Cerebrospinal fluid CD19(+) B-cell expansion in N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor encephalitis

Anti-NMDAR antibodies, the blood-brain barrier, and anti-NMDAR encephalitis

Anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (anti-NMDAR) encephalitis is an antibody-related autoimmune encephalitis. It is characterized by the existence of antibodies against NMDAR, mainly against the GluN1 subunit, in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). Recent research suggests that anti-NMDAR antibodies may reduce NMDAR levels in this disorder, compromising synaptic activity in the hippocampus. Although anti-NMDAR antibodies are used as diagnostic indicators, the origin of antibodies in the central nervous system (CNS) is unclear. The blood-brain barrier (BBB), which separates the brain from the peripheral circulatory system, is crucial for antibodies and immune cells to enter or exit the CNS. The findings of cytokines in this disorder support the involvement of the BBB. Here, we aim to review the function of NMDARs and the relationship between anti-NMDAR antibodies and anti-NMDAR encephalitis. We summarize the present knowledge of the composition of the BBB, especially by emphasizing the role of BBB components. Finally, we further provide a discussion on the impact of BBB dysfunction in anti-NMDAR encephalitis.

Advances in Potential Cerebrospinal Fluid Biomarkers for Autoimmune Encephalitis: A Review

Autoimmune encephalitis (AE) is a severe inflammatory disease of the brain. Patients with AE demonstrate amnesia, seizures, and psychosis. Recent studies have identified numerous associated autoantibodies (e.g., against NMDA receptors (NMDARs), LGI1, etc.) involved in the pathogenesis of AE, and the levels of diagnosis and treatment are thus improved dramatically. However, there are drawbacks of clinical diagnosis and treatment based solely on antibody levels, and thus the application of additional biomarkers is urgently needed. Considering the important role of immune mechanisms in AE development, we summarize the relevant research progress in identifying cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers with a focus on cytokines/chemokines, demyelination, and nerve damage.

Cytokine dynamics and targeted immunotherapies in autoimmune encephalitis

Autoimmune encephalitides constitute a diverse group of immune-mediated central nervous system disorders mainly characterized by the presence of antibodies targeting neuronal or glial antigens. Despite the notable contribution of antibody discovery to the understanding of their physiopathology, the specific immune cells and inflammatory mediators involved in autoimmune encephalitis are still poorly defined. However, cytokines have recently emerged as crucial signalling molecules in the pathogenesis of autoimmune encephalitis. Cytokines are biologically active, soluble, low-molecular-weight proteins or glycoproteins involved in a wide variety of physiological functions, including central nervous system development and homeostasis, immune surveillance, as well as proliferation and maturation of immune cells. Since unbalanced cytokine expression is considered a hallmark of many autoimmune central nervous system disorders, their identification and quantification has become an essential element in personalized medicine applied to the field of neuroimmunology. Several studies have explored the cytokine profile of autoimmune encephalitis, but their interpretation and comparison is challenging due to their small sample sizes and extremely high heterogeneity, especially regarding the cytokines analysed, type of sample used, and associated neural antibody. Only the cytokine profile of anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor encephalitis has extensively been investigated, with findings suggesting that, although humoral immunity is the main effector, T cells may also be relevant for the development of this disorder. A better understanding of cytokine dynamics governing neuroinflammation might offer the opportunity of developing new therapeutic strategies against specific immune cells, cytokines, antibodies, or intracellular signalling cascades, therefore leading to better outcomes and preventing undesired side effects of the presently used strategies. In this review, we first summarize the current knowledge about the role of cytokines in the pathogenesis of autoimmune encephalitis, combining theoretical analysis with experimental validations, to assess their suitability as clinical biomarkers. Second, we discuss the potential applicability of the novel targeted immunotherapies in autoimmune encephalitis depending on the immunobiology of the associated antibody, their limitations, as well as the main limitations that should be addressed in future studies.

Contemporary advances in anti-NMDAR antibody (Ab)-mediated encephalitis

The study of antibody (Ab)-mediated encephalitis has advanced dramatically since the discovery of antibodies directed against the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) in association with a unique neuro-psychiatric syndrome, over a decade-and-a-half ago. Anti-NMDAR Ab-mediated encephalitis now represents the most well characterised form of autoimmune encephalitis. The disease most commonly manifests in young women, but all ages and both sexes can be affected. Autoantibodies may arise in the context of two well-recognised disease triggers in a proportion of patients, and ultimately facilitate NMDAR displacement from synapses. Various CSF cytokines, chemokines, and other molecules have been explored as candidate biomarkers but are limited in sensitivity and specificity. The clinical spectrum is diverse, with evolution and a combination of neuro-psychiatric abnormalities at disease nadir common. Anti-NMDAR Ab-mediated encephalitis is immunotherapy responsive, and a near-majority ultimately acquire a broadly favourable clinical outcome. The diagnosis, and more particularly, the management of the disease can still hold considerable challenges. Moreover, well-defined biomarkers remain elusive. The present review will therefore delineate pathogenic and clinical advances to date in anti-NMDAR antibody-mediated encephalitis.

