|
1
|
Nakai Y, Oyama H, Kanai S, Noguchi K, Sato T, Hakuta R, Ishigaki K, Saito K, Saito T, Hamada T, Takahara N, Mizuno S, Kogure H, Isayama H, Koike K. Double Guidewire Technique Using an Uneven Double Lumen Catheter for Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Interventions. Dig Dis Sci 2021; 66:1540-1547. [PMID: 32436121 DOI: 10.1007/s10620-020-06345-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2020] [Accepted: 05/12/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS)-guided interventions are often performed using a single guidewire (SGW), but there are a few reports on the use of double guidewire (DGW) technique to facilitate multiple drainage placement during EUS-guided drainage of pancreatic fluid collections. This DGW technique may have advantages other than multiple drainage placement during EUS-guided interventions such as scope stabilization, support for stone extraction and device insertion. METHODS Consecutive patients who underwent EUS-guided interventions between Feb 2012 and Apr 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. The rate and reasons of DGW technique, and clinical outcomes were evaluated. DGW technique was performed, using an uneven double lumen cannula (UDLC), which facilitates insertion of 0.025-in. and 0.035-in. guidewires. RESULTS A total of 249 EUS-guided interventions were analyzed, and DGW technique was utilized primarily in 65 cases (25.7%) and as a salvage after failed SGW technique in 18 cases (7.1%). The reasons for DGW technique were 60 multiple drainage placement, 10 scope stabilization, 7 device insertion, 5 safety guidewire, and 4 antegrade stone removal. Insertion of UDLC and DGW was successful in 100%. Technical success rate of preplanned interventions was 92.7% (96.9% in primary DGW and 77.8% in salvage DGW technique). Adverse events were observed in 19.5% after DGW but were not related to DGW technique. CONCLUSIONS DGW technique using UDLC during EUS-guided interventions was technically feasible and safe. In addition to multiple drainage insertion, it can potentially support complex EUS-guided interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yousuke Nakai
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan. .,Department of Endoscopy and Endoscopic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan.
| | - Hiroki Oyama
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Sachiko Kanai
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kensaku Noguchi
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Tatsuya Sato
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Ryunosuke Hakuta
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kazunaga Ishigaki
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kei Saito
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Tomotaka Saito
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Tsuyoshi Hamada
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Naminatsu Takahara
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Suguru Mizuno
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hirofumi Kogure
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hiroyuki Isayama
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Juntendo University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kazuhiko Koike
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
|
2
|
Huang L, Yu QS, Zhang Q, Liu JD, Wang Z. Comparison between double-guidewire technique and transpancreatic sphincterotomy technique for difficult biliary cannulation. Dig Endosc 2015; 27:381-7. [PMID: 25284147 DOI: 10.1111/den.12387] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2014] [Accepted: 09/22/2014] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIM The aim of the present study was to compare the effectiveness and complications of the double-guidewire technique (DWT) with the transpancreatic sphincterotomy (TPS) technique. METHODS From January 2013 to December 2014, 366 consecutive endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) procedures were carried out. Of 366 procedures, 354 procedures were carried out in patients with native major papilla biliary cannulation. A total of 279 consecutive therapeutic ERCP were included in the study and data of included patients were collected retrospectively. One hundred and thirty-seven procedures (49.1%) were done with DWT and 142 procedures (50.9%) were done with TPS for patients with difficult cannulation. The results and complications of ERCP were compared. RESULTS Success rate of first-attempt cannulation was 62.0% in the DWT group and 81.0% in the TPS group (P = 0.00). Final rate of successful cannulation of the two biliary cannulation techniques was 86.9% and 90.8%, respectively (P = 0.09). Cannulation time in the DWT group was 7.8 ± 1.7 min compared with 3.7 ± 2.3 min in the TPS group (P = 0.00). Overall incidence of post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP), hemorrhage, perforation and cholangitis was 1.8%, 1.1%, 0.4% and 1.1%, respectively. Adverse event rate was 2.19% in the DWT group and 7.04% in the TPS group (P = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS DWT and TPS procedures were safe and effective. Overall cannulation rate was similar between the groups. Although DWT had a longer cannulation time, it could be considered the preferred technique in patients with failed standard cannulation for lower adverse event rate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Long Huang
- Department of No. 1 Surgery, The First Hospital Affiliated to Anhui Chinese Medical University, Hefei, China
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|