Molecular analysis of atypical deep penetrating nevus progressing to melanoma

Superficial Wnt-Activated Melanocytic Nevi/Melanocytomas With a Junctional Component: A Case Series

ABSTRACT

The conventional morphological characteristics of Wnt-activated deep penetrating/plexiform melanocytomas/nevi (DPN) are those of large spindled or epithelioid melanocytes with distinctive voluminous amphophilic cytoplasm, fine pigmented granules, and surrounding melanophages. The central molecular hallmark is the activation of the Wnt-pathway predominantly driven by mutations in the beta-catenin (CTNNB1) gene. Although typically lacking a junctional component, a lesser-known superficial variant with a junctional component has been identified, which could potentially lead to diagnostic challenges. This study presents a cohort of 11 such cases displaying a junctional component of DPN from 10 patients (5 women and 5 men; age range: 27-78 years; median age: 51 years). The nevi were distributed as follows: 1 conjunctival, 1 scalp, 2 lower limb, and 6 truncal lesions. Eight cases were combined with a conventional nevus, 2 cases displayed pure DPN cytology exhibiting only a junctional element, and 9 cases exhibited some degree of lentiginous architecture. All cases demonstrated a low mitotic index (<1 mitosis/mm2). Immunohistochemistry revealed positive BRAF V600E staining in 8 cases (8/11), whereas all cases tested (11/11) were PRAME negative. Nuclear beta-catenin and LEF1 staining was consistently strong and diffuse with DPN cytology (11/11), along with robust cyclin D1 staining in all cases tested (11/11). By contrast, all 9 conventional nevi showed an absence of nuclear beta-catenin staining (0/9) and weaker, mosaic-type LEF1 and cyclin D1 staining was observed. This study emphasizes the diagnostic challenge these nevi can pose in the absence of a conventional, deeper DPN component, which can potentially be misdiagnosed as melanoma.

Combined WNT-activated deep-penetrating/plexiform melanocytoma: insights into clinicopathological and molecular characterization

BACKGROUND

A combined deep-penetrating tumour redefined as WNT-activated deep-penetrating/plexiform melanocytoma (DPM), may pose challenging clinical and histological diagnoses.

OBJECTIVES

To review the clinicopathological characteristics of combined DPMs and characterize the molecular profile of atypical and malignant forms.

METHODS

The study included 51 patients with combined DPMs diagnosed at the Hospital Clinic of Barcelona and the University of Florence between 2012 and 2020. Clinical data, dermoscopy images (when available) and histological characteristics were reviewed. Immunohistochemistry for β-catenin, LEF1, HMB45, Ki67, p16 and PRAME (preferentially expressed antigen in melanoma) was performed. Atypical forms underwent next-generation sequencing (NGS) panel analysis, including driver genes implicated in DPMs, TERT-promoter (p) mutations and the investigation of the 9p21 locus via fluorescence in situ hybridization.

RESULTS

Among the 51 patients (32 females and 19 males, age range 4-74 years), 68% with available clinical data (15/22) were initially suspected of having melanoma. Except for one patient, complete excision resulted in no recurrences or metastases. One patient who had an incompletely excised combined DPM developed a lymph node melanoma metastasis 10 years later. In the 51 patients, 10 samples (20%) showed atypical histological features; 7 (14%) exhibited a significant loss of p16 expression; and 2 (4%) showed a high-proliferative index (Ki67 over 5%). NGS analysis in 11 patients revealed a double mutation BRAFV600E and exon 3 CTNNB1; no TERTp mutations were detected.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinical suspicion of melanoma is common in combined DPMs, but malignant progression is infrequent in tumours lacking high-grade atypia or proliferation. These findings are congruent with the consideration of these lesions as intermediate-grade tumours or melanocytomas.

Melanocytic Neoplasm With KIT and APC Mutations: A New Subtype of Melanocytoma?

