Multi-center study of endoscopic revision after side-by-side metal stent placement for malignant hilar biliary obstruction

Updates on Endoscopic Stenting for Unresectable Malignant Hilar Biliary Obstruction

Malignant hilar biliary obstruction (MHBO) can cause obstructive jaundice and/or cholangitis necessitating appropriate biliary drainage. Endoscopic biliary stenting is the first-choice treatment, especially in unresectable cases, owing to its minimally invasive nature and utility. However, the hilar region is complex because of the branching and curving of bile ducts, making strictures in this area more complicated. Therefore, MHBO stenting is challenging, and treatment strategies have yet to be established. Furthermore, recent advances in antitumor therapies have altered the background surrounding the development of stenting strategies. Therefore, it is necessary to understand and grasp the current evidence well and to accumulate additional evidence reflecting the current situation. This study reviews the current status, issues, and prospects of endoscopic stenting for MHBO, especially in unresectable cases.

Retrospective comparative study of new slim-delivery and conventional large-cell stents for stent-in-stent methods for hilar malignant biliary obstruction

OBJECTIVES

Endoscopic management of unresectable hilar malignant biliary obstruction (HMBO) is technically challenging, and effectiveness of stent-in-stent using large-cell, metal stents was reported. A new, large-cell stent with a 6F tapered delivery system was recently developed. The aim of this study was to compare clinical outcomes of slim-delivery and conventional large-cell stents.

METHODS

This was a multicenter retrospective comparative study of stent-in-stent methods using slim-delivery stents (Niti-S Large Cell SR Slim Delivery [LC slim-delivery]) and conventional stents (Niti-S large-cell D-type; LCD) for unresectable HMBO.

RESULTS

Eighty-three patients with HMBO were included; 31 LC slim-delivery and 52 LCD. Overall technical and clinical success rates were 100% and 90% in LC slim-delivery group and 98% and 88% in LCD group. Use of the LC slim-delivery was associated with shorter stent placement time in the multiple regression analysis, with a stent placement time of 18 and 23 min in LC slim-delivery and LCD groups, respectively. The early adverse event (AE) rate of LC slim-delivery was 10%, with no cholangitis or cholecystitis as compared to 23% in the LCD group. Recurrent biliary obstruction (RBO) rates and time to RBO were comparable between the two groups: 35% and 44%, and 8.5 and 8.0 months in LC slim-delivery and LCD groups, respectively. The major cause of RBO was tumor ingrowth (82%) in the LC slim-delivery group and sludge (43%) and ingrowth (48%) in LCD group.

CONCLUSION

Stent-in-stent methods using LC slim-delivery shortened stent placement time with low early AE rates and comparable time to RBO in patients with HMBO.

Retrospective evaluation of slim fully covered self-expandable metallic stent for unresectable malignant hilar biliary obstruction

BACKGROUND

There have been few reports of covered self-expandable metallic stent (SEMS) placement for malignant hilar-biliary obstruction (MHBO) because of risk of biliary branch obstruction. We studied feasibility and efficacy of 6-mm-diameter, slim, fully covered SEMS (SFCSEMS) in a relatively large cohort.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated SFCSEMS in unresectable MHBO from December 2016 to September 2021 in Juntendo University Hospital.

RESULTS

We enrolled consecutive 54 unresectable MHBO (18 bile duct, 11 gallbladder, eight pancreatic, two hepatocellular, and 15 metastatic cancer cases) including Bismuth-type II (n = 11), III (n = 17), and IV (n = 26), and placed two (n = 35) or three (n = 19) SFCSEMS. The technical and clinical success rate was 100% and 92.5%, respectively, with 76.3 min of mean procedure time. Recurrent biliary obstruction (RBO) was observed in 35.2% and the median cumulative time to RBO (TRBO) was 181 days. Other adverse events were 11.1% (four mild-pancreatitis, one segmental-cholangitis, and one cholecystitis). There were no failed cases of stent exchange and second SFCSEMS (n = 6) showed significantly lower RBO (16.7% vs. 81.8%, P = .0364) and longer TRBO (undefined vs 86 days; P = .0617) than plastic stent (n = 11).

CONCLUSIONS

Endoscopic placement of SFCSEMS for unresectable MHBO was effective and feasible with low incidence of segmental cholangitis, and exchange strategy of SFCSEMS was promising.

Endoscopic radiofrequency ablation for ingrowth occlusion after bilateral metal stent placement for malignant hilar biliary obstruction: a prospective pilot study

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Endoscopic biliary radiofrequency ablation (RFA) may be an option for the treatment of ingrowth occlusion after self-expandable metal stent (SEMS) deployment; however, its utility remains uncertain. This study aimed to examine the feasibility of RFA for the palliation of ingrowth after bilateral SEMS placement in patients with malignant hilar biliary obstruction.