Role and Relevance of Cerebrospinal Fluid Cells in Diagnostics and Research: State-of-the-Art and Underutilized Opportunities

Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) has recently experienced a revival in diagnostics and research. However, little progress has been made regarding CSF cell analysis. For almost a century, CSF cell count and cytomorphological examination have been central diagnostic parameters, with CSF pleocytosis as a hallmark finding of neuroinflammation and cytology offering valuable clues regarding infectious, autoimmune, and malignant aetiologies. A great deal of information, however, remains unattended as modern immune phenotyping technologies have not yet been broadly incorporated into routine CSF analysis. This is a serious deficit considering the central role of CSF cells as effectors in central nervous system (CNS) immune defence and autoimmune CNS processes, and the diagnostic challenges posed by clinically overlapping infectious and immune-mediated CNS diseases. Here, we summarize historical, specimen-intrinsic, methodological, and technical issues determining the state-of-the-art diagnostics of CSF cells and outline future perspectives for this underutilized window into meningeal and CNS immunity.

Current Status of Biomarkers in Anti-N-Methyl-D-Aspartate Receptor Encephalitis

The discovery of biomarkers in rare diseases is of paramount importance to allow a better diagnosis, improve predictions of outcomes, and prompt the development of new treatments. Anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) encephalitis is a rare autoimmune disorder associated with the presence of antibodies targeting the GluN1 subunit of the NMDAR. Since it was discovered in 2007, large efforts have been made towards the identification of clinical, paraclinical, and molecular biomarkers to better understand the immune mechanisms that govern the course of the disease as well as to define predictors of treatment response and long-term outcomes. However, most of these biomarkers are still in an exploratory phase, with only a few candidates reaching the final phases of the always-complex process of biomarker development, mainly due to the low incidence of the disease and its recent description. Clinical and paraclinical markers are probably the most widely explored in anti-NMDAR encephalitis, five of them combined in a clinical score to predict 1 year outcome. On the contrary, soluble molecules, such as persistent antibody positivity, antibody titers, cytokines, and other inflammatory mediators, have been proposed as biomarkers of clinical activity, inflammation, prognosis, and treatment response, but further studies are required for their clinical validation including larger and more homogenous cohorts of patients. Similarly, genetic susceptibility biomarkers are still in the exploratory phase and, therefore, weak conclusions can for now only be achieved. Thus, further studies are warranted to define biomarkers and unravel the underlying mechanisms driving rare diseases such as anti-NMDAR encephalitis. Future international collaborative studies with prospective designs that enable the enrollment of large cohorts will allow for the identification and validation of novel biomarkers for clinical decision-making.

Pediatric Autoimmune Encephalitis and Its Relationship With Infection

Autoimmune encephalitis (AE) is an increasingly recognized inflammatory disorder of the central nervous system and is most often characterized by antibodies against intracellular and neuronal surface antigens. AE is a devastating disease that may result in developmental delay or regression in children. However, the pathogenesis of AE is not clear, and immune system disorders after infection likely play an important role in AE. Many studies have reported that patients with herpes simplex virus encephalitis develop anti-N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor encephalitis after antiviral treatment. It is critical to recognize pediatric AE early and to distinguish it from infectious forms because AE is treatable and responsive to immunotherapies. In this review, we discuss the clinical features of pediatric AE and focus on the relationship between AE and postinfection status. In addition, we review the probable mechanisms underlying infection-triggered AE, which include molecular mimicry, bystander activation, epitope spreading, immune system disorder, and genetic susceptibility.

