Genome-wide association study for time to failure of kidney transplants from African American deceased donors

Racial Disparities in Hospitalization Rates During Long-Term Follow-Up After Deceased-Donor Kidney Transplantation

OBJECTIVE

To compare hospitalization rates between African American (AA) and European American (EA) deceased-donor (DD) kidney transplant (KT) recipients during over a10-year period.

METHOD

Data from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients and social determinants of health (SDoH), measured by the Social Deprivation Index, were used. Hospitalization rates were estimated for kidney recipients from AA and EA DDs who had one kidney transplanted into an AA and one into an EA, leading to four donor/recipient pairs (DRPs): AA/AA, AA/EA, EA/AA, and EA/EA. Poisson-Gamma models were fitted to assess post-transplant hospitalizations.

RESULT

Unadjusted hospitalization rates (95% confidence interval) were higher among all DRP involving AA, 131.1 (122.5, 140.3), 134.8 (126.3, 143.8), and 102.4 (98.9, 106.0) for AA/AA, AA/EA, and EA/AA, respectively, compared to 97.1 (93.7, 100.6) per 1000 post-transplant person-years for EA/EA pairs. Multivariable analysis showed u-shaped relationships across SDoH levels within each DRP, but findings varied depending on recipients' race, i.e., AA recipients in areas with the worst SDoH had higher hospitalization rates. However, EA recipients in areas with the best SDoH had higher hospitalization rates than their counterparts.

CONCLUSIONS

Relationship between healthcare utilization and SDoH depends on DRP, with higher hospitalization rates among AA recipients living in areas with the worst SDoH and among EA recipients in areas with the best SDoH profiles. SDoH plays an important role in driving disparities in hospitalizations after kidney transplantation.

KiT-GENIE, the French genetic biobank of kidney transplantation

KiT-GENIE is a monocentric DNA biobank set up to consolidate the very rich and homogeneous DIVAT French cohort of kidney donors and recipients (D/R) in order to explore the molecular factors involved in kidney transplantation outcomes. We collected DNA samples for kidney transplantations performed in Nantes, and we leveraged GWAS genotyping data for securing high-quality genetic data with deep SNP and HLA annotations through imputations and for inferring D/R genetic ancestry. Overall, the biobank included 4217 individuals (n = 1945 D + 2,272 R, including 1969 D/R pairs), 7.4 M SNPs and over 200 clinical variables. KiT-GENIE represents an accurate snapshot of kidney transplantation clinical practice in Nantes between 2002 and 2018, with an enrichment in living kidney donors (17%) and recipients with focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (4%). Recipients were predominantly male (63%), of European ancestry (93%), with a mean age of 51yo and 86% experienced their first graft over the study period. D/R pairs were 93% from European ancestry, and 95% pairs exhibited at least one HLA allelic mismatch. The mean follow-up time was 6.7 years with a hindsight up to 25 years. Recipients experienced biopsy-proven rejection and graft loss for 16.6% and 21.3%, respectively. KiT-GENIE constitutes one of the largest kidney transplantation genetic cohorts worldwide to date. It includes homogeneous high-quality clinical and genetic data for donors and recipients, hence offering a unique opportunity to investigate immunogenetic and genetic factors, as well as donor-recipient interactions and mismatches involved in rejection, graft survival, primary disease recurrence and other comorbidities.

Novel Therapies in APOL1-Mediated Kidney Disease: From Molecular Pathways to Therapeutic Options

Apolipoprotein L1 (APOL1) high-risk variants confer an increased risk for the development and progression of kidney disease among individuals of recent African ancestry. Over the past several years, significant progress has been made in understanding the pathogenesis of APOL1-mediated kidney diseases (AMKD), including genetic regulation, environmental interactions, immunomodulatory, proinflammatory and apoptotic signaling processes, as well as the complex role of APOL1 as an ion channel. Collectively, these findings have paved the way for novel therapeutic strategies to mitigate APOL1-mediated kidney injury. Precision medicine approaches are being developed to identify subgroups of AMKD patients who may benefit from these targeted interventions, fueling hope for improved clinical outcomes. This review summarizes key mechanistic insights in the pathogenesis of AMKD, emergent therapies, and discusses future challenges.

Rationale and design of the CORE (COrticosteroids REvised) study: protocol

INTRODUCTION

Corticosteroids are an important pillar in many anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressive treatment regimens and are available in natural and synthetic forms, which are considered equipotent if clinical bioequivalence data are used. Current clinical bioequivalence data are however based on animal studies or studies with subjective endpoints. Furthermore, advancement in steroid physiology with regard to metabolism, intracellular handling and receptor activation have not yet been incorporated. Therefore, this study aims to re-examine the clinical bioequivalence and dose effects of the most widely used synthetic corticosteroids, prednisolone and dexamethasone.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

In this double-blind, randomised cross-over clinical trial, 24 healthy male and female volunteers aged 18-75 years, will be included. All volunteers will randomly receive either first a daily dose of 7.5 mg prednisolone for 1 week, immediately followed by a daily dose of 30 mg prednisolone for 1 week, or first a presumed clinical bioequivalent dose of 1.125 mg dexamethasone per day, immediately followed by 4.5 mg of dexamethasone per day for 1 week. After a wash-out period of 4-8 weeks, the other treatment will be applied. The primary study endpoint is the difference in free cortisol excretion in 24 hours urine. Secondary endpoints will include differences in immunological parameters, blood pressure and metabolic measurements.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This study has been approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of the University Medical Center Groningen (METC 2020.398). The results of this study will be submitted for publication in peer-reviewed journals.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ClinicalTrials.gov (Identifier: NCT04733144), and in the Dutch trial registry (NL9138).

