Observer-perceived light aversion behaviour in photophobic subjects with traumatic brain injury

Structure and function of retinal ganglion cells in subjects with a history of repeated traumatic brain injury

This study tested whether repeated traumatic brain injuries (TBIs) alter the objective structure or the objective function of retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) in human subjects recruited from an optometry clinic. Case subjects (n = 25) with a history of repeated TBIs (4.12 ± 2.76 TBIs over 0-41 years) and healthy pair-matched control subjects (n = 30) were prospectively recruited. Retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness was quantified with spectral-domain optical coherence tomography, and scanning laser polarimetry measured RNFL phase retardation. Measurements of the photopic negative response were made using full-field flash electroretinography. There was no statistically significant difference (p = 0.42) in global RNFL thickness between the case cohort (96.6 ± 9.4 microns) and the control cohort (94.9 ± 7.0 microns). There was no statistically significant difference (p = 0.80) in global RNFL phase retardation between the case cohort (57.9 ± 5.7 nm) and the control cohort (58.2 ± 4.6 nm). There were no statistically significant differences in the peak time (p = 0.95) of the PhNR or in the amplitude (p = 0.11) of the PhNR between the case cohort (69.9 ± 6.9 ms and 24.1 ± 5.1 μV, respectively) and the control cohort (70.1 ± 8.9 ms and 27.8 ± 9.1 μV, respectively). However, PhNR amplitude was more variable (p < 0.025) in the control cohort than in the case cohort. Within the case cohort, there was a strong positive (r = 0.53), but not statistically significant (p = 0.02), association between time since last TBI and PhNR amplitude. There was also a modest positive (r = 0.45), but not statistically significant (p = 0.04), association between time since first TBI and PhNR amplitude. Our results suggest that there were no statistically significant differences in the objective structure or in the objective function of RGCs between the case cohort and the control cohort. Future large, longitudinal studies will be necessary to confirm our negative results and to more fully investigate the potential interaction between PhNR amplitude and time since first or last TBI.

Differential diagnosis and theories of pathophysiology of post-traumatic photophobia: A review

BACKGROUND: Photophobia is a common sensory symptom after traumatic brain injury (TBI) that may have a grave impact on a patient’s functional independence, neurorehabilitation, and activities of daily living. Post-TBI photophobia can be difficult to treat and the majority of patients can suffer chronically up to and beyond one year after their injury. OBJECTIVES: This review evaluates the current theories of the pathophysiology of photophobia and the most-common co-morbid etiologies of light sensitivity in TBI to help guide the differential diagnosis and individualized management of post-TBI photophobia. METHODS: Primary articles were found via PubMed and Google Scholar search of key terms including “photophobia” “light sensitivity” “photosensitivity” “photo-oculodynia” “intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cells” “ipRGC” and “concussion” “brain injury” “dry eye”. Due to paucity of literature papers were reviewed from 1900 to present in English. RESULTS: Recent advances in understanding the pathophysiology of photophobia in dry eye and migraine and their connection to intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cells (ipRGC) have revealed complex and multifaceted trigeminovascular and trigeminoautonomic pathways underlying photophobia. Patients who suffer a TBI often have co-morbidities like dry eye and migraine that may influence the patient’s photophobia. CONCLUSION: Post-traumatic photophobia is a complex multi-disciplinary complaint that can severely impact a patient’s quality of life. Exploration of underlying etiology may allow for improved treatment and symptomatic relief for these patients beyond tinted lenses alone.

Visual photosensitivity threshold and objective photosensitivity luminance in healthy human eyes assessed using an automated ocular photosensitivity analyser: a step towards translation of a clinical tool for assessing photophobia

PURPOSE

To evaluate the visual photosensitivity threshold and objective photosensitivity luminance in healthy eyes, thereby providing a normative dataset that will lead to a better understanding of diseases causing photophobia.

METHODS

This was a prospective cross-sectional study. Emmetropes whose visual acuity was better than 0.18 logMAR (6/9) with no other ocular abnormality were included. Headache Impact Test-6 and visual light sensitivity questionnaires were administered. Visual photosensitivity threshold was measured subjectively using the ocular photosensitivity analyser. Objective photosensitivity luminance was assessed manually by evaluating videos recorded using an infrared camera and noting the intensity of light at the first squeezing reflex.

