Long‐term outcomes of posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens implantation in keratoconus

The efficacy of 2 different phakic intraocular lens implant in keratoconus as an isolated procedure or combined with collagen crosslinking and intra-stromal corneal ring segments: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

To compare the efficacy of phakic intra-ocular lenses in isolation or in combination with corneal crosslinking (CXL) and/or intra-stromal corneal ring segments (ICRS) in keratoconus.

METHODS

Data extracted from the publications meeting the selection. The outcome parameters included mean pre- and post-operative uncorrected distance visual acuity, corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), sphere and cylinder of refraction and complications. Available data analyzed with Cochrane Review Manager.

RESULTS

A total of 23 studies including 464 eyes were included. All the parameters showed significant improvement in all subgroups other than CDVA in ACPIOL + CXL subgroup and cylinder in PIOL + CXL subgroups. There was not a significant difference between PCPIOL and ACPIOL in the outcomes, exception was more improvement of CDVA in "ACPIOL only" than" PCPIOL only" subgroup.

CONCLUSION

Both PCPIOLs and ACPIOLs are comparably safe and efficient options in management of KCN and their efficacy significantly improves when combined with CXL/ICRS.

Phakic intraocular Lens implantation in keratoconus patients

BACKGROUND

Both the anterior chamber and posterior chamber phakic intraocular lenses (pIOLs) implantation are acceptable refractive surgical approaches in keratoconus patients with high anisometropia, contact lens intolerance, or who prefer spectacle and contact lens independent. They are beneficial for correcting anisometropia in stable keratoconus cases or following corneal procedures such as intrastromal corneal ring segments (ICRS), collagen cross-linking (CXL), and keratoplasty. They are suitable for eyes without advanced keratoconus with acceptable best-corrected distance visual acuity (BCDVA) or without highly irregular astigmatism, high comma, and higher-order aberrations (HOAs). Combined procedures for irregular astigmatism reduction and corneal regularization with either ICRS or topography/wavefront-guided transepithelial PRK (with or without CXL) can be associated in advance with pIOLs implantation to improve BCDVA in these cases.

AIM

To study and report the evidence regarding the safety and efficacy of pIOLs for KC patients' visual and refractive rehabilitation, we have analyzed the scientific evidence published within the last 10 years (from 2012 onwards).

RESULTS

No randomized controlled trials but only eleven retrospective case series and two prospective case series were identified. Satisfactory visual rehabilitation was achieved regarding uncorrected and corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) and predictability of the refractive correction. Both types of pIOL (iris claw and posterior chamber pIOLs) offer very good results in terms of safety and efficacy with indexes close to or even exceeding 1.

CONCLUSION

pIOLs implantation is a valid refractive therapeutic approach for correcting stable keratoconus with moderate-to-high refractive errors, especially anisometropia associated with regular or mildly irregular astigmatism, and good CDVA.

Outcomes of two different treatment modalities in mild to moderate keratoconus

PURPOSE

To describe visual and refractive outcomes of intrastromal corneal ring segments (ICRS) and toric implantable collamer lenses (TICL) implantation in cases of mild and moderate keratoconus.

METHODS

A prospective descriptive interventional case series. 40 eyes were allocated into two groups. First group (20 eyes) was treated with corneal collagen crosslinking (CXL) 1 month after ICRS implantation and the second group was treated using TICL after 1 year of CXL.

RESULTS

Both groups showed statistically significant improvement in spherical equivalent, cylindrical refraction, uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) and best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) over the follow-up period.

CONCLUSION

Both ICRS and TICL are effective in treatment of mid and moderate keratoconus with more predictable visual results with TICL.

Posterior Chamber Phakic Intraocular Lens Implantation for Refractive Correction in Corneal Ectatic Disorders: A Review

PURPOSE

To summarize the indications and outcomes of posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens (PIOL) implantation in corneal ectasias including keratoconus, pellucid marginal degeneration (PMD), post-refractive surgery, and post-keratoplasty ectasias.

METHODS

A review of the literature was conducted using the relevant keywords from various databases up to August 15, 2020. All pertinent studies were reviewed, and the relevant articles were studied in detail for efficacy, stability, predictability, and safety outcomes. In addition, visual quality, corneal biomechanical outcomes, complications, the role of posterior chamber PIOL in combination treatment, and comparison of posterior chamber PIOL with other PIOLs for ectasias were also evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 30 relevant studies (13 prospective, 13 retrospective, 4 case reports) on the subject were studied and summarized. All studies showed a favorable refractive outcome. Quality of vision remained unaffected and no significant complications were reported in any of the studies.

CONCLUSIONS

Posterior chamber PIOLs represent a viable option in the treatment of mild to moderate and stable corneal ectasia in patients with contact lens intolerance who have low irregular astigmatism, a clear central cornea, and good preoperative corrected distance visual acuity. [J Refract Surg. 2021;37(5):351-359.].

