Clinical and cytopathological factors affecting the cellularity of urinary cell blocks and the implication for diagnosis and follow-up of urinary bladder urothelial carcinoma

Utility and performance of cell blocks in cerebrospinal fluid cytology: Experience at two teaching hospitals

BACKGROUND

Cytology cell blocks (CBs) are not routinely made for cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) specimens. The goal of this study was to identify when CSF CB preparation improves diagnostic performance.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Under institutional review board approval, a retrospective review of CSF cytology cases was conducted at a tertiary university-based hospital and an affiliated county hospital. Patient history, CSF volume, final diagnosis, use of stains, and whether the CB was contributory was determined from the cytopathology report. CSF nucleated cell count data was obtained from the medical record.

RESULTS

A total of 69 CSF specimens with CBs from January 2006 to March 2023 were identified from 61 patients. The median CSF volume was 8 mL (interquartile range, 4-13 mL; range, 1-800 mL), with immunohistochemical stains performed on 29 (42%) cases. Per cytology report, CB was contributory in 23 cases (33%), not contributory in 34 cases (49%), and not discussed in 12 cases (17%). The median volume was 8 mL for cases in which CB was contributory, not contributory, or not discussed. There was no difference in average nucleated cell counts between cases in which CB was contributory versus not contributory (73.9 vs. 40.0, p = .175).

CONCLUSIONS

CBs for CSF samples were contributory in a subset (33%) of cases. The authors were unable to identify any specific pre-analytic factors, including specimen volume and average nucleated cell counts, for cases in which CB was contributory. Further evaluation is needed to identify if there are scenarios in which CSF CBs should be routinely prepared.

Correlation between PD-L1 expression of the tumour cells and lymphocytes infiltration in the invasive front of urothelial carcinoma

PURPOSE

Programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) as a cell surface glycoprotein can inhibit T cell function when binding to its receptor, PD-1. The newly developed therapy of targeting PD-1/PD-L1 signal pathway has shown great promise for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer as well as melanoma. Approved by Food and Drug Administration, atezolizumab has become the first new drug to treat advanced bladder cancer. The aim of this study is to evaluate whether PD-L1 is associated with the lymphocytes infiltration in the tumour microenvironment and to assess the prognostic value of PD-L1 expression.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Among 96 invasive bladder urothelial carcinomas, some were used to construct tissue-microarrays, and some cases with shallow infiltration or large heterogeneity were performed, respectively, for the following work. By means of immunohistochemistry and HE, PD-L1 expression and immune cell infiltration in the invasive front of urothelial carcinoma were analysed.

RESULTS

We find that PD-L1 expression in tumour cells and lymphocytes are significantly associated with more tumour infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) and more T cells. The integrated TILs, T-PD-L1 and I-PD-L1 are not significantly correlated with the overall survival (OS) of patients. However, the combination of T-PD-L1 and TILs, T-PD-L1 and I-PD-L1 is significantly correlated with the OS of patients. The T-PD-L1 (-)/TIL (-) group show the best prognosis and the T-PD-L1 (+)/I-PD-L1 (-) group show the worst prognosis. Furthermore, a multivariate analysis reveal that PD-L1 expression of lymphocytes is an independent prognostic factor for OS of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study reveal that PD-L1 of tumour cells are associated with the corresponding T cells infiltration and that the combination of T-PD-L1 and I-PD-L1, T-PD-L1 and TILs could be a relevant marker for the determination of the prognostic role of patients with the urothelial carcinoma.

Utility and performance of cell blocks in urine cytology: Experience at three teaching hospitals

BACKGROUND

The use of cell block (CB) preparation is underused in urine cytology (UC) and varies among hospitals. In addition to confirming a diagnosis, CBs can be useful in cases of metastatic disease, diagnoses requiring immunohistochemical (IHC) staining, and for ancillary studies. The role of this study is to examine the performance of CBs for UC at three affiliated teaching hospitals.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective review of UC cases with a CB was conducted at a county hospital, Veterans Affairs hospital, and tertiary university-based hospital. For each specimen, patient demographics, specimen type, volume, original diagnosis, and IHC stains were recorded. Each case was reviewed for diagnosis based on ThinPrep alone, diagnosis based on ThinPrep and CB, utility of CB for diagnosis, and CB cellularity.

RESULTS

A total of 250 UC specimens with CB from 186 patients was identified. Bladder washes were the most common (72.1%). IHC stains were performed on 17.2% of cases. On blinded review, CB preparation was deemed useful in 61.2% of cases, with the highest rate for suspicious for high-grade urothelial carcinoma (SHGUC) cases (87.0%). The diagnosis based on ThinPrep review changed with incorporation of CB in 13.2% of cases, with the highest rate for SHGUC cases (43.5%).

