Novel hemostatic method for non-spouting bleeding from unidentified point in endoscopic submucosal dissection using a self-assembling peptide solution

Short Peptide Nanofiber Biomaterials Ameliorate Local Hemostatic Capacity of Surgical Materials and Intraoperative Hemostatic Applications in Clinics

Short designer self-assembling peptide (dSAP) biomaterials are a new addition to the hemostat group. It may provide a diverse and robust toolbox for surgeons to integrate wound microenvironment with much safer and stronger hemostatic capacity than conventional materials and hemostatic agents. Especially in noncompressible torso hemorrhage (NCTH), diffuse mucosal surface bleeding, and internal medical bleeding (IMB), with respect to the optimal hemostatic formulation, dSAP biomaterials are the ingenious nanofiber alternatives to make bioactive neural scaffold, nasal packing, large mucosal surface coverage in gastrointestinal surgery (esophagus, gastric lesion, duodenum, and lower digestive tract), epicardiac cell-delivery carrier, transparent matrix barrier, and so on. Herein, in multiple surgical specialties, dSAP-biomaterial-based nano-hemostats achieve safe, effective, and immediate hemostasis, facile wound healing, and potentially reduce the risks in delayed bleeding, rebleeding, post-operative bleeding, or related complications. The biosafety in vivo, bleeding indications, tissue-sealing quality, surgical feasibility, and local usability are addressed comprehensively and sequentially and pursued to develop useful surgical techniques with better hemostatic performance. Here, the state of the art and all-round advancements of nano-hemostatic approaches in surgery are provided. Relevant critical insights will inspire exciting investigations on peptide nanotechnology, next-generation biomaterials, and better promising prospects in clinics.

Efficacy of a novel self-assembling peptide gel for initial hemostasis during cold snare polypectomy for multiple duodenal adenomas

Watch a video of this article.

Efficacy and Safety of a Novel Hemostatic Peptide Solution During Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial

INTRODUCTION

To compare the effectiveness of the novel hemostatic peptide, TDM-621, with that of conventional hemostatic methods in treating intraoperative blood oozing during endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD).

METHODS

This multicenter, open-label, randomized controlled trial involved 227 patients with gastric and rectal epithelial tumors in whom ESD was indicated. Patients in whom the source of blood oozing was difficult to identify with waterjet washing during the procedure and required hemostasis with hemostatic forceps were randomly assigned to the TDM-621 and control groups. The TDM-621 group (in which hemostasis was achieved with TDM-621, followed by coagulation hemostasis with hemostatic forceps, as needed) was compared with the control group (in which hemostasis was achieved with hemostatic forceps). The primary end point was the mean number of coagulations with hemostatic forceps, determined by a blinded independent review committee. The secondary end points were the rate of achievement of hemostasis with only TDM-621, the dosage of TDM-621, and adverse events in the TDM-621 group.

RESULTS

The mean number of coagulations with hemostatic forceps was significantly reduced in the TDM-621 group (1.0 ± 1.4) compared with that in the control group (4.9 ± 5.2) ( P < 0.001). The rate of hemostasis achievement with only TDM-621 was 62.2%; the mean dosage of TDM-621 was 1.75 ± 2.14 mL. The rates of grade ≥3 adverse events were 6.2% and 5.0% in the TDM-621 and control groups, respectively.

DISCUSSION

TDM-621 is a useful, easily operable hemostatic peptide for treatment of blood oozing during gastric and rectal ESD, with no serious safety concerns.

Clinical course and treatment of radiation-induced hemorrhagic gastritis: a case series study

Radiation-induced hemorrhagic gastritis is a relatively uncommon complication of irradiation that can be severe. However, appropriate treatment guidelines have not yet been established because of the small number of known cases. At our hospital, we encountered nine cases of radiation-induced hemorrhagic gastritis between July 2005 and July 2018. All patients initially underwent argon plasma coagulation (APC) for hemostasis. The treatment was highly effective, and hemostasis was successfully achieved in eight of the cases. Hemostasis could not be achieved in one case treated with APC; therefore, surgical resection was required. This patient had risk factors, such as liver cirrhosis and a history of abdominal surgery. Our case series suggests that APC is an effective hemostatic method that should be considered as the initial treatment option for radiation-induced hemorrhagic gastritis; however, surgical resection may be considered when the patient is at high risk for rebleeding.