Autoimmune encephalitis mediated by B-cell response against N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor

Anti-N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) encephalitis is a neuropsychiatric disease characterized by an antibody-mediated autoimmune response against NMDAR. Recent studies have shown that anti-NMDAR antibodies are involved in the pathophysiology of the disease. However, the upstream immune and inflammatory processes responsible for this pathogenic response are still poorly understood. Here, we immunized mice against the region of NMDA receptor containing the N368/G369 amino acids, previously implicated in a pathogenic response. This paradigm induced encephalopathy characterized by blood-brain barrier opening, periventricular T2-MRI hyperintensities and IgG deposits into the brain parenchyma. Two weeks after immunization, mice developed clinical symptoms reminiscent of encephalitis: anxiety- and depressive-like behaviours, spatial memory impairment (without motor disorders) and increased sensitivity to seizures. This response occurred independently of overt T-cell recruitment. However, it was associated with B220+ (B cell) infiltration towards the ventricles, where they differentiated into CD138+ cells (plasmocytes). Interestingly, these B cells originated from peripheral lymphoid organs (spleen and cervical lymphoid nodes). Finally, blocking the B-cell response using a depleting cocktail of antibodies reduced the severity of symptoms in encephalitis mice. This study demonstrates that the B-cell response can lead to an autoimmune reaction against NMDAR that drives encephalitis-like behavioural impairments. It also provides a relevant platform for dissecting encephalitogenic mechanisms in an animal model, and enables the testing of therapeutic strategies targeting the immune system in anti-NMDAR encephalitis.

Cerebrospinal fluid CD20 positive B-cell expansion in a case of anti-NMDAR encephalitis

Anti-N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) encephalitis is a potentially fatal autoimmune encephalitis with a strong B-cell response. We measured the proportion of CD20 positive and CD19 positive B-cells in the CSF from a case of severe anti-NMDAR encephalitis. The proportion of CD20 positive B-cells in the CSF was 15.0%, higher than CD19 positive B cells (10.1%), and higher than that seen in non-inflammatory neurological disorders (<1%). After the treatments of steroids, intravenous immunoglobulin and rituximab to eliminate B-cells, she recovered. These findings further support the use of rituximab that targets CD20 positive B-cells in anti-NMDAR encephalitis.

Anti-NMDA Receptor Encephalitis: Efficacy of Treatment for Male Patients and miRNA Biomarker

BACKGROUND

Anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor encephalitis is an acute form of encephalitis. Treatments for the anti-NMDA receptor encephalitis usually include steroids, intravenous immunoglobulin, plasma exchange, plasmapheresis, rituximab, cyclophosphamide and tumor resection.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to compare the efficacy of the treatments including intravenous immunoglobulin, plasma exchange, plasmapheresis, rituximab or cyclophosphamide for male anti- NMDA receptor encephalitis patients without tumor and to discuss potential biomarkers for this disease.

METHOD

The Fisher exact test and the contingency table analysis were used to analyze the treatment efficacy for 43 male and 76 female patients. In addition, a hierarchical tree method was adopted to analyze the difference in the treatment efficacy between male and female patients.

RESULTS

The p-values of testing whether the efficacy rate of plasmapheresis (or plasma exchange) for the male patient is greater than a threshold are significantly different from the pvalues for the other two treatments. In addition, the hierarchical tree method shows that the treatment strategy associating with early recovery is different for male and female patients.

CONCLUSION

The results revealed that the efficacy rate of plasmapheresis (or plasma exchange) is not inferior to that of intravenous immunoglobulin and rituximab (or cyclophosphamide) for male patients without tumor. In addition, B-cell attracting C-X-C motif chemokine 13 (CXCL13) and microRNA let-7b have the potential to be the treatment response biomarkers for anti-NMDA receptor encephalitis. They may not be useful prognostic biomarkers for this encephalitis unless they are not biomarkers for other autoimmune encephalitides.

CD19+ B-cells in autoantibody-negative limbic encephalitis

PURPOSE

Flow cytometry helps to elucidate the cellular immune repertoire's mechanisms in patients with temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) due to limbic encephalitis (LE) subcategories and carries potential significance for subtype-specific treatment.

METHODS

We enrolled 62 patients with TLE due to LE associated with no autoantibodies (n = 40), neural autoantibodies (n = 22), as well as autoantibodies against intracellular antigens (n = 15/22). All patients underwent neuropsychological testing, brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), electroencephalography (EEG) recordings, and peripheral blood (PB) and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) investigations including flow cytometry.

RESULTS

CD19+ B-cells were increased in the PB and CSF of patients with antibody-negative LE compared with those associated with antibodies against intracellular antigens (Kruskal-Wallis one way analysis of variance (ANOVA) on ranks with Dunn's test, p < 0.05). There were no differences in CD138+ B-cells, CD4+ T-cells, human leukocyte antigen - DR isotype (HLA-DR+) CD4+ T-cells, CD8+ T-cells, and HLA-DR+ CD8+ T-cells in the CSF between groups with LE. The blood-brain barrier is more often impaired in patients with antibody-negative LE than in LE with antibodies against intracellular antigens (chi-square test, p < 0.05). In addition, we detected no correlations between immune cell subsets and clinical or paraclinical parameters in patients with antibody-negative and intracellular antibody-positive LE.

