Blood product transfusion and lung transplant outcomes: A systematic review

Impact of blood donation biovigilance and transfusion-transmitted infections on organ transplantation

Over 118 million blood donations are collected globally each year. Recipients of blood products include those who experience major trauma or surgery, have acute blood loss and anemia, or impaired bone marrow function. Solid organ transplant recipients often require transfusion of blood products which places them at risk of transfusion-associated adverse events including transfusion-transmitted infection. National hemovigilance networks have documented low rates of transfusion-transmitted infection in the general population. Incidence transfusion-transmitted infection continues to occur in solid organ transplant patients and arises mainly from existing gaps in blood donor biovigilance processes. Emerging infectious diseases have highlighted existing gaps in the donor-recipient pathway to administering safe blood products. This article reviews the current process and regulatory oversight of blood donor biovigilance, including donor screening and microbiological testing, highlights cases of transfusion-transmitted infection documented in the literature, and addresses ways in which biovigilance may be improved, with a focus on the impact of solid organ transplantation.

High Rate of Passenger Lymphocyte Syndrome after ABO Minor Incompatible Lung Transplantation

Rationale: Passenger lymphocyte syndrome (PLS) may complicate minor ABO mismatched lung transplantation (LuTX) via donor-derived red cell antibody-induced hemolysis.Objectives: To ascertain the incidence and specificity of PLS-relevant antibodies among the study population as well as the dynamics of hemolysis parameters and the transfusion requirement of patients with or without PLS.Methods: In this cohort study, 1,011 patients who received LuTX between January 2010 and June 2019 were studied retrospectively. Prospectively, 87 LuTX (July 2019 to June 2021) were analyzed. Postoperative ABO antibody and hemolytic marker determinations, transfusion requirement, and duration of postoperative hospital care were analyzed. Retrospectively, blood group A recipients of O grafts with PLS were compared with those without.Measurements and Main Results: PLS affected 18.18% (retrospective) and 30.77% (prospective) of A recipients receiving O grafts, 5.13% of B recipients of O grafts, and 20% of AB patients receiving O transplants. Anti-A and anti-A1 were the predominant PLS-inducing antibodies, followed by anti-B and anti-A,B. Significantly lower hemoglobin values (median, 7.4 vs. 8.3 g/dl; P = 0.0063) and an approximately twice as high percentage of patients requiring blood transfusions were seen in PLS. No significant differences in other laboratory markers, duration of hospital stay, or other complications after LuTX were registered.Conclusions: Minor ABO incompatible LuTX recipients are at considerable risk of developing clinically significant PLS. Post-transplant monitoring combining red cell serology and hemolysis marker determination appears advisable so as not to overlook hemolytic episodes that necessitate antigen-negative transfusion therapy.

Donor and recipient risk factors for the development of primary graft dysfunction following lung transplantation

Primary Graft Dysfunction (PGD) is a major cause of both short-term and long-term morbidity and mortality following lung transplantation. Various donor, recipient, and technical risk factors have been previously identified as being associated with the development of PGD. Here, we present a comprehensive review of the current literature as it pertains to PGD following lung transplantation, as well as discussing current strategies to mitigate PGD and future directions. We will pay special attention to recent advances in lung transplantation such as ex-vivo lung perfusion, thoracoabdominal normothermic regional perfusion, and up-to-date literature published in the interim since the 2016 ISHLT consensus statement on PGD and the COVID-19 pandemic.

Development of New Donor-Specific and Human Leukocyte Antigen Antibodies After Transfusion in Adult Lung Transplantation

OBJECTIVES

The development of new human leukocyte antigens (HLAs) and donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) in patients are associated with worse outcomes following lung transplantation. The authors aimed to examine the relationship between blood product transfusion in the first 72 hours after lung transplantation and the development of HLA antibodies, including DSAs.

DESIGN

A retrospective observational study.

SETTING

At a single academic tertiary center.

PARTICIPANTS

Adult lung transplant recipients who underwent transplantation between September 2014 and June 2019.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

A total of 380 patients were included in this study, and 87 (23%) developed de novo donor-specific antibodies in the first year after transplantation. Eighty-five patients (22%) developed new HLA antibodies that were not donor-specific, and 208 patients (55%) did not develop new HLA antibodies in the first year after transplantation. Factors associated with increased HLA and DSA development included donor pulmonary infection, non-infectious indication for transplant, increased recipient body mass index, and a preoperative calculated panel reactive antibody value above 0. Multivariate analysis identified platelet transfusion associated with an increased risk of de novo HLA antibody development compared to the negative group (odds ratio [OR; 95% CI] 1.18 [1.02-1.36]; p = 0.025). Cryoprecipitate transfusion was associated with de novo DSA development compared to the negative group (OR [95% CI] 2.21 [1.32-3.69] for 1 v 0 units; p = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

Increased perioperative transfusion of platelets and cryoprecipitate are associated with de novo HLA and DSA development, respectively, in lung transplant recipients during the first year after transplantation.

Utilization of machine learning to model the effect of blood product transfusion on short-term lung transplant outcomes

The objective of this study was to identify the relationship between blood product transfusion and short-term morbidity and mortality following lung transplantation utilizing machine learning. Preoperative recipient characterstics, procedural variables, perioperative blood product transfusions, and donor charactersitics were included in the model. The primary composite outcome was occurrence on any of the following six endpoints: mortality during index hospitalization; primary graft dysfunction at 72 h post-transplant or the need for postoperative circulatory support; neurological complications (seizure, stroke, or major encephalopathy); perioperative acute coronary syndrome or cardiac arrest; and renal dysfunction requiring renal replacement therapy. The cohort included 369 patients, with the composite outcome occurring in 125 cases (33.9%). Elastic net regression analysis identified 11 significant predictors of composite morbidity: higher packed red blood cell, platelet, cryoprecipitate and plasma volume from the critical period, preoperative functional dependence, any preoperative blood transfusion, VV ECMO bridge to transplant, and antifibrinolytic therapy were associated with higher risk of morbidity. Preoperative steroids, taller height, and primary chest closure were protective against composite morbidity.

Lung Retransplantation

Lung retransplantation remains the standard treatment of irreversible lung allograft failure. The most common indications for lung retransplantation are acute graft failure, chronic lung allograft dysfunction, and postoperative airway complications. Careful patient selection with regards to indications, anatomy, extrapulmonary organ dysfunction (specifically renal dysfunction), and immunologic consideration are of utmost importance. The conduct of the lung retransplantation operation is arduous with special considerations given to operative approach, type of surgery (single vs bilateral), use of extracorporeal circulatory support, and hematological management. Outcomes have improved significantly for most patients, nearing short and midterm outcomes of primary lung recipients in select cases.