Management of thyroid cytological material, preanalytical procedures and bio-banking

The Driver Role of Pathologists in Endocrine Oncology: What Clinicians Seek in Pathology Reports

Endocrine neoplasia represents an increasingly broad spectrum of disorders. Endocrine neoplasms range from incidental findings to potentially lethal malignancies. In this paper, we cover the impact of pathology in the interpretation of the clinic-pathological, genetic, and radiographic features underpinning these neoplasms. We highlight the critical role of multidisciplinary interactions in structuring a rational diagnostic and efficient therapeutic plan and emphasize the role of histopathological input in decision-making. In this context, standardized pathology reporting and second opinion endocrine pathology review represent relevant tools to improve the overall diagnostic workup of patients affected by endocrine tumors in every specific scenario. In fact, although a relevant proportion of cases may be correctly identified based on clinical presentation and biochemical/imaging investigations, a subset of cases presents with atypical findings that may lead to an inappropriate diagnosis and treatment plan based on a wrong pathological diagnosis if all pieces of the puzzle are not correctly considered. Pathologists have a responsibility to actively guide clinicians before and during surgical procedures to prevent unnecessary interventions. In all areas of endocrine pathology, pathologists must understand the complexity of tissue preservation and assay sensitivities and specificities to ensure the optimal quality and interpretation of diagnostic material. Finally, pathologists are central actors in tumor tissue biobanking, which is an expanding field in oncology that should be promoted while adhering to strict ethical and methodological standards.

SFE-AFCE-SFMN 2022 Consensus on the management of thyroid nodules : Recommendations in thyroid cytology: from technique to interpretation

The SFE-AFCE-SFMN 2022 consensus deals with the management of thyroid nodules, a condition that is a frequent reason for consultation in endocrinology. In more than 90% of cases, patients are euthyroid, with benign non-progressive nodules that do not warrant specific treatment. The clinician's objective is to detect malignant thyroid nodules at risk of recurrence and death, toxic nodules responsible for hyperthyroidism or compressive nodules warranting treatment. The diagnosis and treatment of thyroid nodules requires close collaboration between endocrinologists, nuclear medicine physicians and surgeons, but also involves other specialists. Therefore, this consensus statement was established jointly by 3 societies: the French Society of Endocrinology (SFE), French Association of Endocrine Surgery (AFCE) and French Society of Nuclear Medicine (SFMN); the various working groups included experts from other specialties (pathologists, radiologists, pediatricians, biologists, etc.). This section deals with the technique and interpretation of thyroid fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB), a reference test for the analysis of thyroid nodules.

Preoperative BRAFV600E mutation detection in thyroid carcinoma by immunocytochemistry

The BRAF^V600E (BRAF) mutation is present in 40-50% of papillary thyroid carcinomas (PTC) and has been associated with more aggressive clinicopathological characteristics of PTC. The aim of this study was to evaluate different methods for preoperative identification of the BRAF mutation in PTC using cytological and histological specimens. Prospectively collected preoperative cytological clots from patients with suspected PTC were tested with BRAF immunocytochemistry (ICC) and the Cobas Test (PCR). In addition, histological specimens were tested with BRAF immunohistochemistry (IHC) and the Cobas Test. All nodules were histologically examined. Fifty-three patients were included in the study. Complete mutation testing was available in 32 patients. The main reason for exclusion was insufficient cell content in the cytological specimen. Twenty-seven nodules were histologically diagnosed as PTC, and 41% (n = 11) of PTCs were BRAF ICC positive. All non-PTC nodules were negative by BRAF ICC. In 26 nodules, all four BRAF tests were concordant, while discordant test results were found in six nodules. ICC was in accordance with the consensus BRAF status in five of these nodules, while BRAF status was undetermined in one nodule. BRAF ICC showed high concordance with the Cobas Test and a low rate of false negative stain. These results indicate that BRAF ICC may be a feasible method for preoperative detection of the BRAF^V600E mutation in patients with PTC.

[Molecular cytology: Opportunities and challenges]

Predictive marker (re-)analysis of tumor material can be a real obstacle in several tumor entities, like non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), due to difficult anatomic conditions and small biopsy samples. As reported in the literature, cytological samples comprise excellent starting material for predictive marker analysis like fluorescence in situ hybridization and next generation sequencing. As for formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue samples, rigorous quality control and standardized laboratory operating procedures are mandatory. Further advantages of cytological specimens are the rapid and straightforward inspection of representativeness, for example by rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE). Another striking advantage is that the fresh cellular material from smears and serous cavity fluids can be used for the generation of two- and three-dimensional cell culture models. Hereby, in addition to the conventional biomarker testing, complex complementary functional genomic assays can also be applied, for example, to assess the effects of multiple variants in one sample and unknown variants of tumor driver genes and tumor suppressor genes. This information may provide additional vulnerabilities of the tumor to be considered for the therapy decision, for example in the molecular tumor board.

Usefulness of cellblock preparation in fine needle aspiration for the diagnosis of thyroid nodules

BACKGROUND

Thyroid nodules are common in the general population. The current diagnostic method for nodules is the ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration (US-FNA). The aim of the study was to evaluate the usefulness of cellblock preparation in addition to routine US-FNA in the diagnosis of thyroid nodules.

METHODS

A retrospective study of patients with thyroid nodules submitted to US-FNA, with collection of material using both smears and cellblock preparation. Two air-dried smears were prepared for each nodule. After centrifugation, the residual aspirate in the syringe and needle was processed as a standard histology specimen (cellblock). Then a pathologist reviewed the smears and cellblock slides of each case.

