Immunocytochemistry for Claudin-18 and Maspin in biliary brushing cytology increases the accuracy of diagnosing pancreatobiliary malignancies

Bile cytology diagnosis in challenging cases: Validation of diagnostic bile cytology criteria and extensive study for immunocytochemical markers

BACKGROUND

Bile cytology is useful in diagnosing biliary tract lesions, albeit often challenging due to equivocal findings. To achieve better diagnoses for clinical decisions, we conducted cytomorphological and immunocytochemical studies of bile cytology cases.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We re-evaluated 40 bile cytology cases with initial equivocal diagnoses, taken from the cytology records of Jichi Medical University Hospital, including 1778 bile cytology specimens. First, we assessed the cases by the diagnostic bile cytology criteria of the Japanese Society of Clinical Cytology. Second, we searched for useful immunocytochemical markers by extensive immunohistochemical analyses using tissue microarray for 10 antibodies: S100P, IMP3, GLUT1, p53, S100A4, Mapsin, MUC17, CD10, MDM2, and SMAD4. Microarrays were from 257 extrahepatic bile duct carcinoma cases. To elucidate the utility of immunocytochemistry, we applied selected markers to immunocytochemical evaluation of the equivocal cases after cell transfer.

RESULTS

The criteria indicated a sensitivity 60%, specificity 87%, and accuracy 70%. Irregularly overlapping (88%), arranged (96%), and shaped (76%) nuclei were more common in malignant cases, while enlarged nuclei were more frequent in benign cases (67% vs. 28%). We applied S100P and IMP3, which showed higher accuracy (88% and 77%) in tissue microarray, to immunocytochemistry. The sensitivity of S100P and IMP3 were 69% and 70%, respectively. The specificity of S100P and IMP3 were 50% and 100%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The criteria showed a certain effectiveness even in challenging cases, and some pitfalls associated with reactive changes of benign cells. Although comprehensive diagnosis including cytomorphology seems preferable, S100P and IMP3 are promising immunocytochemical markers.

Claudin-18.2 as a therapeutic target in cancers: cumulative findings from basic research and clinical trials

Claudins are major components of tight junctions that maintain cell polarity and intercellular adhesion. The dynamics of claudins in cancer cells have attracted attention as a therapeutic target. During carcinogenesis, claudin expression is generally downregulated; however, overexpression of claudin-18.2 has been observed in several types of cancers. Upregulated and mislocalized claudin-18.2 expression in cancer cells has been suggested as a therapeutic target. Research on claudin-18.2 has revealed its involvement in carcinogenesis. Clinical trials using zolbetuximab, a monoclonal antibody targeting claudin-18.2, for patients with advanced cancer yielded positive results with few high-grade adverse events; thus, it is expected to be a novel and effective therapeutic. Here, we review current insights into the role that claudin-18.2 plays in basic cancer research and clinical applications. A better understanding of these roles will facilitate the development of new treatment strategies for cancer patients with poor prognoses.

Claudin-18 Immunohistochemical Staining Facilitates the Identification of Metastatic Carcinoma of Gastric or Pancreatic Origin in Effusion Specimens

Determining the primary origin of a malignant effusion remains a common challenge for cytopathologists. Although immunohistochemical (IHC) markers are available for most primary sites, ideal IHC markers for metastatic gastric adenocarcinoma and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma are lacking, and related interpretation is often hindered by mesothelial cells. We recently revealed that claudin-18 IHC staining is useful for identifying the stomach and pancreas as the primary sites of metastatic adenocarcinoma. Thus, we assessed the use of claudin-18 IHC staining in 111 cell blocks obtained from various metastatic cancers and specimens negative for malignancy. Positive membranous claudin-18 staining was noted in all 10 (100%) metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas, 9 (90%) of 10 gastric adenocarcinomas, and 1 (9%) of 11 nonmucinous lung adenocarcinomas. The cases of metastatic mucinous carcinomas of lung origin (1 case) and ovarian origin (1 case) were also positive for claudin-18. The other remaining 89 cases showed variable cytoplasmic staining on some cells (73 cases) or complete absence of staining (16 cases). After normalization to the tumor frequency, the sensitivity and specificity for identifying the stomach or pancreas as primary tumor sites in ascites were 95% (confidence interval: 0.83-0.99) and 99% (confidence interval: 0.94-1), respectively. In conclusion, membranous claudin-18 staining is a useful marker for metastatic gastric adenocarcinoma and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma in effusion specimens.