Donor–Recipient Non-HLA Variants, Mismatches and Renal Allograft Outcomes: Evolving Paradigms

Despite significant improvement in the rates of acute allograft rejection, proportionate improvements in kidney allograft longevity have not been realized, and are a source of intense research efforts. Emerging translational data and natural history studies suggest a role for anti-donor immune mechanisms in a majority of cases of allograft loss without patient death, even when overt evidence of acute rejection is not identified. At the level of the donor and recipient genome, differences in highly polymorphic HLA genes are routinely evaluated between donor and recipient pairs as part of organ allocation process, and utilized for patient-tailored induction and maintenance immunosuppression. However, a growing body of data have characterized specific variants in donor and recipient genes, outside of HLA loci, that induce phenotypic changes in donor organs or the recipient immune system, impacting transplant outcomes. Newer mechanisms for “mismatches” in these non-HLA loci have also been proposed during donor–recipient genome interactions with transplantation. Here, we review important recent data evaluating the role of non-HLA genetic loci and genome-wide donor-recipient mismatches in kidney allograft outcomes.

Employment status at transplant influences ethnic disparities in outcomes after deceased donor kidney transplantation

Background

African American (AA) recipients of deceased-donor (DD) kidney transplants (KT) have shorter allograft survival than recipients of other ethnic groups. Reasons for this disparity encompass complex interactions between donors and recipients characteristics.

Methods

Outcomes from 3872 AA and 19,719 European American (EA) DDs who had one kidney transplanted in an AA recipient and one in an EA recipient were analyzed. Four donor/recipient pair groups (DRP) were studied, AA/AA, AA/EA, EA/AA, and EA/EA. Survival random forests and Cox proportional hazard models were fitted to rank and evaluate modifying effects of DRP on variables associated with allograft survival. These analyses sought to identify factors contributing to the observed disparities in transplant outcomes among AA and EA DDKT recipients.

Results

Transplant era, discharge serum creatinine, delayed graft function, and DRP were among the top predictors of allograft survival and mortality among DDKT recipients. Interaction effects between DRP with the kidney donor risk index and transplant era showed significant improvement in allograft survival over time in EA recipients. However, AA recipients appeared to have similar or poorer outcomes for DDKT performed after 2010 versus before 2001; allograft survival hazard ratios (95% CI) were 1.15 (0.74, 1.76) and 1.07 (0.8, 1.45) for AA/AA and EA/AA, compared to 0.62 (0.54, 0.71) and 0.5 (0.41, 0.62) for EA/EA and AA/EA DRP, respectively. Recipient mortality improved over time among all DRP, except unemployed AA/AAs. Relative to DDKT performed pre-2001, employed AA/AAs had HR = 0.37 (0.2, 0.69) versus 0.59 (0.31, 1.11) for unemployed AA/AA after 2010.

Conclusion

Relative to DDKT performed before 2001, similar or worse overall DCAS was observed among AA/AAs, while EA/EAs experienced considerable improvement regardless of employment status, KDRI, and EPTS. AA recipients of an AA DDKT, especially if unemployed, had worse allograft survival and mortality and did not appear to benefit from advances in care over the past 20 years.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12882-021-02631-4.

Apolipoprotein L1: role in the evaluation of kidney transplant donors

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To summarize the current state of evidence regarding the role of apolipoprotein L1 (APOL1) genotyping in evaluating donors for kidney transplantation.

RECENT FINDINGS

African ancestry is associated with an increased risk of kidney failure following living donation. Moreover, kidney transplants from African ancestry deceased donors have an increased risk of graft failure. Preliminary evidence suggests that APOL1 genotype may mediate at least a portion of this racial variation, with high-risk APOL1 genotypes defined by presence of two renal risk variants (RRVs). A pilot study 136 African ancestry living donors found that those with APOL1 high-risk genotypes had lower baseline kidney function and faster rates of kidney function decline after donation. To date, three retrospective studies identified a two-to-three times greater risk of allograft failure associated with kidneys from donors with high-risk APOL1 genotype. Active research initiatives seek to address unanswered questions, including reproducibility in large national samples, the role of 'second hits' injuries, and impact of recipient genotype, with a goal to build consensus on applications for policy and practice.

SUMMARY

As evidence evolves, APOL1 genotyping may have applications for organ quality scoring in deceased donor kidney allocation, and for the evaluation and selection of living donor candidates.