Diagnostic algorithm of magnifying endoscopy with crystal violet staining for non-ampullary duodenal epithelial tumors

Endoscopic Diagnosis of Epithelial Subtypes of Superficial Non-Ampullary Duodenal Epithelial Tumors using Magnifying Narrow-Band Imaging

INTRODUCTION

Superficial non-ampullary duodenal epithelial tumors (SNADETs) include low-grade adenoma (LGA) and high-grade adenoma or carcinoma (HGA/Ca) and are classified into two different epithelial subtypes, gastric-type (G-type) and intestinal-type (I-type). We attempted to distinguish them by endoscopic characteristics including magnifying endoscopy with narrow-band imaging (M-NBI).

METHODS

Various endoscopic and M-NBI findings of 286 SNADETs were retrospectively reviewed and compared between G- and I-types and histological grades. M-NBI findings were divided into four patterns based on the following vascular patterns; absent, network, intrastructural vascular (ISV), and unclassified. Lesions displaying a single pattern were classified as mono-pattern and those displaying multiple patterns as mixed-pattern. Lesions showing CDX2 positivity were categorized as I-types and those showing MUC5AC or MUC6 positivity were categorized as G-types based on immunohistochemistry.

RESULTS

Among 286 lesions, 23 (8%) were G-type and 243 (85%) were I-type. More G-type lesions were located oral to papilla (91.3 vs. 45.6%, p < 0.001), and had protruding morphology compared to those of I-types (65.2 vs. 14.4%, p < 0.001). The major M-NBI pattern was ISV in G-type (78.2 vs. 26.3%, p < 0.001), and absent for I-type (0 vs. 34.5%, p = 0.003). Three endoscopic characteristics; location oral to papilla, protruding morphology, and major M-NBI pattern (ISV) were independent predictors for G-type. Mixed-pattern was more common in HGA/Ca than LGA for I-type (77.0 vs. 58.8%, p = 0.01); however, there was no difference for those in G-type.

CONCLUSION

Endoscopic findings including M-NBI are useful to differentiate epithelial subtypes.

Non-Pure Intestinal Phenotype as an Indicator of Progression in Sporadic Nonampullary Duodenal Adenomas: A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study

INTRODUCTION

We aimed to evaluate the natural course of sporadic nonampullary duodenal adenomas (SNDAs) and determine the risk factors of progression.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the follow-up outcomes of patients with biopsy-diagnosed SNDA between April 2010 and March 2016 at 13 institutions. All initial biopsy specimens were centrally evaluated. Only those diagnosed with adenomas were included. Mucinous phenotypes were classified into pure intestinal and non-pure intestinal phenotypes. Cumulative incidence rates of carcinoma and tumor enlargement were evaluated. Tumor enlargement was defined as a ≥25% or 5-mm increase in tumor size.

RESULTS

Overall, 121 lesions were analyzed. Within a median observation period of 32.7 months, 5 lesions were diagnosed as carcinomas; the cumulative 5-year incidence of carcinoma was 9.5%. Male sex ( P = 0.046), initial lesion size ≥10 mm ( P = 0.044), and non-pure intestinal phenotype ( P = 0.019) were significantly associated with progression to carcinoma. Tumor enlargement was observed in 22 lesions, with a cumulative 5-year incidence of 33.9%. Initial lesion size ≥10 mm ( P < 0.001), erythematous lesion ( P = 0.002), high-grade adenoma ( P = 0.002), Ki67 negative ( P = 0.007), and non-pure intestinal phenotype ( P = 0.001) were risk factors of tumor enlargement. In a multivariate analysis, an initial lesion size ≥10 mm ( P = 0.010) and non-pure intestinal phenotype ( P = 0.046) were independent and significant risk factors of tumor enlargement.

DISCUSSION

Lesion size ≥10 mm and non-pure intestinal phenotype on initial biopsy are risk factors of cancer progression and tumor enlargement in cases with SNDA. Thus, management effectiveness may be improved by focusing on lesion size and the mucinous phenotype.

Endoscopic diagnosis and treatment of superficial non-ampullary duodenal epithelial tumors: A review