CONCLUSIONS

The increase of CD19+ B-cells in the CSF and frequent signs of dysfunctional blood-brain barrier in patients with antibody-negative rather than intracellular antibody-positive LE suggest that CD19+ B-cells play a role in antibody-negative encephalitis although their pathogenic role in the central nervous system (CNS) immunity because of missing correlations between immune cells and clinical and paraclinical parameters remains unknown. Further studies are required to evaluate the usefulness of these B-cells as a biomarker for the stratification of treatment strategies.

Low CSF CD4/CD8+ T-cell proportions are associated with blood-CSF barrier dysfunction in limbic encephalitis

PURPOSE

Investigating immune cells in autoimmune limbic encephalitis (LE) will contribute to our understanding of its pathophysiology and may help to develop appropriate therapies. The aim of the present study was to analyze immune cells to reveal underlying immune signatures in patients with temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) with LE.

METHODS

We investigated 68 patients with TLE with LE compared with 7 control patients with TLE with no signs of LE screened from 154 patients with suspected LE. From the patients with TLE-LE, we differentiated early seizure onset (<20 years, n = 9) and late seizure onset group (≥20 years, n = 59) of patients. Patients underwent neuropsychological assessment, electroencephalography (EEG), brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and peripheral blood (PB) and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) analysis including flow cytometry.

RESULTS

We identified a higher CD4/8+ T-cell ratio in the PB in all patients with TLE-LE and in patients with late-onset TLE-LE each compared with controls (Kruskal-Wallis one-way ANOVA (analysis of variance) with Dunn's test, p < 0.05). Moreover, a lower CD4/CD8+ T-cell ratio is detected in all patients with TLE-LE with blood-CSF barrier dysfunction, unlike in those with none (Kruskal-Wallis one-way ANOVA with Dunn's test, p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest that the proportion of CD4+ and CD8+ T-cells in the CSF of patients with LE associated with blood-CSF barrier dysfunction plays a potential role in CNS (central nervous system) inflammation in these patients. Thus, flow cytometry as a methodology reveals novel insights into LE's genesis and symptomatology. The CD4/8+ T-cell ratio in PB as a biomarker for LE requires further investigation.

Differential Diagnosis of Autoimmune Encephalitis from Infectious Lymphocytic Encephalitis by Analysing the Lymphocyte Subsets of Cerebrospinal Fluid

This study is aimed at investigating the lymphocyte subsets of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) to provide possible differential diagnostic values and better understand the pathophysiological mechanism underlying autoimmune encephalitis (AE) and infectious lymphocytic encephalitis. A series of CD markers, including CD3/4/8/20 representing different types and developmental stages of lymphocytes, were used to count the corresponding subpopulations of CSF from clinical and laboratory confirmed cases of anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor AE (NMDAR-AE), herpes simplex virus encephalitis (HSVE), and tuberculous meningitis (TBM). The percentages of lymphocytes observed and the CD4 : CD8 ratios were compared between the three groups. There were no significant differences of the percentage of total lymphocytes, CD3 cells, and CD4 cells of CSF among each group. However, there were strongly statistical differences of the CD4 : CD8 ratio in CSF of each group with 0.6 : 1 in NMDAR-AE, 0.9 : 1 in HSVE, and 3.2 : 1 in TBM. The percentage of CD20 B lymphocytes in NMDAR-AE was statistically higher than that of other groups. The distinct percentages of lymphocyte subpopulations of CSF appeared to be characteristic and could potentially serve as diagnostic indicators. Further verification and research will be necessary to clarify the significance and nature of CD4 : CD8 ratios and B lymphocytes in CSF between AE and the infectious lymphocytic encephalitis.

Innate Immunity in the Central Nervous System: A Missing Piece of the Autoimmune Encephalitis Puzzle?

The autoimmune encephalitides are a group of autoimmune conditions targeting the central nervous system and causing severe clinical symptoms including drug-resistant seizures, cognitive dysfunction and psychiatric disturbance. Although these disorders appear to be antibody mediated, the role of innate immune responses needs further clarification. Infiltrating monocytes and microglial proliferation at the site of pathology could contribute to the pathogenesis of the disease with resultant blood brain barrier dysfunction, and subsequent activation of adaptive immune response. Both innate and adaptive immune cells can produce pro-inflammatory molecules which can perpetuate ongoing neuroinflammation and drive ongoing seizure activity. Ultimately neurodegenerative changes can ensue with resultant long-term neurological sequelae that can impact on ongoing patient morbidity and quality of life, providing a potential target for future translational research.