CONCLUSIONS

The results demonstrate that use of CB in UC confirms the final diagnosis in more than one-half of cases and changes the diagnosis in a subset of cases. Use of CB was most helpful in the SHGUC category. Further evaluation of the types of cases in which CB are prepared is warranted.

Uncovering additional predictors of urothelial carcinoma from voided urothelial cell clusters through a deep learning-based image preprocessing technique

BACKGROUND

Urine cytology is commonly used as a screening test for high-grade urothelial carcinoma for patients with risk factors or hematuria and is an essential step in longitudinal monitoring of patients with previous bladder cancer history. However, the semisubjective nature of current reporting systems for urine cytology (e.g., The Paris System) can hamper reproducibility. For instance, the incorporation of urothelial cell clusters into the classification schema is still an item of debate and perplexity among expert cytopathologists because several previous works have disputed their diagnostic relevance.

METHODS

In this work, an automated preprocessing tool for urothelial cell cluster assessment was developed that divides urothelial cell clusters into meaningful components for downstream assessment (ie, population-based studies, workflow automation).

RESULTS

In this work, an automated preprocessing tool for urothelial cell cluster assessment was developed that divides urothelial cell clusters into meaningful components for downstream assessment (ie, population-based studies, workflow automation). Results indicate that cell cluster atypia (i.e., defined by whether the cell cluster harbored multiple atypical cells, thresholded by a minimum number of cells), cell border overlap and smoothness, and total number of clusters are important markers of specimen atypia when considering assessment of urothelial cell clusters.

CONCLUSIONS

Markers established through techniques to separate cell clusters may have wider applicability for the design and implementation of machine learning approaches for urine cytology assessment.

The Diagnostic Dilemma of Urothelial Tissue Fragments in Urinary Tract Cytology Specimens

Since the release of The Paris System for Reporting Urinary Cytology (TPS), the assessment of urine cytology specimens has primarily focused on the detection of high-grade urothelial carcinoma (HGUC) and carcinoma in situ (CIS). Fortunately, the malignant cells in these lesions tend to be loosely cohesive, resulting in the natural exfoliation of individual malignant cells into the urine. However, HGUC/CIS lesions occasionally exfoliate larger fragments which can be difficult to assess due to cellular overlap and fragment three-dimensionality. Furthermore, reactive benign urothelial fragments and fragments from low-grade urothelial neoplasms (LGUN) may also be seen in urine specimens and contain atypical cytomorphologic features. As a result, the significance of urothelial tissue fragments (UTFs) is often unclear. Herein, we discuss the literature on UTFs before and after the implementation of TPS, as well as strategies to help overcome this diagnostic challenge.

Architectural aspects of cell-blocks as small biopsies

Cell-block preparations have become an essential part of integrated cytology diagnosis. They are essentially microbiopsies that are formalin fixed and embedded in paraffin. This has become more prevalent with greater sample procurement due to the advent of newer biopsy techniques and needles. Cell-blocks allow retrieval of small tissue fragments from cytology specimens that sometimes cannot be processed by alternate cytologic techniques. They represent concentrated, cell-enriched preparations that provide cytologists with the opportunity to evaluate cellular architecture, as well as to perform ancillary testing. A cell-block compatible sample may thus obviate the need for a more invasive procedure such as a tissue biopsy. Microscopic examination of cell-blocks is quick, avoids obscuring material, permits cells to be evaluated in one focal plane, and allows the histologic architecture such as glandular differentiation, papillary formations, and sometimes invasion to be easily identified. This new era of “cytohistology” accordingly requires practicing cytologists to become more familiar with histopathology. This review article discusses the benefit of various architectural patterns identifiable in cell-blocks employed as an adjunct to Pap tests, exfoliative fluid specimens, and fine-needle aspirations.

Cell blocks in urine cytopathology: do they add value to the diagnosis? A pilot study

INTRODUCTION

The utility of cell block (CB) preparation is well established in cytopathology. Despite 23.3% of College of American Pathologists-accredited laboratories using CB with liquid-based preparations on urine cytology (UC) cases, there are very few studies on their performance. To determine their usefulness, we conducted a retrospective review of UC cases that received CB.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We identified 27 UC cases with ThinPrep (TP) and CB preparation between 2016 and 2020 at our institution. Clinical history and follow-up data were compiled. A blinded review of TP alone, and TP together with CB, was performed by 2 pathologists and 2 cytotechnologists. Diagnoses were rendered in accordance with The Paris System for Reporting Urine Cytology.