ABSTRACT

We report a very unusual case of melanocytic neoplasm appearing clinically as a 0.5-cm dome-shaped pigmented papule on the chest of a 63-year-old man. Microscopically, it was an asymmetric, entirely dermally based neoplasm characterized by a multinodular, vaguely plexiform architecture composed of moderately pleomorphic spindled melanocytes with ample, dusty pigmented cytoplasm and scattered multinucleated cells. The tumor cells were strongly positive for Melan-A, HMB45, S100, and PRAME, whereas p16 showed diffuse nuclear loss. β-catenin presented a strong and diffuse cytoplasmic staining, while nuclei were negative. Despite an increased cellularity, mitotic count was low (1/mm 2 ). Fluorescence in situ hybridization revealed no copy number alteration in melanoma-related genes ( CDKN2A, MYB, MYC, CCND1 and RREB1 ). DNA and RNA sequencing identified KIT c.2458G>T and APC c.6709C>T mutations. No further genetic alteration was detected including TERT-promoter (TERT-p ) hot-spot mutation. A re-excision was performed. A sentinel lymph node biopsy was negative. Clinical investigations revealed no extracutaneous involvement. The patient is disease-free after a follow-up period of 8 months. Given the peculiar morphologic and molecular findings, we hypothesize the lesion may represent a novel subtype of an intermediate grade melanocytic tumor (melanocytoma).

Diagnosing Cutaneous Melanocytic Tumors in the Molecular Era: Updates and Review of Literature

Over the past decade, molecular and genomic discoveries have experienced unprecedented growth, fundamentally reshaping our comprehension of melanocytic tumors. This review comprises three main sections. The first part gives an overview of the current genomic landscape of cutaneous melanocytic tumors. The second part provides an update on the associated molecular tests and immunohistochemical stains that are helpful for diagnostic purposes. The third section briefly outlines the diverse molecular pathways now utilized for the classification of cutaneous melanomas. The primary goal of this review is to provide a succinct overview of the molecular pathways involved in melanocytic tumors and demonstrate their practical integration into the realm of diagnostic aids. As the molecular and genomic knowledge base continues to expand, this review hopes to serve as a valuable resource for healthcare professionals, offering insight into the evolving molecular landscape of cutaneous melanocytic tumors and its implications for patient care.

PRAME and LEF1 in Combined Deep Penetrating Nevus and Combined Blue Nevus: Utility and Pitfalls

ABSTRACT

Deep penetrating nevi (DPN), particularly those showing combined features, or combined deep penetrating nevi (CDPN), may show histopathological resemblance to blue nevus (BN) and melanoma. Preferentially Expressed Antigen in MElanoma (PRAME) is a marker that helps distinguish melanoma from benign melanocytic lesions. Lymphoid enhancer-binding factor 1 (LEF1) has been proposed to be used in conjunction with β-catenin for diagnosis of DPN. The immunohistochemical expression of PRAME and LEF1 was evaluated in 10 DPN (including 6 CDPN and 2 DPN-like proliferations with atypical features), 16 BN (including combined and cellular BN), and 2 melanomas with features of DPN or BN. PRAME was negative in most DPN (n = 10/10, n = 9/10, one case with discrepancy between readers) and all BN (n = 16/16), while the 2 melanomas included were positive (n = 2/2). All DPN were positive for LEF1 (n = 9/9) while only a subset of BN were positive (n = 6/16, P = 0.0028; n = 5/16, P = 0.001, per both readers). LEF1 seemed to be easier to interpret than β-catenin because of its nuclear pattern of expression. The expression of LEF1 in the regular nevus component of combined BN presents a potential pitfall in practice because it may lead to misinterpretation of LEF1 as positive in the BN component of the lesion. However, a subset (approximately one-third) of combined BN seemed to show true LEF1 expression. Taking into account pitfalls in interpretation, the combinatorial panel of PRAME and LEF1, in addition to conventional histopathological features, may be useful to distinguish CDPN from combined BN and other benign and malignant mimics.