METHODS

This prospective, single-center, pilot study enrolled 30 patients who met the eligibility criteria between April 2020 and March 2022. Study outcomes were technical success, clinical success, recurrent biliary obstruction (RBO), and adverse events (AEs) besides RBO associated with RFA for ingrowth occlusion. Furthermore, factors predictive of clinical success were evaluated.

RESULTS

Technical and clinical success rates were 93.3% (28/30) and 71.4% (20/28), respectively. The rates of early and late AEs were 6.7% (2/30) and 10.0% (2/20), respectively. The incidence rate of RBO after RFA was 45.0% (9/20), and the median time to RBO was 163 days. Multivariate analysis of the factors affecting clinical success revealed a positive association between the recanalization diameter on the ingrown part within the SEMS (odds ratio, 1.13; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-1.26; P = .038). The calculated optimal cutoff for the ratio of the recanalization diameter to the SEMS diameter for predicting clinical success was 51.1%.

CONCLUSIONS

Endoscopic biliary RFA elicited promising results, with good long-term stent patency and without the requirement of any additional stent placement, for the palliation of ingrowth occlusion after bilateral SEMS placement. However, the clinical success rate was insufficient, necessitating improvements in the future. (Clinical trial registration number: UMIN000040154.).

Endobiliary Radiofrequency Ablation Using a Short-Type Balloon Enteroscope in Patients with Surgically Altered Anatomy

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is expected to prolong stent patency for malignant biliary obstruction (MBO). However, its feasibility when used in conjunction with a balloon enteroscope (BE) in patients with surgically altered anatomy (SAA) remains unknown.

AIMS

This study aimed to investigate the feasibility of RFA combined with metal stent insertion under BE guidance for MBO in patients with SAA.

METHODS

Thirty-seven patients who underwent treatment between October 2016 and January 2021 and met the eligibility criteria were investigated retrospectively. Study outcomes included technical and clinical success, recurrent biliary obstruction (RBO), and other adverse events besides RBO associated with RFA with metal stent placement using BE.

RESULTS

Technical and clinical success rates were 100% (37/37) each. The rates of early and late adverse events were 8.1% (3/37) and 8.1% (3/37), respectively. RBO occurred in 32.4% (12/37) of the patients, and the median time to RBO was 296 days. The cause of RBO was ingrowth in eight patients, overgrowth in three patients, and indeterminate in one patient. All reinterventions for RBO were successful using the BE approach; all ingrowths, except one, were recanalized using additional RFA without additional stent placement. The frequency of reintervention-related adverse events was 9.1% (1/11). The median time to RBO after reintervention was 166 days.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated the technical safety and feasibility as well as good long-term outcomes of endobiliary RFA combined with metal stent placement under BE guidance. This approach may be a useful option for treating MBO in patients with SAA.

Endoscopic re-intervention after stent-in-stent versus side-by-side bilateral self-expandable metallic stent deployment

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Endoscopic bilateral self-expandable metallic stent (SEMS) placement for unresectable malignant hilar biliary obstruction (MHBO) is widely performed; however, re-intervention after recurrent biliary obstruction (RBO) is often challenging. We compared stent-in-stent (SIS) and side-by-side (SBS) SEMS placement for MHBO considering re-intervention for RBO.

METHODS

One hundred five consecutive patients with MHBO who underwent endoscopic bilateral SEMS placement in our hospital and its affiliated institutions were enrolled in this study; 75 patients underwent partial SIS deployment between December 2005 and December 2012; and 30 underwent SBS deployment between January 2013 and March 2019. Initial treatments and re-interventions in each group were retrospectively evaluated.

RESULTS

Technical success rate (92% vs 100%, P = 0.179), procedure duration (46 vs 35 min, P = 0.382), functional success rate (97.1% vs 100%, P = 1.00), complication rate (24.6% vs 20.0%, P = 0.797), time to RBO (260 vs 312 days; Gray test, P = 0.815), and rate of RBO (59.4% vs 70.0%, P = 0.371) were not significantly different between the SIS and SBS groups. However, bilateral re-stenting with plastic stents through SEMS was successful in 63.4% of patients in the SIS group compared with 100% of patients in the SBS group (P = 0.0013). Median time to RBO upon first re-stenting with a plastic stent was 75 days (range, 11-195 days).

CONCLUSIONS

Endoscopic re-stenting after RBO was significantly more successful in the SBS group than in the SIS group. SBS method is suitable for MHBO considering revisionary stent placement.