RESULTS

Blood and acute inflammation were common background elements in cases that received CB preparation. In total, CB upgraded the diagnosis in 7 of 27 cases (26%). The maximum utility of CB preparation was seen in indeterminate cases where 60% (6 of 10) were upgraded, including 71% (5 of 7) of atypical urothelial cells (AUC) and 30% (1 of 3) of suspicious for high-grade urothelial carcinoma (HGUC). One case (1 of 12, 8%) diagnosed as negative for HGUC on TP was diagnosed as low-grade urothelial neoplasia on CB.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results demonstrate that adjunct use of CB preparation aids in a definitive diagnosis on AUC category and may be helpful in cases with cell clusters or tissue fragments, or cases suspicious for HGUC. Further correlation studies are warranted in this area to expand our knowledge about the utility of CBs in urine cytology.

A review of upper urinary tract cytology performance before and after the implementation of The Paris System

Urinary cytology (UC) is one of the primary diagnostic modalities used for the screening and surveillance of urothelial carcinoma. Despite its widespread use, UC has suffered from a lack of standardized or reproducible criteria and wide interobserver variability, particularly of the designation of atypical urothelial cells. The Paris System for Reporting Urinary Cytology (TPS), published in 2016, aimed to provide a standardized approach for evaluating UC by creating diagnostic categories with specific cytomorphologic criteria. Recent studies have primarily investigated the application of TPS on lower urinary tract specimens and have mostly shown that TPS implementation has improved the performance of UC specimens. Only a few studies have reported the impact of TPS on upper urinary tract (UUT) cytology. Additionally, there is uncertainty as to which cytological features are most predictive of high-grade urothelial carcinoma (HGUC) in the UUT. This review summarizes the literature regarding the utility and performance of UUT cytology and highlights findings before and after the implementation of TPS.

A review of urinary cytology in the setting of upper tract urothelial carcinoma

Urothelial carcinomas of the upper urinary tract (UUT) are uncommon. Cytological examination of voided urine or washings from the UUT has been part of the standard workup for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC); however, its value remains controversial. The lack of uniform terminology and specific diagnostic criteria could also have contributed to the inferior performance of urinary cytology for detecting UTUC. The Paris System for Reporting Urinary Cytology (TPS) has provided a standardized reporting system for urinary cytology specimens with clearly defined cytomorphologic diagnostic criteria and found acceptance on an international level after its implementation in 2016. Recent studies have shown that TPS has led to improved diagnostic performance of urinary cytology; however, most of these studies had focused on the evaluation of lower urinary tract cytology specimens. Only a limited number of new research studies have analyzed the effect of TPS when applied to UUT cytology specimens. In the present report, we have summarized the current understanding and utility of UTUC, including its molecular biology, and reviewed the current literature.

Cell block preparation in urine cytology: examination of utility and workflow in an academic practice

INTRODUCTION

Urine cytology is a common non-invasive test to screen for urothelial carcinoma. Urine cell blocks may sometimes be prepared as a diagnostic aid (eg, to characterize architecture or perform immunohistochemistry). The aim of this study was to determine whether routinely preparing cell blocks on urine specimens improves diagnostic sensitivity.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Three time periods were compared: time period 1 (prior to November 2009; 1437 consecutive selected cases), when cell blocks were rarely prepared; period 2 (November 2009 to May 2010; 1230 selected cases), when cell blocks were prepared on all cases; and period 3 (after May 2010; 1499 consecutive selected cases), when cell blocks were made only when indicated (for samples with substantial cellular pellets or when requested by a pathologist).

RESULTS

Patient demographics and the type of specimens received were relatively similar during the 3 time periods. Increased preparation of cell blocks was not accompanied by a notable improvement in specimen adequacy rate, given that <1%, 2%, and 1% of samples were unsatisfactory for the 3 periods. Only the proportion of atypical cases differed during the time periods, being highest in period 1 (23%), but lower in periods 2 and 3. Turnaround time was fastest for period 1 (mean: 47 hours, median: 33 hours), and slower for period 2 and period 3.

CONCLUSION

These data show that routinely preparing cell blocks for urine samples did not improve our laboratory's specimen adequacy rate. Nonetheless, cell block preparation on urine samples did help lower the proportion of atypical diagnoses, when routinely or selectively prepared. Because preparation of cell blocks on all urine cases can be costly and only provides minimal added clinical benefit, our recommendation is to rather judiciously utilize cell blocks when screening urine cytology samples.