Drug survival and clinical effectiveness of secukinumab, ixekizumab, brodalumab, guselkumab, risankizumab, tildrakizumab for psoriasis treatment

Prescribing patterns and persistence of biological therapies for psoriasis management: a retrospective cohort study from Saudi Arabia

BACKGROUND

Biological therapies are effective for psoriasis, but patient responses vary, often requiring therapy switching or discontinuation.

OBJECTIVES

To identify physicians' prescribing patterns of biological therapies at a referral tertiary center in Saudi Arabia and assess the probability of biologic persistence following treatment initiation.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study of biologic-naïve adult psoriasis patients who initiated therapy from October 2013 to July 2022 in Dammam. Descriptive statistics and a Kaplan-Meier analysis evaluated treatment persistence at 6, 12, 24, and 36 months.

RESULTS

A total of 151 patients received adalimumab (n = 89), etanercept (n = 17), risankizumab (n = 30), ustekinumab (n = 14), and ixekizumab (n = 1). At 6 months, all therapies demonstrated 100% persistence. At 12 months, persistence was highest for ustekinumab (100%) and lowest for etanercept (88.2%). At 24 months, ustekinumab maintained 100% persistence, followed by risankizumab (96.6%), adalimumab (94.3%), and etanercept (76.4%). At 36 months, risankizumab had the highest persistence (96.6%), followed by adalimumab (83.1%), ustekinumab (78%), and etanercept (70.6%). The most common reasons for discontinuation were lack of effectiveness and intolerability.

CONCLUSION

This study shows changing psoriasis treatment patterns with new therapies. Risankizumab demonstrated high long-term persistence, while etanercept and ustekinumab showed declining persistence, suggesting evolving treatment considerations.

Drug Survival and Clinical Course of Patients with Cancer Treated with Biologic Therapy for Psoriasis

Background/Objectives: Patients with treated solid tumors (TST) are a highly heterogeneous and difficult-to-treat population due to the risk of disease progression/recurrence or infection. Methods: We conducted an observational, retrospective, single-center study at the Dermatology Clinic of Turin with a focus on the special population of cancer patients with psoriasis treated with biologics. Results: As of July 2023, 52 psoriatic patients with a prior/concomitant history of malignancy had taken biologic drugs. The median age was 67 years, and the median age of cancer onset was 55 years. The most common tumors were gastrointestinal cancer and melanoma. After the tumor diagnosis, 61% received an anti-IL17 drug; 37 patients continued the initiated biologic therapy, while 12 switched drugs due to secondary inefficacy. The estimated biologic DS was 55.6% at 50 months. Evidence suggests that IL-17 is a key pathogenic factor involved in tumorigenesis, resulting in a lower risk of malignancies in subjects managed with IL-17 inhibitors. Similarly, IL-23 plays a role in suppressing innate immunity and promoting tumor and metastases development. This is a consistent real-life case series that support the use of biologic drugs in patients with TST. Conclusions: IL-23 and IL-17 inhibitors, being immunomodulators rather than immunosuppressants, may be a safe option for patients in an active oncological setting and for immune-correlated adverse events.

Psoriasis in Childbearing Age: A Real-Life, Retrospective, Single-Center Study on Anti-IL17 and IL-23 Agents

Background: Psoriasis (PSO) involves about 1-3% of the population, and around 75% of women develop PSO before the age of 40. Official guidelines on the treatment of woman with anti-IL17 and anti-IL23 during this potential childbearing time are not currently available. Objective: To investigate the effectiveness and safety of biologic treatments in women of childbearing age. Methods: At the Dermatology Clinic of the University of Turin, Italy, 172 women aged 20-55 years underwent IL-17 and IL-23 inhibitor therapy for moderate-severe PSO and were followed up to 52 weeks in a real-life, retrospective, single-center study. Results: Overall, 40% of patients achieved PASI 100 at week 16, and 72% at week 52. A similar trend was observed for PASI 90 and PASI < 3 with almost 80% and 90% of patients achieving the target at 52 weeks. As for PASI 100, a statistically significant difference (p = 0.004) was found at 16 weeks, with 23.84% of patients achieving PASI 100, with IL-17 and 15.70% with the IL-23 inhibitor. No statistically significant differences were found at 28 and 52 weeks. No statistically significant differences in PASIs at any time points were recorded across the different biologic agents. Forty-six patients discontinued treatment. The most reported side effects were headache, nausea, asthenia, injection site pain, and rhinitis. Conclusions: This study showed that biologic drugs are effective and safe in women of childbearing age, with negligible side effects.

