SOX-10 expression in cutaneous myoepitheliomas and mixed tumors

Cutaneous Syncytial Myoepithelioma: An Uncommon and Distinct Variant of Cutaneous Epithelioid Neoplasm

BACKGROUND

Cutaneous syncytial myoepithelioma (CSM) is an uncommon and distinct variant of cutaneous myoepithelioma. We aim to present a case of CSM to enhance the recognition of this unique variant, encompassing its clinical characteristics, histopathological features, immunohistochemical staining, and therapeutic approaches.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 10-year-old girl presented with a dome-shaped nodule located on the skin of her left medial distal arm. Microscopic examination of the skin biopsy revealed a well-defined dermal nodular lesion, surrounded by an epidermal collarette. Tumor cells were composed of epithelioid to spindle-shaped cells with round-to-oval nuclei, small nucleoli, and abundant eosinophilic cytoplasm with a syncytial-like growth pattern. A moderate degree of nuclear pleomorphism was noted. Mitotic activity was not prominent. Immunohistochemical staining revealed positive staining for epithelial membrane antigen, GLUT1, collagen IV, and S100. Smooth muscle actin, CD10, and CD68 showed patchy positivity. CD31, CD34, p63, SOX10, anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK), glial fibrillary acidic protein, pankeratin (AE1/AE3/PCK26), Melan-A, and CD1a were negative. Fluorescence in situ hybridization targeting TFE3 and ALK genes was negative. The differential diagnosis included ALK-negative epithelioid cell histiocytoma, epithelioid perineurioma, and CSM. Based on the above findings, a diagnosis of CSM was rendered.

DISCUSSION

CSM is a benign cutaneous neoplasm composed of sheets of histiocytoid or short spindle cells with pale eosinophilic cytoplasm with a syncytial-like growth pattern. Clinically, CSM often presents as a painless, slow-growing nodule or plaque in a broad anatomical distribution with a preference for the distal extremities. CSM is characteristically positive for epithelial membrane antigen (EMA) and S100 protein and negative for keratins. In challenging cases, molecular testing for EWSR1 gene rearrangement and EWSR1-PBX3 gene fusion aid in confirming the diagnosis.

CONCLUSIONS

The histologic features of CSM present a unique set of challenges posing a diagnostic dilemma, as they can bear resemblance to a range of benign and malignant cutaneous neoplasms including ALK-negative epithelioid cell histiocytoma, epithelioid perineurioma, malignant or nevoid melanoma, and epithelioid sarcoma. An accurate diagnosis is crucial for guiding proper clinical management considering that this entity typically demonstrates an excellent prognosis following a complete surgical excision.

Cutaneous Syncytial Myoepithelioma: A Unique Variant Worth Recognizing

Cutaneous syncytial myoepithelioma is a recently characterized variant of cutaneous myoepithelioma with a distinct histopathological and immunohistochemical profile. It is more common in men and predominately involves upper and lower extremities. Microscopically, it is a dermal tumor with a characteristic solid syncytial growth pattern displaying positivity with EMA and S100 immunohistochemical stains. Lately, EWSR1-PBX3 fusion has been documented in a vast majority. Although it follows a benign clinical course, its histopathological differential diagnosis includes clinically aggressive neoplasia. This contribution summarizes the derivation, clinical presentation, histopathological and immunohistochemical features, molecular genetics, pertinent differential diagnosis, and behavior of this unique cutaneous appendageal tumor.

Cutaneous Myoepithelial Neoplasms on Acral Sites Show Distinctive and Reproducible Histopathologic and Immunohistochemical Features

