Diagnostic utility of BAP1 for malignant pleural mesothelioma in pleural fluid specimens with atypical morphology

Contemporary Trends in Malignant Peritoneal Mesothelioma: Incidence and Survival in the United States

Background: Malignant peritoneal mesothelioma (MPM) is a rare disease with a historically poor prognosis. Given the emergence of effective therapies, a contemporary analysis of MPM incidence and survival is warranted. Methods: The SEER-18 registry dataset was analyzed (2000−2018). Age-adjusted annual incidence was stratified by sex and histology. Joinpoint regression was used to estimate annual percent change (APC) in incidence. Multivariable cox proportional hazards models were used to investigate survival trends. Results: Of 1689 MPM cases, most were male (55.4%), >50 years (80.0%), and white (75.2%). Age-adjusted incidence of MPM remained stable over time, with an average annual incidence of 1.02 cases/million. Epithelioid histology increased by 240% (APC 2.6; 95% CI: 0.7, 4.5), while incidence of undefined histology decreased significantly (APC −2.1; 95% CI: −3.1, −1.1). Cases treated with cancer-directed surgery increased from 27% to 43%. Overall median age-standardized survival was 11.6 months. Median age-standardized survival was 16.6 months for epithelioid histology but 2.0 months for sarcomatoid histology. Diagnosis in recent years (2015−2018 HR 0.51; 95% CI: 0.38, 0.67) and receipt of cancer-directed surgery (HR 0.84; 95% CI: 0.72, 0.98) were associated with improved survival. Conclusions: Although the overall incidence of MPM remained stable, recognition of epithelioid histology increased. Concurrent with an increase in cancer-directed surgery, MPM survival has improved.

Sneaky Diagnosis of Pleural Malignant Mesothelioma in Thoracic Surgery: All That Glitters Is Not Gold

Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma (MPM) is a highly aggressive disease whose diagnosis could be challenging and confusing. It could occur with atypical presentations on every examined level. Here, we present three unconventional cases of the complex diagnostic process of MPM that we have experienced during routine practice: a patient with reactive mesothelial hyperplasia mimicking MPM, an unexpected presentation of MPM with persistent unilateral hydropneumothorax, a rare case of MPM in situ. Then, we review the relevant literature on each of these topics. Definitive biomarkers to confidently distinguish MPM from other pleural affections are still demanded. Patients presenting with persistent hydropneumothorax must always be investigated for MPM. MPM in situ is now a reality, and this raises questions about its management.

BAP1 loss by immunohistochemistry predicts improved survival to first line platinum/pemetrexed chemotherapy for pleural mesothelioma patients: A validation study

INTRODUCTION

Pleural mesothelioma (PM) is an aggressive malignancy with no identified predictive biomarkers. We assessed whether tumour BRCA associated protein 1 (BAP1) status is a predictive biomarker for survival in patients receiving first-line combination platinum/pemetrexed therapy.introduction METHODS: PM cases (n=114) from Aalborg, Denmark were stained for BAP1 on tissue microarrays. Demographic, clinical and survival data were extracted from registries and medical records. Surgical cases were excluded. BAP1 status was associated with overall survival (OS) by Cox regression and Kaplan-Meier methods. Results were validated in an independent cohort from Perth, Australia (n=234).

RESULTS

BAP1 loss was demonstrated in 62% and 60.3% of all Danish and Australian samples respectively. BAP1 loss was an independent predictor of OS in multivariate analyses corrected for histology, performance status, age, sex and treatment (HR = 2.49, p < 0.001 and 1.48, p = 0.01, respectively). First-line platinum/pemetrexed treated patients with BAP1 loss had significantly longer median survival than those with retained BAP1 in both the Danish (20.1 vs 7.3 months, p < 0.001) and Australian cohorts (19.6 vs 11.1 months, p < 0.01). Survival in patients with BAP1 retained and treated with platinum/pemetrexed was similar as in those with best supportive care (BSC). There was a higher OS in BSC patients with BAP1 loss, but significant only in the Australian cohort (16.8 vs 8.3 months, p < 0.01).results CONCLUSION: BAP1 is a predictive biomarker for survival following first-line combination platinum/pemetrexed chemotherapy and a potential prognostic marker in PM. BAP1 in tumour is a promising clinical tool for treatment stratification.

CONCLUSION