An update on the characteristics of patients attending the Kooyong Low Vision Clinic

2022 Glenn A. Fry Award lecture: Enhancing clinical assessment for improved ophthalmic management

ABSTRACT

Detailed clinical assessment is critical to allow sensitive evaluation of the eye and its management. As technology advances, these assessment techniques can be adapted and refined to improve the detection of pathological changes of ocular tissue and their impact on visual function. Enhancements in optical medical devices including spectacle, contact, and intraocular lenses have allowed for a better understanding of the mechanism and amelioration of presbyopia and myopia control. Advancements in imaging technology have enabled improved quantification of the tear film and ocular surface, informing diagnosis and treatment strategies. Miniaturized electronics, large processing power, and in-built sensors in smartphones and tablets capacitate more portable assessment tools for clinicians, facilitate self-monitoring and treatment compliance, and aid communication with patients. This article gives an overview of how technology has been used in many areas of eye care to improve assessments and treatment and provides a snapshot of some of my studies validating and using technology to inform better evidence-based patient management.

Trends in low vision service utilisation: A retrospective study based on general population healthcare claims

Purpose

To identify parameters associated with the downward trend in the uptake of Low Vision Services (LVS) in the Netherlands.

Methods

A retrospective cohort study was conducted based on a Dutch national health insurance claims database (Vektis CV) of all adults (≥18 years) who received LVS from 2015 until 2018. Descriptive statistics were used to assess socio‐demographic, clinical and contextual characteristics and other healthcare utilisation of the study population. General estimating equations trends in characteristics and healthcare utilisation were determined over time.

Results

A total of 49,726 unique patients received LVS, but between 2015 and 2018, the number of patients decreased by 15%. The majority was aged 65 years or older (53%), female (54%), had a middle (38%) or low (24%) socio‐economic status and lived in urban areas (68%). Between 2015–2018, significant downward trends were found for treatment with intravitreal injections and lens‐related diseases for LVS patients. For physical comorbidity, utilisation of ophthalmic care, low vision aids and occupational therapy, a significant upward trend was found over time.

Conclusion

The decrease of Dutch LVS patients by 15% between 2015 and 2018 might be explained by a reduced distribution of patients treated with intravitreal injections and patients with lens‐related diseases within the LVS. Compared to 2015, patients were more likely to have physical comorbidity, to see an ophthalmologist and to use low vision aids and occupational therapy in 2016, 2017 and 2018. This might indicate enhanced access to LVS when treated by ophthalmologists or within other medical specialties, or the opposite, i.e., less access when not treated within one of these medical specialties. Future research is needed to examine differences in patterns between LVS users and non‐users further.

Developing consensus-based referral criteria for low vision services in Australia

PURPOSE

To develop expert consensus on referral criteria for low vision services in Australia.

METHODS

In a modified online Delphi process, a panel of 38 Australian experts in low vision (including ophthalmologists, optometrists, orthoptists, occupational therapists, orientation and mobility professionals, researchers and managers) participated in three rounds of consensus building over a period of 5 months commencing in 2019. Initially, 90 statements were developed, addressing what should be included in best-practice low vision referral criteria, currently used criteria, timing of referral and responsibility for referral. By the third round, these had been reduced and refined to a total of four statements.

RESULTS

In three Delphi rounds, the expert panel produced three key recommendations for low vision referral: (1) that low vision referral should be based mainly on the impact of uncorrectable vision impairment on function and well-being; (2) clinical measures of visual acuity and visual field might be a secondary consideration and (3) it is important to fully inform a person about low vision services at an early stage of vision loss and to involve them in decision making about referral. There was consensus on the need for clear referral pathways and that both ophthalmologists and optometrists have primary responsibility to refer for low vision services.

CONCLUSIONS

Although recommendations and guidelines should not replace sound individual clinical judgement, promotion and adoption of these consensus recommendations could assist health care professionals in providing appropriate and timely referral for low vision services to the benefit of people with vision impairment.