Cutaneous myoepithelial neoplasms are a heterogenous group of neoplasms with mixed tumors typically affecting the head and myoepitheliomas showing a predilection for the extremities. Their malignant counterparts, myoepithelial carcinoma, and malignant mixed tumor are exceptionally rare in the skin, and the morphologic criteria for malignancy are only poorly defined. The aim of the present study was to characterize the clinicopathologic features of myoepithelial neoplasms presenting on acral skin. The clinical and histopathologic features of 11 tumors were recorded, and follow-up was obtained. Immunohistochemistry was performed for S100, SOX10, glial fibrillary acidic protein, keratins, epithelial membrane antigen, p63, p40, smooth muscle actin, desmin, and PLAG1. The tumors mainly affected the feet of adults (range: 26 to 78 y; median: 47 y) with a predilection for the great toe and a male predominance of 1.8:1. Most tumors (91%) displayed a lobular architecture composed of solid and nested growth of epithelioid cells with plasmacytoid features in a myxoid or angiomatous stroma. Scattered cytologic atypia and rare duct differentiation were frequently noted. Three tumors with confluent cytologic atypia, infiltrative growth, and lymphovascular invasion were classified as malignant. By immunohistochemistry, the tumors were positive for S100, SOX10, keratins AE1/AE3, CK5/6 and CK7, and PLAG1. Local recurrence and bilateral pulmonary metastasis were observed in a patient presenting with a histopathologically benign-appearing tumor. Two patients with malignant tumors experienced local recurrences, and 1 developed metastasis to soft tissue, lung, and mediastinal lymph nodes. All patients are currently alive, all but 1 with no evidence of disease after a median follow-up interval of 96 months (range: 2 to 360 mo). In conclusion, acral myoepithelial neoplasms show distinctive and reproducible histopathologic and immunohistochemical features. They are best regarded as a distinctive subset of mixed tumors with features reminiscent of their salivary gland counterparts. While most tumors pursue a benign disease course, histopathologic features appear to be a poor indicator of prognosis.

Clear Cell Proliferations of the Skin: A Histopathologic Review

ABSTRACT

Cutaneous clear cell proliferations encompass a heterogenous group of several primary cutaneous neoplasms and metastatic tumors with different histogenesis. Many of these clear cell proliferations may seem strikingly similar under the microscope resulting in challenging diagnosis. In many of these clear cell lesions, the reason for the clear or pale appearance of proliferating cells is unknown, whereas in other ones, this clear cell appearance is due to intracytoplasmic accumulation of glycogen, mucin, or lipid. Artifacts of tissue processing and degenerative phenomenon may also be responsible for the clear cell appearance of proliferating cells. Awareness of the histopathologic findings as well as histochemical and immunohistochemical techniques are crucial to the accurate diagnosis. This review details the histopathologic features of clear cell cutaneous proliferations, classifying them according their type of differentiation and paying special attention to the histopathologic differential diagnosis among them.

Current Diagnosis and Treatment Options for Cutaneous Adnexal Neoplasms with Apocrine and Eccrine Differentiation

Adnexal tumors of the skin are a rare group of benign and malignant neoplasms that exhibit morphological differentiation toward one or more of the adnexal epithelium types present in normal skin. Tumors deriving from apocrine or eccrine glands are highly heterogeneous and represent various histological entities. Macroscopic and dermatoscopic features of these tumors are unspecific; therefore, a specialized pathological examination is required to correctly diagnose patients. Limited treatment guidelines of adnexal tumor cases are available; thus, therapy is still challenging. Patients should be referred to high-volume skin cancer centers to receive an appropriate multidisciplinary treatment, affecting their outcome. The purpose of this review is to summarize currently available data on pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment approach for apocrine and eccrine tumors.

Primary cutaneous Ewing sarcoma with diffuse S100/SOX10 positivity and pseudoalveolar pattern: An extraordinarily rare case highlighting a potential pitfall with significant repercussions

Primary cutaneous Ewing sarcoma is a very rare entity with less than 100 cases reported in the literature, sharing the same morphological and immunohistochemical characteristics as their osseous counterparts. Herein, to the best of our knowledge, we report the first case in English literature of a molecularly confirmed Ewing sarcoma with diffuse and strong SOX10 immunoreactivity. This exceedingly rare immunohistochemical finding along with the rarity of this tumor could easily lead to a misdiagnosis with significant repercussions. Our case highlights the difficulty in diagnosing primary cutaneous Ewing sarcoma as well as the pivotal role molecular diagnostics can play in specific scenarios.

Cutaneous Myoepithelioma: An Unusual Tumor in the Hand

Cutaneous myoepithelioma (CM) is a rare tumor among the primary skin neoplasms. We present the case of a patient with a diagnosis of CM in the right hypothenar region. Histological study showed a proliferation of myoepithelial cells with a solid, reticular growth pattern in a chondromyxoid stroma. The tumor cells were positive for CK AE, S-100, EMA, and p63.