Relapse risk factors in anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor encephalitis

AIM

To identify factors that may predict and affect the risk of relapse in anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) encephalitis.

METHOD

This was a retrospective study of an Italian cohort of patients with paediatric (≤18y) onset anti-NMDAR encephalitis.

RESULTS

Of the 62 children included (39 females; median age at onset 9y 10mo, range 1y 2mo-18y; onset between 2005 and 2018), 21 per cent relapsed (median two total events per relapsing patient, range 2-4). Time to first relapse was median 31.5 months (range 7-89mo). Severity at first relapse was lower than onset (median modified Rankin Scale [mRS] 3, range 2-4, vs median mRS 5, range 3-5; admission to intensive care unit: 0/10 vs 3/10). At the survival analysis, the risk of relapsing was significantly lower in patients who received three or more different immune therapies at first disease event (hazard ratio 0.208, 95% confidence interval 0.046-0.941; p=0.042). Neurological outcome at follow-up did not differ significantly between patients with relapsing and monophasic disease (mRS 0-1 in 39/49 vs 12/13; p=0.431), although follow-up duration was significantly longer in relapsing (median 84mo, range 14-137mo) than in monophasic patients (median 32mo, range 4-108mo; p=0.002).

INTERPRETATION

Relapses may occur in about one-fifth of children with anti-NMDAR encephalitis, are generally milder than at onset, and may span over a long period, although they do not seem to be associated with severity in the acute phase or with outcome at follow-up. Aggressive immune therapy at onset may reduce risk of relapse.

WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS

Relapses of anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor encephalitis may span over a long period. Relapses were not associated with severity in the acute phase or outcome at follow-up. Aggressive immune therapy at onset appears to decrease risk of relapse.

N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antibody production from germinal center reactions: Therapeutic implications

Introduction

N‐methyl‐D‐aspartate receptor (NMDAR) antibody encephalitis is mediated by immunoglobulin G (IgG) autoantibodies directed against the NR1 subunit of the NMDAR. Around 20% of patients have an underlying ovarian teratoma, and the condition responds to early immunotherapies and ovarian teratoma removal. However, despite clear therapeutic relevance, mechanisms of NR1‐IgG production and the contribution of germinal center B cells to NR1‐IgG levels are unknown.

Methods

Clinical data and longitudinal paired serum NR1‐reactive IgM and IgG levels from 10 patients with NMDAR‐antibody encephalitis were determined. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells from these 10 patients, and two available ovarian teratomas, were stimulated with combinations of immune factors and tested for secretion of total IgG and NR1‐specific antibodies.

Results

In addition to disease‐defining NR1‐IgG, serum NR1‐IgM was found in 6 of 10 patients. NR1‐IgM levels were typically highest around disease onset and detected for several months into the disease course. Moreover, circulating patient B cells were differentiated into CD19⁺CD27⁺⁺CD38⁺⁺ antibody‐secreting cells in vitro and, from 90% of patients, secreted NR1‐IgM and NR1‐IgG. Secreted levels of NR1‐IgG correlated with serum NR1‐IgG (p < 0.0001), and this was observed across the varying disease durations, suggestive of an ongoing process. Furthermore, ovarian teratoma tissue contained infiltrating lymphocytes which produced NR1‐IgG in culture.

Interpretation

Serum NR1‐IgM and NR1‐IgG, alongside the consistent production of NR1‐IgG from circulating B cells and from ovarian teratomas suggest that ongoing germinal center reactions may account for the peripheral cell populations which secrete NR1‐IgG. Cells participating in germinal center reactions might be a therapeutic target for the treatment of NMDAR‐antibody encephalitis. Ann Neurol 2018;83:553–561

Management of antibody-mediated autoimmune encephalitis in adults and children: literature review and consensus-based practical recommendations

Autoimmune encephalitis associated with antibodies against neuronal surface targets (NSAE) are rare but still underrecognized conditions that affect adult and pediatric patients. Clinical guidelines have recently been published with the aim of providing diagnostic clues regardless of antibody status. These syndromes are potentially treatable but the choice of treatment and its timing, as well as differential diagnoses, long-term management, and clinical and paraclinical follow-up, remain major challenges. In the absence of evidence-based guidelines, management of these conditions is commonly based on single-center expertise.Taking into account different published expert recommendations in addition to the multicenter experience of the Italian Working Group on Autoimmune Encephalitis, both widely accepted and critical aspects of diagnosis, management and particularly of immunotherapy for NSAE have been reviewed and are discussed.Finally, we provide consensus-based practical advice for managing hospitalization and follow-up of patients with NSAE.

