FISHing for pancreatobiliary tract malignancy in endoscopic brushings enhances the sensitivity of routine cytology

Performance of fluorescence in situ hybridization in biliary brushings with equivocal cytology: an institutional experience

INTRODUCTION

Biliary brushing (BB) cytology has a sensitivity of 15%-65% and specificity approaching 100% for detecting malignancy. Fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH) using the UroVysion probe set has been advocated to enhance the detection of malignancies with reported sensitivity of 43%-84%. We sought to evaluate the performance of FISH in BB with equivocal cytology at our institution.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with atypical and suspicious BB with concurrent diagnostic FISH performed at our institution from 2014 to 2021 were identified through a query of our pathology database. FISH (using UroVysion probe set containing centromere enumeration probes to chromosomes 3, 7, and 17) was positive if at least 5 cells demonstrated polysomy. Electronic medical records were reviewed for pathology results and outcomes. Patients were classified malignant if they had positive pathology or documented clinical impression of malignancy and benign if they had negative pathology and/or documented benign clinical course for at least 12 months.

RESULTS

We identified 254 equivocal BB (238 atypical/16 suspicious) with concurrent FISH results from 191 patients (105 benign, 86 malignant). 12% (22/191) of patients were FISH positive. Twenty-four percent (21/86) of patients with malignancy had positive FISH but were nonspecific for pancreaticobiliary/ampullary adenocarcinomas. Almost all positive FISH were associated with malignancy (21/22; 95%). There was 1 positive FISH in a patient with primary sclerosing cholangitis who had a benign outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

The small number of positive FISH results in BB with equivocal cytology raises the question of the optimal criteria for malignancy. Using only polysomy could result in lower sensitivity.

Refined pancreatobiliary UroVysion criteria and an approach for further optimization

Pancreatobiliary strictures are a common source of false negatives for malignancy detection. UroVysion is more sensitive than any other method but remains underutilized because of conflicting sensitivities and specificities due to a lack of standardized cutoff criteria and confusion in interpreting results in the context of primary sclerosing cholangitis. We set out to determine the sensitivities and specificities of UroVysion, brushing cytology, forceps biopsies, and fine needle aspiration (FNAs) for pancreatobiliary stricture malignancy detection. A retrospective review was performed of all biopsied pancreatobiliary strictures at our institution over 5 years. UroVysion was unquestionably the most sensitive method and all methods were highly specific. Sensitivity was highest while maintaining specificity when a malignant interpretation was limited to cases with 5+ cells with the same polysomic signal pattern and/or loss of one or both 9p21 signals. Only UroVysion detected the metastases and a neuroendocrine tumor. In reviewing and analyzing the signal patterns, we noticed trends according to location and diagnosis. Herein we describe our method for analyzing signal patterns and propose cutoff criteria based upon observations gleaned from such analysis.

An assessment of chromosomal alterations detected by fluorescence in situ hybridisation in pancreatobiliary tract malignancy

Background

Using fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) to detect any gain of chromosomes 3, 7, or 17 and loss of the 9p21 locus has been proven to be sensitive in the diagnosis of pancreatobiliary tumors. However, both genetic and environmental factors contribute to the pathogenesis of pancreatobiliary tumors. Therefore, it is unknown whether this method is suitable for Chinese patients with pancreatobiliary tumors. This study aims to compare the sensitivity, specificity, predictive values and accuracy of cytology, ERCP/MRCP and FISH based on Chinese patients with pancreatobiliary tumors,and to analyze differences between brushing-based and formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE)-based FISH.

Methods

A total of 66 brush cytology specimens obtained during ERCP were detected by FISH and cytology test respectively to compare the sensitivity, specificity, predictive values and accuracy. Besides, FFPE-based FISH was performed on 46 corresponding paraffin sections of pancreatobiliary tumors obtained by surgical resection.

Results

Our findings demonstrate that FISH greatly improves diagnostic sensitivity and negative predictive value compared to ERCP/MRCP and cytology without much reduction in specificity and positive predictive value. However, our results also indicate that FFPE-based FISH could not effectively identify the false-negative of brushing-based FISH.

Conclusions

We believe that FISH can effectively distinguish true positive and false positive results of cytological or radiological suspicions of malignancy. However, FFPE-based FISH still does not precisely recognize the false-negative of brushing-based FISH. Both cytology-based and PPFE-based FISH had limitation in some specimens.