Myoepithelioma of bone: ultrastructural, immunohistochemical and molecular study of three cases

Primary intraosseous myoepithelial tumors are rare neoplasms with only a handful of cases described in the medical literature. To date, intraosseous variant of benign myoepithelioma, due to its rarity, has not been studied ultrastructurally, and only one case of a malignant intraosseous myoepithelioma has been described. Three cases were retrieved from the files at the Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH). A diagnosis of benign myoepithelioma was made in case 1 and malignant epithelioma in cases 2 and 3. Ultrastructurally, intermediate filaments (without dense bodies) were found in each case with an abundance in case 1 and lesser amounts in cases 2 and 3. Surprisingly, cell junctions were not identified in case 1. However, they were found occasionally as intermediate junctions in case 2 and were easily identified as desmosome like junctions in case 3. The nucleus was irregular in the neoplastic cells of benign myoepithelioma which contrasted with cases 2 and 3 where the nuclei were oval yet had visible nucleoli. Herein, we add three new cases, including two new cases of malignant myoepithelioma. We also provide the first ultrastructural description of benign myoepithelioma of bone.

Plasmacytoid cells in salivary pleomorphic adenoma: an alternative interpretation of their immunohistochemical characteristics highlights function and capability for epithelial-mesenchymal transition

OBJECTIVES

Plasmacytoid cells (PLCs) in salivary pleomorphic adenoma (SPA) are regarded as modified neoplastic myoepithelia and define plasmacytoid myoepithelioma (pMYO). However, histochemically, immunohistochemically and ultrastructurally, PLCs fail to demonstrate frank myogenous properties. Epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) may explain the phenotypes in SPA. Our aim was to evaluate (1) PLCs with accepted or purported myoepithelial and EMT-related markers; and (2) pMYOs for PLAG1 aberrations by using fluorescence in situ hybridization.

STUDY DESIGN

Eight SPAs with or without PLC-predominance and 3 pMYOs were immunohistochemically studied.

RESULTS

PLCs in SPA and pMYO exhibited strong, scattered to diffuse positivity for K7, rare K14 positivity and were mostly negative for α-smooth muscle actin, h-caldesmon, and p63/p40. S100 staining was strong and diffuse, whereas calponin was variable. DOG1 was negative. PLCs in pMYO and PLC-rich SPA exhibited selective or diffuse WT1 and D2-40 immunoreactivity. EMT markers SNAIL/SLUG exhibited strong and variable immunoreactivity in PLCs in contrast to weak or absent E-cadherin expression. SOX10 was diffusely and strongly positive. PLAG1 rearrangement was present in 1 pMYO.

CONCLUSIONS

PLCs mostly fail to express myoepithelial markers; PLCs are neoplastic cells adapting to microenvironmental changes and capable of EMT; and tumors composed solely of PLCs are apparently SPAs depleted of a ductal component.

Practical Application of Lineage-Specific Immunohistochemistry Markers: Transcription Factors (Sometimes) Behaving Badly

CONTEXT.—

Transcription factors (TFs) are proteins that regulate gene expression and control RNA transcription from DNA. Lineage-specific TFs have increasingly been used by pathologists to determine tumor lineage, especially in the setting of metastatic tumors of unknown primary, among other uses. With experience gathered from its daily application and increasing pitfalls reported from immunohistochemical studies, these often-touted highly specific TFs are not as reliable as once thought.

OBJECTIVES.—

To summarize the established roles of many of the commonly used TFs in clinical practice and to discuss known and potential sources for error (eg, false-positivity from cross-reactivity, aberrant, and overlap "lineage-specific" expression) in their application and interpretation.

DATA SOURCES.—

Literature review and the authors' personal practice experience were used. Several examples selected from the University Health Network (Toronto, Ontario, Canada) are illustrated.

CONCLUSIONS.—

The application of TF diagnostic immunohistochemistry has enabled pathologists to better assess the lineage/origin of primary and metastatic tumors. However, the awareness of potential pitfalls is essential to avoid misdiagnosis.

SOX10 Immunostaining in granulomatous dermatoses and benign reactive lymph nodes

BACKGROUND

SOX10 immunostaining has been considered a highly sensitive and specific marker for melanoma. But there is evidence suggesting that SOX10 positive cells can be present in dermal scars. Therefore, we investigated whether non-melanocytic cell types present in chronic inflammatory processes or benign lymph nodes express SOX10.

METHODS

We retrospectively selected 20 benign lymph nodes and 20 cutaneous granulomatous dermatoses. SOX10, CD68, and Melan-A immunohistochemistry was performed in all cases.

RESULTS

Scattered SOX10 positivity was found in 85% of lymph nodes, specifically in subcapsular and medullary sinuses and in 85% of granulomatous dermatoses. In granulomatous dermatoses, the Melan-A stain did not label the scattered SOX10 positive cells and it was difficult to determine if CD68 was co-expressed on the SOX10 positive cells. In the lymph nodes, the SOX10 positive cells did not co-express Melan-A or CD68.