Revisiting risankizumab: a newer biologic drug in dermatology

INTRODUCTION

Risankizumab is an interleukin 23p19 inhibitor, approved by the USA Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the management of moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. Apart from its utility in psoriasis, there are a number of other dermatologic conditions where risankizumab has demonstrated value. The aim of this narrative review is to describe the utility of risankizumab in psoriasis, as well as its implication in off-label dermatologic disorders.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

PubMed, Google Scholar, Scopus and ResearchGate were searched for scholarly articles related to risankizumab and its utility in dermatology using the search terms "Risankizumab" AND "Psoriasis" AND "other dermatological disorders."

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Risankizumab is a valuable biologic agent for the management of psoriasis and psoriatic arthropathy. It has also been used successfully for other dermatologic disorders like hidradenitis suppurativa, pityriasis rubra pilaris and pyoderma gangrenosum.

CONCLUSIONS

Risankizumab's usage is not limited to psoriasis. Its benefit extends to many more dermatologic conditions. Besides, it has an acceptable safety profile.

Comparison of Drug-Free Remission after the End of Phase III Trials of Three Different Anti-IL-23 Inhibitors in Psoriasis

INTRODUCTION

Knowing the remission duration after biologics discontinuation in patients with psoriasis is important, especially when disease relapse is defined as the restart of systemic agents, because it also reflects the real-world clinical practice when topical treatment alone is not adequate for disease control, and a systemic treatment, including biologic, is needed. Biologics are currently indicated for patients with psoriasis who are candidates for systemic treatments.

METHODS

We included 42 patients who were followed up with regularly after the end of risankizumab, guselkumab and mirikizumab trials and investigated the drug-free remission (DFR). A Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox regression model were employed to identify the possible risk factors for relapse.

RESULTS

Overall, 38/42 (90.5%) patients experienced relapses after discontinuing trial biologics during the follow-up period of at least 96 weeks and up to 227 weeks. In all patients with relapse, the median DFR was 104 days. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis revealed a significant 1-year drug-free survival (DFS) difference between risankizumab (Z) and guselkumab (T) + mirikizumab (M) (p = 0.0462). A difference in DFS curves was noted when patients were categorized by disease duration > or ≤ 2 years (p = 0.1577) and maintenance of a psoriasis area and severity index score (PASI) of 90 at the end of trials (p = 0.1177). Univariate Cox regression model identified that age [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.030 (1.000-1.060), p = 0.0467] and disease duration [HR = 1.046(1.009-1.084), p = 0.0134] were significantly associated with relapse risk. A risk model was established on the basis of multivariable Cox regression results. Risk value = 0.021038 * Age + 0.515628 * Biologic_type (Z = 0,T/M = 1) + 0.025048 * Disease_Duration. The validated patients were divided into two groups by median risk value (1.5). The high-risk group (risk value > 1.5) had a non-significant higher relapse risk than the low-risk group (risk value < 1.5), with a hazard ratio of 1.62 [95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.82-3.23, p = 0.1809].

CONCLUSION

Types of biologics used, disease duration > or ≤ 2 years, and PASI 90 improvement at the end of trial affect the 1-year DFS after biologics discontinuation. Further studies consisting of a larger patient number and longer follow-up period are needed to verify our findings.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers NCT02694523, NCT03047395, NCT02207224, NCT02576431, NCT03482011, and NCT03556202.

Efficacy of probiotic supplementation in the treatment of psoriasis-A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Many studies have emphasized the possible role of probiotics in psoriasis, probiotic supplementation might be helpful to treat psoriasis. This study systematically evaluated the efficacy of probiotic supplementation for the treatment of psoriasis.

METHODS

We searched some databases with keywords until November 10, 2023, including PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Web of Science. These keywords included probiotics, psoriasis RCT, and so on. After rigorous literature screening by two authors, five studies were identified. Eventually, the required data were independently extracted by another author.

