Review of a single institution's fine needle aspiration results for thyroid nodules: Initial observations and lessons for the future

Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration of Deep Thyroid Nodule: Is There a Correlation between the Nodule's Depth and Nondiagnostic Results?

Objective

To evaluate whether thyroid nodule depth correlates with nondiagnostic results in ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration cytopathology.

Background

Many factors correlate with nondiagnostic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) results, including older age, macrocalcification, small-sized nodules, aspirin medication, and cystic portion in more than 50% of the thyroid nodules. However, there are few studies which have examined whether there is a relationship between the depth of nodules and the percentage of nondiagnostic results in cytology (Bethesda category I). We conducted this study in order to investigate if such a correlation exists.

Materials and Methods

FNAC was performed on 283 thyroid nodules between January 2019 and December 2020. Cytological analyses of the nodules were reviewed and sorted as nondiagnostic and diagnostic according to the Bethesda score. Patient files and ultra sound (US) scans were reviewed for clinical information (such as age, sex, and ethnic group) and sonographic features of nodules (such as depth, size, cystic portion, type of calcification, and echogenicity) and were compared between the nondiagnostic and diagnostic nodule results. The depth of a nodule was calculated as the shortest distance from the skin to the most superficial border of the nodule in the axial plane, using our medical center's computer program, which allows reviewing all saved shots of the US scan.

Results

Age, sex, and ethnicity were not significantly different between the nondiagnostic group and the diagnostic group (p > 0.05). Nodule diameter, cystic portion, calcification, and echogenicity were also not associated with the frequency of nondiagnostic results. The depth of nodules ≥9 mm was correlated with nondiagnostic US-guided FNA cytological results (OR = 2.55, p=0.018).

Conclusions

Deep thyroid nodules correlated with nondiagnostic US-guided FNA cytological results. Further studies are needed for optimizing the approach to deep thyroid nodules in order to improve the efficacy of FNA in deep thyroid nodules.

Validating the 'CUT score' risk stratification tool for indeterminate thyroid nodules using the Bethesda system for reporting thyroid cytopathology

PURPOSE

Managing intermediate thyroid nodules remains challenging. The CUT score is an Italian metanalysis-based cytologic (SIAPEC-IAP) scoring system, designed to assist clinicians. However, it was never evaluated against the Bethesda system for reporting thyroid cytopathology (BSRTC). This study aims to validate its utility for BSRTC III and IV nodules in a non-Italian population.

METHODS

We collected all BSRTC III and IV thyroid nodules with a documented final pathology between 2010 and 2020. We calculated the C + U components of the CUT score using retrospective clinical (C) data collection and reevaluation of preoperative sonography (U) examination. The cytology (T) component which originally referred to the five-tiered SIAPEC-IAP cytologic classification was replaced by the corresponding BSRTC categories. Optimal test performances were calculated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Data were analyzed twice with considering of NIFTP as benign and as malignant.

RESULTS

After exclusions, 62 nodules from 61 patients were included (50% BSRTC III, 50% BSRTC IV). Malignant nodules demonstrated a significantly higher C + U score compared with benign in both categories. The C + U cutoff value for BSRTC III was 5.25 (sensitivity and specificity of 69.23% and 66.67%, respectively, AUC = 0.72, p-value = 0.016), and 5.75 for BSRTC IV (sensitivity and specificity of 85.7% and 76.5%, respectively, AUC = 0.84, p-value < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Our study suggests that the CUT score is applicable for both BSRTC III and IV nodules, and highlights the need for internal validations, since the cutoffs found were higher than previously reported.

National differences in cost analysis of Afirma Genomic sequencing classifier

CONTEXT

Thyroid nodules of indeterminate cytology can be subjected to molecular testing such as the Afirma Genomic Sequencing Classifier (GSC), thereby minimizing the number of unnecessary diagnostic surgeries.

OBJECTIVE

This work aimed to evaluate and compare the cost of routine GSC testing of indeterminate thyroid nodules in different countries.

