Piloting a nationally disseminated, interactive human subjects protection program for community partners: design, content, and evaluation

Pedagogic Tailoring of a Human Research Ethics Training for Community-Engaged Research With Latinos

Because of the increase in community-engaged research, several human research ethics trainings for laypeople have been developed. We aim to (1) describe the pedagogical tailoring of a research ethics training for laypeople for a research study where promotores-community health workers-delivered an intervention to increase health care access and promote healthy behaviors among Latinos and (2) present results of the application of the training after 4 months in the field. We tailored a previously developed training to Latino community members implementing a research study. Key modifications included (1) translation (2) use of pedagogical tools, such as cooperative learning, role-plays, and inclusion of cultural preferences. One novel addition was to use dialogues that the trainees enacted and then discussed. We evaluated the training with a posttraining survey with eight community liaisons and 13 promotores implementing the intervention, and a focus group with eight promotores, 4 months after working in the field. Trainees said they felt confident obtaining informed consent, felt the dialogues were realistic and helped them remember what they learned, and wanted more feedback from trainers on their performance. Promotores demonstrated the application of ethical principles beyond the training by discussing the possibility of advertising broadly in social media (justice), the risks and benefits of providing community resources to participants (beneficence), and the university's role in legitimizing their position as promotores (respect). We conclude that a pedagogically tailored ethics research training for laypeople can be successful and that dialogues to be enacted need to be explored further.

Developing a patient and family research advisory panel to include people with significant disease, multimorbidity and advanced age

BACKGROUND

People who have experienced illness due to significant disease, multimorbidity and/or advanced age are high utilizers of the health care system. Yet this population has had little formal opportunity to participate in guiding the health care research agenda, and few mechanisms exist for researchers to engage this population in an efficient way.

OBJECTIVE

We describe the process of developing a standing patient and family advisory panel to incorporate this population's voice into research in the USA.

METHODS

The panel was created at the University of Colorado. Preliminary panel development consisted of a needs assessment, information gathering and participant recruitment. We collected feedback from researchers who consulted with the panel and from panel members in order to better understand the experience from the patient and family member perspective.

RESULTS

The patient and family research advisory panel consists of eight advisors who have experience with significant disease, multimorbidity and/or advanced age, two physicians and a program manager. The panel meets every other month for 2 hours with the main purpose of advising diverse researchers on health care studies.

CONCLUSION

People with significant disease, multimorbidity and/or advanced age represent a growing demographic in the USA, and their engagement in research is essential as the model of health care delivery moves from volume to value.

Culturally Relevant Human Subjects Protection Training: A Case Study in Community-Engaged Research in the United States

Non-academic members of research teams, such as community members, can perceive traditional human subjects protection training as lacking in cultural relevance. We present a case exemplar of the development of a human subjects protection training for research staff with limited English proficiency and/or no or limited research experience. Seven modules were adapted for language, cultural examples, etc., from the standard Collaborative Institutional Training Initiative (CITI) human subjects protection training. Non-academic research staff completed a day-long training in human subjects protection (six modules) and our research protocol (one module). We assessed comprehension of content with PowerPoint slides and module quizzes. All participants successfully passed each module quiz with ≥ 80% correct. Questions answered incorrectly were discussed before proceeding to the next module. To meet the increasing demand for collaborative community-engaged research with underserved minority populations, human subjects protection training protocols can be adapted successfully to reflect real-world situations and provide culturally relevant materials to help non-academic research staff better understand the importance and necessity of research ethics.