Clinical outcomes of the Centre for Eye Health: an intra-professional optometry-led collaborative eye care clinic in Australia

Clinical relevance: This novel clinical model is the first of its kind in Australia and was designed to help reduce unnecessary referrals into overburdened public systems by utilising pre-existing community-based resources.Background: The Centre for Eye Health (CFEH) is an intra-professional optometry-led care clinic offering an alternative pathway to traditional ophthalmology-based pathways (public hospital clinics or private practices) for 'at-risk' patients requiring ocular imaging, diagnostic and management services. This study evaluates the CFEH integrated eye-care model in the identification of chronic eye diseases within the community.Methods: A retrospective random clinical audit of over 750 medical records of patients referred to the CFEH between July 2016 and June 2019 was conducted. Demographics of patients, referral type, final diagnosis and recommended management plans were extracted from this subset. Clinic key performance indicators (referral turnaround time, and net cost per patient appointment) were also extracted.Results: Of the 755 referrals associated with the audited records, 77.4% resulted in the identification of patients with or at-risk of developing eye diseases with 73.5% of this cohort requiring ongoing monitoring at CFEH or referral to ophthalmology. Although the CFEH model is not designed to diagnose or manage acute conditions, 1.5% of patients in this pathway required same day ophthalmological or medical intervention. The cost per patient was equivalent to hospital eye departments costs.Conclusion: This integrated care pathway has the potential to reduce unnecessary referrals from optometrists to hospital ophthalmological service by offering a safe and effective alternate pathway. The majority of patients seen within this pathway were able to be monitored within optometry-led services. This is a unique clinical model utilising inter-professional referrals within optometry which has the potential to reduce preventable blindness within the community through the early detection of eye diseases.

Profile of the Australian College of Optometry low vision clinic

BACKGROUND

The number of Australians living with vision impairment or blindness is expected to increase substantially due to the ageing population and prevalence of age-related eye disease. In response, the Australian College of Optometry (ACO) commenced a low vision clinic in 2013. The ACO is a not-for-profit organisation providing eye-care services to more than 60,000 Victorians per year experiencing economic or social disadvantage. Consultation fees are bulk-billed to the Australian national health care scheme - Medicare - while spectacles and visual aids are subsidised through the state government-funded Victorian Eyecare Service. The aim of this study was to determine the profile and prescribing patterns of the new optometry-led low vision clinic, and report the findings of a short-term loan magnifier pilot study.

METHODS

A retrospective audit of 270 patient records was conducted. Additionally, a short-term loan magnifier program was pilot tested to ascertain the demand for, and benefits of, such a program among this cohort.

RESULTS

The median age was 77 years (interquartile range 64 to 85 years), with 52 per cent being female. The main cause of vision impairment was age-related macular degeneration (40 per cent). At least one-third primarily spoke a language other than English. The majority (75 per cent) were referred by the optometrist to the onsite consultant occupational therapist for immediate assistance with activities of daily living and onward referral for additional comprehensive services, as required. Of the 49 participants who completed the loan magnifier study, only nine exchanged the magnifier/s initially prescribed.

CONCLUSIONS

The ACO has established a low vision service within a large optometry clinic for people experiencing social and economic disadvantage. Where a program of subsidised low-cost magnifiers is available, there is little benefit to short-term loans of magnifiers. Providing basic affordable low vision aids and rehabilitation within a large primary care optometry setting can facilitate acceptability and uptake of low vision services that increase quality of life.

The use of contact lenses in low vision rehabilitation: optical and therapeutic applications

Ocular pathology that manifests at an early age has the potential to alter the vision-dependent emmetropisation mechanism, which co-ordinates ocular growth throughout childhood. The disruption of this feedback mechanism in children with congenital or early-onset visual impairment often results in the development of significant ametropia, including high levels of spherical refractive error, astigmatism and anisometropia. This review examines the use of contact lenses as a refractive correction, low vision aid and therapeutic intervention in the rehabilitation of patients with bilateral, irreversible visual loss due to congenital ocular disease. The advantages and disadvantages of the use of contact lenses for increased magnification (telescopes and microscopes) or field expansion (reverse telescopes) are discussed, along with the benefits and practical considerations for the correction of pathological high myopia. The historical and present use of therapeutic tinted contact lenses to reduce photosensitivity and nystagmus in achromatopsia, albinism and aniridia are also presented, including clinical considerations for the contact lens practitioner. In addition to the known optical benefits in comparison to spectacles for high levels of ametropia (an improved field of view for myopes and fewer inherent oblique aberrations), contact lenses may be of significant psycho-social benefit for patients with low vision, due to enhanced cosmesis and reduced conspicuity and potential related effects of improved self-esteem and peer acceptance. The contact lens correction of patients with congenital vision impairment can be challenging for both practitioner and patient but should be considered as a potential optical or therapeutic solution in modern low vision rehabilitation.