Patterns and drivers of long‐term changes in breeding bird communities in a global biodiversity hotspot in Mexico

Elevational Gradients Impose Dispersal Limitation on Streptomyces

Dispersal governs microbial biogeography, but the rates and mechanisms of dispersal remain poorly characterized for most microbial taxa. Dispersal limitation is driven by limits on dissemination and establishment, respectively. Elevation gradients create striking patterns of biogeography because they produce steep environmental gradients at small spatial scales, and these gradients offer a powerful tool to examine mechanisms of dispersal limitation. We focus on Streptomyces, a bacterial genus common to soil, by using a taxon-specific phylogenetic marker, the RNA polymerase-encoding rpoB gene. By targeting Streptomyces, we assess dispersal limitation at finer phylogenetic resolution than is possible using whole community analyses. We characterized Streptomyces diversity at local spatial scales (100 to 3,000 m) in two temperate forest sites located in the Adirondacks region of New York State: Woods Lake (<100 m elevation change), and Whiteface Mountain (>1,000 m elevation change). Beta diversity varied considerably at both locations, indicative of dispersal limitation acting at local spatial scales, but beta diversity was significantly higher at Whiteface Mountain. Beta diversity varied across elevation at Whiteface Mountain, being lowest at the mountain’s base. We show that Streptomyces taxa exhibit elevational preferences, and these preferences are phylogenetically conserved. These results indicate that habitat preferences influence Streptomyces biogeography and suggest that barriers to establishment structure Streptomyces communities at higher elevations. These data illustrate that Streptomyces biogeography is governed by dispersal limitation resulting from a complex mixture of stochastic and deterministic processes.

Improvements in reports of species redistribution under climate change are required

Studies have documented climate change-induced shifts in species distributions but uncertainties associated with data and methods are typically unexplored. We reviewed 240 reports of climate-related species-range shifts and classified them based on three criteria. We ask whether observed distributional shifts are compared against random expectations, whether multicausal factors are examined on equal footing, and whether studies provide sufficient documentation to enable replication. We found that only ~12.1% of studies compare distributional shifts across multiple directions, ~1.6% distinguish observed patterns from random expectations, and ~19.66% examine multicausal factors. Last, ~75.5% of studies report sufficient data and results to allow replication. We show that despite gradual improvements over time, there is scope for raising standards in data and methods within reports of climate-change induced shifts in species distribution. Accurate reporting is important because policy responses depend on them. Flawed assessments can fuel criticism and divert scarce resources for biodiversity to competing priorities.