Role of Ancillary Techniques in Biliary Cytopathology Specimens

Biliary brushing cytology has become the standard of practice for the investigation of strictures of the biliary and pancreatic duct systems. The methodology however has a limitation in that it has low diagnostic sensitivity when only cytologic evaluation is used. A number of testing methodologies have been applied to brushing specimens in an attempt to improve overall sensitivity without loss of specificity. These have included DNA ploidy analysis, immunocytochemistry, individual gene mutational analysis, fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH), and next generation sequencing (NGS). Currently, FISH coupled with routine cytology appears to be the method of choice for improving diagnostic sensitivity. NGS shows significant promise for improvement of diagnostic sensitivity.

UroVysion Multi-Target Fluorescence in situ Hybridization Assay for the Detection of Malignant Bile Duct Brushing Specimens: A Comparison with Routine Cytology

OBJECTIVE

Routine bile duct brushing cytology is an important diagnostic tool in the evaluation of bile duct stricture. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the performance of the UroVysion fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) assay for the detection of malignant bile duct brushing specimens.

STUDY DESIGN

Thirty-five bile duct brushing specimens were included in the study. The FISH assay utilized the commercially available UroVysion probes. The indeterminate cytology results were considered as negative for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

Twenty-two of 35 patients were diagnosed as having malignancy based on tissue diagnosis or clinical progression of disease by image assessment. The sensitivity of routine cytology and FISH for the detection of malignancy was 14% (3/22) and 55% (12/22), respectively (p = 0.003). The specificity of routine cytology and FISH was 100% (13/13) and 62% (8/13), respectively (p = 0.025). The false-positive rate for routine cytology and FISH was 0% (0/13) and 38% (5/13), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study shows that FISH is significantly more sensitive than routine cytology for the detection of malignancy in bile duct brushing specimens. However, in our study, the specificity of FISH was poor compared to the excellent specificity of routine cytology. The compromised specificity of FISH may limit its utility in the detection of malignant bile duct brushing specimens.

Modern work-up and extended resection in perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: the AMC experience

AIM

Perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (PHC) is a challenging disease and requires aggressive surgical treatment in order to achieve curation. The assessment and work-up of patients with presumed PHC is multidisciplinary, complex and requires extensive experience. The aim of this paper is to review current aspects of diagnosis, preoperative work-up and extended resection in patients with PHC from the perspective of our own institutional experience with this complex tumor.

METHODS

We provided a review of applied modalities in the diagnosis and work-up of PHC according to current literature. All patients with presumed PHC in our center between 2000 and 2016 were identified and described. The types of resection, surgical techniques and outcomes were analyzed.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

Upcoming diagnostic modalities such as Spyglass and combinations of serum biomarkers and molecular markers have potential to decrease the rate of misdiagnosis of benign, inflammatory disease. Assessment of liver function with hepatobiliary scintigraphy provides better information on the future remnant liver (FRL) than volume alone. The selective use of staging laparoscopy is advisable to avoid futile laparotomies. In patients requiring extended resection, selective preoperative biliary drainage is mandatory in cholangitis and when FRL is small (< 50%). Preoperative portal vein embolization (PVE) is used when FRL volume is less than 40% and optionally includes the left portal vein branches to segment 4. Associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) as alternative to PVE is not recommended in PHC. N2 positive lymph nodes preclude long-term survival. The benefit of unconditional en bloc resection of the portal vein bifurcation is uncertain. Along these lines, an aggressive surgical approach encompassing extended liver resection including segment 1, regional lymphadenectomy and conditional portal venous resection translates into favorable long-term survival.

Isolated IgG4-related sclerosing cholangitis misdiagnosed as malignancy in an area with endemic cholangiocarcinoma: a case report

Background

The most common cause of perihilar obstruction is cholangiocarcinoma, especially in Thailand. Benign perihilar stricture represents less than 20% of cases. IgG4-related disease and IgG4-related sclerosing cholangitis, however, have been receiving increased recognition. Isolated IgG4-related sclerosing cholangitis is less common. The preoperative diagnosis of IgG4-related sclerosing cholangitis without pancreatic involvement is very difficult because the clinical presentation and preoperative evaluation are extremely difficult to distinguish from perihilar cholangiocarcinoma.

Case presentation

We report the case of a 56-year-old man who presented with obstructive jaundice with preoperative imaging showing proximal common bile duct obstruction. He underwent right lobe liver hepatectomy with extrahepatic bile duct resection and regional lymph node dissection due to high suspicion of malignancy. The pathological report showed severe acute and chronic inflammation of the bile duct with morphology and immunohistochemistry suggestive of IgG4-related sclerosing cholangitis.

Conclusions

IgG4-related sclerosing cholangitis with perihilar obstruction should be considered even in areas where cholangiocarcinoma is endemic.