G Moore
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Strong Memorial Hospital, University of Rochester Medical Center, New York
| | - Jonathan I Leckenby
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Strong Memorial Hospital, University of Rochester Medical Center, New York
| | - Oscar J Manrique
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Strong Memorial Hospital, University of Rochester Medical Center, New York
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Wall AE, Testa G, Axelrod D, Johannesson L. Uterus transplantation-questions and answers about the procedure that is expanding the field of solid organ transplantation. Proc AMIA Symp 2021; 34:581-585. [PMID: 34456477 DOI: 10.1080/08998280.2021.1925064] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Uterus transplant is a new and rapidly evolving field of solid organ transplantation designed to help women with absolute uterine-factor infertility who desire to carry their own pregnancies. The advent of this procedure and human clinical trials of uterus transplantation have raised technical, clinical, and ethical questions. We address several questions about uterus transplantation based on available literature and the clinical experience at Baylor University Medical Center, which has the largest uterus transplant program in the United States.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anji E Wall
- Division of Abdominal Transplantation, Annette C. and Harold C. Simmons Transplant Institute, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Giuliano Testa
- Division of Abdominal Transplantation, Annette C. and Harold C. Simmons Transplant Institute, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - David Axelrod
- Division of Transplantation, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa
| | - Liza Johannesson
- Division of Abdominal Transplantation, Annette C. and Harold C. Simmons Transplant Institute, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, Texas.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Dallas UtErus Transplant Study: Early Outcomes and Complications of Robot-assisted Hysterectomy for Living Uterus Donors. Transplantation 2021; 105:225-230. [PMID: 32150040 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000003211] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Uterus transplantation is a treatment for absolute uterine infertility and can be performed with living and deceased donors. Given the safety and increased utilization of robotic assistance with other gynecologic and transplant donor operations, we adopted a robot-assisted approach to donor hysterectomy. This study compared early outcomes and morbidity of the robot-assisted approach to donor hysterectomy with the traditionally performed open approach and addressed whether the robot-assisted approach is safe and offers advantages for the donor. METHODS Our institution has performed 18 living donor hysterectomies for uterus transplantation. This retrospective review compared the last 5 cases utilizing a robot-assisted technique and vaginal extraction of the uterus graft with the first 13 cases performed with an open laparotomy technique. Demographic, intraoperative, and postoperative data were examined. RESULTS There were no differences between the robot-assisted and the open living donor group with respect to age, body mass index, or gynecological history. Although the median operative time was shorter for the open approach (6.27 versus 10.46 h), the donors' median estimated blood loss, length of hospital stay, and length of sick leave were less with the robot-assisted approach. There was no conversion to open hysterectomy in the robot-assisted cases, and the incidence of complications was similar between the 2 groups. There was no difference in early graft function. CONCLUSIONS These preliminary results show that robot-assisted living donor hysterectomy is feasible and safe for the donors; it allows a faster postoperative recovery and the same early graft function.
Collapse
|
14
|
Georgevsky D, Li Y, Pather S, Tejada-Berges T, Robinson D, Laurence J, Campbell N, Wyburn K, Liyanagama K, Narayan R, Lutz T, Chan A, Heaney SA, Kitzing YX, Anderson L, Testa G, Johannesson L, Marren A. Uterus transplantation and pregnancy induction: Approved protocol at the Royal Prince Alfred Hospital. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2021; 61:621-624. [PMID: 33956989 DOI: 10.1111/ajo.13364] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2020] [Revised: 03/24/2021] [Accepted: 04/02/2021] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
Absolute uterine factor infertility (AUFI) is defined as the absence of a uterus or the presence of a non-functional uterus. Before the first live birth from a uterus transplant in 2014, the only fertility options for women with AUFI were surrogacy and adoption. In November 2019, our team was granted approval for the first uterus transplant trial in Australia using known living donors. Our program is based on that of our overseas collaborators in Dallas, Texas; this team will also be proctoring us for our first two cases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dana Georgevsky
- Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Sydney Institute for Women, Children and their Families, Sydney Local Health District, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Ying Li
- Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Selvan Pather
- Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Institute of Academic Surgery, Sydney Local Health District, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Trevor Tejada-Berges
- Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Institute of Academic Surgery, Sydney Local Health District, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
| | - David Robinson
- Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Institute of Academic Surgery, Sydney Local Health District, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Jerome Laurence
- Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Institute of Academic Surgery, Sydney Local Health District, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Neil Campbell
- Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Kate Wyburn
- Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Keith Liyanagama
- Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Rajit Narayan
- Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Tracey Lutz
- Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Agnes Chan
- Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Sally-Ann Heaney
- Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Yu Xuan Kitzing
- Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Lyndal Anderson
- Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Giuliano Testa
- Annette C. and Harold C. Simmons Transplant Institute at Baylor University Medical Centre Dallas, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Liza Johannesson
- Annette C. and Harold C. Simmons Transplant Institute at Baylor University Medical Centre Dallas, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Anthony Marren
- Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Sydney Institute for Women, Children and their Families, Sydney Local Health District, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia.,Institute of Academic Surgery, Sydney Local Health District, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Dahm-Kähler P, Kvarnström N, Alfonzo Rodriguez E, Skogsberg Dahlgren U, Brännström M. Uterus transplantation for fertility preservation in patients with gynecologic cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2021; 31:371-378. [PMID: 33649004 DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2020-001804] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2020] [Revised: 10/02/2020] [Accepted: 10/05/2020] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Cervical and endometrial cancer may impact women interested in future fertility in approximately 5-25% of cases. The recommended treatment for patients with early stage disease is hysterectomy and/or radiation leading to infertility. This is referred to as absolute uterine factor infertility. Such infertility was considered untreatable until 2014, when the first child was born after uterus transplantation. Thereafter, multiple births have been reported, mainly from women with Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome, with congenital uterine absence, although also from a patient with iatrogenic uterine factor infertility caused by radical hysterectomy secondary to an early stage cervical cancer 7 years before uterus transplantation. A live birth after uterus transplantation may be considered promising for many who may not otherwise have this option.Uterus transplantation is a complex process including careful patient selection in both recipients and donors, in vitro fertilization, and complex surgery in the organ procurement procedure including harvesting the vessel pedicles with the thin-walled veins. Thereafter, the transplantation surgery with anastomosis to ensure optimal blood inflow and outflow of the transplanted organ. Knowledge regarding immunosuppression and pregnancy is essential. Lastly there is the hysterectomy component as the uterus must be removed. Multidisciplinary teams working closely are essential to achieve successful uterus transplantation and, ultimately, delivery of a healthy child. Both the living and deceased donor concept may be considered and we address both the advantages and disadvantages. This review summarizes the animal research thus far published on uterus transplantation, the suggested recipient selections including former gynecologic cancer patients, the living and deceased donor uterus transplantation concepts with reported results, and updated fertility outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pernilla Dahm-Kähler
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sahlgrenska Academy, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Niclas Kvarnström
- Department of Transplantation, Sahlgrenska Academy, Goteborg, Sweden
| | | | | | - Mats Brännström
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sahlgrenska Academy, Gothenburg, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Uterine Transplantation Using Living Donation: A Cross-sectional Study Assessing Perceptions, Acceptability, and Suitability. Transplant Direct 2021; 7:e673. [PMID: 34104711 PMCID: PMC8183710 DOI: 10.1097/txd.0000000000001124] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2020] [Revised: 12/01/2020] [Accepted: 12/02/2020] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text. A uterine transplantation is a nonvital, quality-of-life–enhancing solid organ transplant. Given improvements in donor risk profile and the anticipated shortage of suitable deceased donors, nondirected donation could facilitate sustainability as uterine transplantation moves from research into the clinical realm. The aim of this article is to determine perceptions and identify motivations of potential nondirected living uterus donors and assess acceptability and suitability.
Collapse
|
17
|
The Evolution of Transplantation From Saving Lives to Fertility Treatment: DUETS (Dallas UtErus Transplant Study). Ann Surg 2021; 272:411-417. [PMID: 32657928 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000004199] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE We report the results of the first 20 uterus transplants performed in our institution. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA Uterus transplantation (UTx) aims at giving women affected by absolute uterine-factor infertility the possibility of carrying their own pregnancy. UTx has evolved from experimental to an established surgical procedure. METHODS The Dallas Uterus Transplant Study (DUETS) program started in 2016. The uterus was transplanted in orthotopic position with vascular anastomoses to the external iliac vessels and removed when 1 or 2 live births were achieved. Immunosuppression lasted only for the duration of the uterus graft. RESULTS Twenty women, median age 29.7 years, enrolled in the study, with 10 in phase 1 and 10 in phase 2. All but 2 recipients had a congenital absence of the uterus. Eighteen recipients received uteri from living donors and 2 from deceased donors. In phase 1, 50% of recipients had a technically successful uterus transplant, compared to 90% in phase 2. Four recipients with a technical success in phase 1 have delivered 1 or 2 babies, and the fifth recipient with a technical success is >30 weeks pregnant. In phase 2, 2 recipients have delivered healthy babies and 5 are pregnant. CONCLUSIONS UTx is a unique type of transplant; whose only true success is a healthy child birth. Based on results presented here, involving refinement of the surgical technique and donor selection process, UTx is now an established solution for absolute uterine-factor infertility.