Mycophenolate mofetil, azathioprine and methotrexate usage in paediatric anti-NMDAR encephalitis: A systematic literature review

BACKGROUND

Available data on mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), azathioprine (AZA) and methotrexate (MTX) for paediatric-onset anti-N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor encephalitis (anti-NMDARE) is limited.

METHODS

Systematic literature review on patients treated with MMF/AZA/MTX for paediatric-onset anti-NMDARE, with focus on modes of use, efficacy and safety.

RESULTS

87 patients were included (age at onset median 11 years, range 0.8-18 years; 69% females). 46% had a relapsing course. 52% received MMF, 27% AZA, 15% MTX, and 6% a combination of MMF/AZA/MTX (7 patients received intrathecal MTX). Before MMF/AZA/MTX, 100% patients received steroids, 83% intravenous immunoglobulin and 45% plasma exchange, and 50% received second-line treatments (rituximab/cyclophosphamide). MMF/AZA/MTX were administered >6 months from onset in 51%, and only after relapse in 40%. Worst mRS before MMF/AZA/MTX was median 4.5 (range 3-5). At last follow-up (median 2 years, range 0.2-8.6), median mRS was 1 (range 0-6). Median annualised relapse rate was 0.4 (range 0-6.7) pre-MMF/AZA/MTX (excluding first events), and 0 on MMF/AZA/MTX (mean 0.03, range 0-0.8). 7% patients relapsed on MMF/AZA/MTX. These relapsing patients had low rate of second-line treatments before MMF/AZA/MTX (25%), long median time between onset and MMF/AZA/MTX usage (18 months), and frequently they were started on MMF/AZA/MTX only after relapse (75%). Relapse rate was lower among patients who received first immune therapy ≤30 days (25%) than later (64%), who received second-line treatments at first event (14%) rather than not (64%), who were started on MMF/AZA/MTX after the first (12%) rather than subsequent events (17%), and who were started on MMF/AZA/MTX ≤3 months from onset (33%) rather than later (53%). Adverse reactions to MMF/AZA/MTX occurred in 2 cases (cytomegalovirus colitis and respiratory infection), of grade 3 Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v4.0.

DISCUSSION

Our literature review disclosed heterogeneity in the use of MMF/AZA/MTX in paediatric-onset anti-NMDARE. MMF/AZA/MTX usage is mostly restricted to retrospective cohort descriptions. These agents may reduce risk of relapse, and have a reasonable safety profile, however data on larger cohorts are required to definitively determine effect.

Anti-NMDA Receptor Encephalitis: Clinical Features and Basic Mechanisms

In slightly more than 10 years, anti-NMDA receptor (NMDAR) encephalitis has changed from a rare paraneoplastic syndrome to the most common cause of nonviral encephalitis. It presents fulminantly with progressive psychosis, seizures, and autonomic dysfunction, leading to death if untreated. However, rapid recognition and treatment can lead to survival and a return to baseline levels of functioning in many patients. While initially associated with ovarian teratomas, it is now associated with other tumors and can reflect a postviral event. The antibodies to the NMDAR made in this syndrome are pathogenic and are directed at the extracellular domain of the GluN1 subunit. Such antibodies lead to internalization of NMDARs in model systems, leading to a physiological state characterized by NMDAR hypofunction. Analogous disorders, characterized by antibodies to other synaptic receptors, present with neurological and psychiatric dysfunction and also appear to reflect antibody-induced internalization of receptors. However, this simple pathophysiology may be too simplistic to reflect the complexity of events in anti-NMDAR encephalitis. Future scientific investigations may allow a more complete understanding of this disorder and improve treatment of anti-NMDAR encephalitis.