Application of enhancer of zeste homolog 2 immunocytochemistry to bile cytology

BACKGROUND

Bile cytology has low diagnostic sensitivity and requires ancillary techniques. This study assessed the utility of enhancer of zeste homolog 2 (EZH2) immunocytochemistry (ICC) in bile cytology.

METHODS

A total of 141 bile cytology specimens from 141 patients were evaluated retrospectively. Papanicolaou-stained slides were immunostained with an antibody to EZH2. After calculation of the EZH2 labeling index (LI), the cutoff value was determined via receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. Cytological performance with and without EZH2 ICC was evaluated with reference to the final diagnosis.

RESULTS

The area under the curve for the EZH2 LI was 0.955, and the cutoff value for identifying benign bile samples versus malignant ones was 24.0%. The sensitivity and specificity values for malignancy were 53.4% and 100% for routine cytology only, 89.0% and 95.7% for EZH2 ICC only, and 89.8% and 95.7% for a combination of routine cytology and EZH2 ICC. The sensitivities of EZH2 ICC only and a combination of routine cytology and EZH2 ICC were significantly improved in comparison with routine cytology only (P < .001). EZH2 ICC alone had a sensitivity of 68.0% and a specificity of 85.7% in bile samples with atypical cytology, a sensitivity of 87.0% in samples that were suspicious for malignancy, and a sensitivity of 85.7% and a specificity of 100% in samples that were negative for malignancy.

CONCLUSIONS

EZH2 ICC improved the diagnostic sensitivity for pancreatobiliary adenocarcinoma in bile cytology. This method is particularly meaningful in samples of indeterminate cytology and may be useful as an initial assessment to ensure that no cancer cells are missed.

Claudin-18 as a Marker for Identifying the Stomach and Pancreatobiliary Tract as the Primary Sites of Metastatic Adenocarcinoma

Identification of the primary site of cancer is essential for the treatment of patients with cancer. Numerous immunohistochemical markers have been developed to determine the differentiation of tumor cells and suggest possible primary sites, but markers of gastric and pancreatic adenocarcinomas are still lacking. Claudin-18 is a tight-junction protein uniquely expressed in gastric epithelial cells and has been shown to be expressed in gastric and pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Whether claudin-18 can be used as a marker for identifying the primary site of cancer is still unclear. In this study, we used the immunohistochemical method to stain claudin-18 in tissue arrays containing 575 carcinomas from different anatomic sites and representative sections of 157 metastatic adenocarcinomas. In the group of primary tumors, claudin-18 was frequently expressed in gastric, pancreatic, and pulmonary mucinous adenocarcinomas. Half of cholangiocarcinomas and ovarian mucinous carcinomas and some colorectal and pulmonary adenocarcinomas were also positive for claudin-18. In the metastatic cohort, 15 of 17 (88%) gastric adenocarcinomas, 18 of 23 (78%) pancreatic adenocarcinomas, and 4 of 7 (57%) cholangiocarcinomas and gallbladder adenocarcinomas were positive for claudin-18. Only 4 tumors that originated outside the stomach and pancreatobiliary tract were positive for claudin-18. After normalization to the tumor frequency, the sensitivity of claudin-18 for identifying the stomach and pancreatobiliary tract as primary tumor sites was 79%, and the specificity was 93%. The positive and negative predictive values were 76% and 94%, respectively. In conclusion, claudin-18 represents a sensitive and specific marker for stomach and pancreatobiliary adenocarcinoma that may be a useful diagnostic tool in routine surgical pathology.

Effect of single operator cholangioscopy on accuracy of bile duct cytology

INTRODUCTION

This is the first study to evaluate the accuracy of bile duct brushings since the introduction of single operator cholangioscopy SpyGlass DS system in 2015. The primary aim of our study was to compare the accuracy of cytology brushings against biopsies obtained at endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and cholangioscopy.