Outcomes and complications of implantable collamer lens for mild to advance keratoconus

PURPOSE

To evaluate the outcome and safety of implantable collamer lens (ICL; (Visian, STAAR Surgical, Monrovia, CA, USA) in mild to advance keratoconus patients with myopia and myopic astigmatism.

METHODS

This retrospective study evaluated all patients who underwent ICL implantation for the management of keratoconus at a tertiary care eye hospital from January 2012 to January 2018. The mean duration of follow-up was 15.3 months (range, 3.13 to 38.97 months). Data were collected on preoperative and postoperative uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) and corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), refraction was compared, and adverse effects were evaluated.

RESULTS

Thirty-two eyes (32 patients) were evaluated. The median CDVA was 20/30 preoperatively and 20/20 at last follow-up. The median UDVA was 20/25 at last follow-up. Thirteen patients (40.6%) had 20/20 UDVA in comparison to none at baseline. The median spherical equivalent in diopters (D) was -7.875 D (-4.125 to -10.0 D) preoperatively and decreased to -0.3125 D at last follow-up. The median manifest refractive cylinder was 3.00 D (2.25 to 5.25 D) preoperatively and decreased to 1.125 D postoperatively. Cylinder axis rotation of 10° or greater occurred in 3 eyes (9.375%) and required repositioning of the ICL. One patient (3%) developed nonvisually significant anterior subcapsular cataract. One ICL (3.125%) had to be explanted due to residual refractive error and unsatisfactory vision.

CONCLUSION

ICLs are a suitable refractive option for the correction of refractive error associated with stable, nonprogressive keratoconus even in advance cases. However, the risk of ICL rotation and subsequent repositioning remain. Careful patient selection is necessary for achieving good outcomes and mitigating intraoperative and postoperative complications.

[Excimer laser in keratoconus management]

Visual rehabilitation in keratoconus is a challenge, notably because of the significant irregular astigmatism and optical aberrations that it induces. Many surgical techniques have been developed in addition to, or in the case of failure of, spectacles and rigid gas permeable contact lenses: intracorneal ring segments, intraocular lenses, excimer laser and, as a last resort, keratoplasty. Excimer laser photoablates the cornea, allowing remodeling of its surface. There are various treatment modes (wavefront-optimized, wavefront-guided and topography-guided), allowing performance of a customized treatment if needed. Its use in keratoconus has been described since the 2000s, alone or in combination with other procedures. For example, the combination of photoablation and corneal cross linking, a technique that increases corneal rigidity and in so doing can slow or even stop the progression of keratoconus, proved its efficacy and safety in many studies, and various protocols have been described. A triple procedure, including intracorneal ring segments, excimer laser and cross linking, has also given some very promising results in progressive keratoconus, providing a significative improvement in visual acuity and topographic data. The combination of excimer laser and intraocular lenses remains a poorly explored lead that might provide some satisfactory results. The objective of this review is to summarize the recent data on excimer laser in keratoconus management.

Refractive approaches to visual rehabilitation in patients with keratoconus

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

As keratoconus is a chronic disease affecting young people, vision-related quality of life is often significantly impaired in patients with this disease. However, successful management of keratoconus, including visual rehabilitation strategies, can improve quality of life in these patients. This review will describe clinical approaches that improve vision-related quality of life in patients with stable keratoconus.

RECENT FINDINGS

Several types of contact lenses including scleral lenses have been used successfully to manage keratoconus. Eyes with severe keratoconus, even those in which fitting with other types of lenses is challenging, can be successfully fitted with scleral lenses. Although laser ablative procedures, such as photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) have been traditionally contraindicated in patients diagnosed with or suspected of having keratoconus, PRK has been attempted to partially correct refractive errors in keratoconus. Although phototherapeutic keratectomy and radial keratotomy have been reported to be used in eyes with keratoconus, effectiveness and safety results have varied. Implantation of phakic intraocular lenses and intraocular lenses, including toric intraocular lenses, which primarily correct regular astigmatism, with cataract extraction or refractive lens exchange can improve vision-related quality of life in patients with keratoconus by significantly reducing cylinder while improving uncorrected visual acuity.

SUMMARY

Appropriate selection and application of treatment options based on consideration of multiple factors will help patients with keratoconus, improving their vision-related quality of life and delaying or avoiding keratoplasty.

Phakic intraocular lenses: Recent advances and innovations

Phakic intraocular lenses (pIOL) are recommended when counselling refractive surgery candidates presenting with high ametropia or ocular surface and/or corneal conditions that contraindicate corneal refractive surgery. This review aims to present the state-of-the-art regarding pIOL models currently available in Europe, addressing their newer indications and recent design innovations. These include, in the case of posterior chamber pIOLs, the addition of a central hole to improve aqueous humour circulation, the availability of larger optical zones, and multifocal optics for the compensation of presbyopia. The review also highlights their good safety and efficacy results, as well as the role of patient education to ensure adequate outcomes in the medium-long term. The indications of pIOLs in special situations, as well as bi-lensectomy, a procedure that most pIOL patients may eventually require as they age and develop cataracts, are also addressed.