Promise, Progress, and Pitfalls in the Search for Central Nervous System Biomarkers in Neuroimmunological Diseases: A Role for Cerebrospinal Fluid Immunophenotyping

Biomarkers are central to the translational medicine strategic focus, though strict criteria need to be applied to their designation and utility. They are one of the most promising areas of medical research, but the "biomarker life-cycle" must be understood to avoid false-positive and false-negative results. Molecular biomarkers will revolutionize the treatment of neurological diseases, but the rate of progress depends on a bold, visionary stance by neurologists, as well as scientists, biotech and pharmaceutical industries, funding agencies, and regulators. One important tool in studying cell-specific biomarkers is multiparameter flow cytometry. Cerebrospinal fluid immunophenotyping, or immune phenotypic subsets, captures the biology of intrathecal inflammatory processes, and has the potential to guide personalized immunotherapeutic selection and monitor treatment efficacy. Though data exist for some disorders, they are surprisingly lacking in many others, identifying a serious deficit to be overcome. Flow cytometric immunophenotyping provides a valuable, available, and feasible "window" into both adaptive and innate components of neuroinflammation that is currently underutilized.

Lower dosages of rituximab used successfully in the treatment of anti-NMDA receptor encephalitis without tumour

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the use and efficacy of lower dosages of rituximab for treating anti N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) encephalitis without tumour.

METHODS

We performed a prospective study of 10 patients with anti-NMDAR encephalitis who did not respond to 10 to 14days first-line immunotherapy and received rituximab administered intravenously (IV) at a dosage of 100mg once per week for 4 consecutive weeks. Reinfusion of rituximab was given when CD19⁺ B-cell counts of total lymphocytes in peripheral blood >1%. The annualized relapse rate (ARR), modified Rankin scale (mRS) and CD19⁺ B-cell counts were measured every 4 to 10weeks after initial rituximab treatment in order to assess the clinical outcome and efficacy of rituximab.

RESULTS

Lower dosages of rituximab led to a significant reduction of mRS and CD19⁺ B-cells when compared with before the rituximab infusion (P<0.05) and allowed 9 (90%) patients to maintain a stabilised neurological status. One patient experienced a relapse at 19weeks after initial rituximab infusion. Although ARR reduction of all 10 patients did not achieve statistical significance (P>0.05), in the 4 patients who had relapses before rituximab treatment there was an apparent reduction in ARR over 56weeks. At the last follow up, 9 patients (90%) had a good outcome (mRS≤2) including 3 patients (30%) who recovered completely (mRS=0). Transient infusion adverse events occurred in 2 patients. We observed no serious delayed adverse events during the 56weeks follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with anti-NMDAR encephalitis who did not respond to first-line immunotherapy, early application of lower dosages of rituximab could efficiently reduce CD19⁺ B-cell counts of peripheral blood and improve the prognosis of anti-NMDAR encephalitis.

The Laboratory Diagnosis of Autoimmune Encephalitis

Autoimmune encephalitis is a group of encephalitis syndromes that cause altered mentality, memory decline, or seizures in association with the presence of serum and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) autoantibodies (auto-Abs). An early diagnosis enables early treatments. The detection of auto-Abs is a confirmatory diagnosis. Tissue-based assay, cell-based immunoassay, and immunoblotting are used to detect various autoantibodies. The CSF test for the presence of antibodies is important because it is more sensitive and reflects disease activity in many autoimmune encephalitis, although antibody tests can be negative even in the presence of autoimmune encephalitis. EEG is often abnormal, but nonspecific. A unilateral or bilateral medial temporal T2 high signal is a common finding in MRI. Fludeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography is sometimes useful for diagnosis in patients with normal MRI.

Human cerebrospinal fluid monoclonal N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor autoantibodies are sufficient for encephalitis pathogenesis

SEE ZEKERIDOU AND LENNON DOI101093/AWW213 FOR A SCIENTIFIC COMMENTARY ON THIS ARTICLE: Anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) encephalitis is a recently discovered autoimmune syndrome associated with psychosis, dyskinesias, and seizures. Little is known about the cerebrospinal fluid autoantibody repertoire. Antibodies against the NR1 subunit of the NMDAR are thought to be pathogenic; however, direct proof is lacking as previous experiments could not distinguish the contribution of further anti-neuronal antibodies. Using single cell cloning of full-length immunoglobulin heavy and light chain genes, we generated a panel of recombinant monoclonal NR1 antibodies from cerebrospinal fluid memory B cells and antibody secreting cells of NMDAR encephalitis patients. Cells typically carried somatically mutated immunoglobulin genes and had undergone class-switching to immunoglobulin G, clonally expanded cells carried identical somatic hypermutation patterns. A fraction of NR1 antibodies were non-mutated, thus resembling 'naturally occurring antibodies' and indicating that tolerance induction against NMDAR was incomplete and somatic hypermutation not essential for functional antibodies. However, only a small percentage of cerebrospinal fluid-derived antibodies reacted against NR1. Instead, nearly all further antibodies bound specifically to diverse brain-expressed epitopes including neuronal surfaces, suggesting that a broad repertoire of antibody-secreting cells enrich in the central nervous system during encephalitis. Our functional data using primary hippocampal neurons indicate that human cerebrospinal fluid-derived monoclonal NR1 antibodies alone are sufficient to cause neuronal surface receptor downregulation and subsequent impairment of NMDAR-mediated currents, thus providing ultimate proof of antibody pathogenicity. The observed formation of immunological memory might be relevant for clinical relapses.