TERT Promoter Mutational Analysis as an Ancillary Diagnostic Tool for Diagnostically Challenging Melanocytic Neoplasms

ABSTRACT

Telomerase reverse transcriptase promoter mutations (TPMs) have been shown to be common in melanoma and uncommon in benign nevi. To assess the use of TPMs as an ancillary diagnostic tool, we report the concordance of the TPM status with the final diagnosis in clinical cases with distinct differential diagnostic scenarios: dysplastic nevus versus melanoma, atypical Spitz nevus versus melanoma, atypical deep penetrating nevus (DPN) versus melanoma, and atypical blue nevus versus malignant blue nevus. In a control cohort, we found a positive TPM in 51/70 (73%) of the total melanomas with the highest frequency in vertical growth phase melanoma cases. Conversely, only 2/35 (6%) dysplastic nevi in our control cases were TPM-positive and b were severely atypical dysplastic nevi. Our clinical cohort of 257 cases had a positive TPM in 24% of cases diagnosed as melanoma and in 1% of cases with a benign diagnosis. The overall concordance of the TPM status with the final diagnosis was 86%. The TPM status had the greatest concordance (95%) with the final diagnosis in the atypical DPN versus melanoma group, with the rest of the groups ranging between 50% and 88%. Overall, our results suggest that TPMs are most useful in the differential diagnosis of atypical DPN versus melanoma. It also has some value in the differential diagnosis of atypical Spitz tumor versus melanoma and dysplastic nevus versus melanoma, whereas in our cohort, it did not contribute meaningfully to differentiating malignant blue nevus and atypical blue nevus.

BAP1-Inactivated Melanoma Arising From BAP1-Inactivated Melanocytic Tumor in a Patient With BAP1 Germline Mutation: A Case Report and Review of the Literature

ABSTRACT

BAP1-inactivated melanocytic tumors represent a subset of epithelioid melanocytic neoplasms resulting from biallelic inactivation of the BAP1 gene and by a driver mutation that activate the MAP kinase pathway, most commonly BRAFV600E. They occur sporadically or, less common, in the setting of BAP1 tumor predisposition syndrome caused by a BAP1 germline mutation that predisposes to several malignancies including cutaneous and uveal melanoma. To date, only few cases of BAP1-inactivated melanomas have been reported. We present a case of a 35-year-old woman presented with a melanocytic lesion microscopically composed of 3 distinct melanocytic populations, suggesting a stepwise progression model to melanoma from a conventional nevus through a melanocytoma stage. This progression was also supported from a molecular viewpoint given BRAFV600E, BAP1, and TERT-p hot spot mutations detected by targeted mutational analysis. Four atypical melanocytic lesions were removed from the patient's back, and the same A BAP1 c.856A>T, p.(Lys286Ter) mutation was detected on either tumoral or normal tissue samples. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first case of BAP1-inactivated melanoma with a documented TERT-p hot spot mutation manifesting as the first presentation of BAP1 tumor predisposition syndrome.

Towards diagnostic criteria for malignant deep penetrating melanocytic tumors using single nucleotide polymorphism array and next-generation sequencing