DESIGN, PATIENTS AND MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The cost of diagnostic hemithyroidectomy of indeterminate thyroid nodules was calculated by performing a Monte Carlo simulation cost analysis on a Markov decision-analytic model and then compared to that of GSC testing in the UK, Australia, USA, and Israel.

RESULTS

Assuming that patients are treated by surgical resection and routine GSC testing is performed for all nodules of indeterminate significance, we found the GSC test to be more cost effective compared with diagnostic hemithyroidectomy when malignancy rates of thyroid nodules are less than 22.6%-37.1%, depending on the country where the test is performed. Given the cost of a thyroidectomy in the UK, Australia and Israel, performing routine GSC tests on all Bethesda IV nodules is more expensive than routine diagnostic hemithyroidectomy and becomes cost effective for Bethesda III when the GSC cost is below 3,031-3,087 USD. In comparison, in the USA, higher cost of thyroidectomy makes the GSC test cost effective for Bethesda III nodules at its current cost, but not for Bethesda IV nodules where it becomes cost effective under the price of 3,031 USD.

CONCLUSIONS

Different molecular testing and surgical costs in different countries should be considered when performing cost analysis. In addition, since different medical centres have different malignancy rates, personalized in-house assessment of cost-effectiveness is warranted.

Thyroid malignancy rates according to the Bethesda reporting system in Israel - A multicenter study

INTRODUCTION

The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology was developed in 2007 to facilitate an accurate, reproducible communication of thyroid fine-needle aspiration (FNA) interpretations between clinicians and cytopathologists and to serve as a guide for treatment. Based on large patient series, the system details the risk of malignancy for each category as well as a suggested management for each FNA result. Though this system has been widely adopted, there are only few studies to determine whether results are applicable for Israel.

METHODS

A multicenter, retrospective analysis of medical charts of all patients who underwent thyroid surgery between January 1st, 2012 and December 31st, 2016 in four medical centers in Israel was performed. Data was analyzed for the overall risk of malignancy for the Bethesda system groups as well as comparison between the different laboratories performing the test.

RESULTS

Records of 810 thyroidectomies in which preoperative cytological reports and final pathology were available and reviewed. The malignancy rates according to the Bethesda groups' I-VI for our cohort were: 27.8%, 17.6%, 41.4%, 41.4%, 86.9%, and 98.1% respectively. Similar results were seen when results were analyzed according to the different laboratories performing the tests.

CONCLUSIONS

Post-surgical review of all Bethesda groups had higher malignancy rates than those reported in the original report. These results indicate a difference in the malignancy rates for the different Bethesda system groups in Israel compared to those reported. Physicians are encouraged to use data validated for their own country or patients' community in addition to published values.

Outcomes of the Bethesda system for reporting thyroid cytopathology: Real-life experience

OBJECTIVE

The 2017 revised Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology (BSRTC) included new malignancy rates for each category as well as new management recommendations. Here, we evaluate the malignancy rate and test performance for BSRTC categories in a middle-sized institution outside the United States (US).

DESIGN

Retrospective single centre case series with chart review.

PATIENTS

All patients who underwent thyroid surgery with a preoperative BSRTC between the years 2010 and 2018 at our institution.

MEASUREMENTS

In order to assess the malignancy rate for each BSRTC, all medical records were reviewed to collect demographics, nodule's size, BSRTC and final pathology.

RESULTS

Three hundred and sixty-four patients were included, with an overall malignancy rate of 34.3%. The malignancy rate for BSRTC categories I-VI was as follows: 13.3%, 5.1%, 25.0%, 24.4%, 91.3% and 95.2%, respectively. The most sensitive test was when BSRTC III-VI were evaluated (91%). Overall best performance (sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and accuracy) was obtained when BSRTC V-VI were grouped together with a substantial decrease when adding BSRTC III-IV (90%, 97%, 94%, 95%, 95% vs, respectively, 91%, 73%, 62%, 95%, 79%, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite differences from the reported 2017 BSRTC malignancy rates, we demonstrated that the revised 2017 BSRTC management recommendations for thyroid nodules are also valid in smaller non-US centre, supporting its use globally.