Collapse
|
18
|
Wall AE, Johannesson L, Sok M, Warren AM, Gordon EJ, Testa G. Decision making and informed consent in uterus transplant recipients: A mixed-methods study of the Dallas uterus transplant study (DUETS) participants. Am J Surg 2021; 222:819-824. [PMID: 33573762 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2021.01.039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2020] [Revised: 12/23/2020] [Accepted: 01/28/2021] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Uterus transplantation (Utx) has achieved clinical success but little is known about motivations and experiences of UTx recipients. METHODS We conducted semi-structured interviews with 20 UTx recipients in addition to collecting quantitative demographic and clinical data. Closed-ended interview questions were treated as categorical variables. Thematic analysis was performed on qualitative data. Bivariate analysis tested associations between categorical variables. RESULTS Themes that emerged included: the decision to pursue UTx is a process, primary motivations for UTx are specific to the experience of gestation, and alternative options did not offer the same value as UTx. There was no association between disease etiology, clinical status, or perception of UTx risk with information needs or donor preference. CONCLUSIONS Our findings suggest that UTx is a unique treatment option that some women with AUFI find preferable to adoption and surrogacy and, as such, should be discussed as a parenthood option with women diagnosed with AUFI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anji E Wall
- Annette C. and Harold C. Simmons Transplant Institute, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
| | - Liza Johannesson
- Annette C. and Harold C. Simmons Transplant Institute, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA; Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Monica Sok
- Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Ann Marie Warren
- Division of Trauma, Acute Care, and Critical Care Surgery, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Elisa J Gordon
- Department of Surgery, Division of Transplantation, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Giuliano Testa
- Annette C. and Harold C. Simmons Transplant Institute, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Infectious complications of vascularized composite allograft transplantation. Curr Opin Organ Transplant 2021; 25:377-382. [PMID: 32487889 DOI: 10.1097/mot.0000000000000780] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Vascularized composite allograft (VCA) transplants constitute multiple tissues transplanted together as one functional unit. These procedures are increasing in frequency and complexity, yet data about graft survival, quality of life, and infection risk remain limited. RECENT FINDINGS Informative guidance for this patient population is often inferred from the solid organ transplantation literature. Yet, it is important to understand that VCA transplantation additionally carries its own significant and distinctive risk factors for infection. SUMMARY In this review, we give an overview of previously described infectious complications of VCA transplantation in the literature, discuss risk factors for future infection in these patients, and discuss how to manage such obstacles.
Collapse
|
20
|
Matoba Y, Kisu I, Banno K, Aoki D. Operative and Clinical Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Living-Donor Surgery on Uterus Transplantation: A Literature Review. J Clin Med 2021; 10:349. [PMID: 33477593 PMCID: PMC7831297 DOI: 10.3390/jcm10020349] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2020] [Revised: 01/11/2021] [Accepted: 01/15/2021] [Indexed: 01/18/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The surgical approach and choice of drainage veins for uterus transplantation living-donor surgery have been investigated to reduce invasiveness. METHODS A thorough search of the PubMed database was conducted. The search was not limited by language or date of publication. The data were collected on 13 October 2020. Two reviewers independently assessed each article and determined eligibility for inclusion in the review article. Inclusion criteria were English peer-reviewed articles reporting surgical information or postoperative course, articles regarding animal research on UTx, UTx on deceased donors, or not original articles. RESULTS Of the 51 operations within 26 articles reviewed, the mean operative time was shortest in the laparoscopic approach, and longest in the robot-assisted approach. The mean blood loss was less in the laparoscopic and robot-assisted approaches than in the open approach. In cases where the uterine veins were not preserved, the mean operative time was shortened by each approach and the mean blood loss decreased with the laparoscopic and robot-assisted approaches. CONCLUSIONS These procedures may contribute to less invasive living-donor surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Iori Kisu
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Keio University School of Medicine 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjku-Ku, Tokyo 160-8582, Japan; (Y.M.); (K.B.); (D.A.)