Cutaneous deep penetrating melanocytic neoplasms frequently simulate melanoma and might occasionally progress to metastatic melanoma. Distinguishing deep penetrating nevi (DPN) and deep penetrating melanocytomas (DPM) from malignant deep penetrating tumors (MDPT) is difficult based on histopathology alone, and diagnostic criteria for MDPT are currently lacking. Using a molecular workup, we aimed to provide readily available diagnostic tools for classification of deep penetrating tumors. We used clinical follow-up and Single Nucleotide Polymorphism (SNP) array for tumor classification of 20 deep penetrating neoplasms to identify associations with histopathological, immunohistochemistry, and NGS findings. Ten neoplasms were classified as MDPT, four as DPM, and six as DPN. Two MDPT showed metastases. The following parameters were statistically significantly associated with MDPT: severe nuclear atypia (risk ratio [RR] 2.9, p < 0.05), absence of a nevus component (RR 10.0, p = 0.04), positive PRAME expression (RR 9.0, p = 0.02), complete loss of p16 expression (RR 3.5, p = 0.003), TERT-p and APC mutations (RR 11.0, p = 0.01 and RR 2.7, p = 0.002, respectively), and ≥1 additional pathogenic mutation (RR 9.0, p = 0.02). Ki-67 expression ≥ 5% was not significantly associated with MDPTs, although it was <5% in all DPNs. Three MDPT did not show nuclear β-catenin expression despite having a CTNNB1 (n = 2) or an APC mutation (n = 1). Our findings suggest that complete loss of p16 and positive PRAME expression, a driver mutation in APC, ≥ 1 additional pathogenic mutation, especially in TERT-p, support an MDPT diagnosis in deep penetrating neoplasms. Besides severe nuclear atypia and possibly severe inflammation, we did not identify specific histopathological criteria for malignancy. Non-aberrant nuclear β-catenin expression might not exclude a deep penetrating signature in MDPT.

Conventional and Atypical Deep Penetrating Nevus, Deep Penetrating Nevus-like Melanoma, and Related Variants

Simple Summary

Atypical deep penetrating nevus (DPN) is a unique skin tumor with an uncertain biologic/metastatic potential that may be difficult to distinguish from DPN (an indolent lesion) and DPN-like melanoma (an aggressive lesion) based on the results of histomorphologic analysis and commonly employed molecular studies such as fluorescence in situ hybridization and comparative genomic hybridization alone. Herein, we review the clinical, histomorphological, immunohistochemical, molecular, and cytogenetic characteristics of the DPN spectrum of lesions to try to better understand the prognosis of these lesions and possible treatment approaches.

Abstract

Deep penetrating nevus (DPN) is an uncommon acquired melanocytic lesion with a distinct histopathological appearance that typically behaves in an indolent manner. The lesion is characterized by a symmetrical proliferation of epithelioid to spindled melanocytes associated with abundant melanophages and wedge-shaped extension to the deep reticular dermis and subcutis. Pronounced cytologic atypia and mitotic figures are usually absent, which helps distinguish DPN from melanoma with a deep penetrating growth pattern. Recently, the concept of atypical DPN has been proposed for lesions that demonstrate borderline histomorphologic features and may be associated with lymph node deposits but lack the copy number aberrations typical of melanoma by either fluorescence in situ hybridization or comparative genomic hybridization. While most of these lesions have a favorable clinical course, rare lesions may progress to melanoma. In this review, we summarize the current literature on atypical DPNs with uncertain behavior/metastatic potential and outline the characteristics that distinguish these lesions from conventional DPN and melanoma with DPN-like features.

Molecular characterization of biphenotypic epithelioid and plexiform melanoma with deep penetrating nevus-like features

Tumor heterogeneity is a relevant hallmark of melanoma due to the high mutation burden and immunogenicity commonly encountered. Heterogeneity at the histologic level frequently corresponds to heterogeneity at the molecular level. A better understanding of this feature of malignancy can help refine the development of predictive biomarkers and to define more effective targeted therapies. Here, we describe a case of melanoma displaying a dual phenotype: a DPN-like/plexiform portion in conjunction with a conventional epithelioid morphology. Molecular studies revealed shared BRAF and PTEN mutations in both components but a CTNNB1 mutation was exclusively found in the DPN-like area of the tumor, consistent with the distinct morphology observed. There was considerable heterogeneity in sequence variants identified in the two regions. Gene expression analysis highlighted differentially regulated genes between the two histologies, including a relevant cluster of genes in the receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) family and related signaling pathways upregulated in the DPN-like/plexiform area.