RESULTS

Seventy five normal subjects (age range, 7-71 years) were included. Median age was 32.7 years (inter-quartile range, 20.3-47.9 years). Forty (53.3%) were males. Median Headache Impact Test score was 38 (inter-quartile range, 36-42) and visual light sensitivity questionnaire score was 11 (inter-quartile range, 8-15). Mean (standard deviation) right eye, left eye and binocular visual photosensitivity threshold was 3.34 (0.78), 3.33 (0.81) and 3.37 (0.78) loglux, respectively. There was a significant negative correlation of visual light sensitivity questionnaire scores with right eye, left eye and binocular visual photosensitivity thresholds, and positive correlation of age with binocular visual photosensitivity thresholds. Mean (standard deviation) right eye, left eye and binocular objective photosensitivity luminance was 3.25 (0.55), 3.35 (0.47) and 3.15 (0.52) loglux, respectively. Age was only positively correlated with binocular objective photosensitivity luminance, and there was no correlation between age and right eye or left eye objective photosensitivity luminance.

CONCLUSIONS

The study characterised, for the first time, objective photosensitivity luminance and established normative data for both visual photosensitivity threshold and objective photosensitivity luminance. The data will help in understanding the pathophysiology of diseases causing photophobia, monitoring the disease progression and evaluating treatment modalities.

Photoaversion in inherited retinal diseases: clinical phenotypes, biological basis, and qualitative and quantitative assessment

Severe light sensitivity is a feature common to a range of ophthalmological and neurological diseases. In inherited retinal diseases (IRDs) particularly, this may be accompanied by significant visual disruption. These symptoms are extremely debilitating for affected individuals and have significant implications in terms of day-to-day activities. Underlying mechanisms remain to be fully elucidated. Currently, there are many assessments of photoaversion (PA), however, all have limitations, with quantitative measurement in particular needing further evaluation. To understand the complexities associated with photoaversion from different pathologies, qualitative and quantitative assessments of the light aversion response must be standardized. There is no treatment to date, and strategies to alleviate symptoms focus on light avoidance. With respect to IRDs, however, gene therapy is currently being investigated in clinical trials and promising and further treatments may be on the horizon. The better characterization of these symptoms is an important end point measure in IRD gene therapy trials.

Photophobia Associated with Traumatic Brain Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

SIGNIFICANCE

This study reports the prevalence and relative risk of photophobia in patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI).

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the prevalence and relative risk of photophobia in patients with TBI.

DATA SOURCES

Three databases were used for literature search: PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library.

STUDY APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS METHODS

Publications reporting the prevalence of photophobia after TBI in patients of any age were included. A series of meta-regression analyses based on a generalized linear mixed model was performed to identify potential sources of heterogeneity in the prevalence estimates.

RESULTS

Seventy-five eligible publications were identified. The prevalence of photophobia was 30.46% (95% confidence interval [CI], 20.05 to 40.88%) at 1 week after the injury. Prevalence decreased to 19.34% (95% CI, 10.40 to 28.27%) between 1 week and 1 month after TBI and to 13.51% (95% CI, 5.77 to 21.24%) between 1 and 3 months after the injury. The rapid decrease in the prevalence of photophobia in the first 3 months after a TBI injury was significant (P < .001). Three months post-TBI, the prevalence of photophobia leveled off to a near plateau with nonsignificant variability, increasing between 3 and 6 months (17.68%; 95% CI, 9.05 to 26.32%) and decreasing between 6 and 12 months since TBI (14.85%; 95% CI, 6.80 to 22.90%). Subgroup analysis of 14 publications that contained control data showed that the estimated risk ratio for photophobia was significantly higher in the TBI than in the control group during the entire 12 months after TBI.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS OF KEY FINDINGS

This study demonstrates that photophobia is a frequent complaint after TBI, which largely resolves for many individuals within 3 months after the injury. For some patients, however, photophobia can last up to 12 months and possibly longer. Developing an objective quantitative methodology for measuring photophobia, validating a dedicated photophobia questionnaire, and having a specific photophobia International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision code would greatly improve data gathering and analysis.