1
|
Centeno BA, Saieg M, Siddiqui MT, Perez-Machado M, Layfield LJ, Weynand B, Reid MD, Stelow EB, Lozano MD, Fukushima N, Cree IA, Mehrotra R, Schmitt FC, Field AS, Pitman MB. The World Health Organization Reporting System for Pancreaticobiliary Cytopathology: Overview and Summary. Cancer Cytopathol 2024; 132:396-418. [PMID: 38709670 DOI: 10.1002/cncy.22806] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2023] [Revised: 01/12/2024] [Accepted: 01/17/2024] [Indexed: 05/08/2024]
Abstract
The recently published WHO Reporting System for Pancreaticobiliary Cytopathology (World Health Organization [WHO] System) is an international approach to the standardized reporting of pancreaticobiliary cytopathology, updating the Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology System for Reporting Pancreaticobiliary Cytology (PSC System). Significant changes were made to the categorization of benign neoplasms, intraductal neoplasms, mucinous cystic neoplasms, and malignant neoplasms considered low grade. Benign neoplasms, such as serous cystadenoma, categorized as Neoplastic: benign in the PSC system, are categorized as Benign/negative for malignancy in the WHO system. Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor, solid-pseudopapillary neoplasm, and gastrointestinal stromal tumor, categorized as Neoplastic: other in the PSC system, are categorized as Malignant in the WHO System in accord with their classification in the 5th edition WHO Classification of Digestive System Tumours (2019). The two new categories of Pancreaticobiliary Neoplasm Low-risk/grade and Pancreaticobiliary Neoplasm High-risk/grade are mostly limited to intraductal neoplasms and mucinous cystic neoplasms. Low-risk/grade lesions are mucinous cysts, with or without low-grade epithelial atypia. High-risk/grade lesions contain neoplastic epithelium with high-grade epithelial atypia. Correlation with clinical, imaging, and ancillary studies remains a key tenet. The sections for each entity are written to highlight key cytopathological features and cytopathological differential diagnoses with the pathologist working in low resource setting in mind. Each section also includes the most pertinent ancillary studies useful for the differential diagnosis. Sample reports are provided for each category. Finally, the book provides a separate section with risk of malignancy and management recommendations for each category to facilitate decision-making for clinicians.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Mauro Saieg
- Santa Casa Medical School, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | - Momin T Siddiqui
- Department of Pathology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| | - Miguel Perez-Machado
- Department of Cellular Pathology, Royal Free Hampstead NHS Trust, London, England
| | - Lester J Layfield
- Department of Pathology and Anatomical Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, USA
| | - Birgit Weynand
- Department of Pathology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Michelle D Reid
- Department of Pathology, Emory University Hospital, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Edward B Stelow
- Department of Pathology, University of Virginia Hospital, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
| | - Maria D Lozano
- Department of Pathology, Clinica University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Noriyoshi Fukushima
- Department of Diagnostic Pathology, Jichi Medical University Hospital, Shimotsuke, Japan
| | - Ian A Cree
- International Agency for Research on Cancer [IARC], World Health Organization, Lyon, France
| | - Ravi Mehrotra
- Indian Cancer Genomic Atlas, Centre for Health, Innovation and Policy Foundation, Noida, Uttar Pradesh, India
| | - Fernando C Schmitt
- Faculty of Medicine, Department of Pathology, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
- CINTESIS@RISE, Porto University, Porto, Portugal
| | - Andrew S Field
- Department of Anatomical Pathology, St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- University of New South Wales Sydney and University of Notre Dame, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Martha B Pitman
- Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Pitman MB, Centeno BA, Reid MD, Saeig M, Siddiqui MT, Layfield LJ, Perez-Machado M, Weynand B, Stelow EB, Lozano MD, Fukushima N, Cree IA, Mehrotra R, Schmitt FC, Field AS. A brief review of the WHO reporting system for pancreaticobiliary cytopathology. J Am Soc Cytopathol 2023; 12:243-250. [PMID: 37003924 DOI: 10.1016/j.jasc.2023.03.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2023] [Revised: 03/01/2023] [Accepted: 03/03/2023] [Indexed: 03/09/2023]
Abstract
The World Health Organization (WHO), the International Academy of Cytology, and the International Agency for Research on Cancer have developed an approach to standardized reporting of pancreaticobiliary cytopathology. The WHO Reporting System for Pancreaticobiliary Cytopathology (WHO System) revises the Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology (PSC) System for Reporting Pancreaticobiliary Cytology published in 2015 and replaces the 6 PSC categories with 7 categories: "Insufficient/Inadequate/Nondiagnostic"; "Benign/Negative for malignancy"; "Atypical"; "Pancreaticobiliary neoplasm, low risk/grade (PaN-low)"; "Pancreatic neoplasm, high risk/grade (PaN-High)"; "Suspicious for malignancy"; and "Malignant". In the PSC system, there is a single category for "Neoplastic" lesions that includes 2 groups, 1 for benign neoplasms and 1 named "Neoplastic-other", dominated by premalignant intraductal neoplasms primarily intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms and low-grade malignant neoplasms (pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PanNET) and solid pseudopapillary neoplasms (SPN). In the WHO System, benign neoplasms with virtually no risk of malignancy are included in the "Benign" category and low-grade malignancies (PanNET and SPN) are included in the "Malignant" category, as per the 5th edition of the WHO Classification of Digestive System Tumors, while the non-invasive pre-malignant lesions of the ducts are divided by the cytomorphological grade of the epithelium into PaN-low and PaN-high with distinctly different risks of malignancy. Within each category, key diagnostic cytopathologic features and the ancillary studies for diagnostic and prognostic evaluation, as well as the implications of diagnosis for patient care and management, are outlined. Reporting and diagnostic management options recognize the variations in the availability of diagnostic and prognostic ancillary testing modalities in low- and middle-income countries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martha B Pitman
- Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
| | | | - Michelle D Reid
- Department of Pathology, Emory University Hospital, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Mauro Saeig
- Santa Casa Medical School, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | - Momin T Siddiqui
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York
| | - Lester J Layfield
- Pathology and Anatomic Science Department, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri
| | - Miguel Perez-Machado
- Department of Cellular Pathology, Royal Free Hampstead NHS Trust, London, England
| | - Birgit Weynand
- Department of Pathology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Edward B Stelow
- Department of Pathology, University of Virginia Hospital, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Maria D Lozano
- Department of Pathology, Clinical University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Noriyoshi Fukushima
- Department of Diagnostic Pathology, Jichi Medical University Hospital, Shimotsuke, Japan
| | - Ian A Cree
- International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), World Health Organization, Lyon, France
| | - Ravi Mehrotra
- Indian Cancer Genomic Atlas, Centre for Health, Innovation and Policy Foundation, Noida, India
| | - Fernando C Schmitt
- Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine of University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | - Andrew S Field
- Department of Anatomical Pathology, St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, and University of New South Wales Sydney and University of Notre Dame, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Saieg M, Pitman MB. Experience and future perspectives on the use of the Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology Terminology System for reporting pancreaticobiliary cytology. Diagn Cytopathol 2020; 48:494-498. [PMID: 32031332 DOI: 10.1002/dc.24393] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2019] [Revised: 01/22/2020] [Accepted: 01/27/2020] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
The Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology developed a set of guidelines for reporting pancreaticobiliary cytology in 2014 (PB System), with a six-tiered system: Nondiagnostic, Negative, Atypical, Neoplastic (Benign or Other), Suspicious, and Positive. This proposed scheme incorporates ancillary testing such as biochemical testing of cyst fluids for diagnosis and provides terminology that standardizes the category of the various diseases of the pancreas, some of which are difficult to diagnose specifically by cytology alone. Since its initial publication five and half years ago, several groups have published their experiences on the use of the PB System and have shown that most objectives proposed by the original publication have been achieved. They have shown that there is a better understanding and definition of the diagnostic categories with an associated distribution and risk of malignancy. The diagnostic categories of Neoplastic: Other, Suspicious, and Malignant show a high sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of malignancy. The System also provides a multi-specialist view of pancreatic lesions, with biochemical and radiological findings being incorporated into the final pathological report. The present review summarizes these findings and discusses the future perspectives and foreseen changes that are to be incorporated to a second edition of the reporting System.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mauro Saieg
- Department of Pathology, Santa Casa Medical School, São Paulo, Brazil.,Department of Pathology, A C Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Martha B Pitman
- Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Saieg M. Implementing the Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology terminology system for reporting pancreaticobiliary cytology refines risk of malignancy in pancreatic specimens. J Am Soc Cytopathol 2019; 8:117-119. [PMID: 31097286 DOI: 10.1016/j.jasc.2019.01.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2019] [Revised: 01/23/2019] [Accepted: 01/23/2019] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Mauro Saieg
- Department of Pathology, Santa Casa Medical School, São Paulo, Brazil; Department of Pathology, A. C. Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, Brazil.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
López-Ramírez AN, Villegas-González LF, Serrano-Arévalo ML, Flores-Hernández L, Lino-Silva LS, González-Mena LE. Reclassification of lesions in biopsies by fine-needle aspiration of pancreas and biliary tree using Papanicolaou classification. J Gastrointest Oncol 2018; 9:847-852. [PMID: 30505584 PMCID: PMC6219961 DOI: 10.21037/jgo.2018.06.06] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2018] [Accepted: 05/30/2018] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Our aim was to evaluate the application of the classification of the Papanicolaou Cytopathology Society for the report of biopsies by fine-needle aspiration (FNA) of pancreas and bile duct. METHODS The FNAs obtained consecutively during 1 year were analyzed. Descriptive statistics were performed and sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and cytohistological correlation were determined. The reference standard test was the histopathological study. RESULTS A total of 134 cases of FNA were reclassified with ultrasound guidance according to the classification of the Papanicolaou Society, the median age was 59 years (range, 25-80 years). A case interpreted as non-diagnostic was reclassified to category 4 and 3 cases with atypical cells were reclassified to category 5. All malignant cases remained unchanged. Surgical follow-up was performed in 35 patients (26.1%), with a cytohistological concordance in 21 cases (91.3%) and 2 discordant cases (8.7%), the reasons for the discrepancy were due to sampling error, one of them with scarce material to make a diagnosis of higher category, the other case with partial agreement, because cytology was observed atypical cylindrical epithelium, with histology of grade 2 neuroendocrine neoplasia and low grade mucinous intraepithelial neoplasia. In general, the sensitivity and specificity were 100% and 75% respectively, the positive predictive value 88% and the negative predictive value 100%. CONCLUSIONS The FNA guided with endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) and interpreted according to the Papanicolaou Cytopathology Society Classification is an accurate method to evaluate pancreatic and biliary tract lesions with a high positive predictive value of 88%.