De novo tacrolimus extended-release tablets (LCPT) versus twice-daily tacrolimus in adult heart transplantation: Results of a single-center non-inferiority matched control trial

Hemorrhagic events associated with tacrolimus: a real-world pharmacovigilance study

BACKGROUND

Tacrolimus is a potent macrolide immunosuppressant frequently used to prevent graft rejection in organ transplantation. Despite the known side effect of hemorrhage, there are no extensive descriptive series of patients who experience hemorrhage events associated with tacrolimus. We sought to review and describe tacrolimus-related hemorrhage events reported by healthcare professionals to the United States Food and Drug Association Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database.

METHODS

The FAERS database (2004q1-2022q4) was retrospectively analyzed to characterize reporting of hemorrhage adverse events (AEs) with tacrolimus. Subgroup analysis was completed on the hemorrhage.

RESULTS

A total of 75,310 tacrolimus-associated AEs were identified, of which 1,511 cases met specific inclusion/exclusion criteria with most occurring in the gastrointestinal tract (422 cases, 27.93% of all included cases). Death was reported in 558 patients (36.93% of hemorrhage cases), the most of which occurred in cases of brain hemorrhage (219 cases, 39.25% of death cases). Among definitive organ transplants, renal transplant was the most common indication for tacrolimus (62 cases, 4.10%) followed by bone marrow transplant (44 cases, 2.91%) and liver transplant (30 cases, 1.99%).

CONCLUSIONS

This study presents the largest collective description of tacrolimus-related hemorrhage events. We additionally described a number of previously unreported tacrolimus-related hemorrhage events.

Three-year outcomes of de novo tacrolimus extended-release tablets (LCPT) compared to twice-daily tacrolimus in adult heart transplantation

BACKGROUND

Extended-release tacrolimus for prophylaxis of allograft rejection in heart transplant (HT) recipients is currently not FDA-approved. One such extended-release formulation of tacrolimus known as LCPT allows once-daily dosing and improves bioavailability compared to immediate-release (IR-) tacrolimus. We compared long-term efficacy and safety of LCPT to IR-tacrolimus applied de novo in adult OHT recipients.

METHODS

25 prospective recipients on LCPT at our center from 2017 to 2019 were matched 1:2 with historical control recipients treated with IR-tacrolimus based on age, gender, and baseline creatinine. The primary composite outcome of death, acute cellular rejection, and/or new graft dysfunction within 3 years following transplant was compared between groups using non-inferiority analysis.

RESULTS

LCPT demonstrated non-inferiority to IR-tacrolimus, with a primary outcome risk reduction of 16% (90%CI, -37%, -1%, non-inferiority p = 0.002) up to 3 years following heart transplant. Up to 3-years post-transplant, 14 patients remained on once-daily LCPT and 10 patients were switched to IR-tacrolimus due to lack of insurance coverage. There were no significant differences in the rate of chronic kidney disease requiring dialysis, cytomegalovirus requiring treatment, cardiac allograft vasculopathy, and malignancy within 3 years following transplant.

CONCLUSION

LCPT is non-inferior in efficacy to IR-tacrolimus in heart transplantation with a similar safety profile. Narrowly-constrained FDA labels specific to kidney transplant remain a barrier to consistent access to many immunosuppressant medications for recipients of non-kidney solid organs. We recommend the FDA consider developing facile pathways for expanding the approved label of extended-release tacrolimus formulations to heart transplant recipients.

Bioimpedance Spectroscopy in Heart Transplantation: Posttransplant Changes in Body Composition and Effects in Outcomes

BACKGROUND

Bioimpedance spectroscopy yields measurements of fat-free mass, fat mass, phase angle, and other measures. Bioimpedance spectroscopy has been validated as a preoperative assessment tool in cardiac surgical studies, in which low phase angle predicted morbidity and mortality. No studies have evaluated bioimpedance spectroscopy following heart transplantation.

METHODS

We evaluated body composition, nutrition status (Subjective Global Assessment, body mass index, midarm muscle circumference, and triceps skinfolds), and functional status (handgrip strength and 6-min walk test) in 60 adults. Body composition measurements via a 256-frequency bioimpedance spectroscopy device included fat and fat-free mass as well as phase angle calculated at 50 kHz. Testing was completed at baseline and 1, 3, 6, and 12 mo following heart transplantation. Mortality and hospital readmissions were analyzed.

