Mesenchymal stem cell application in children with subacute sclerosing panencephalitis

A Comprehensive Investigation of the Current Subacute Sclerosing Panencephalitis (SSPE) Treatment Options to Improve Patient Quality of Life

Subacute sclerosing panencephalitis (SSPE) is a progressive, disabling, and deadly neurological disorder related to measles (rubeola) infection occurring primarily in children. The slow but persistent viral infection occurs in children or young adults and affects their central nervous system (CNS). There have been plenty of reports on SSPE throughout the world, but it is considered a rare disease in developed countries. This research focuses on comparing the current treatments available to prolong the life of patients for over three years after the onset of SSPE. The goal was to identify possible patterns or trends among the treatments in order to find the best possible method to lengthen a patient's life. The results indicated that interferon alpha, inosine pranobex, and ribavirin display the most effective treatment plan and indicate the most potential in discovering a more effective therapeutic for SSPE.

Aprepitant in the Treatment of Subacute Sclerosing Panencephalitis: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study

BACKGROUND

Aprepitant is a neurokinin-1 receptor antagonist approved for the treatment of chemotherapy-induced nausea. We aimed to investigate the safety and efficacy of aprepitant in patients with subacute sclerosing panencephalitis.

METHODS

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study was conducted in patients with subacute sclerosing panencephalitis assigned to receive two courses of aprepitant 250 mg/day orally or placebo for 15 days with an interval of two months between courses. Primary end points were safety and tolerability, and secondary end point was clinical improvement or stabilization assessed by subacute sclerosing panencephalitis scoring system. Electroencephalography (EEG), brain magnetic resonance imaging, and cerebrospinal fluid measles-specific immunoglobulin G index were evaluated before and after treatment.

RESULTS

Sixty-two patients with subacute sclerosing panencephalitis were allocated to aprepitant (n = 31, median age 18 years) or placebo (n = 31, median age 22 years) group. Fifteen patients left the study within the first six months and 12 patients left between six and 12 months. Aprepitant was well tolerated and treatment-associated adverse events were similar to those described in the treatment of nausea. Clinical status at six and 12 months' follow-up did not differ between aprepitant and placebo groups. Post-treatment EEG scores at 12 months were better in the aprepitant group (P = 0.015). Cerebral atrophy on magnetic resonance imaging increased in both groups, whereas measles-specific immunoglobulin G index decreased in the placebo group.

CONCLUSIONS

In this first clinical trial of aprepitant treatment in patients with subacute sclerosing panencephalitis, the drug was safe and well tolerated. No clinical effect was observed. A modest improvement in EEG findings might justify trials for longer periods because EEG changes can precede clinical findings in subacute sclerosing panencephalitis.

Subacute sclerosing panencephalitis

Subacute sclerosing panencephalitis (SSPE) is a slowly progressive brain disorder caused by mutant measles virus. SSPE affects younger age groups. SSPE incidence is proportional to that of measles. High-income countries have seen substantial decline in SSPE incidence following universal vaccination against measles. SSPE virus differs from wild measles virus. Measles virus genome recovered from the autopsied brain tissues demonstrates clustered mutations in virus genome particularly in the M gene. These mutations destroy the structure and functioning of the encoded proteins. Complete infectious virus particle has rarely been recovered from the brain. Human neurons lack required receptor for entry of measles virus inside the neurons. Recent in vitro studies suggest that mutations in F protein confer hyperfusogenic properties to measles virus facilitating transneuronal viral spread. The inflammatory response in the brain leads to extensive tissue damage. Clinically, SSPE is characterized by florid panencephalitis. Clinically, SSPE is characterized by cognitive decline, periodic myoclonus, gait abnormalities, vision loss, and ultimately to a vegetative state. Chorioretinitis is a common ocular abnormality. Electroencephalography (EEG) shows characteristic periodic discharges. Neuroimaging demonstrates periventricular white matter signal abnormalities. In advanced stages, there is marked cerebral atrophy. Definitive diagnosis requires demonstration of elevated measles antibody titers in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). Many drugs have been used to stabilize the course of the disease but without evidence from randomized clinical trials. Six percent of patients may experience prolonged spontaneous remission. Fusion inhibitor peptide may, in the future, be exploited to treat SSPE. A universal vaccination against measles is the only proven way to tackle this menace currently.

A long-term subacute sclerosing panencephalitis survivor treated with intraventricular interferon-alpha for 13 years

Subacute sclerosing panencephalitis (SSPE) is a rare, progressive, and fatal central nervous system disorder resulting from persistent measles virus infection. Long-term data are scarce, with a maximum follow-up period of 10 years. Interferon-alpha (IFN-α) is a protein that exerts its antiviral activity via enhancement of cellular immune response and is reported to be an effective drug for the treatment of SSPE. However, there is currently no consensus regarding the optimal duration of IFN-α therapy. Here, we present a case report of a patient with SSPE treated with long-term intraventricular IFN-α therapy, which facilitated clinical improvement and neurological stabilization without causing serious adverse effects. To the best of our knowledge, this is one of the longest follow-up studies investigating a patient with SSPE receiving intraventricular INF-α treatment. Further studies are necessary to validate the benefits and safety of long-term intraventricular IFN-α treatment in patients with SSPE.

Should the Gross Motor Function Classification System be used for children who do not have cerebral palsy?

This literature review addressed four questions. (1) In which populations other than cerebral palsy (CP) has the Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) been applied? (2) In what types of study, and why was it used? (3) How was it modified to facilitate these applications? (4) What justifications and evidence of psychometric adequacy were used to support its application? A search of PubMed, MEDLINE, and Embase databases (January 1997 to April 2017) using the terms: 'GMFCS' OR 'Gross Motor Function Classification System' yielded 2499 articles. 118 met inclusion criteria and reported children/adults with 133 health conditions/clinical descriptions other than CP. Three broad GMFCS applications were observed: as a categorization tool, independent variable, or outcome measure. While the GMFCS is widely used for children with health conditions/clinical description other than CP, researchers rarely provided adequate justification for these uses. We offer recommendations for development/validation of other condition-specific classification systems and discuss the potential need for a generic gross motor function classification system.

WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS

The Gross Motor Function Classification System should not be used outside cerebral palsy or as an outcome measure. The authors provide recommendations for development and validation of condition-specific or generic classification systems.