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Uterine Transplantation: Evolving Data, Success, and Clinical Importance. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2020; 28:502-512. [PMID: 33348011 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2020.12.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2020] [Revised: 12/09/2020] [Accepted: 12/15/2020] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
Uterine transplantation is an evolving procedure to allow for childbearing in paitents with absolute uterine factor infertility. The objective of this study was to review the existing literature using a comprehensive PubMed literature search. A systematic medical subheadings search strategy was used with the terms "uterus transplant" and "uterine transplantation". Of the 75 full-text articles assessed for eligibility, 68 were included in the qualitative synthesis. Of these, 9 were included in the meta-analysis on living donor uterine transplant, 5 on deceased donor uterine transplant, and 6 case reports of single uterine transplants. In conclusion, uterus transplant is a nascent field undergoing a rapid rate of evolution as programs mature their data and increase the number of procedures performed. The most recent publications and advances are thus summarized in this article to capture the most up-to-date information.
Collapse
|
22
|
Dion L, Jacquot Thierry L, Tardieu A, Carbonnel M, Ayoubi JM, Gauthier T, Lavoué V. [Uterus transplantation, current prospect and future indications. State of art with review of literature]. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2020; 49:193-203. [PMID: 32916317 DOI: 10.1016/j.gofs.2020.09.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2020] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The aim of this review is to summarize the development of UT on worldwide and to develop the new questions posed by this technique in 2020. METHODS According to the PRISMA model, via Pubmed, we searched for publications containing the keywords: uterus transplantation; UT and cryopreservation from 2000 to 2020. RESULTS At least 76 UTx have been carried out around the world and 19 healthy babies were born. The main indication remains the uterine agenesis (MRKH Syndrome>85% cases) then the history of hysterectomy (hemorrhage of the delivery or cervical cancer) and the non-functional uterus (Asherman's syndrome, diffuse adenomyosis). The 2 types of donors (living and deceased) are developed representing respectively 75% and 25% of the TU; the success rate in terms of return of rules is better in the living donor group and is 79% vs 68% in the deceased donor group. The choice of donor type must take into account the constraints of both procedures. Surgical complications (grade III) for the donor are estimated to be 14% mainly represented by ureter wounds. Technical simplifications concerning the venous return of the graft but also the carrying out of robot-assisted surgery would reduce the operating time for the donor and facilitate the collection process. CONCLUSION TU is a complementary alternative to GPA and adoption allowing patients to be surrogates, legal and biological of the baby. An extension of the indications to patients with non absolute uterine infertility is in the process of democratization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L Dion
- Service de gynécologie, CHU de Rennes, hôpital Sud, 16, boulevard de Bulgarie, 35000 Rennes, France.
| | - L Jacquot Thierry
- Service de gynécologie, CHU de Rennes, hôpital Sud, 16, boulevard de Bulgarie, 35000 Rennes, France
| | - A Tardieu
- Département de gynécologie obstétrique, CHU Limoges, avenue Dominique Larrey, 87000 Limoges, France; Inserm, UMR-1248, CHU Limoges, 87000 Limoges, France
| | - M Carbonnel
- Service de gynécologie obstétrique et médecine de la reproduction, hôpital Foch, université de Versailles Saint-Quentin en Yvelines, 92150 Suresnes, France
| | - J-M Ayoubi
- Service de gynécologie obstétrique et médecine de la reproduction, hôpital Foch, université de Versailles Saint-Quentin en Yvelines, 92150 Suresnes, France
| | - T Gauthier
- Département de gynécologie obstétrique, CHU Limoges, avenue Dominique Larrey, 87000 Limoges, France; Inserm, UMR-1248, CHU Limoges, 87000 Limoges, France
| | - V Lavoué
- Service de gynécologie, CHU de Rennes, hôpital Sud, 16, boulevard de Bulgarie, 35000 Rennes, France
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Living-Donor Uterus Transplantation: Pre-, Intra-, and Postoperative Parameters Relevant to Surgical Success, Pregnancy, and Obstetrics with Live Births. J Clin Med 2020; 9:jcm9082485. [PMID: 32756295 PMCID: PMC7464820 DOI: 10.3390/jcm9082485] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2020] [Revised: 07/24/2020] [Accepted: 07/27/2020] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Uterus transplantation (UTx) can provide a route to motherhood for women with Mayer–Rokitansky–Küster–Hauser syndrome (MRKHS), a congenital disorder characterized by uterovaginal aplasia, but with functional ovaries. Based on our four successful living-donor transplantations and two resulting births, this analysis presents parameters relevant to standardizing recipient/donor selection, UTx surgery, and postoperative treatment, and their implementation in routine settings. We descriptively analyzed prospectively collected observational data from our four uterus recipients, all with MRKHS, their living donors, and the two newborns born to two recipients, including 1-year postnatal follow-ups. Analysis included only living-donor/recipient pairs with completed donor/recipient surgery. Two recipients, both requiring ovarian restimulation under immunosuppression after missed pregnancy loss in one case and no pregnancy in the other, each delivered a healthy boy by cesarean section. We conclude that parameters crucial to successful transplantation, pregnancy, and childbirth include careful selection of donor/recipient pairs, donor organ quality, meticulous surgical technique, a multidisciplinary team approach, and comprehensive follow-up. Surgery duration and blood vessel selection await further optimization, as do the choice and duration of immunosuppression, which are crucial to timing the first embryo transfer. Data need to be collected in an international registry due to the low prevalence of MRKHS.