The WHO 2018 Classification of Cutaneous Melanocytic Neoplasms: Suggestions From Routine Practice

The "multidimensional" World Health Organization (WHO) classification 2018 of melanocytic tumors encompasses nine melanoma pathways (seven of which for cutaneous melanoma) according to a progression model in which morphologically intermediate melanocytic tumors are cosidered as simulators and/or precursors to melanoma. These "intermediates" can be subclassified into: i) a "classical" subgroup (superficial/thin compound: dysplastic nevus), which is placed within the morphologic and molecular progression spectrum of classical (Clark's and McGovern's) melanoma subtypes (superficial spreading and, possibly, nodular); and ii) a "non-classical" subgroup (thick compound/dermal: "melanocytomas") whose genetic pathways diverge from classical melanoma subtypes. Such a progression model is aimed at giving a conceptual framework for a histopathological classification; however, routine clinicopathological practice strongly suggests that most melanomas arise de novo and that the vast majority of nevi are clinically stable or even involuting over time. Clinicopathological correlation can help identify some severely atypical but benign tumors (e.g.: sclerosing nevus with pseudomelanomatous features) as well as some deceptively bland melanomas (e.g.: lentiginous melanoma; nested melanoma), thereby addressing some ambiguous cases to a correct clinical management. The recently available adjuvant therapy regimens for melanoma raise the problem of a careful distinction between severely atypical (high grade) melanocytoma and "classical" melanoma: conventional morphology can guide an algorithmic approach based on an antibody panel (anti-mutated BRAF, BAP1, PRAME, ALK, TRKA, MET, HRAS-WT, ROS; beta catenin; R1alpha; p16; HMB45; Ki67), a first-line molecular study (identification of hot spot mutations of BRAF and NRAS) and an advanced molecular study (sequencing of NF1, KIT, BRAF, MAP2K1, GNAQ, GNA11, PLCB4, CYSLTR2, HRAS; fusions studies of BRAF, RET, MAP3K8, PRKCA); as a final step, next-generation sequencing can identify melanocytic tumors with rare genetic signatures and melanocytic tumors with a high tumor mutation burden which should be definitely ascribed to the category of classical melanoma with the respective therapeutic options.

NGS-Based Analysis of Atypical Deep Penetrating Nevi

Simple Summary

The recent WHO classification of melanocytic tumors requires the implementation of combined phenotypic–genotypic diagnostics. For rare tumors, such as atypical deep penetrating nevi, there is insufficient information regarding genetic status, and it is not yet clear whether the observed unusual morphological cyto-architectures reflect a distinct genomic profile or are associated with an increased metastatic potential and aggressive clinical behavior. We report herein a comprehensive next-generation sequencing (NGS) analysis of a series of atypical DPNs, showing their mutational profile with some specific signatures for these rare and diagnostically challenging tumors.

Abstract

Deep penetrating nevi (DPNs) are rare melanocytic neoplasms consisting of pigmented spindled or epithelioid melanocytes with a distinctive wedge-shaped configuration showing activation of the WNT pathway, with unusual cyto-architectural features. It is unclear whether they show a distinct genomic profile associated with a diverse metastatic potential. We describe herein a cohort of 21 atypical DPNs analyzed by next-generation sequencing using the Ion AmpliSeq™ Comprehensive Cancer Panel. We found that β-catenin exon 3 was mutated in 95% and MAP kinase pathway genes in 71% of the cases. Less frequent mutations were observed in HRAS (19%) and MAP2K1 (24%). Isocitrate dehydrogenases 1 (IDH1) mutations, including R132C, V178I, and S278L, were identified in 38% of cases and co-existed with BRAF/HRAS mutations. The only case with progressive nodal disease carried alterations in the β-catenin pathway and mutations in IDH1 and NRAS (codon 61). By a comprehensive mutation analysis, we found low genetic heterogeneity and a lack of significant associations between specific gene mutations and histopathological features, despite atypical features. Whether the acquisition of an NRAS or IDH1 mutation in an atypical DPN may represent a molecular evolution implying a pathway to melanoma progression should be confirmed in a larger series.