Not All Bethesda 1 Thyroid Nodules Were Created Equal: Different B1 Subgroups

OBJECTIVE

The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology is a uniform method used worldwide to report thyroid fine-needle aspiration (FNA) outcomes. This study focuses on the Nondiagnostic/Unsatisfactory category, designated as Bethesda1 (B1). The documented risk of malignancy for B1 nodules can vary significantly, implying this category is not homogenous and might be composed of different subtypes. Our hypothesis was that B1 subgroups (blood only, insufficient thyrocytes, cyst content) will vary in their malignancy rate.

METHODS

The study design was observational and retrospective. The study population included 154 patients in the Galilee Medical Center who underwent FNA examination of the thyroid gland from 2013-2018 and had a B1 result. We looked at the final diagnosis of malignant or benign for patients who underwent surgery and calculated the malignancy rate for each subgroup.

RESULTS

Malignancy rates were higher in the Blood subgroup than in the other subgroups, and higher in the Thyrocytes subgroup than in the Cyst subgroup (P < .05). All malignancies were papillary thyroid carcinomas. There was no significant difference in the malignancy rate when we further divided the B1 samples into 2 groups based on the presence of epithelial cells. Many repeat FNA tests resulted in a different B1 subgroup.

CONCLUSION

The different malignancy rates suggest that individual management approaches should be considered for each B1 subgroup.

The diversities in thyroid cytopathology practices among Asian countries using the Bethesda system for reporting thyroid cytopathology

Background

The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology (TBSRTC) has been adopted and widely used among Asian countries. This study aims to investigate the application of TBSRTC in thyroid cytology practice among Asian countries.

Methods

We searched electronic databases including PubMed and Web of Science from 2010 to 2019. Meta-analysis of proportion and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using the random-effect model. Meta-regression and subgroup analysis were used to search for heterogeneity origins.

Results

We included 42 Asian studies with 84.953 fine-needle aspirations. Among six categories, benign was the most commonly diagnosed category. The resection rate (RR) and risk of malignancy (ROM) were highest in malignant and SM categories, and lowest among benign nodules. Thyroid cytology practice in Asia was characterized by a low RR and high ROM in patients with indeterminate thyroid nodules. There was a significant amount of heterogeneities of TBSRTC outputs (frequency, resection rate, and malignancy risk) among Asian countries. Meta-regression showed that the sources of heterogeneity might stem from the differences in study origin and the application of molecular testing. We highlighted the usefulness of preoperative molecular testing to select patients for surgery.

Conclusions

Our study provided insight regarding thyroid cytology practice among Asian countries. Active surveillance is commonly used in Asian practice resulting in a low RR and high ROM for indeterminate nodules. There are still variations in general thyroid cytology practice in Asia. Future guidelines and consensus regarding the application of TBSRTC in thyroid cytology practice among Asian countries are required.

Atypia of undetermined significance/follicular lesion of undetermined significance: Asian vs. non-Asian practice, and the Singapore experience