CONCLUSIONS

We report SOX10 positive cells detected in granulomatous dermatoses and benign lymph nodes. In lymph nodes, SOX10 positive cells were exclusively in subcapsular and medullary sinuses. Therefore, SOX10 is an excellent stain for evaluation of metastatic melanoma with the caveat that positivity in subcapsular and medullary sinuses can be of non-melanocytic origin; the use of additional melanocytic markers is recommended in this situations.

Cutaneous syncytial myoepithelioma: A recently described neoplasm which may mimic nevoid melanoma and epithelioid sarcoma

Cutaneous syncytial myoepithelioma is a recently described rare tumor of the dermis. It is derived and composed purely of myoepithelial cells and shows a characteristic syncytial growth pattern of neoplastic cells with little intervening stroma and no recognizable ductal structures. It represents a diagnostic challenge to dermatopathologists given its rarity and unusual immunophenotype. Molecular testing for rearrangement of the EWSR1 gene plays a significant role in confirming the diagnosis in most cases. Herein, we present 2 cases with mundane clinical presentations and challenging histopathological findings. In both cases, the lesion was composed of relatively well-circumscribed proliferation of epithelioid and spindle cells in the superficial dermis growing in a syncytial fashion and showing focal adipocytic metaplasia. The 2 cases had slightly different immunohistochemical profiles, but shared focal positivity for S100, EMA and pan-keratin or p63. Break-apart FISH demonstrated the presence of an EWSR1 gene rearrangement confirming the diagnosis in both cases. We discuss the most important differential diagnoses, particularly melanocytic lesions and epithelioid sarcoma and the original diagnostic considerations that the cases were referred to us with. We also review the molecular features and spectrum of immunohistochemical findings in these lesions and their role in excluding entities in the differential diagnosis.

Expression of SOX10 in Salivary Gland Oncocytic Neoplasms: A Review and a Comparative Analysis with Other Immunohistochemical Markers

OBJECTIVES

We evaluated SOX10 (SRY-related HMG-box 10) in differentiating acinic cell carcinoma (AciCC) from other salivary gland neoplasms with oncocytic features on fine-needle aspiration cell blocks (FNA CB) and compared its performance to DOG1 (discovered on gastrointestinal stromal tumor 1).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

35 FNA CB of oncocytic salivary gland neoplasms, i.e. 13 cases of AciCC, 16 of Warthin tumor (WT), 3 of mucoepidermoid carcinoma (MEC) and 3 of oncocytoma (ONC), and 75 salivary gland resections, i.e. 26 AciCC, 7 WT, 36 MEC, 3 ONC, 2 mammary analog secretory carcinomas (MASC) and 1 papillary cystadenoma were stained for SOX10 and DOG1.

RESULTS

None of the benign oncocytic neoplasms were immunoreactive for SOX10 on CB or resection, similar to DOG1. On CB, 61.5 and 77% of AciCC were positive for SOX10 and DOG1, respectively. All surgically resected AciCC cases were positive for SOX10 and DOG1; other malignant oncocytic lesions such as MEC and MASC demonstrated variable SOX10 and DOG1 staining.

CONCLUSION

The use of SOX10 may increase the diagnostic accuracy of oncocytic lesions on FNA. In this context, SOX10 is equivalent to DOG1 in ruling out benign lesions such as WT and ONC; however, negative results for SOX10 as well as DOG1 do not favor a benign diagnosis since MEC is often negative for both markers.

Challenges in the diagnosis of cutaneous adnexal tumours

The diagnosis of cutaneous adnexal neoplasms, a heterogeneous group of entities, is often perceived by practising pathologists as challenging. A systematic approach to diagnosis is necessary for classification of these lesions, which establishes the tumour differentiation (follicular, sebaceous, sweat gland or apocrine) and evaluates histological features differentiating between benign and malignant entities. Consideration of clinical history is a necessary adjunct in evaluation of the adnexal neoplasm, as characteristic anatomical sites are described for many adnexal lesions. In some instances, immunohistochemical studies may also be employed to aid the diagnosis. The differential diagnosis between primary cutaneous adnexal neoplasms and cutaneous metastases from visceral tumours may also be difficult. Clinical, radiological, histological and immunohistochemical characteristics will be further discussed, considering that the correct diagnosis has a significant impact on the patient's management and prognosis.