RESULTS

Phase angle and fat mass increased while fat-free mass decreased; grip strength and 6-min walk test improved after transplantation (all P <  0.001). Improvement in phase angle in the first month postoperatively was associated with reduced risk of readmission. Low perioperative and 1-mo phase angles were associated with prolonged posttransplant length of stay (median: 13 versus 10 d, P =  0.03), increased infection-related readmissions (40% versus 5%, P =  0.001), and increased 4-y mortality (30% versus 5%, P =  0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Phase angle, grip strength, and 6-min walk test distance improved after heart transplantation. Low phase angle appears to be associated with suboptimal outcomes and may be a feasible and affordable method to predict outcomes. Further research should ascertain whether preoperative phase angle can predict outcomes.

Voclosporin: Unique Chemistry, Pharmacology and Toxicity Profile, and Possible Options for Implementation into the Management of Lupus Nephritis

Calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) can suppress allo- and autoimmunity by suppressing T cell function but also have anti-proteinuric effects by stabilizing the cellular components of the kidney's filtration barrier. Therefore, CNI are used in autoimmune kidney diseases with proteinuria. However, the traditional CNI, cyclosporine A and tacrolimus, have a narrow therapeutic range, need monitoring of drug levels, and their use is associated with nephrotoxicity and metabolic alterations. Voclosporin (VOC), a novel CNI, no longer requires drug level monitoring and seems to lack these adverse effects, although hypertension and drug-drug interactions still occur. VOC demonstrated efficacy superior to standard-of-care in controlling active lupus nephritis in the phase 2 AURA-LV and the phase 3 AURORA-1 trials and was approved for the treatment of active lupus nephritis. However, how to implement VOC into the current and changing treatment landscape of lupus nephritis is still debated. Here, we review the unique chemistry, pharmacology, and toxicity profile of VOC, summarize the efficacy and safety data from the AURA-LV and AURORA-1 trials, and discuss the following four possible options to implement VOC into the management of lupus nephritis, namely regarding B cell-targeting therapy with belimumab (BEL). These include: 1. patient stratification to either VOC or BEL, 2. VOC/BEL combination therapy, 3. VOC-BEL sequential therapy, or 4. alternative options for the rapid antiproteinuric effect of VOC.

Comparison of the Prolonged- and Immediate-Release Tacrolimus Capsule Formulation: The Patient's View and Medication Satisfaction of Patients After Pediatric Heart Transplantation

BACKGROUND

Medication adherence is essential for long-term success after pediatric organ transplantation. Causes of reduced adherence should be detected early to improve the consequent medication intake. We describe the influence of switching from tacrolimus twice daily (tacrolimus-BID) to tacrolimus once daily (tacrolimus-QD) on medication satisfaction and medication adherence in patients after pediatric heart transplantation.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted regarding patient satisfaction and adherence to the immunosuppressant tacrolimus after pediatric heart transplantation, before and after conversion from tacrolimus-BID to tacrolimus-QD, using questionnaires.

RESULTS

Thirty-eight patients were enrolled (tacrolimus-BID: n = 35, mean age 15.7 ± 5.2 years; tacrolimus-QD: n = 38, mean age 16.2 ± 5.6 years). The amount of unadministered medication in the last 3 months did not differ between the 2 pharmaceutical forms. However, 17% (n = 6) reported unstable tacrolimus trough levels when taking tacrolimus-BID, vs 8% (n = 3) under tacrolimus-QD (P = .453). However, there was no statistically significant difference in the stability of the last 6 trough levels of each patient (P = .074). A total of 57% (n = 20) of patients had subjective side effects before conversion, compared to only 29% (n = 11) after conversion (P = .013). Regarding the intensity of the side effects, 6 patients reported strong/very strong side effects when taking tacrolimus-BID vs 1 patient when taking tacrolimus-QD (P = .250). In addition, the overall satisfaction with the immunosuppressant was higher under tacrolimus-QD (92% vs 83%; P = .508). However, this improvement was statistically not significant and may not be clinically relevant.

CONCLUSIONS

The amount of forgotten medication was not reduced after conversion from tacrolimus-BID to tacrolimus-QD. However, subjective side effects as well as patient satisfaction improved under tacrolimus-QD.