The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology has paved the way for comparisons of the practice of thyroid cytology in many different regions. However, there have been comparatively few studies documenting differences between Asian and non-Asian practice. Here, we aim to compare a few key parameters between the two regions, focusing on the indeterminate category of atypia of undetermined significance (AUS)/follicular lesion of undetermined significance (FLUS). We compared its incidence, resection rates (RRs), risk of malignancy (ROM), rate of repeat fine needle aspiration (rFNA), ROMs of cytomorphologic subcategories of nuclear atypia (AUS-N) vs. architectural atypia (AUS-A), and, finally, the incidence of papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) vs. follicular neoplasms (FNs) in resected AUS/FLUS cases in Asian and non-Asian regions. Where possible, these metrics were compared with the Singapore experience from a tertiary referral institution. While the incidence of AUS/FLUS was similar in both regions, we found geographical differences in the RRs and ROMs, which may reflect a higher collective threshold for surgery in Asian countries. However, both cohorts showed higher ROMs in the AUS-N subcategory as compared to the AUS-A subcategory, supporting the subclassification of the AUS/FLUS based on the presence of nuclear atypia. We also observed a higher incidence of AUS-N coupled with a higher incidence of PTC in resected AUS/FLUS nodules in Asian cohorts, while AUS-A and follicular-patterned neoplasms featured more prominently in the non-Asian cohorts. These incidences may account for the starkly different molecular approaches that we noted-in Asian (chiefly Korean and Chinese) centers, BRAF mutational analysis was favored, while gene panels and gene expression classifiers were more frequently applied in non-Asian centers (chiefly in the United States of America). Overall, the data from Singapore appears more closely aligned to non-Asian trends, despite its geographical location in Southeast Asia and its predominantly Asian population. We conclude that there is significant heterogeneity in the outcomes of the AUS/FLUS categories between and within regions, which is only partially explained by regional variations, and may also reflect different regional diagnostic and management practices. This highlights the importance of understanding the local context in the interpretation of indeterminate Bethesda categories, rather than adopting a "one-size fits all" approach.

Influence of Care Pathway on Thyroid Nodule Surgery Relevance: A Historical Cohort Study

Background: Guidelines recommend using fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) to guide thyroid nodule surgical indication. However, the extent to which these guidelines are followed remains unclear. This study aimed to analyze the quality of the preoperative care pathway and to evaluate whether compliance with the recommended care pathway influenced the relevance of surgical indications. Methods: Nationwide historical cohort study based on data from a sample (1/97th) of French health insurance beneficiaries. Evaluation of the care pathway of adult patients operated on between 2012 and 2015 during the year preceding thyroid nodule surgery. The pathway containing only FNAC was called “FNAC”, the pathway including an endocrinology consultation (ENDO) with FNAC was called “FNAC+ENDO”, whereas the no FNAC pathway was called “NO FNAC”. The main outcome was the malignant nature of the nodule. Results: Among the 1080 patients included in the study, “FNAC+ENDO” was found in 197 (18.2%), “FNAC” in 207 (19.2%), and “NO FNAC” in 676 (62.6%) patients. Cancer diagnosis was recorded in 72 (36.5%) “FNAC+ENDO” patients and 66 (31.9%) “FNAC” patients, against 119 (17.6%) “NO FNAC” patients. As compared to “NO FNAC”, the “FNAC+ENDO” care pathway was associated with thyroid cancer diagnosis (OR 2.67, 1.88–3.81), as was “FNAC” (OR 2.09, 1.46–2.98). Surgeries performed in university hospitals were also associated with thyroid cancer diagnosis (OR 1.61, 1.19–2.17). Increasing the year for surgery was associated with optimal care pathway (2015 vs. 2012, OR 1.52, 1.06–2.18). Conclusions: The recommended care pathway was associated with more relevant surgical indications. While clinical guidelines were insufficiently followed, compliance improved over the years.

Differences in cytopathologist thyroid nodule malignancy rate

OBJECTIVES

The accuracy of a cytological diagnosis obtained by fine needle aspiration is influenced by several factors including the technique used and the experience of both the aspirator as well as the cytologist. In this project we planned to evaluate the interobserver differences of thyroid nodule cytopathology in our medical centre.

METHODS

The study was conducted using retrospective pathology reports from a single academic centre from August 2013 to September 2017. We compared the sensitivity, specificity, negative and positive predictive values, malignancy rates, and accuracy of two cytopathologists who evaluated thyroid nodules.

RESULTS

We included 287 fine needle aspirations of thyroid nodules in the study. Approximately one fifth (18.5%) of patients had surgery and the rate of malignancy was 40%. There was a similar frequency of use of all thyroid Bethesda system (TBS) categories with the exception of TBS 3 (8.0% and 21.2%, P = .01). As a consequence, the malignancy rate was different in TBS 3 category (40% vs 17%, P = .545).

CONCLUSIONS

There are interobserver differences in the evaluation of thyroid nodules. Clinicians should be aware of such differences because they affect the malignancy rate in each TBS category.