'Outgrowing' a cerebral palsy diagnosis

Uncertainties regarding cerebral palsy diagnosis: opportunities to operationalize the consensus definition

Background and Objectives

Cerebral palsy (CP), the most common motor disability of childhood, is variably diagnosed. We hypothesized that child neurologists and neurodevelopmentalists, often on the frontlines of CP diagnosis in North America, harbor uncertainties regarding the practical application of the most recent CP consensus definition from 2006.

Methods

We conducted a cross-sectional survey of child neurologists and neurodevelopmentalists at the 2022 Child Neurology Society Annual Meeting. Attendees were provided the 2006 CP consensus definition and asked whether they had any uncertainties about the practical application of the definition across four hypothetical clinical vignettes.

Results

Of 230 attendees, 164 responded to the closing survey questions (71%). 145/164 (88%) expressed at least one uncertainty regarding the clinical application of the 2006 definition. Overwhelmingly, these areas of uncertainty focused on: 1) Age, both with regards to the minimum age of diagnosis and the maximum age of brain disturbance or motor symptom onset, (67/164, 41%), and 2) Interpretation of the term "non-progressive" (48/164, 29%). The vast majority of respondents (157/164, 96%) answered 'Yes' to the question: Do you think we should revise the 2006 consensus definition of CP?

Discussion

We propose that the uncertainties we identified could be addressed by operationalizing the 2006 consensus definition to support a more uniform CP diagnosis. To address the most common CP diagnostic uncertainties we identified, we propose 3 points of clarification based on the available literature: 1) Motor symptoms/signs should be present by 2 years old; 2) CP can and should be diagnosed as early as possible, even if activity limitation is not yet present, if motor symptoms/signs can be reasonably predicted to yield activity limitation (e.g. by using standardized examination instruments, Brain MRI, and a suggestive clinical history); and 3) The clinical motor disability phenotype should be non-progressive through 5 years old. We anticipate that operationalizing the 2006 definition of CP in this manner could clarify the uncertainties we identified among child neurologists and neurodevelopmentalists and reduce the diagnostic variability that currently exists.

Histologic chorioamnionitis and risk of neurodevelopmental impairment at age 10 years among extremely preterm infants born before 28 weeks of gestation

BACKGROUND

Extremely preterm infants whose placenta had histologic evidence of chorioamnionitis have early brain dysfunction, but little is known about neurologic development at 10 years of age.

OBJECTIVE

We investigated the association between histologic chorioamnionitis and neurodevelopmental impairment at 10 years among children born <28 weeks' gestation (extremely preterm).

STUDY DESIGN

The multicenter Extremely Low Gestational Age Newborns study enrolled extremely preterm newborns from 2002 to 2004 at 14 hospitals in the United States. Chorioamnionitis was defined by histologic stage (early, moderate, and advanced) and grade (mild/moderate and severe) of chorionic plate and umbilical cord inflammation. The children were examined for cerebral palsy at 2 years and for autism spectrum disorder, cognitive impairment (intelligence quotient >2 standard deviations below the mean), and epilepsy at the age of 10 years by blinded evaluators using validated measures. Multivariable logistic regression with generalized estimating equations was used.

RESULTS

Among 805 placentas, 43% (347/805) had histologic chorioamnionitis by moderate or advanced maternal stage, 36% (286/805) by severe maternal grade, 18% (132/737) by moderate or advanced fetal stage, and 1% (10/737) by severe fetal grade. The frequencies of impairments were 11% (88/767) for cerebral palsy, 7% (56/773) for autism spectrum disorder, 15% (120/788) for cognitive impairment, and 7% (52/763) for epilepsy. After adjustment for maternal age, body mass index, race, insurance status, maternal education, tobacco use, infant sex, and multiple gestations, the adjusted odds ratio for the association between histologic chorioamnionitis and cerebral palsy years was increased with advanced maternal stage (adjusted odds ratio, 2.5; 95% confidence interval, 1.6-3.9), severe maternal grade (adjusted odds ratio, 2.0; 95% confidence interval, 1.2-3.4), moderate fetal stage (adjusted odds ratio, 2.20; 95% confidence interval, 2.1-2.2), and mild or moderate fetal grade (adjusted odds ratio, 1.5; 95% confidence interval, 1.0-2.2). Similarly, the adjusted odds ratio for the association between histologic chorioamnionitis and epilepsy was increased with advanced maternal stage (adjusted odds ratio, 1.5; 95% confidence interval, 1.3-1.6) and severe fetal grade (adjusted odds ratio, 5.9; 95% confidence interval, 1.9-17.8). In addition, the adjusted odds ratio for the association between histologic chorioamnionitis and autism spectrum disorder was increased with mild or moderate fetal grade (adjusted odds ratio, 1.7; 95% confidence interval, 1.0-2.9). Histologic chorioamnionitis was not associated with cognitive impairment. These findings held after adjustment for gestational age at delivery. In contrast to histologic chorioamnionitis, a clinical diagnosis of chorioamnionitis was not associated with neurodevelopmental impairment.

CONCLUSION

Histologic chorioamnionitis may be associated with some forms of neurodevelopmental impairment at 10 years of life among infants born <28 weeks' gestation.

Early Diagnosis and Classification of Cerebral Palsy: An Historical Perspective and Barriers to an Early Diagnosis

Since the 1800s, there have been calls in the literature for the early diagnosis of cerebral palsy (CP). However, diagnosis still often occurs late, from 12 to 24 months in high income countries and as late as 5 years in low resource settings. This is after the optimal timeframe for applying interventions which could harness neuroplastic potential in the developing brain. Multiple barriers exist which affect clinicians' confidence in diagnosing CP early. These range from the lack of definitive biomarkers to a lack of curative treatments for CP. Further barriers to diagnosis are proposed including; (a) difficulty finding a congruent fit with the definition of CP in an infant, where expected activity limitations might not yet be apparent; and (b) differences in the presentation of motor type and topography classifications between infants and children. These barriers may affect a clinicians' confidence using "pattern recognition" in the differential diagnosis process. One of the central tenets of this paper is that diagnosis and classification are different, involving different instruments, and are more accurately conducted separately in infants, whereas they are fundamentally interconnected in older children and inform therapeutic decisions. Furthermore, we need to be careful not to delay early diagnosis because of the low reliability of early classification, but instead uncouple these two processes. Ongoing implementation of best practice for early detection requires creative solutions which might include universal screening for CP. Implementation and accompanying knowledge translation studies are underway to decrease the average age of diagnosis in CP.