Recent advances regarding endoscopic biliary drainage for unresectable malignant hilar biliary obstruction

Biliary drainage for unresectable malignant hilar biliary obstruction (UMHBO) is still associated with a number of controversies to be resolved. The superiority of bilateral drainage in comparison to unilateral drainage has not been proven obviously yet. However, bilateral drainage is necessary to treat obstructive jaundice in some UMHBO patients, and this may be connected with preservation of the functional liver volume. The partial stent-in-stent (SIS) method and side-by-side (SBS) method developed as bilateral drainage methods. There is no significant difference in the technical or clinical success rates of the SIS and SBS methods. In addition, these methods are comparable in terms of adverse events, patency period, and survival period. On the other hand, reintervention for recurrent biliary obstruction (RBO) after the SBS method seems to be easier in comparison to cases with RBO after the SIS method; however, there is no remarkable difference in the clinical results of these procedures. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided biliary drainage also has become an option for patients with UMHBO. Left hepatic drainage using EUS-guided hepaticogastrostomy (EUS-HGS) has become common; however, few studies have reported the results of bridging drainage for the right lobe using the EUS-HGS route or EUS-guided hepaticojejunostomy. A few studies addressed the results of newly designed stents, such as the 6-mm braided metal stent and inside stent. The development of various drainage methods and new devices is necessary for the further advancement of endoscopic biliary drainage for patients with UMHBO, further studies to evaluate those methods and devices are warranted.

Endobiliary Radiofrequency Ablation Combined with Gemcitabine and Cisplatin in Patients with Unresectable Extrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma

Background: Endobiliary radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is a promising treatment modality for patients with extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (eCCA). However, no study has investigated the combined use of endobiliary RFA and gemcitabine plus cisplatin (GC) chemotherapy. This study aimed to examine the feasibility and efficacy of endobiliary RFA with GC therapy for patients with unresectable eCCA. Methods: The study outcomes included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), time to recurrent biliary obstruction (RBO), and adverse events associated with the treatment. These parameters were retrospectively compared between 25 patients who underwent RFA with self-expandable metal stent (SEMS) placement followed by GC therapy (with-RFA group) and a control cohort of 25 patients who underwent SEMS placement alone and GC therapy (without-RFA group). Results: The median time to RBO was significantly longer in the with-RFA group (10.7 versus 5.2 months, p = 0.048). The median OS was significantly higher in patients with locally advanced tumors in the with-RFA group (23.1 versus 16.6 months, p = 0.032), but did not differ significantly in patients with metastasis (11.4 versus 8.5 months, p = 0.180). Similarly, the median PFS was significantly higher in the with-RFA group in patients with locally advanced disease (10.1 versus 7.3 months, p = 0.015), while there was no significant difference in patients with metastasis (5.4 versus 4.4 months, p = 0.529). The rates of various toxicities did not differ significantly between the groups. Conclusions: Endobiliary RFA prolonged the patency period of uncovered SEMS combined with GC therapy in patients with eCCA. Although RFA also yielded survival benefits, its effect was restricted to locally advanced tumors.

Endoscopic Reintervention for Recurrence of Malignant Biliary Obstruction: Developing the Best Strategy

Drainage therapy for malignant biliary obstruction (MBO) includes trans-papillary endoscopic retrograde biliary drainage (ERBD), percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD), and trans-gastrointestinal endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage (EUS-BD). With the development of chemotherapy, many MBO cases end up needing endoscopic reintervention (E-RI) for recurrent biliary obstruction. To achieve a successful E-RI, it is necessary to understand the various findings regarding E-RI in MBO cases reported to date. Therefore, in this review, we focus on E-RI for ERBD of distal MBO, ERBD of hilar MBO, and EUS-BD. To plan an appropriate E-RI strategy for biliary stent occlusion for MBO, the following must be considered on a case-by-case basis: the urgency of the drainage, the cause of the occlusion, the original route of drainage (PTBD/ERBD/EUS-BD), the initial stent used (plastic stent or self-expandable metallic stent), and in the case of self-expandable metallic stents, the type used (fully covered or uncovered). Regardless of the original method of stent placement, if the inflammation caused by obstructive cholangitis is severe and/or the patient is in shock, PTBD should be considered as the first choice. Finally, it is important to keep in mind that in many cases, performing E-RI will be difficult.

Updated evidence on the clinical impact of endoscopic radiofrequency ablation in the treatment of malignant biliary obstruction

Endoscopic biliary radiofrequency ablation (RFA) was recently developed as a novel adjunctive procedure and a promising therapeutic option in patients with malignant biliary obstruction (MBO). RFA can achieve local tumor control, resulting in improved biliary stent patency and a potential survival benefit. However, the efficacy of biliary RFA remains controversial, and previous studies have shown conflicting results. At present, extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma is considered the condition most effectively treated by biliary RFA, but there is limited research even on this point. Further, limitations of RFA associated with the devices used during the procedure are an important subject of discussion. In addition to further well-designed clinical trials, development of innovative devices is warranted to investigate and conclusively establish the usefulness of biliary RFA. In this review we summarize the updated evidence regarding the use of endoscopic biliary RFA for MBO and discuss issues that should be addressed in future studies.