COVID‐19 und Immunregulation – von grundlegenden und translationalen Aspekten zu klinischen Implikationen

Basic Susceptibility of Patients with Psoriasis under Systemic Therapy for Respiratory Infections: Data from the German Psoriasis Registry PsoBest

Background: Patients with psoriasis under systemic treatments are in focus regarding their susceptibility to respiratory infections. To analyse real-world data for respiratory infections in patients with psoriasis under systemic treatments. Methods: We analysed data of the prospective, non-interventional German Psoriasis Registry PsoBest and compared rates for respiratory infections of 13,823 patients on systemic treatments for psoriasis and/or psoriatic arthritis in different therapy cohorts before the COVID-19 pandemic. Results: In total, 1415 respiratory infections were observed in 970 patients. Significant differences were observed between biologics and non-biologics, but not within these groups. The highest event rates (events/100 patient years) were identified for TNF-α inhibitors, 8.1, (CI 7.4-8.9), followed by 7.0 for IL-17 inhibitors (6.2-7.9), 5.7 for IL-12/23 and IL-23 inhibitors (5.1-6.5), 4.8 for methotrexate (4.3-5.4), 3.7 for small molecules (3.3-4.2), and 2.7 for retinoids (1.2-5.1). Conclusions: Overall, the susceptibility for respiratory infections in patients under systemic therapy for psoriasis is low compared to published study data and is sufficient as comparative data for COVID-19 studies.

The tick and I: Parasite-host interactions between ticks and humans

Ticks, particularly hard ticks (Ixodidae), which are among the most important vectors of dangerous infectious agents, feed on their hosts for extended periods of time. With this lifestyle, numerous adaptations have evolved in ticks and their hosts, the pharmacological importance of which is increasingly being recognized. Many bioactive substances in tick saliva are being considered as the basis of new drugs. For example, components of tick cement can be developed into tissue adhesives or wound closures. Analgesic and antipruritic salivary components inhibit histamine or bradykinin, while other tick-derived molecules bind opioid or cannabinoid receptors. Tick saliva inhibits the extrinsic, intrinsic, or common pathway of blood coagulation with implications for the treatment of thromboembolic diseases. It contains vasodilating substances and affects wound healing. The broad spectrum of immunomodulatory and immunosuppressive effects of tick saliva, such as inhibition of chemokines or cellular immune responses, allows development of drugs against inflammation in autoimmune diseases and/or infections. Finally, modern vaccines against ticks can curb the spread of serious infections. The medical importance of the complex tick-host interactions is increasingly being recognized and translated into first clinical applications. Using selected examples, an overview of the mutual adaptations of ticks and hosts is given here, focusing on their significance to medical advance.

Immunologie in der dermatologischen Praxis – wieviel, warum, wann?

Die Haut als Grenzorgan zum Körperäußeren realisiert viele immunologische Abwehrfunktionen. Folglich sind Immunologie und Dermatologie eng miteinander verknüpft. Die Diagnostik immunologischer Hauterkrankungen und deren Immuntherapie, labormedizinische Analysen, Hyposensibilisierung – Begegnungen mit der Immunologie finden auch in einer dermatologischen Praxis im Alltag nahezu ständig statt. Ziel dieser Arbeit ist es, praxisnah aufzuzeigen, wie uns Dermatologen die Immunologie in unserer Fachdisziplin helfen kann.

Interdependencies of cellular and humoral immune responses in heterologous and homologous SARS-CoV-2 vaccination

Background

Homologous and heterologous SARS‐CoV‐2 vaccinations yield different spike protein‐directed humoral and cellular immune responses. This study aimed to explore their currently unknown interdependencies.

Methods

COV‐ADAPT is a prospective, observational cohort study of 417 healthcare workers who received vaccination with homologous ChAdOx1 nCoV‐19, homologous BNT162b2 or with heterologous ChAdOx1 nCoV‐19/BNT162b2. We assessed humoral (anti‐spike‐RBD‐IgG, neutralizing antibodies, and avidity) and cellular (spike‐induced T‐cell interferon‐γ release) immune responses in blood samples up to 2 weeks before (T1) and 2–12 weeks following secondary immunization (T2).