The surface of the small bowel mucosa is covered more than any other section of the digestive canal; however, the overall prevalence of small bowel tumors of the whole gastrointestinal tract is evidently low. Owing to the improvement in endoscopic techniques, the prevalence of small bowel tumors has increased across multiple countries, which is mainly due to an increase in duodenal tumors. Superficial non-ampullary duodenal epithelial tumors (SNADETs) are defined as tumors originating from the non-ampullary region in the duodenum that share similarities and discrepancies with their gastric and colorectal counterparts in the pathogenesis and clinicopathologic characteristics. To date, white light endoscopy (WLE) remains the cornerstone of endoscopic diagnosis for SNADETs. Besides, narrow-band imaging (NBI) techniques and magnifying endoscopy (ME) have been widely used in the clinic and endorsed by multiple guidelines and consensuses for SNADETs' evaluation. Confocal laser endomicroscopy (CLE), endocytoscopy (ECS), and artificial intelligence (AI) are also up-and-coming methods, showing an exceptional value in the diagnosis of SNADETs. Similar to the endoscopic treatment for colorectal polyps, the choices for SNADETs mainly include cold snare polypectomy (CSP), endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR), endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), and laparoscopic endoscopic cooperative surgery (LECS). However, owing to the narrow lumen, rich vascularity, weak muscle layer, abundant Brunner's gland, and the hardship of endoscope control, the duodenum ranks as one of the most dangerous operating areas in the digestive tract. Therefore, endoscopists must anticipate the difficulties in endoscopic maneuverability, remain aware of the increased risk of complications, and then select the appropriate treatment according to the advantages and disadvantages of each method.

Current status and perspectives for endoscopic diagnosis of superficial nonampullary duodenal epithelial tumors

In recent years, there have been significant advances in the endoscopic resection (ER) procedures of superficial nonampullary duodenal epithelial tumors (SNADETs). A preoperative endoscopic diagnosis is thus deemed necessary in determining the indication for subsequent ER. For the histologic and endoscopic diagnosis of SNADETs, understanding the mucin phenotype is inevitable. Recently, two diagnostic algorithms for the differential diagnosis of SNADETs from nonneoplastic lesions under magnifying endoscopy with narrow-band imaging have been proposed. In addition, various endoscopic approaches have been proposed to differentiate low- and high-grade adenomas/carcinomas, including white light endoscopy, magnifying image-enhanced endoscopy, and endocytoscopy. These methods, however, have not been standardized with respect to the classification of their findings and the validation of their diagnostic accuracy. Moreover, there are still concerns with respect to the histologic criteria required to establish a SNADETs diagnosis. Standardization in the histologic and endoscopic diagnosis of SNADETs is needed.

Current endoscopic diagnosis treatment strategy for superficial nonampullary duodenal tumours

Background

Preoperative endoscopic diagnosis and timely treatment are important for the clinical management of sporadically superficial nonampullary duodenal epithelial tumours (SNADETs), including adenoma and adenocarcinoma limited to the submucosal layer.

Methods

This review explores current endoscopic diagnosis and endoscopic resection technology for SNADETs. We compare endoscopic diagnosis accuracy using white light imaging, narrow band imaging, and magnification endoscopy alone or in combination. In addition, we review the current endoscopic resection methods for SNADETs and discuss the limitations and applicable future directions of each technology.

Results

A simple scoring system based on the endoscopic findings of white light imaging or magnified endoscopy combined with image-enhanced techniques was applied for the prediction of the histological grade of SNADETs. Benign or low-grade adenoma can be followed up without biopsy, and high-grade adenoma and adenocarcinoma should be resected by endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR), endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), or surgery. EMR frequently leads to a piecemeal resection, while ESD ensures a high en bloc resection rate with a high risk of complications. Covering or closing post-ESD ulcers is an effective strategy to reduce the risk of delayed perforation and bleeding. Laparoscopic endoscopic cooperative surgery is a promising treatment for SNADETs with excellent rates of en bloc resection and a low risk of complications, although it is expensive and requires many specialists.

Conclusions

Early endoscopic diagnosis and optimal treatment selection for SNADETs may improve the poor prognosis of duodenal cancer.

The mucin phenotype does not affect the endoscopic resection outcome of non-ampullary duodenal epithelial tumors

Background and study aims  Some studies have reported an association between clinicopathological features and mucin phenotypes of non-ampullary duodenal epithelial tumors (NADETs). However, the association between clinical outcomes of endoscopic resection (ER) and mucin phenotypes has not been elucidated. The aim of this retrospective study was to analyze clinical outcomes of ER of NADETs with reference to mucin phenotypes. Patients and methods  We retrospectively evaluated the clinical outcomes of ER for NADETs performed from 2006 to 2019 and compared clinicopathological characteristics, ER procedures, and outcomes, including adverse events (AEs) among tumors classified by mucin phenotype. Mucin phenotypes were classified as gastric, gastrointestinal, and intestinal based on immunohistochemical examination. Grade of dysplasia was determined according to the Vienna classification (VCL). Results  The proportion of VCL 4/5 was higher in the gastric type (50 %) compared with that in the gastrointestinal (39.1 %, P  = 0.009) and intestinal types (5.4 %, P  = 0.008), respectively. With no statistical difference in tumor size and ER method among the three groups, no significant difference was observed for ER outcomes, i. e., en bloc and R0 resection rates. In the gastrointestinal and intestinal types, AEs occurred in four cases treated with ESD, but none developed in the gastric type. Conclusions  This study suggests that the mucin phenotype does not affect resection outcome. However, considering high malignant potential and tendency for low AE rates, the gastric type NADETs may be more appropriate for proactive ER than the others.