Collapse
|
24
|
Carbonnel M, Revaux A, Menzhulina E, Karpel L, Snanoudj R, Le Guen M, De Ziegler D, Ayoubi JM. Uterus Transplantation with Live Donors: Screening Candidates in One French Center. J Clin Med 2020; 9:jcm9062001. [PMID: 32630524 PMCID: PMC7356518 DOI: 10.3390/jcm9062001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2020] [Revised: 06/15/2020] [Accepted: 06/16/2020] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
We report our experience regarding the profile and screening process of potential recipients (R) and their live donors (D) in our Uterus transplantation (UTx) trial from 2014 to 2020. The initial screening was performed using medical questionnaires and consultations. The second step of the screening consisted of two individual interviews with an independent multidisciplinary committee. Then, a complete medical, biological and imaging assessment of the directed living D, the R, and her partner was performed over a two-day hospitalization. A total of 239 women contacted our department: 165 potentials R and 74 potentials D. During the first step of screening, 141 R and 45 D were excluded. Only 12 R/D pairs were pursued. During inclusion, 10 R/D pairs were excluded. One R/D pair is still under evaluation. Finally, only 1 R/D pair was definitively included (0.6%), which led us to perform the first French UTx in March 2019 with a successful graft. The primary limiting factors of inclusion were due to very strict criteria and difficulty of having a suitable directed living D. The International Society of UTx (ISUTx) guidelines based on worldwide results of trials can help ease our inclusion criteria in the future while remaining safe for patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marie Carbonnel
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital Foch, University of Versailles, Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, 55, avenue de Paris, 78000 Versailles, France; (A.R.); (E.M.); (L.K.); (D.D.Z.); (J.M.A.)
- Correspondence:
| | - Aurelie Revaux
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital Foch, University of Versailles, Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, 55, avenue de Paris, 78000 Versailles, France; (A.R.); (E.M.); (L.K.); (D.D.Z.); (J.M.A.)
| | - Elena Menzhulina
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital Foch, University of Versailles, Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, 55, avenue de Paris, 78000 Versailles, France; (A.R.); (E.M.); (L.K.); (D.D.Z.); (J.M.A.)
| | - Lea Karpel
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital Foch, University of Versailles, Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, 55, avenue de Paris, 78000 Versailles, France; (A.R.); (E.M.); (L.K.); (D.D.Z.); (J.M.A.)
| | - Renaud Snanoudj
- Department of Nephrology and Transplantation, University of Versailles, Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, 55, avenue de Paris, 78000 Versailles, France;
| | - Morgan Le Guen
- Department of Anesthesiology, Hospital Foch, University of Versailles, Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, 55, avenue de Paris, 78000 Versailles, France;
| | - Dominique De Ziegler
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital Foch, University of Versailles, Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, 55, avenue de Paris, 78000 Versailles, France; (A.R.); (E.M.); (L.K.); (D.D.Z.); (J.M.A.)
| | - Jean Marc Ayoubi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital Foch, University of Versailles, Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, 55, avenue de Paris, 78000 Versailles, France; (A.R.); (E.M.); (L.K.); (D.D.Z.); (J.M.A.)
| |
Collapse
|