Soft Tissue Sarcoma Mimicking Melanoma: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Sarcoma may show similarities to malignant melanoma in terms of morphologic and immunohistochemical aspects, making it difficult to differentiate between these two neoplasms during the diagnostic process. This systematic review aims to summarize available evidence on cases of sarcoma that were initially diagnosed as melanoma.

METHODS

A comprehensive search of the MEDLINE/Pubmed, EMBASE, and SCOPUS databases was conducted through March 2023. We included case series and case reports of sarcoma patients that were initially diagnosed as malignant melanoma. PRISMA guidelines were followed.

RESULTS

Twenty-three case reports and four case series with a total of 34 patients were included. The clinical presentation was heterogeneous, and the most involved anatomical regions were lower limbs (24%), head/neck (24%), and upper limbs (21%). IHC positivity was reported for S100 (69%), HMB45 (63%), MelanA (31%), and MiTF (3%). The main reasons for a second assessment were unusual presentation (48%) and uncertain diagnosis (28%). EWSR1 translocation was investigated in 17/34 patients (50%) and found to be positive in 16/17 (94%). The final diagnosis was clear cell sarcoma (50%) or other soft tissue sarcomas (50%).

CONCLUSIONS

Melanoma and some histotypes of sarcoma share many similarities. In cases of atypical lesions, a second diagnosis should be considered, and ESWR1 translocation should be investigated.

Top 10 Differential Diagnoses for Desmoplastic Melanoma

BACKGROUND

Desmoplastic melanoma is a rare subtype of melanoma mainly appearing on sun-exposed skin. Clinically, it is many times non-pigmented and therefore the diagnosis is often not suspected.

METHODS

Review article.

RESULTS

In this paper we review the main histopathological, immunohistochemical, and molecular features of desmoplastic melanoma, as well as the top 10 morphologic differential diagnoses which should be considered in most cases. The histopathological pattern can be many times deceptive, mimicking a scar, a fibrous reaction, a fibrohistiocytic tumor such as a dermatofibroma, a vascular tumor such as angiosarcoma, a smooth muscle tumor such as leiomyosarcoma, or a neural tumor. Although an overlying atypical junctional melanocytic proliferation may be seen in most cases, it is absent in a significant percentage (up to 30%) of cases, making the diagnosis even more difficult in those instances. The range of diagnostic pitfalls is wide, which may present disastrous prognostic consequences.

CONCLUSION

Desmoplastic melanoma is often a difficult diagnosis to make, as it frequently shows nonspecific clinical findings and overlapping histologic features with many other tumors. However, the potential clinical and prognostic consequences of misdiagnosis as another entity are great. Therefore, this diagnosis must always be kept in mind when encountering spindle cell tumors affecting the head and neck area.

INSM1 Expression in Angiosarcoma

OBJECTIVES

Aberrant expression of neuroendocrine markers has been reported in angiosarcomas and can occasionally result in diagnostic confusion. The aim of this study was to evaluate the expression of insulinoma-associated protein 1 (INSM1), a marker for neuroendocrine differentiation, in angiosarcomas as well as other sarcomas.

METHODS

Tissue microarrays, including angiosarcoma, Ewing sarcoma, desmoplastic small round cell tumor (DSRCT), clear cell sarcoma, synovial sarcoma, leiomyosarcoma, alveolar soft part sarcoma, epithelioid sarcoma, and undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma, were evaluated for expression of INSM1. The extent of immunoreactivity was graded according to the percentage of positive tumor cell nuclei (0, no staining; 1+, <5%; 2+, 5%-25%; 3+, 26%-50%; 4+, 51%-75%; and 5+, 76%-100%), and the intensity of staining was graded as weak, moderate, or strong.

RESULTS

INSM1 expression was found in a subset of angiosarcomas (n = 24/94, 26%; majority 5+, weak to moderate), as well as DSRCTs (n = 7/62, 11%; 2+, weak to strong) and rarely synovial sarcomas (n = 3/76, 4%; 2+, moderate to strong). No INSM1 expression was detected in the other sarcomas.

CONCLUSIONS

Aberrant expression of INSM1 can be seen in a subset of angiosarcomas often with diffuse labeling. Other sarcomas that can rarely demonstrate small cell morphology and focal INSM1 expression include DSRCT and synovial sarcoma.

Evaluation of eight melanocytic and neural crest-associated markers in a well-characterised series of 124 malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumours (MPNST): useful to distinguish MPNST from melanoma?

AIMS

The diagnosis of malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumour (MPNST) may be challenging, especially in the sporadic setting. Owing to the lack of specific histological criteria, immunohistochemical and molecular diagnostic markers, several differential diagnoses must be considered, especially melanoma. Indeed, although S100 protein usually stains melanoma, other melanocytic markers are often negative, especially in spindle cell/desmoplastic types. This pattern of immunoreactivity resembles that of some nerve-derived tumours such as MPNST. Owing to their different clinical behaviours and therapeutic implications, accurate identification of these two different tumours is crucial.

METHODS AND RESULTS

S100, SOX10, KBA62, MITF, HMB45, Melan-A, tyrosinase PNL2 and BRAF-V600E immunostaining was performed in a pathologically and genetically well-characterised cohort of primary MPNST (n = 124), including 66 (53%) NF1-associated tumours. Sox10 and KBA62 expression were found, respectively, in 102 (84%) and in 101 (83%) MPNST, whereas S100 was expressed in 64 cases (52%). We observed an increased loss of S100 with increasing histological grade (P = 0.0052). We found Melan-A expression in 14% (n = 17) of all MPNST, occurring in 82% (n = 14) of cases in an NF1 context. Six per cent (n = 8) of MPNST showed tyrosinase positivity, including seven (87%) NF1-associated. MITF expression was found in 10 (8%) MPNST. None expressed PNL2, HMB45 or BRAF-V600E.

CONCLUSION

MPNST (in NF1 and a sporadic setting) can quite often be positive for Melan-A, tyrosinase and MITF. Pathologists should be cognisant of these exceptions to prevent confusion with melanoma.