Current status of endoscopic diagnosis and treatment for superficial non-ampullary duodenal epithelial tumors

Though superficial non-ampullary duodenal epithelial tumors (SNADETs) have been traditionally considered rare, there is a growing detection under the development and widespread of endoscopic techniques in recent times. Many case studies have revealed early manifestations of lesions through advanced endoscopic technology, however, because of the low incidence of duodenal tumors and challenges in diagnosing, the preoperative diagnosis criteria have not been established so far. In spite of this, recently the increasing detection rate of early duodenal epithelial lesions enhances the demand for minimally invasive treatment as well. The most suitable therapeutic endoscopic modality to remove duodenal lesions should be selected according to the size, location and histological invasive depth of duodenal lesions. Nevertheless, due to the special anatomical structure of the duodenum, the incidence of complications is much higher than in any other part of the digestive tract. To prevent these adverse events prophylactically, a few novel strategies have been applied effectively after resection. This review describes the current status of preoperative endoscopic diagnosis and endoscopic resection approaches, as well as countermeasures for avoiding procedure-related complications.

Endoscopic management of superficial nonampullary duodenal tumors: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline

1: ESGE recommends that all duodenal adenomas should be considered for endoscopic resection as progression to invasive carcinoma is highly likely.Strong recommendation, low quality evidence. 2: ESGE recommends performance of a colonoscopy, if that has not yet been done, in cases of duodenal adenoma.Strong recommendation, low quality evidence. 3: ESGE recommends the use of the cap-assisted method when the location of the minor and/or major papilla and their relationship to a duodenal adenoma is not clearly established during forward-viewing endoscopy.Strong recommendation, moderate quality evidence. 4: ESGE recommends the routine use of a side-viewing endoscope when a laterally spreading adenoma with extension to the minor and/or major papilla is suspected.Strong recommendation, low quality evidence. 5: ESGE suggests cold snare polypectomy for small (< 6 mm in size) nonmalignant duodenal adenomas.Weak recommendation, low quality evidence. 6: ESGE recommends endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) as the first-line endoscopic resection technique for nonmalignant large nonampullary duodenal adenomas.Strong recommendation, moderate quality evidence. 7: ESGE recommends that endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for duodenal adenomas is an effective resection technique only in expert hands.Strong recommendation, low quality evidence. 8: ESGE recommends using techniques that minimize adverse events such as immediate or delayed bleeding or perforation. These may include piecemeal resection, defect closure techniques, noncontact hemostasis, and other emerging techniques, and these should be considered on a case-by-case basis.Strong recommendation, low quality evidence. 9: ESGE recommends endoscopic surveillance 3 months after the index treatment. In cases of no recurrence, a further follow-up endoscopy should be done 1 year later. Thereafter, surveillance intervals should be adapted to the lesion site, en bloc resection status, and initial histological result. Strong recommendation, low quality evidence.

White light and/or magnifying endoscopy with narrow band imaging for superficial nonampullary duodenal epithelial tumors

BACKGROUND AND AIM

A reliable optical diagnosis of superficial nonampullary duodenal epithelial tumors (SNADETs) to guide optimal treatment strategy is lacking. The aim of this study was to simulate the treatment outcomes based on optical diagnosis using white light imaging (WLI) or magnifying endoscopy with narrow band imaging (MNBI) and to evaluate the method to extract optimal lesions suitable for cold snare polypectomy (CSP) or not.

METHODS

We created a decision tree model using WLI and MNBI diagnosis for ideal treatment for SNADETs. Optical diagnoses of Vienna category 3 lesions (C3), category 4/5 (C4/5) were defined based on the WLI scoring system or the MNBI pattern diagnosis. Ideal treatments were CSP for C3 < 10mm, and endoscopic mucosal resection, endoscopic submucosal dissection or surgery for lesions ≥10mm or C4/5. Ideal treatment results based on optical diagnosis were analyzed according to actual pathological results.

RESULTS

A total of 218 lesions with pre-operative diagnosis of SNADETs were included for analysis. Percentage of ideal treatment for C3 < 10mm based on WLI or MNBI or both was 88%, 83% and 97%. When WLI and MNBI diagnoses predicted the same histology, the specificity, positive predictive value and accuracy were significantly higher than those of WLI or MNBI alone (p < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

A decision tree model using lesion diameter, WLI scoring and MNBI pattern diagnosis is hypothetically useful to select ideal lesions for CSP among SNADETs. Optical diagnosis using both WLI and MNBI is more useful than WLI or MNBI alone.