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Leonardo S Lino-Silva
- Department of Surgical Pathology, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, México City, México
| | - Ludwig E González-Mena
- Department of Cytopathology, Hospital General de Mexico "Gerardo Liceaga", Mexico City, Mexico
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Abstract
The diagnostic approach to pancreaticobiliary disease requires a multidisciplinary team in which the cytopathologist plays a crucial role. Fine-needle aspiration, obtained by endoscopic ultrasound, is the diagnostic test of choice for pancreatic lesions. Preoperative clinical management depends on many factors, many of which rely on accurate cytologic assessment. Pancreaticobiliary cytology is wrought with diagnostic pitfalls. Clinical history, imaging studies, cytology samples, and ancillary tests, including immunohistochemistry, biochemical analysis, and genetic sequencing, are integral to forming a complete diagnosis and guiding optimal patient management. This article reviews clinical aspects and the diagnostic work-up of commonly encountered diagnostic entities within the field of pancreatic cytology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raza S Hoda
- Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA 02114, USA
| | - Martha B Pitman
- Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA 02114, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Wright PK, Shelton DA, Holbrook MR, Thiryayi SA, Narine N, Slater D, Rana DN. Outcomes of endoscopic ultrasound-guided pancreatic FNAC diagnosis for solid and cystic lesions at Manchester Royal Infirmary based upon the Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology pancreaticobiliary terminology classification scheme. Cytopathology 2017; 29:71-79. [DOI: 10.1111/cyt.12502] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/03/2017] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- P. K. Wright
- Manchester Cytology Centre; Manchester Royal Infirmary; Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust; Manchester UK
| | - D. A. Shelton
- Manchester Cytology Centre; Manchester Royal Infirmary; Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust; Manchester UK
| | - M. R. Holbrook
- Manchester Cytology Centre; Manchester Royal Infirmary; Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust; Manchester UK
| | - S. A. Thiryayi
- Manchester Cytology Centre; Manchester Royal Infirmary; Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust; Manchester UK
| | - N. Narine
- Manchester Cytology Centre; Manchester Royal Infirmary; Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust; Manchester UK
| | - D. Slater
- Manchester Cytology Centre; Manchester Royal Infirmary; Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust; Manchester UK
| | - D. N. Rana
- Manchester Cytology Centre; Manchester Royal Infirmary; Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust; Manchester UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Maire F, Cibot JO, Compagne C, Hentic O, Hammel P, Muller N, Ponsot P, Levy P, Ruszniewski P. Epidemiology of pancreatic cancer in France: descriptive study from the French national hospital database. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2017; 29:904-908. [PMID: 28471829 DOI: 10.1097/meg.0000000000000901] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Although indirect evidence suggests that the incidence of pancreatic adenocarcinoma has increased in the last decade, few data are available in European countries. The aim of the present study was to update the epidemiology of pancreatic cancer in France in 2014 from the French national hospital database (Programme de Médicalisation des Systèmes d'Information). PATIENTS AND METHODS All patients hospitalized for pancreatic cancer in France in 2014 in public or private institutions were included. Patient and stays (length, type of support, institutions) characteristics were studied. The results were compared with those observed in 2010. RESULTS A total of 13 346 (52% men, median age 71 years) new patients were treated for pancreatic cancer in 2014, accounting for a 12.5% increase compared with 2010. Overall, 22% of patients were operated on. Liver metastases were present in 60% of cases. The disease accounted for 146 680 hospital stays (+24.8% compared with 2010), 76% of which were related to chemotherapy (+32%). The average annual number and length of stay were 7 and 2.6 days, respectively. In 2014, 11 052 deaths were reported (+15.8%). CONCLUSION Approximately 13 350 new cases of pancreatic cancer were observed in France in 2014. The increase in incidence was associated with a marked increase in hospital stays for chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Frédérique Maire
- aGastroenterology-Pancreatology unit, Beaujon Hospital, Clichy, Paris-Diderot University bCustomizer, Paris cSigma-tau, Issy les, Moulineaux, France
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Chandra A. Developments in non-gynaecological cytology reporting terminologies. Cytopathology 2016; 27:144-5. [PMID: 27221747 DOI: 10.1111/cyt.12348] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- A Chandra
- Department of Cellular Pathology, Guy's & St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
| |
Collapse
|