Results

Initial vaccination with ChAdOx1 nCoV‐19 resulted in lower anti‐spike‐RBD‐IgG compared with BNT162b2 (70 ± 114 vs. 226 ± 279 BAU/ml, p < .01) at T1. Booster vaccination with BNT162b2 proved superior to ChAdOx1 nCoV‐19 at T2 (anti‐spike‐RBD‐IgG: ChAdOx1 nCoV‐19/BNT162b2 2387 ± 1627 and homologous BNT162b2 3202 ± 2184 vs. homologous ChAdOx1 nCoV‐19 413 ± 461 BAU/ml, both p < .001; spike‐induced T‐cell interferon‐γ release: ChAdOx1 nCoV‐19/BNT162b2 5069 ± 6733 and homologous BNT162b2 4880 ± 7570 vs. homologous ChAdOx1 nCoV‐19 1152 ± 2243 mIU/ml, both p < .001). No significant differences were detected between BNT162b2‐boostered groups at T2. For ChAdOx1 nCoV‐19, no booster effect on T‐cell activation could be observed. We found associations between anti‐spike‐RBD‐IgG levels (ChAdOx1 nCoV‐19/BNT162b2 and homologous BNT162b2) and T‐cell responses (homologous ChAdOx1 nCoV‐19 and ChAdOx1 nCoV‐19/BNT162b2) from T1 to T2. Additionally, anti‐spike‐RBD‐IgG and T‐cell response were linked at both time points (all groups combined). All regimes yielded neutralizing antibodies and increased antibody avidity at T2.

Conclusions

Interdependencies between humoral and cellular immune responses differ between common SARS‐CoV‐2 vaccination regimes. T‐cell activation is unlikely to compensate for poor humoral responses.

Perception of the coronavirus pandemic by patients with atopic dermatitis - Results from the TREATgermany registry

BACKGROUND

TREATgermany, a registry for patients with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis (AD), established an additional questionnaire in spring 2020 to investigate the effects of the coronavirus pandemic on the daily life of patients with AD.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A questionnaire was used to analyze general information regarding a patient's experience of the coronavirus pandemic and, using the Inventory of Life-Changing Events, the resulting personal burden. To analyze possible associations between disease severity (EASI score, oSCORAD, IGA, PGA, POEM), quality of life (DLQI) and personal burden, t-tests, analyses of variance and correlations were evaluated, controlled for sex and age.

RESULTS

58 % (n = 233) of the included 400 registry patients reported high burden scores caused by the coronavirus pandemic, regardless of an actual infection. Men showed significantly higher burden scores than women, and younger than older respondents (both P = 0.03). There were no differences in burden scores related to the physician's assessment of disease severity. However, patients with higher quality of life impairments and higher disease severity perceived the burden of the coronavirus pandemic as less severe (DLQI P = 0.019, PGA P = 0.044).

CONCLUSIONS

Our data show that registry patients considered the coronavirus pandemic as a life-changing event and perceived the burden differently. This should be taken into account in the treatment of patients with moderate to severe AD as well as in further studies.

[Rare superinfection in a COVID-19 patient-A chronology]

Bei einem 55-jährigen Mann, der sich zur elektiven Ablation bei Vorhofflimmern in der Klinik befand, wurde nach einer Reanimationssituation auf der peripheren Station ein SARS-CoV-2-Abstrich positiv getestet. Anamnestisch gab es im Vorwege gesicherten Kontakt zu einem COVID-19-positiven Patienten. Im Verlauf entwickelte sich das Vollbild einer COVID-19-Pneumonie mit umfangreicher intensivmedizinischer Behandlung. Nach rund 2‑wöchiger Therapie musste das Weaning bei erneuter Verschlechterung abgebrochen werden, und es ergaben sich bei dem wiederholt hochseptischen Patienten mikrobiologische Nachweise einer Superinfektion mit Cryptococcus neoformans und später Leclercia adecarboxylata. Der Patient wurde erfolgreich behandelt und überlebte die Erkrankung.

[Treatment of atopic dermatitis with dupilumab : A retrospective cohort analysis from dermatological practice]