Autoimmune channelopathies in paraneoplastic neurological syndromes

Paraneoplastic neurological syndromes and autoimmune encephalitides are immune neurological disorders occurring or not in association with a cancer. They are thought to be due to an autoimmune reaction against neuronal antigens ectopically expressed by the underlying tumour or by cross-reaction with an unknown infectious agent. In some instances, paraneoplastic neurological syndromes and autoimmune encephalitides are related to an antibody-induced dysfunction of ion channels, a situation that can be labelled as autoimmune channelopathies. Such functional alterations of ion channels are caused by the specific fixation of an autoantibody upon its target, implying that autoimmune channelopathies are usually highly responsive to immuno-modulatory treatments. Over the recent years, numerous autoantibodies corresponding to various neurological syndromes have been discovered and their mechanisms of action partially deciphered. Autoantibodies in neurological autoimmune channelopathies may target either directly ion channels or proteins associated to ion channels and induce channel dysfunction by various mechanisms generally leading to the reduction of synaptic expression of the considered channel. The discovery of those mechanisms of action has provided insights on the regulation of the synaptic expression of the altered channels as well as the putative roles of some of their functional subdomains. Interestingly, patients' autoantibodies themselves can be used as specific tools in order to study the functions of ion channels. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled: Membrane channels and transporters in cancers.

Anti-NMDAR autoimmune encephalitis

The N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) is involved in normal physiological and pathological states in the brain. Anti-NMDAR encephalitis is characterized by memory deficits, seizures, confusion, and psychological disturbances in males and females of all ages. This type of encephalitis is often associated with ovarian teratoma in young women, but children are less likely to have tumors. Anti-NMDAR encephalitis is a neuroimmune syndrome in patients with autoantibodies recognizing extracellular epitopes of NMDAR, and the autoantibodies attenuate NMDAR function through the internalization of NMDAR. Following the initial symptoms of inflammation, the patients show the various symptoms such as memory loss, confusion, emotional disturbances, psychosis, dyskinesis, decrease in speech intelligibility, and seizures. About half of these patients improved with immunotherapy including high-dose intravenous corticosteroids and intravenous immunoglobulins is administrated to these patients, but the patients who had no improvement with these therapy require further treatments with rituximab or cyclophosphamide. It is necessary to detect anti-NMDAR antibodies at early stages, because the prognosis of these patients may be improved by early treatment. Recovery is slow, and the patients may have some disturbances in their motor function and cognition. The pathologic mechanism underlying the development of anti-NMDAR encephalitis has been elucidated gradually, but the optimal treatment has not yet been clarified. Further studies are required to clarify in detail the mechanism underlying anti-NMDA encephalitis and to develop effective treatments.

Autoimmune encephalitis: recent updates and emerging challenges

The knowledge of immune dysregulation and autoimmunity in neurological disorders has expanded considerably in recent times. Recognition of clinical syndromes, reliable methods of diagnosis, and early targeted immunotherapy can lead to a favourable outcome in acute and subacute neurological disorders that may be associated with significant morbidity and mortality if left untreated. This review focuses on the rapidly expanding field of autoimmune encephalitis. We describe the differences between limbic encephalitis associated with antibodies targeting intracellular antigens, and neuronal surface antibody syndromes (NSAS) where the antigens are primarily receptors or synaptic proteins located on the neuronal cell surface. We chronologically highlight important developments in NSAS by focusing on voltage gated potassium channel complex-associated antibody mediated encephalitis, anti-N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor (anti-NMDAR) encephalitis, and anti-dopamine 2 receptor antibody-associated basal ganglia encephalitis. Contentious issues such as the complexities of using serum antibodies as biomarkers, the initiation of central nervous system autoimmunity, and possible pathogenic mechanisms of these antibodies will be reviewed. The therapeutic challenges that clinicians face such as the timing of therapy and the role of second-line therapy will be discussed, with crucial concepts highlighted in the form of clinical vignettes. Future directions will involve the identification of novel antigens and methods to establish their pathogenicity, as well as evaluation of the most efficacious therapeutic strategies in patients with established NSAS.