RESULTS

A total of 12.360 thyroid nodules were submitted to US-FNA. Cellblock preparation was performed in 153 (1.2%) in addition to smears. Among the satisfactory cellblocks (80.5%, 120), 31.7% (38) provided additional morphological information in comparison with smears alone. No significant differences were found between the smear and the combined smear and cellblock evaluation concerning the number of unsatisfactory (12.1% vs. 11.4%, p = .85) and indeterminate (27.5% vs. 24.2%, p = .52) results. Overall, 10 samples (6.7%) had their diagnosis changed after cellblock evaluation, nine of them due to immunohistochemical studies. Immunohistochemistry confirmed parathyroid origin of the nodule in six cases.

CONCLUSION

Cellblocks did not contribute to increase cellularity of the samples or to reduce indetermined results of FNA of thyroid nodules. Immunohistochemistry was essential to characterize rare cases without follicular histogenesis. Cellblock must only be prepared when considering performing immunohistochemistry.

Practical diagnostic utility of thyroid fine-needle aspiration cell blocks: is always too much?

INTRODUCTION

Thyroid fine-needle aspiration (tFNA) is a powerful screening tool for assessing solitary thyroid nodules. Generally, morphologic evaluation of smears yields an accurate diagnosis; but, in some cases it is useful to have a cell block (CB) to conduct ancillary studies such as immunohistochemistry (IHC). Cytologic diagnoses guide clinical decisions, so it is important that accurate and efficient diagnoses be rendered. Our study evaluates the diagnostic utility of the CB in the evaluation of tFNAs.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed a retrospective chart review of all tFNA specimens from January 2014 to July 2019. Data collected included TAT (in days), diagnosis, if a CB was prepared, and if it was diagnostically contributory. Descriptive statistics were calculated. Data were analyzed using the χ² test and the Mann-Whitney U-test.

RESULTS

Of the 2321 specimens, 40.2% (933) had CB and only 0.3% (7) were diagnostically contributory. IHC was used for 2 cases. For cases with CB, the median TAT was one day [0-18 days] and the median TAT without CB was 0 [0-9 days]. There was a significant difference in TAT between cases with a CB and those without. Most cases without a CB had same-day TAT (66.4%), whereas only 1.1% of those with a CB had same day TAT. Cases with CB were more likely to have a TAT >1 day (65% versus 12.1%) or >3 days (25.4% versus 10%) than those without a CB (P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

We found the diagnostic utility of CB for tFNAs to be very low. The addition of a CB added at least 1 day to the TAT in all diagnostic strata. The additional time causes patients to wait for results, even for nondiagnostic studies. The increased TAT, resources, and manpower use may be reduced if CB were produced only as needed-if the results of the smear were ambiguous or if ancillary tests were needed to confirm the diagnosis.

Measures to reduce diagnostic error and improve clinical decision making in thyroid FNA aspiration cytology: A proposed framework

Thyroid fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNA) and histopathology can be subjective areas of medical diagnosis and subject to different interpretations. On the basis of the authors' personal experience, 12 recommendations with potential to improve clinical decision making, ensure quality, and reduce diagnostic error in thyroid FNAC and histopathology are presented. 1) use a standardized reporting terminology for thyroid FNAC; 2) understand and explain to service users the limitations of cytology and the standardized thyroid FNAC reporting terminology used; 3) the cytopathologist should review all relevant clinical and ultrasound findings, if feasible; 4) include the risk of malignancy in all FNAC reports if feasible; 5) collect data to calculate the local institutional risk of malignancy for FNAC if feasible; 6) accept that nondiagnostic FNAC will include small numbers of carcinomas; 7) use rapid on-site evaluation and/or educational sessions for aspirators if the nondiagnostic aspiration rate is high; 8) know the diagnostic pitfalls of both cytology and histopathology; 9) use special immunohistochemical and molecular techniques that are evidence-based; 10) make use of second opinions, either in-house or interinstitutional; 11) multidisciplinary discussion of cases before surgery or therapy is invaluable; and, finally, 12) manage patient and clinician expectations of thyroid cytology and histopathology. These 12 recommendations may assist in quality-improvement initiatives and may reduce diagnostic errors in thyroid cytology and histopathology. Thyroid multidisciplinary case discussion remains the principal, overarching method for error reduction and for providing high-quality clinical decision making.

Approach to cytological indeterminate thyroid nodules

The indeterminate thyroid nodules diagnosed by fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC)represents a problem for both cytopathologists and clinicians. The former sometimes use this diagnostic category as a sort of basket, putting in cases that they do not know exactly how to classify. The latter are faced with a highly variable risk of malignancy and consequently the management remains a challenge. On the histopathological side, the new WHO classification of tumors of the thyroid introduced the concept of tumors with uncertain and low malignant potential, and the concept of non-invasive follicular thyroid neoplasm with papillary-like nuclear features (NIFTP), whose prognosis and management are still to be completely elucidated. While the risk of malignancy of the indeterminate diagnostic category has decreased due to the re-classification of certain types of papillary thyroid carcinomas of the follicular variant into a low malignant potential form (the NIFTP), cases diagnosed cytologically as indeterminate will probably increase in the future to avoid false positive diagnosis. Thus, the indeterminate thyroid diagnostic category still remains a challenge, both at the diagnostic level and for its management. The new version of the Bethesda system for reporting thyroid cytopathology suggests managing these patients with a repeat FNA, diagnostic lobectomy and/or molecular testing.