Drug consumption rooms: A systematic review of evaluation methodologies

ISSUES

Drug consumptions rooms (DCR) and supervised injecting facilities (SIF) are expanding internationally. Previous reviews have not systematically addressed evaluation methodologies.

APPROACH

Results from systematic searches of scientific databases in English until June 2017 were coded for paper type, country and year of publication. For evaluation papers, study outcome, methodology/study design and main indicators of DCR/SIF 'exposure' were recorded.

KEY FINDINGS

Two hundred and nineteen eligible peer-reviewed papers were published since 1999: the majority from Canada (n = 117 papers), Europe (n = 36) and Australia (n = 32). Fifty-six papers reported evaluation outcomes. Ecological study designs (n = 10) were used to assess the impact on overdose, public nuisance and crime; modelling techniques (n = 6) estimated impact on blood-borne diseases, overdose deaths and costs. Papers using individual-level data included four prospective cohorts (n = 28), cross-sectional surveys (n = 7) and service records (n = 5). Individual-level data were used to assess safer injecting practice, uptake into health and social services and all the other above outcomes except for impact on crime and costs. Four different indicators of DCR/SIF attendance were used to measure service 'exposure'.

IMPLICATIONS

Research around DCRs/SIFs has used ecological, modelling, cross-sectional and cohort study designs. Further research could involve systematic inclusion of a control group of people who are eligible but do not access SIFs, validation of self-reported proportion of injections at SIFs or a stepped-wedge or a cluster trial comparing localities.

CONCLUSIONS

Methodologies appropriate for DCR/SIF evaluation have been established and can be readily replicated from the existing literature. Research on operational aspects, implementation and transferability is also warranted.

The evolving drug epidemic of prescription opioid injection and its association with HCV transmission among people who inject drugs in Montréal, Canada

AIMS

To examine temporal trends in prescription opioid (PO) injection and to assess its association with hepatitis C virus (HCV) seroconversion among people who inject drugs (PWID).

DESIGN

Prospective cohort study spanning 2004 to 2016.

SETTING

Montréal, Canada.

PARTICIPANTS

PWID reporting injection during the past 6 months.

MEASUREMENTS

PWID were recruited between 2004 and 2016. At each 3-6-month follow-up visit, participants completed interview-administered questionnaires and were tested for HCV-antibody.

FINDINGS

Among 1524 PWID [83% males, mean age 38 years, standard deviation (SD) = 10, 34% (31-36) prescription opioid (PO) injection past month] included in trends analyses, PO injection use expanded between 2004 and 2009, and plateaued between 2010 and 2016 (trend tests < 0.001 and 0.335, respectively). Of the 432 HCV-seronegative PWIDs followed at least once (81% males, mean age 34, SD 9.8, 38% injection PO), 153 became HCV-antibody-positive during 1230 years of follow-up, for an incidence of 12.4 per 100 person-years [95% confidence interval (CI) = 10.6, 14.6]. PO injectors were 3.9 times more likely to seroconvert to HCV, relative to non-PO injectors. In a multivariate analysis, a stronger association between PO injection and HCV seroconversion was found post-2009 [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) = 5.4, 95% CI = 2.7, 10.8] than before (aHR = 1.5, 95% CI = 0.9, 2.4) (P-value for interaction = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Prescription opioid injection increased among people who inject drugs in Montréal, Canada from 2004 to 2009, to reach a plateau between 2010 and 2016. The association between prescription opioid injection and HCV seroconversion was stronger during the second period than the first according to the epidemic phase.