Wir präsentieren die Ergebnisse einer retrospektiven Datenauswertung von 44 Patienten einer Praxiskohorte, deren atopische Dermatitis (AD) über bis zu 3 Jahre mit dem IL(Interleukin)-4/13-Rezeptor-Antikörper Dupilumab behandelt wurde. Die Betreuung erfolgte in den letzten 21 Monaten in einer Spezialsprechstunde Immundermatologie, in der die aufwendige Dokumentation realisiert werden konnte. Die Charakteristika der Kohorte hinsichtlich Alters- und Geschlechterverteilung, Schwere und Dauer der Erkrankung sind vergleichbar mit den großen Patientenkollektiven der Zulassungsstudien. Die therapeutische Effizienz unter Praxis-Alltagsbedingungen erwies sich als sehr gut (Anteil Patienten EASI [Eczema Area and Severity Index] 50, 75, 90 nach 16 Wochen: 94, 84, 60 %) und anhaltend (86 % EASI 90 nach 52 Wochen Therapie). Etwa die Hälfte unserer Patienten hatte anamnestisch oder bei Therapiebeginn eine Beteiligung der Gesichtshaut und/oder Augen. Diese Patientengruppe erwies sich als betreuungsintensiver, weil die Gesichts- und periorbitale Dermatitis sowie begleitende Konjunktividen verzögert abheilten, zu Rezidiven neigten und häufig einer zusätzlichen topischen Therapie bedurften. Wir haben keine schweren Nebenwirkungen in den hier ausgewerteten 48 Patientenjahren festgestellt. Dupilumab erwies sich als sichere und effiziente Therapie für die atopische Dermatitis in der dermatologischen Praxis.

Dermatologic comorbidities of the patients with severe COVID-19: A case-control study

The current studies focus on the association between COVID-19 and certain comorbidities. To the best of our knowledge, the association between severe COVID-19 and dermatologic comorbidities has not been reported yet. In this study, we aimed to describe the dermatologic comorbidities of patients with severe COVID-19 and compare it with the control group. Patients who have died at Uşak Training and Research Hospital due to COVID-19 and other diseases in the COVID-19 Intensive Care Units and Internal Medicine Intensive Care Units were recruited into the study. Two groups were compared with each other regarding the most common dermatologic comorbidities. A total of 198 patients including 111 patients with COVID-19 and 87 age and sex-matched patients with other diseases were enrolled in the study. The most common dermatologic comorbidities were pruritus (8.1%), eczema (6.3%), skin infections (3.6%), leukocytoclastic vasculitis (1.8%), and urticaria (0.9%) in the COVID-19 group while they were skin infections (9.2%), eczema (3.4%), pruritus (2.3%), and urticaria (1.1%) in the control group. None of patients in the control group had leukocytoclastic vasculitis. There were no significant differences between COVID-19 and control groups in terms of pruritus, eczema, skin infections, and urticaria (P values were .117, .517, .181, .505, and 1.000, respectively). In conclusion, although it is not statistically significant, it appears that pruritus and leukocytoclastic vasculitis are more common in severe COVID-19 patients. These cytokines-related diseases in the immuno-cutaneous systems may give some clues on the COVID-19 severity. Further studies are required to elucidate the relationship between the immuno-cutaneous system and COVID-19 severity.

COVID‐19 und Auswirkungen auf dermatologische und allergologische Erkrankungen

Die durch das Coronavirus SARS‐CoV‐2 verursachte Krankheit COVID‐19 hat sich zu einer Pandemie entwickelt. Bei der Betrachtung von dermatologischen und allergologischen Krankheiten, die potenziell von COVID‐19 betroffen sind, stehen wir vor komplexen Herausforderungen, die Pathogenese und Beeinflussung verschiedener immunologischer Signalwege einschließen. Medizinische Behandlungen müssen daher im Zusammenhang mit dieser Infektion oft neu bewertet und in Frage gestellt werden.

Dieser Übersichtsartikel fasst den aktuellen Wissensstand zu COVID‐19 hinsichtlich der wichtigsten dermatologischen und allergologischen Erkrankungen zusammen. Es werden aber auch die medizinischen Bereiche beschrieben, für die keine ausreichenden Daten vorliegen. Unter Zusammenfassung der publizierten Daten und grundsätzlicher pathophysiologischer Überlegungen werden hier Schlussfolgerungen für das Management unserer Patienten während der Pandemie gezogen. Wir konzentrieren uns auf häufige Hauterkrankungen mit komplexer immunologischer Pathogenese: Psoriasis, Ekzeme einschließlich atopischer Dermatitis, Typ‐I‐Allergien, blasenbildende Autoimmundermatosen, Kollagenosen, Vaskulitiden und Hautkrebserkrankung. Da viele weitere Hauterkrankungen verwandte oder vergleichbare immunologische Reaktionsmuster aufweisen, können pathophysiologisch ähnliche entzündliche Dermatosen möglicherweise auch mit ähnlichen therapeutischen Überlegungen und Schlussfolgerungen während der Pandemie behandelt werden. Daher soll diese Übersicht Behandlungsempfehlungen auf der Basis bisher publizierter Daten und Empfehlungen zu Therapieentscheidungen auch über die hier diskutierten, häufigsten Erkrankungen hinaus liefern.