METHOD

A retrospective search for bile duct brushing specimens was performed and the charts reviewed. The gold standard for definitive diagnosis of malignancy was surgical tissue or compelling clinical evidence of malignancy. Definite negative diagnosis relied on lack of clinical/imaging features of malignancy on follow-up.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in diagnostic accuracy of cytology specimens obtained at different procedures. Overall sensitivity for all methods was 59%, specificity 90% and accuracy of 82%. Notably, all four false-positive cases except for one were from patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis or primary biliary sclerosis. There was no significant difference in sensitivity or specificity between biopsies procured by the two methods. The combined biopsy sensitivity for all modalities was 44% with a specificity of 100%. There was 70% concordance between cytology and biopsy cases. The overall specificity and sensitivity of the combined cytology and biopsy result was 85% and 65.3%, respectively. Ranking of factors that predict clinical diagnosis shows cytology results to surpass other parameters including pancreatic mass, age and stenosis length. Similarly, the presence of two cell populations and three-dimensional clusters was not nearly as predictive of malignancy as single malignant cells.

CONCLUSION

Biliary brush cytology specimens performed better than biopsies irrespective of whether they are procured during ERCP or cholangioscopy. The combination of cytology and biopsy had the best accuracy than either one alone.

Role of Ancillary Techniques in Biliary Cytopathology Specimens

Biliary brushing cytology has become the standard of practice for the investigation of strictures of the biliary and pancreatic duct systems. The methodology however has a limitation in that it has low diagnostic sensitivity when only cytologic evaluation is used. A number of testing methodologies have been applied to brushing specimens in an attempt to improve overall sensitivity without loss of specificity. These have included DNA ploidy analysis, immunocytochemistry, individual gene mutational analysis, fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH), and next generation sequencing (NGS). Currently, FISH coupled with routine cytology appears to be the method of choice for improving diagnostic sensitivity. NGS shows significant promise for improvement of diagnostic sensitivity.

Subcellular expression of maspin – from normal tissue to tumor cells

Maspin or SerpinB5, a member of the serine protease inhibitor family, was shown to function as a tumor suppressor, especially in carcinomas. It seems to inhibit invasion, tumor cells motility and angiogenesis, and promotes apoptosis. Maspin can also induce epigenetic changes such as cytosine methylation, de-acetylation, chromatin condensation, and histone modulation. In this review, a comprehensive synthesis of the literature was done to present maspin function from normal tissues to pathologic conditions. Data was sourced from MEDLINE and PubMed. Study eligibility criteria included: Published in English, between 1994 and 2019, specific to humans, and with full-text availability. Most of the 118 studies included in the present review focused on maspin immunostaining and mRNA levels. It was shown that maspin function is organ-related and depends on its subcellular localization. In malignant tumors, it might be downregulated or negative (e.g., carcinoma of prostate, stomach, and breast) or upregulated (e.g., colorectal and pancreatic tumors). Its subcellular localization (nuclear vs cytoplasm), which can be proved using immunohistochemical methods, was shown to influence both tumor behavior and response to chemotherapy. Although the number of maspin-related papers increased, the exact role of this protein remains unknown, and its interpretation should be done with extremely high caution.

Practical Immunohistochemistry in Neoplastic Pathology of the Gastrointestinal Tract, Liver, Biliary Tract, and Pancreas

CONTEXT

- Immunomarkers with diagnostic, therapeutic, or prognostic values have been increasingly used to maximize the benefits of clinical management of patients with neoplastic diseases of the gastrointestinal tract, liver, biliary tract, and pancreas.

OBJECTIVES

- To review the characteristics of immunomarkers that are commonly used in surgical pathology practice for neoplasms of the gastrointestinal tract, liver, biliary tract, and pancreas, and to summarize the clinical usefulness of immunomarkers that have been discovered in recent years in these fields.

DATA SOURCES

- Data sources include literature review, authors' research data, and personal practice experience.

CONCLUSIONS

- Immunohistochemistry is an indispensable tool for the accurate diagnosis of neoplastic diseases of the gastrointestinal tract, liver, biliary tract, and pancreas. Useful immunomarkers are available to help distinguish malignant neoplasms from benign conditions, determine organ origins, and subclassify neoplasms that are morphologically and biologically heterogeneous. Specific immunomarkers are also available to help guide patient treatment and assess disease aggressiveness, which are keys to the success of personalized medicine. Pathologists will continue to play a critical role in the discovery, validation, and application of new biomarkers, which will ultimately improve patient care.