EGFR mutation testing in cytology smears of advanced non-small cell lung carcinomas: Practical applications in low-resource laboratories

Retrospective application of WHO reporting system for lung cytopathology with assessment of risk of malignancy

INTRODUCTION

The recently introduced World Health Organization (WHO) Reporting System for Lung Cytopathology presents 5 diagnostic categories with corresponding risk of malignancy (ROM) and management protocols. This study uses the system to categorize our institutional respiratory tract cytology specimens, evaluating ROM and diagnostic accuracy for each category.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In a retrospective analysis (May 2020 to August 2021), the following respiratory cytology specimens were classified based on the WHO categories: bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL), bronchial wash/bronchial brushings (BB/BW), endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA), fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC), sputum, biopsy imprint (BI), and endotracheal wash. Exclusions comprised pleural effusions and EBUS-TBNA from mediastinal and hilar lymph nodes. Correlation of cytologic and histopathologic diagnoses was performed to assess ROM collectively and individually.

RESULTS

A total of 1518 respiratory samples (BAL [968], BW/BB [380], EBUS-TBNA [42], FNAC [32], sputum [80], BI [11] and endotracheal wash [5]) of 1410 patients were screened, of which 522 cases (34.3%) had histopathologic correlation. One hundred forty-one cases (9.3%) were Insufficient/Inadequate/Non-Diagnostic (ND), 1221 (80.4%) were Benign (B), 3 (0.2%) were Atypical (A), 32 (2.1%) were Suspicious for malignancy (SM) and 121 (8.0%) were Malignant (M). The estimated ROM for each category was 49.2% for ND, 13.3% for B, 66.6% for A, 81.5% for SM and 92.7% for M. FNAC and EBUS-TBNA exhibited the highest sensitivity (100%) compared with BW/BB (66.3%). Specificity ranged from 96.8% to 100% across the samples, while diagnostic accuracy varied from 58.8% to 100%.

CONCLUSIONS

Application of the WHO reporting system enhances standardized terminology, aiding clinicians in informed decision-making and improving patient care through accurate risk assessment of malignancy.

Multiplex fluorescence in situ hybridization testing for anaplastic lymphoma kinase and c-ros oncogene 1 gene rearrangements on cytology smears in lung adenocarcinomas: comparative study with formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded sections

INTRODUCTION

Multiplex anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)/c-ros oncogene 1 (ROS1) fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) probes conserve tissue by analyzing both ALK and ROS1 gene rearrangements (ALK-R/ROS1-R) in a single test. The positivity cutoffs have been validated on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue sections and not tested on non-cell block (CB) cytology preparations. We sought to validate non-CB cytology preparations for the detection of ALK-R/ROS1-R using multiplex ALK/ROS1 FISH probes by comparing the results with matched FFPE results.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

During the 3.5-year study period, FISH using the FlexISH ALK/ROS1 DistinguISH Probe (ZytoVision) was performed in non-CB cytology preparations of patients for whom FISH on FFPE sections was performed.

RESULTS

A total of 20 patients had one or more non-CB cytology preparations (n = 27) suitable for FISH analysis. These comprised direct smears (n = 17), smears from centrifuged effusion pellets (n = 8), cytospin smears (n = 1), and biopsy imprint smears (n = 1). These had been fixed in 95% ethanol (n = 18) or air dried (n = 9), and stained with Papanicolaou (n = 14), May-Grünwald-Giemsa (n = 9), immunocytochemistry (n = 3), or hematoxylin and eosin (n = 1). The median archival time was 1 year. Successful FISH results were achieved in 14 samples (6 with ALK-R, 2 with ROS1-R, 6 negative) and were concordant with the FFPE FISH results for 13 of 14 cases. The single case with discordant results between cytology and FFPE FISH showed ALK-R on cytology concordant with positive ALK D5F3 companion diagnostics assay results and was considered a false-negative FFPE FISH result. FISH failure occurred mainly in the older archived slides because of overdigestion (n = 5), hybridization failure (n = 5), or excessive background fluorescence (n = 3).

CONCLUSIONS

Non-CB cytology smears are highly suitable for multiplex FISH analysis with 100% concordance with FFPE FISH and/or ALK D5F3 companion diagnostics assay results.

EGFR analysis on scrapings from cytology smears in lung carcinoma, an effective alternative to testing on trucut biopsies

BACKGROUND

Lung carcinomas are a leading cause of cancer morbidity and mortality. Many cases present at an advanced stage of disease where definitive treatment by surgical resection is not feasible. Molecular testing using materials derived from minimally invasive procedures aid in targeted therapy with least iatrogenic burden to the patient.

METHODS

Cases diagnosed as non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) on cytology were included in the study. Scrapings from the smears with adequate tumor cell load were submitted for molecular testing. The DNA was extracted and quantified. Mutations in exons 18, 19, 20, and 21 of the EGFR gene were detected using Sanger sequencing. DNA quantity and EGFR mutation status on equal number of consecutive trucut biopsy specimens were also analyzed.

RESULTS

Seventy cases of NSCLC tested for EGFR mutation had a median DNA concentration of 40.2 ng/μl and 31% cases showed mutation. Majority of mutations (14/21, 66.66%) were identified in exon 19. Among 70 trucut biopsy samples, DNA concentration was 41.42 ng/μl and 30% cases showed mutation. No significant difference was seen in DNA quantity and EGFR mutation between cytology smears and trucut biopsies.

CONCLUSION

EGFR testing on cytology smears provides adequate DNA yield with minimal invasiveness and is equally effective as biopsies. Testing on samples like pleural effusion allows for concomitant diagnosis, staging, and molecular testing in one procedure. Tests done on the smears rather than on cell block or trucut biopsies ensures superior quality DNA from the tumor cells as they are unexposed to cross linking formalin fixative.

Testing EGFR with Idylla on Cytological Specimens of Lung Cancer: A Review

The current standard of care for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer is based on detecting actionable mutations that can benefit from targeted therapy. Comprehensive genetic tests can have long turn-around times, and because EGFR mutations are the most prevalent actionable mutation, a quick detection would enable a prompt initiation of targeted therapy. Furthermore, the scarcity of diagnostic material means that sometimes only cytologic material is available. The Idylla™ EGFR assay is a real-time PCR–based method able to detect 51 EGFR mutations in 2.5 h. Idylla is validated for use only on FFPE sections, but some researchers described their experiences with cytological material. We reviewed the relevant literature, finding four articles describing 471 cases and many types of cytological input material: smears, cell-block sections, suspensions, and extracted DNA. The sensitivity, specificity, and limit of detection appear comparable to those obtained with histological input material, with one exception: the usage of scraped stained smears as input may reduce the accuracy of the test. In conclusion, usage of cytological material as input to the Idylla EGFR test is possible. A workflow where common mutations are tested first and fast, leaving rarer mutations for subsequent comprehensive profiling, seems the most effective approach.