RESULTS

A total of five studies with 286 patients were included. The pooled results showed that the efficacy of probiotic supplementation was superior to placebo in the treatment of psoriasis. The Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (SMD = -1.40, 95% Cl = -2.63 to -0.17, p < 0.00001) and Dermatology Life Quality Index (SMD = -0.92, 95% Cl = -1.86 to 0.01, p < 0.00001). Score decreased after probiotic supplementation.

CONCLUSIONS

The meta-analysis showed that probiotic supplementation could be a new treatment option for psoriasis.

Drug Survival of IL-17 and IL-23 Inhibitors for Psoriasis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

The most recently approved biologics for moderate-to-severe psoriasis are the interleukin (IL)-17 and IL-23 inhibitors. Drug survival is a frequently used outcome to assess drug performance in practice. An overview of the available drug survival studies regarding IL-17 and IL-23 inhibitors is lacking. Therefore, our objective was to assess the drug survival of IL-17 and IL-23 inhibitors for psoriasis.

METHODS

A search of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library and Web of Science was conducted (last search 27 December, 2023). Inclusion criteria were (1) cohort study; (2) patients aged ≥ 18 years with plaque psoriasis; and (3) evaluation of drug survival of at least one of the IL-17 and IL-23 inhibitors. Exclusion criteria were: primary focus on patients with psoriatic arthritis, fewer than ten study subjects and another language than English. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses reporting guideline was followed. Survival probabilities at monthly intervals were extracted from Kaplan-Meier curves using a semi-automated tool. Data were pooled using a non-parametric random-effects model to retrieve distribution-free summary survival curves. Summary drug survival curves were constructed per biologic for different discontinuation reasons: overall, ineffectiveness and adverse events, and split for the effect modifier biologic naivety. Results were analysed separately for registry/electronic health record data and for pharmacy/claims data.

RESULTS

A total of 69 studies aggregating drug survival outcomes of 48,704 patients on secukinumab, ixekizumab, brodalumab, guselkumab, risankizumab, and tildrakizumab were included. Summary drug survival estimates of registry/electronic health record studies for overall, ineffectiveness and adverse event related drug survival were high (all point estimates ≥ 0.8 at year 1) for included biologics, with highest estimates for guselkumab and risankizumab. All estimates for drug survival were higher in biologic naive than in experienced patients. Estimates of pharmacy/claims databases were substantially lower than estimates from the primary analyses based on registry/electronic health record data.

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis showed that the investigated IL-17 and IL-23 inhibitors had high drug survival rates, with highest rates for guselkumab and risankizumab drug survival. We showed that effect modifiers such as biologic naivety, and the source of data used (registry/electronic health record data vs pharmacy/claims databases) is relevant when interpreting drug survival studies.

Interclass Switch between IL17 and IL23 Inhibitors in Psoriasis: A Real-Life, Long-Term, Single-Center Experience

BACKGROUND

Interleukin 23 (IL-23) inhibitors, such as guselkumab, risankziumab, and tildrakizumab, have proved to be highly effective and safe for psoriasis treatment either in bio-naïve or bio-experienced patients. A substantial proportion of patients show a primary or secondary inefficacy to IL-17 inhibitors and can benefit from an alternative line of treatment, like IL-23 inhibitors. To date, no sufficient data are available on the effectiveness of IL-23 inhibitors after an anti-IL-17 agent.

METHODS

Our study includes 48 patients with moderate to severe psoriasis undergoing a switch from IL-17 to IL-23 inhibitors. This trial is registered with SS_DERMO_20.

RESULTS

The mean PASI (Psoriasis Area Severity Index) decreases from 11.6 to 3.3 at week 16, with responses maintained at weeks 28 and 52 (2 and 1.4, respectively), and a PASI100 achievement in more than 24% of patients at 16 weeks and 61.9 at 48 weeks, with no occurrence of serious adverse events. However, almost one in six patients interrupted the IL-23 inhibitors mainly due to primary ineffectivenss.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data support the evidence that an interclass switch among IL-17 inhibitors is a safe and effective therapeutic option for these patients.