Non-mesenchymal Mimics of Sarcoma

A variety of different non-mesenchymal neoplasms may mimic sarcoma, in particular sarcomatoid carcinoma and melanoma, but also mesothelioma and rarely some lymphomas. This article reviews the key clinical and histologic features of such neoplasms in different settings, along with the use of ancillary studies to help identify the tumor types most frequently misdiagnosed as sarcoma.

Melan-A positive dermal cells in malignant melanoma in situ

The presence of Melan-A positive dermal cells in excisions for melanoma in situ represents a frequent conundrum for pathologists. These cells may represent superficially invasive melanoma, benign, incidental, dermal nevi or non-specific staining of dermal melanophages. Occasionally, rare, Melan-A positive dermal cells are present which do not clearly correspond to the above three categories. Our objective was to further characterize these Melan-A positive dermal cells. To do this, immunoperoxidase staining for Melan-A and SOX-10 was performed on 188-cutaneous excisions, including examples of melanoma in situ, atypical junctional melanocytic hyperplasia and non-melanocytic tumors. These were evaluated for the presence of Melan-A and SOX-10 positive dermal cells. Dermal cells, positive for both markers, were identified in 17% of the excisions. The cells were present in 10% of cases from the melanocytic group and 31% of the cases from the non-melanocytic group. These cells did not exhibit cytologic atypia and resembled neither the co-existing neoplasm nor melanophages. We conclude that positivity of these rare Melan-A positive cells for SOX-10 argues that they represent true melanocytes and not non-specific staining. The absence of cytologic atypia in these cells and their presence in excisions of non-melanocytic neoplasms argues that they are benign, reactive, dermal melanocytes.

An update on the application of newly described immunohistochemical markers in soft tissue pathology

CONTEXT

During the last 5 to 10 years, significant progress has been made in the molecular characterization of soft tissue tumors, predominantly with the identification of recurrent translocations or amplification of certain genes in different tumor types. Alongside this, translational efforts have identified many novel and diagnostically useful immunohistochemical markers for many of these tumor types.

OBJECTIVE

This article reviews a select group of recently described immunohistochemical markers of particular use in the evaluation of mesenchymal neoplasms; the underlying biology of the protein product, practical utility, and limitations of each marker are discussed in detail.

DATA SOURCES

Literature review, authors' research data, and personal practice experience serve as sources.

CONCLUSIONS

There are many diagnostically useful immunohistochemical markers to help confirm the diagnosis of many different soft tissue tumor types, some of which have reduced the need for additional, and more costly, studies, such as fluorescence in situ hybridization. However, no one marker is 100% specific for a given tumor, and knowledge of potential pitfalls and overlap in patterns of staining among other tumor types is crucial to ensure the appropriate application of these markers in clinical practice.

Myoepithelial tumor of soft tissue: histology and genetics of an evolving entity

Myoepithelial neoplasms represent a heterogeneous group of tumors of which classification is incomplete and evolving. Those of the soft tissues often form genetically distinct subgroups that differ from those arising within salivary glands. Soft-tissue myoepithelial tumors (including mixed tumors that show true glandular or ductal differentiation) exhibit a spectrum of different morphologic patterns, making them difficult to distinguish from a variety of other neoplasms. They have been increasingly shown to harbor genetic fusions involving EWSR1 and partner genes that are not seen in the well-characterized tumor classes involving EWSR1 translocations. We review the spectrum of soft-tissue myoepithelial tumors, discussing recent immunohistochemical and genetic findings and the differential diagnosis.

SOX15 and other SOX family members are important mediators of tumorigenesis in multiple cancer types

SOX genes are transcription factors with important roles in embryonic development and carcinogenesis. The SOX family of 20 genes is responsible for regulating lineage and tissue specific gene expression patterns, controlling numerous developmental processes including cell differentiation, sex determination, and organogenesis. As is the case with many genes involved in regulating development, SOX genes are frequently deregulated in cancer. In this perspective we provide a brief overview of how SOX proteins can promote or suppress cancer growth. We also present a pan-cancer analysis of aberrant SOX gene expression and highlight potential molecular mechanisms responsible for their disruption in cancer. Our analyses indicate the prominence of SOX deregulation in different cancer types and reveal potential roles for SOX genes not previously described in cancer. Finally, we summarize our recent identification of SOX15 as a candidate tumor suppressor in pancreatic cancer and propose several research avenues to pursue to further delineate the emerging role of SOX15 in development and carcinogenesis.